Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Officials ran a smooth election, silencing the false narrative around voter fraud

People working in a vote counting center

Election workers tabulate results of early voting and absentee ballots in Gwinnett County, Ga., on Nov. 5.

Nathan Posner/Anadolu/Getty Images

Originally published by The 19th.

Election officials across the country administered a relatively smooth 2024 general election, despite reports of bomb threats, technical issues and a polarizing online ecosystem that at times challenged the integrity of counting ballots.

The predominately women-led workforce went into Election Day having readied for potential disruptions and a disinformation campaign that had swelled in the final weeks of the presidential race between Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Kamala Harris. But by early Wednesday, their processes for receiving and counting ballots — and a large enough vote margin in key battleground states — enabled major news outlets to project the former president’s win over the vice president shortly after midnight, days faster than in 2020.


“The culmination of voting yesterday has demonstrated that once again our election professionals have administered a safe and secure election in the face of adversity,” said Tammy Patrick, chief executive officer for programs at the Election Center, an organization that works with election officials, in a statement. “From flooding and hurricanes to foreign disruption campaigns, our election officials did all in their power with the resources on hand to make certain voters had opportunities to vote over the course of the election cycle. As the ongoing post-election work continues in the ensuing days and weeks, they will ensure that the final official results are accurate.”

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

While election officials in some states dealt with issues involving voting equipment, non-credible bomb threats were reported at polling sites in several battleground states with large populations of voters of color, including Black residents in the metro Atlanta area and Indigenous people in Arizona. Some locations were briefly closed and kept open later. Some threats appeared to originate from Russian email domains, according to the FBI.

Election officials said they worked to ensure voters who reported to impacted sites were not disenfranchised, but it is difficult to measure the full impact of the closures.

Zach Manifold, election supervisor in Gwinnett County, Georgia, where a handful of polling sites were impacted, said during a call with the press that he spoke with a woman on Election Day who worried about whether she or her husband would be able to return to one of the polling sites later. He reminded her that she would have more options to vote at different sites later in the evening because of Georgia law.

“I did not hear much of people kind of in that situation, that they didn't think they'd get back or they wouldn't have time that day,” he said.

Jen Easterly, director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), the lead federal government agency for election infrastructure security, released a statement on Wednesday applauding the work of state and local election officials and poll workers.

“As we have said repeatedly, our election infrastructure has never been more secure and the election community never better prepared to deliver safe, secure, free, and fair elections for the American people,” she said. “This is what we saw yesterday in the peaceful and secure exercise of democracy. Importantly, we have no evidence of any malicious activity that had a material impact on the security or integrity of our election infrastructure.”

Carolina Lopez, executive director for Partnership for Large Election Jurisdictions, an organization that works with election officials, spent Election Day at a CISA command post and said during a call with press that she observed federal authorities responding to the incoming reports of bomb threats. She said it is clear that tabletop exercises in recent years had paid off.

“I saw professionals through and through, across this country, sort of understanding … ‘Let’s figure out what's happening. Let's figure out who we need to talk to — legal, law enforcement, local election officials — how do we communicate with the community so that they understand, we are here for them, and minimizing disruptions,’” she said during a media briefing. “I think that there’s something to be said about the preparation that went into making that a non-story today.”

Trump, who cast doubt on the voting process during his 2016 win and 2020 defeat, did not commit to fully accepting the results of this year’s election. In the final weeks of campaigning, he claimed without evidence that there would be widespread voter fraud, including in the battleground states of Pennsylvania and Michigan. But on election night, as the vote returns showed he was poised to win, Trump appeared to stop spreading that narrative.

In the lead up to November, both Harris and Trump had prepared legal teams for a potentially lengthy post-Election Day period if the race had been close and questions emerged about legally cast ballots during the certification process

But Harris, who sought as a vice president and candidate to prioritize access to the ballot, reportedly called Trump on Wednesday morning to concede — a move that sets in motion the peaceful transfer of power.

