Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Podcast: What decisions do political parties make after losing an election?

Podcast: What decisions do political parties make after losing an election?

Editor's note: This article has been updated to correct the spelling of Seth Masket's name.

In this episode of "Politics In Question," Seth Masket joins Julia and James to consider how losing an election affects partisans.


Market is a professor of political science and the director of the Center on American Politics at the University of Denver. He is the author of several books and articles on political parties, campaigns and elections, and state legislatures. His most recent book is "Learning from Loss: The Democrats 2016-2020" (Cambridge 2020). Masket contributes regularly at FiveThirtyEight, Mischiefs of Faction, and the Denver Post.

He is currently working on a book project examining the Republican Party’s interpretations of the 2020 election and its preparations for 2024.Who holds power in the Democratic and Republican parties after an election defeat? Does the location of power vary between the two parties? How do partisans explain losing an election? And how do party leaders and partisan activists try to frame election defeats to gain leverage on their intra-party rivals? These are some of the questions Seth, Julia, and James discuss in this week’s episode.

https://open.spotify.com


Read More

A mother and daughter standing together.

Becky Pepper-Jackson and her mother, Heather Jackson, stand in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.

Courtesy of Lambda Legal

The trans athletes at the center of Supreme Court cases don’t fit conservative stereotypes

Conservatives have increasingly argued that transgender women and girls have an unfair advantage in sports, that their hormone levels make them stronger and faster. And for that reason, they say, trans women should be banned from competition.

But Lindsay Hecox wasn’t faster. She tried out for her track and field team at Boise State University and didn’t make the cut. A 2020 Idaho bill banned her from a club team, anyway.

Keep ReadingShow less
The map of the U.S. broken into pieces.

In Donald Trump's interview with Reuters on Jan. 24, he portrayed himself as an "I don't care" president, an attitude that is not compatible with leadership in a constitutional democracy.

Getty Images

Donald Trump’s “I Don’t Care” Philosophy Undermines Democracy

On January 14, President Trump sat down for a thirty-minute interview with Reuters, the latest in a series of interviews with major news outlets. The interview covered a wide range of subjects, from Ukraine and Iran to inflation at home and dissent within his own party.

As is often the case with the president, he didn’t hold back. He offered many opinions without substantiating any of them and, talking about the 2026 congressional elections, said, “When you think of it, we shouldn’t even have an election.”

Keep ReadingShow less
The Danger Isn’t History Repeating—It’s Us Ignoring the Echoes

Nazi troops arrest civilians in Warsaw, Poland, 1943.

The Danger Isn’t History Repeating—It’s Us Ignoring the Echoes

The instinct to look away is one of the most enduring patterns in democratic backsliding. History rarely announces itself with a single rupture; it accumulates through a series of choices—some deliberate, many passive—that allow state power to harden against the people it is meant to serve.

As federal immigration enforcement escalates across American cities today, historians are warning that the public reactions we are witnessing bear uncomfortable similarities to the way many Germans responded to Adolf Hitler’s early rise in the 1930s. The comparison is not about equating leaders or eras. It is about recognizing how societies normalize state violence when it is directed at those deemed “other.”

Keep ReadingShow less