Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

How voter perceptions of celebrities, politicians shape trust, respect

Kamala Harris speaking at a podium

"It is clear that though any individual’s choice to vote for Donald Trump or Kamala Harris in November may be about their policies, it is undoubtedly also tied to their sense of identity — to a much higher degree than it would have been decades ago," writes Becvar.

Aaron J. Thornton/WireImage

Becvar is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and executive director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

In August, The Fulcrum and Fidelum Partners joined to develop the 2024 US Celebrity & Politician Warmth & Competence Study. Building upon similar studies conducted by Fidelum in 2016 and 2020, the report offers updated insights into voter perceptions of political candidates and similar evaluations of celebrities.

The research is rooted in the social psychology approach known as the Stereotype Content Model, founded on a belief that the combination of perceived warmth and competence leads to different emotions and behaviors toward those social groups. Perceptions of warmth reflect friendliness or trustworthiness, and perceptions of competence reflect capability or effectiveness.


Universal drivers of human behaviorTrends in Cognitive Sciences

That premise was applied to consumer and brand research and interpersonal relationships by Fidelum Partners, leading to the Brands as Intentional Agents Framework. They concluded that humans perceive, interact, and become loyal to companies and brands like we do other people — based on their warmth and competence.

One of the co-researchers on the development of the framework, Susan Fiske, applied the model to an analysis of effective communication around climate change science. The literature and research confirmed that perceptions of warmth and competence were accurate indicators of determining trusted messengers. The evaluations of scientists as high in competence show that the public largely respects scientists — however, the low evaluations of warmth manifest as trustworthiness.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Figure of rankings of perceptions of warmth and competence among professions, indicating scientist and researchers to be in the high-competence, low-warmth sector.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

In both cases, the dimensions of perception and belief — whether in the context of brand marketing or climate research — are central to influencing attitudes, behaviors, and decisions. How do those perceptions give us insight into celebrities and politicians?

Emotional perceptions have shifted the American electorate from voting based on personal interests to voting based on their perceived inclusion on a social “team.” The type of partisan-ideological sorting played out in recent decades has led to the feeling that every aspect of the social world around us can be divided into supporting one of those teams. Social science researchers have established a deep body of research on the effects of polarization on partisanship. It is clear that though any individual's choice to vote for Donald Trump or Kamala Harris in November may be about their policies, it is undoubtedly also tied to their sense of identity — to a much higher degree than it would have been decades ago.

Similarly, it is reasonable to consider whether the well-established indicators of trust and capability have become more influential to voters than policy positions or social issues.

This shift poses a thought-provoking question: As we move toward the 2024 election, could public figures outside of traditional politics start to wield even more significant influence on voter sentiment? And more importantly, what does it say about the electorate when celebrities are perceived as more competent leaders than those running for the highest office in the land?

The 2024 map shows substantial changes in public perceptions of Joe Biden, Donald Trump and Kamala Harris since 2020.2024 US Celebrity & Politician Warmth & Competence Study

In the first analysis of the 2024 study on celebrities and politicians' warmth and competence, both perceptions have decreased for Joe Biden, while evaluations of both have increased for Harris and Trump. However, none of the three showed up in the quadrant of high warmth and competence either in 2020 or 2024 — the highest rated in both qualities among politicians remains Barack Obama. However, Obama is considered less warm and less competent than both Kelly Clarkson and Taylor Swift.

Does that mean that in an open ballot, our first female president could be President Clarkson? It's safe to say that isn't the case. In a head-to-head evaluation, 11 percent of people would vote for Clarkson, while 37 percent would vote for Harris. Clearly, voters haven't completely foregone considering policy in favor of feelings.

While warmth and competence dominate the election landscape, social and political beliefs about economic fairness, immigration, and corporate profits are not insignificant. Thirty-six percent (36%) of Trump's and 37 percent of Harris's support stems from such issues.

However, the politician who would receive the highest percentage of votes among survey respondents, Obama, tells us that warmth and competence perceptions are also necessary to seal the deal.

data tableThe 2024 results of respondent likelihood to vote for politicians and celebrities.2024 US Celebrity & Politician Warmth & Competence Study

Read More

Hand-drawn Pilgrim hat with the words "Happy Thanksgiving"
mushroomstore/Getty Images

This Thanksgiving, it's not only OK but necessary to talk politics

This Thanksgiving, do not follow the old maxim that we should never discuss politics at the dinner table.

Many people's emotions are running high right now. Elections often bring out a wide range of feelings, whether pride and optimism for those who are pleased with the results or disappointment and frustration from those who aren’t. After a long and grueling election season, we need to connect with and not avoid one another.

Keep ReadingShow less
Men in "Dominicans for Trump" shirts

Attendees cheer as former President Donald Trump speaks on stage during a campaign rally in Allentown, Pa.,. in October.

Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The great Latino apology: It’s ‘the street,’ stupid

Donald Trump secured a surprising 43 percent of the Latino vote, enough to swing the election in his favor. Now, Democrats are forced to confront the fallout of their failure, which is rooted in decades of disinvestment and disregard for the diverse Latino communities. Articles, conferences and white papers have warned of these consequences for years.

Those familiar with Latino politics know that Latinos voting for Republicans is nothing new. Historically, Cuban Americans and some South American groups have formed a solid Republican voting bloc. What’s new is the recent shift among Mexican Americans, Central Americans and Puerto Ricans. Was it religion? Racism? Machismo? Misogyny? Negative experiences with government in the United States and home countries? A look at Mexico and its first female president (of Jewish descent) this year might challenge some of these assumptions. Whether this shift is permanent remains to be seen.

Keep ReadingShow less
Women voting

Voters cast their votes on Nov. 5 in in Nashua, New Hampshire.

Zhu Ziyu/VCG via Getty Images

Harris lost support from women overall — but not women over 65

Originally published by The 19th.

Vice President Kamala Harris’ potentially history-making bid to become the first woman in the White House did little to bring more women voters into the Democratic Party during the first presidential election after the loss of federal abortion rights, with seemingly one exception: women over 65.

These women were motivated by the same issues that were important to the overall electorate, like the economy, threats to democracy, immigration and abortion, something central to Harris’ failed bid for the presidency. They were, however, more likely to name priorities like caregiving, aging in place and preserving the government retirement savings program Social Security as decisive factors, according to an AARP analysis of an AP VoteCast survey of 120,000 registered voters.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump at a podium
Howard Schnapp/Newsday RM via Getty Images

Was Trump elected due to sexism, misogyny and racism?

As should be expected, the Democratic Party and its supporters are casting blame for the results of the 2024 presidential election. Many are looking inside the party and its ideology, policies, candidates and messaging, as they should. But some are trying to blame sexism (even misogyny) and racism for the failure of a woman of color to win the election.

As Americans, we should all disavow sexism, misogyny and racism, while acknowledging that these views still exist in some human hearts. But blaming the content of American hearts broadly is wrong, further divides us and is counterproductive to the goal of building a majority in the future.

Keep ReadingShow less