Jay Young, senior director of voting and democracy at Common Cause, a voting rights advocacy organization, said during a post-election media briefing that the nation needs to turn down the rhetoric on widespread voter fraud — of which there is no proof.

“There cannot be this continued attack on this institution, and to do anything to support a notion that, ‘Well, if our guy wins, the election was administered fairly. But if our guy doesn't win, there was a problem, there was a fraud.’ We have to change that,” he said.

Young said he considered it a “significant victory” that early voting, either in-person or by mail, was popular this year. At least 80 million people cast a ballot ahead of Election Day. He also noted that some states updated vote-counting rules that allowed election officials to pre-process mail-in ballots. That sped up the vote-counting in some areas.

“Those reforms also make it easier for those election workers to process and count our votes in a timely way, and we're going to see that play out, hopefully, over the coming days and weeks,” he said.

In his first remarks to the nation on Wednesday morning, Trump claimed that he won the popular vote and that Republicans had won the U.S. House. But that is not clear yet — ballot counting to determine control of the House is expected to take at least several days if not weeks.

On Wednesday, election officials returned to work to process and count more ballots that will determine local, state and federal races around the country.

Read More

Woman holding a sign that reads "This is a time to roll up our sleeves."

A protestor holds up a sign with a quote from Vice President Kamala Harris at the Women's March rally outside the Heritage Foundation on Nov. 9.

Shannon Finney/Getty Images

Dems blame everything but themselves for losing

It’s tough sledding for Democrats, as they try to wrap their heads around Donald Trump’s improbable-but-also-foreseeable sweep of all seven swing states and winning the popular vote.

This wasn’t supposed to happen, after all. Democrats genuinely believed — as they did in 2016 — that Trump’s many odious qualities would be enough to keep him far away from the White House again.

And if for some reason that wasn’t enough for most Americans, they had in Vice President Kamala Harris a woman of color who, apparently, by virtue of her identity alone, would help seal the deal among those voting demographics.

Keep ReadingShow less
People eating Thanksgiving dinner
The Good Brigade/Getty Images

Thanksgiving dinner at the grown-ups’ table

Lockard is an Iowa resident who regularly contributes to regional newspapers and periodicals. She is working on the second of a four-book fictional series based on Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice."

With our national elections the first week and Thanksgiving the last week, November is a banner month for Americans. On Nov. 5 we voted, electing Donald J. Trump to become our 47th president and arguably the most powerful person on the planet. Now we look forward to Thanksgiving.

Somewhere in each of our past Thanksgivings, there likely came a time when we were invited to join the adults at the grown-ups’ table. The most important qualification demonstrating we had earned this “promotion” was our behavior: We were expected to act like a grown-up. Maybe returning from college did it, or getting married. Perhaps we were bumped up earlier. Whenever it occurred, we understood we were being accorded a privilege. We had arrived.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump speaking at a podium

President-elect Donald Trump speaks to at an election night gathering in West Palm Beach, Fla.

Brendan Gutenschwager/Anadolu via Getty Images

Voters want a president who takes care of their most basic needs

Schmidt is a columnist and editorial board member with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

This election was not about our national identity or a reflection of who we are as a collection of people. Rather, it centered on whether our most essential requirements as citizens were being served by our government.

A resounding number of voters told Vice President Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party that the answer to that question was “No.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Silhouette of an American politician speakting , with the country's flag on the left
Andrea Nicolini/Getty Images

Coming to terms with elitism and intellectual arrogance

Breslin is the Joseph C. Palamountain Jr. Chair of Political Science at Skidmore College and author of “A Constitution for the Living: Imagining How Five Generations of Americans Would Rewrite the Nation’s Fundamental Law.”

Over the past 11 months I have written more than 30 essays for The Fulcrum’s A Republic if we can keep it series. My charge was “to assist American citizens on the bumpy road ahead this election year,” and to remind readers of the matchless quality of our unique experiment in democracy. The process of putting these constitutional thoughts on paper has been exceedingly rewarding, and I hope readers have learned a thing or two along the way.

Sadly, though, I now fear that I failed miserably in my one crucial task.

Keep ReadingShow less