Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Lawsuit seeks time for mailed ballots to arrive in Pa.

Absentee ballots

Language similar to what's on this California envelope governs mailed ballots in Pennsylvania as well.

SKrow/Getty Images

Disability and seniors' rights groups are suing Pennsylvania to count absentee ballots that are postmarked on time but get delayed in the mail for as long as a week.

The lawsuit asks the state Supreme Court to declare the current rules in violation of the state constitution in light of the coronavirus pandemic. Currently, mailed ballots only get counted if they arrive at local election offices by the time the polls close.

Filed late Monday, the lawsuit is the latest in a wave of litigation hoping the public health crisis will provide the necessary leverage to ease election regulations in battleground states.


The lawsuit argues the surge of Pennsylvanians taking advantage of the state's no-excuse absentee voting rules this spring could be punished through no fault of their own. The inevitable backlog in fulfilling so many ballot applications will be compounded by slowed deliveries to the voters and back again, since the Postal Service has been hobbled by the Covid-19 outbreak.

More than 600,000 requests for mailed ballots had been made as of Thursday, seven times as many as voted absentee in the 2016 primaries, when both parties' presidential nominations were still hotly contested.

In Allegheny County, where Pittsburgh is located, officials have so far processed only 20,000 of the 71,000 applications received, the lawsuit states.

The plaintiffs say their aim is to avoid a repeat of Wisconsin. That problem-plagued primary three weeks ago has prompted an investigation by the Postal Service into reports of requested absentee ballots never getting delivered or arriving at voters' homes after Election Day. (The Supreme Court refused to extend the deadline for absentee voting despite the pandemic.)

Disability Rights Pennsylvania and SeniorLAW Center are among the plaintiffs in the new suit against Democratic Secretary of the State Kathy Boockvar.

Last week, the state's Alliance for Retired Americans filed a similar lawsuit. It also asked a state court to make Boockvar provide a postage-paid return envelope with every absentee ballot and permit voters to have help in completing their forms.

The Democratic presidential race is effectively over, and there's not much competition for the congressional and state legislative nominations in Pennsylavnia's primary, now delayed six weeks to June 2. But the state's 20 electoral votes will be one of the most hotly contested prizes in the fall. Last time President Trump carried the state by 44,000 votes, or 7 tenths of a point, breaking a six-election winning streak for the Democrats. Polling currently shows former Vice President Joe Biden with a narrow edge.

Read More

U.S. President Barack Obama speaking on the phone in the Oval Office.

U.S. President Barack Obama talks President Barack Obama talks with President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan during a phone call from the Oval Office on November 2, 2009 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, The White House

‘Obama, You're 15 Years Too Late!’

The mid-decade redistricting fight continues, while the word “hypocrisy” has become increasingly common in the media.

The origin of mid-decade redistricting dates back to the early history of the United States. However, its resurgence and legal acceptance primarily stem from the Texas redistricting effort in 2003, a controversial move by the Republican Party to redraw the state's congressional districts, and the 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry. This decision, which confirmed that mid-decade redistricting is not prohibited by federal law, was a significant turning point in the acceptance of this practice.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand of a person casting a ballot at a polling station during voting.

Gerrymandering silences communities and distorts elections. Proportional representation offers a proven path to fairer maps and real democracy.

Getty Images, bizoo_n

Gerrymandering Today, Gerrymandering Tomorrow, Gerrymandering Forever

In 1963, Alabama Governor George Wallace declared, "Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever." (Watch the video of his speech.) As a politically aware high school senior, I was shocked by the venom and anger in his voice—the open, defiant embrace of systematic disenfranchisement, so different from the quieter racism I knew growing up outside Boston.

Today, watching politicians openly rig elections, I feel that same disbelief—especially seeing Republican leaders embrace that same systematic approach: gerrymandering now, gerrymandering tomorrow, gerrymandering forever.

Keep ReadingShow less
An oversized ballot box surrounded by people.

Young people worldwide form new parties to reshape politics—yet America’s two-party system blocks them.

Getty Images, J Studios

No Country for Young Politicians—and How To Fix That

In democracies around the world, young people have started new political parties whenever the establishment has sidelined their views or excluded them from policymaking. These parties have sometimes reinvigorated political competition, compelled established parties to take previously neglected issues seriously, or encouraged incumbent leaders to find better ways to include and reach out to young voters.

In Europe, a trio in their twenties started Volt in 2017 as a pan-European response to Brexit, and the party has managed to win seats in the European Parliament and in some national legislatures. In Germany, young people concerned about climate change created Klimaliste, a party committed to limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, as per the Paris Agreement. Although the party hasn’t won seats at the federal level, they have managed to win some municipal elections. In Chile, leaders of the 2011 student protests, who then won seats as independent candidates, created political parties like Revolución Democrática and Convergencia Social to institutionalize their movements. In 2022, one of these former student leaders, Gabriel Boric, became the president of Chile at 36 years old.

Keep ReadingShow less
How To Fix Gerrymandering: A Fair-Share Rule for Congressional Redistricting

Demonstrators gather outside of The United States Supreme Court during an oral arguments in Gill v. Whitford to call for an end to partisan gerrymandering on October 3, 2017 in Washington, DC

Getty Images, Olivier Douliery

How To Fix Gerrymandering: A Fair-Share Rule for Congressional Redistricting

The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground. ~ Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Col. Edward Carrington, Paris, 27 May 1788

The Problem We Face

The U.S. House of Representatives was designed as the chamber of Congress most directly tethered to the people. Article I of the Constitution mandates that seats be apportioned among the states according to population and that members face election every two years—design features meant to keep representatives responsive to shifting public sentiment. Unlike the Senate, which prioritizes state sovereignty and representation, the House translates raw population counts into political voice: each House district is to contain roughly the same number of residents, ensuring that every citizen’s vote carries comparable weight. In principle, then, the House serves as the nation’s demographic mirror, channeling the diverse preferences of the electorate into lawmaking and acting as a safeguard against unresponsive or oligarchic governance.

Nationally, the mismatch between the overall popular vote and the partisan split in House seats is small, with less than a 1% tilt. But state-level results tell a different story. Take Connecticut: Democrats hold all five seats despite Republicans winning over 40% of the statewide vote. In Oklahoma, the inverse occurs—Republicans control every seat even though Democrats consistently earn around 40% of the vote.

Keep ReadingShow less