Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Lawsuit seeks time for mailed ballots to arrive in Pa.

Absentee ballots

Language similar to what's on this California envelope governs mailed ballots in Pennsylvania as well.

SKrow/Getty Images

Disability and seniors' rights groups are suing Pennsylvania to count absentee ballots that are postmarked on time but get delayed in the mail for as long as a week.

The lawsuit asks the state Supreme Court to declare the current rules in violation of the state constitution in light of the coronavirus pandemic. Currently, mailed ballots only get counted if they arrive at local election offices by the time the polls close.

Filed late Monday, the lawsuit is the latest in a wave of litigation hoping the public health crisis will provide the necessary leverage to ease election regulations in battleground states.


The lawsuit argues the surge of Pennsylvanians taking advantage of the state's no-excuse absentee voting rules this spring could be punished through no fault of their own. The inevitable backlog in fulfilling so many ballot applications will be compounded by slowed deliveries to the voters and back again, since the Postal Service has been hobbled by the Covid-19 outbreak.

More than 600,000 requests for mailed ballots had been made as of Thursday, seven times as many as voted absentee in the 2016 primaries, when both parties' presidential nominations were still hotly contested.

In Allegheny County, where Pittsburgh is located, officials have so far processed only 20,000 of the 71,000 applications received, the lawsuit states.

The plaintiffs say their aim is to avoid a repeat of Wisconsin. That problem-plagued primary three weeks ago has prompted an investigation by the Postal Service into reports of requested absentee ballots never getting delivered or arriving at voters' homes after Election Day. (The Supreme Court refused to extend the deadline for absentee voting despite the pandemic.)

Disability Rights Pennsylvania and SeniorLAW Center are among the plaintiffs in the new suit against Democratic Secretary of the State Kathy Boockvar.

Last week, the state's Alliance for Retired Americans filed a similar lawsuit. It also asked a state court to make Boockvar provide a postage-paid return envelope with every absentee ballot and permit voters to have help in completing their forms.

The Democratic presidential race is effectively over, and there's not much competition for the congressional and state legislative nominations in Pennsylavnia's primary, now delayed six weeks to June 2. But the state's 20 electoral votes will be one of the most hotly contested prizes in the fall. Last time President Trump carried the state by 44,000 votes, or 7 tenths of a point, breaking a six-election winning streak for the Democrats. Polling currently shows former Vice President Joe Biden with a narrow edge.

Read More

Independent Voters Just Got Power in Nevada – if the Governor Lets It Happen

"On Las Vegas Boulevard" sign.

Photo by Wesley Tingey on Unsplash. Unplash+ license obtained by IVN Editor Shawn Griffiths.

Independent Voters Just Got Power in Nevada – if the Governor Lets It Happen

CARSON CITY, NEV. - A surprise last-minute bill to open primary elections to Nevada’s largest voting bloc, registered unaffiliated voters, moved quickly through the state legislature and was approved by a majority of lawmakers on the last day of the legislative session Monday.

The bill, AB597, allows voters not registered with a political party to pick between a Republican and Democratic primary ballot in future election cycles. It does not apply to the state’s presidential preference elections, which would remain closed to registered party members.

Keep ReadingShow less
Voter registration

In April 2025, the SAVE Act has been reintroduced in the 119th Congress and passed the House, with a much stronger chance of becoming law given the current political landscape.

SDI Productions

The SAVE Act: Addressing a Non-Existent Problem at the Cost of Voter Access?

In July 2024, I wrote about the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act when it was first introduced in Congress. And Sarah and I discussed it in an episode of Beyond the Bill Number which you can still listen to. Now, in April 2025, the SAVE Act has been reintroduced in the 119th Congress and passed the House, with a much stronger chance of becoming law given the current political landscape. It's time to revisit this legislation and examine its implications for American voters.

Read the IssueVoter analysis of the bill here for further insight and commentary.

Keep ReadingShow less
Independent Voters Gain Ground As New Mexico Opens Primaries
person in blue denim jeans and white sneakers standing on gray concrete floor
Photo by Phil Scroggs on Unsplash

Independent Voters Gain Ground As New Mexico Opens Primaries

With the stroke of a pen, New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham enfranchised almost 350,000 independent voters recently by signing a bill for open primaries. Just a few years ago, bills to open the primaries were languishing in the state legislature, as they have historically across the country. But as more and more voters leave both parties and declare their independence, the political system is buckling. And as independents begin to organize and speak out, it’s going to continue to buckle in their direction.

In 2004, there were 120,000 independent voters in New Mexico. A little over 10 years later, when the first open primary bill was introduced, that number had more than doubled. That bill never even got a hearing. But today the number of independents in New Mexico and across the country is too big to ignore. Independents are the largest group of voters in ten states and the second-largest in most others. That’s putting tremendous pressure on a system that wasn’t designed with them in mind.

Keep ReadingShow less
"Voter Here" sign outside of a polling location.

"Voter Here" sign outside of a polling location.

Getty Images, Grace Cary

Stopping the Descent Toward Banana Republic Elections

President Trump’s election-related executive order begins by pointing out practices in Canada, Sweden, Brazil, and elsewhere that outperform the U.S. But it is Trump’s order itself that really demonstrates how far we’ve fallen behind. In none of the countries mentioned, or any other major democracy in the world, would the head of government change election rules by decree, as Trump has tried to do.

Trump is the leader of a political party that will fight for control of Congress in 2026, an election sure to be close, and important to his presidency. The leader of one side in such a competition has no business unilaterally changing its rules—that’s why executive decrees changing elections only happen in tinpot dictatorships, not democracies.

Keep ReadingShow less