Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Virus alters more election rules, starting in New York

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo

Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced New York's primary would be postponed until June due to the coronavirus.

Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/Getty Images

The state at the epicenter of the American coronavirus pandemic is now positioned to be the final big prize in the Democratic presidential race.

New York on Saturday became the 11th and by far the biggest state to postpone primaries during the peak of the Covid-19 outbreak. Such delays are just one example of the broad array of ways states are responding to the historic public health emergency.

Also over the weekend, a push intensified in the biggest battleground state, Florida, to expand voting by mail in time for November. One judge was pressed to ease the Arkansas absentee voting deadline, while another judge made it temporarily easier to get on the ballot with petitions in Virginia. But the obvious problems gathering signatures during mandatory social distancing prompted the end of a ballot referendum drive in Arizona.

Here are the latest developments:


New York

Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo postponed presidential voting until June 23 — eight weeks later than scheduled, and in line with the state's legislative and congressional primaries. He acted just before the state reported that 1,218 people had died and 9,517 people in the state were hospitalized with the virus, both figures far ahead of any other state's.

"I don't think it's wise to be bringing a lot of people to one location to vote, a lot of people touching one doorknob, a lot of people touching one pen," Cuomo said at a news conference.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The Board of Elections had explored the possibility of holding the primary on April 28 as scheduled but entirely by mail, but concluded that county elections offices were not capable of processing the deluge of paper ballots.

With 274 pledged delegates at stake, New York's primary is the second most consequential on the Democratic calendar. Ten other states with a combined 820 delegates have already delayed primaries, all but a couple of them until June as well: Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island.

Virginia

A Richmond judge granted an emergency request to lower the number of signatures required to qualify for the ballot.

The decision resolves a request by Omari Faulkner, one of eight Republicans hoping to mount a longshot challenge to Democratic Sen. Mark Warner. He said that he was only able to get 3,769 signatures before the coronavirus shut him down — with another 6,000 to go. With the judge's approval, Virginia's signature requirement was lowered to 3,500, so Faulkner will be part of the June 9 Republican primary.

The judge's order did not eliminate the state's signature requirement in its entirety, though. The ruling only applies to Republicans running for the Senate this year — and the deadline for their petition signatures was last week.

Arkansas

A federal lawsuit filed ahead of runoffs Tuesday in a dozen counties asked the state to extend the deadline for accepting absentee ballots. State law mandates they be received by 7:30 p.m. Election Day, but the suit alleges this deadline "unconstitutionally burdens the rights of Arkansas voters, particularly black voters."

Christian Ministerial Alliance, a religious nonprofit organization, and the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund asked that deadline be extended by 10 days and that the state be ordered to tell voters they have more time.

Arkansa voters, the lawsuit asserts, "should not also be forced to make the untenable choice between their safety and potentially endangering the lives of others and exercising their fundamental right to vote."

Arizona

A third petition drive has been called off by groups hoping to get referendums on the statewide ballot in November.

The latest to be called off was the Arizona Right to Know Source of Campaign Contributions Initiative. The measure would compel the state to obtain and reveal the identities of people donating more than $5,000 to a campaign's media efforts.

The group's leader, former state Attorney General Terry Goddard, asked the Legislature to allow for signatures to be gathered online — noting that leeway has also been given to people circulating nominating petitions.

Florida

The state and national Democratic parties launched a text message campaign to get as many as 1 million party members to vote by mail in November, when the state's 29 electoral votes will be intensely contested by both nominees.

The state Republican Party has also made nearly 140,000 calls to voters about alternatives to in-person voting. Florida allows people to request an absentee ballot for each election without giving an excuse.

Read More

People voting
Paul J. Richards/Getty Images

Make safe states matter

Richie is co-founder and senior advisor of FairVote.

It’s time for “safe state” voters to be more than nervous spectators and symbolic participants in presidential elections.

The latest poll averages confirm that the 2024 presidential election will again hinge on seven swing states. Just as in 2020, expect more than 95 percent of major party candidate campaign spending and events to focus on these states. Volunteers will travel there, rather than engage with their neighbors in states that will easily go to Donald Trump or Kamala Harris. The decisions of a few thousand swing state voters will dwarf the importance of those of tens of millions of safe-state Americans.

But our swing-state myopia creates an opportunity. Deprived of the responsibility to influence which candidate will win, safe state voters can embrace the freedom to vote exactly the way they want, including for third-party and independent candidates.

Keep ReadingShow less
Map of the United States

The National EduDemocracy Landscape Map provides a comprehensive overview of where states are approaching democracy reforms within education.

The democracy movement ignores education races at its peril

Dr. Mascareñaz is a leader in the Cornerstone Project, a co-founder of The Open System Institute and chair of the Colorado Community College System State Board.

One of my clearest, earliest memories of talking about politics with my grandfather, who helped the IRS build its earliest computer systems in the 1960s, was asking him how he was voting. He said, “Everyone wants to make it about up here,” he said as gestured high above his head before pointing to the ground. “But the truth is that it’s all down here.” This was Thomas Mascareñaz’s version of “all politics is local” and, to me, essential guidance for a life of community building.

As a leader in The Cornerstone Project and a co-founder of The Open System Institute I've spent lots of time thinking and working at the intersections of education and civic engagement. I've seen firsthand how the democratic process unfolds at all levels — national, statewide, municipal and, crucially, in our schools. It is from this vantage point that I can say, without a shadow of a doubt, that the democracy reform movement will not succeed unless it acts decisively in the field of education.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kamala Harris at the Democratic National Convention

Vice President Kamala Harris closes out the Democratic National Convention on Thursday night.

Liao Pan/China News Service/VCG via Getty Images

The Democrats didn't have a meaningful primary, and no one cared

Lovit is a senior program officer and historian at the Charles F. Kettering Foundation, where he also hosts the podcast"The Context.”

In many respects, last week’s Democratic National Convention was indeed conventional. The party faithful gathered in a basketball arena in Chicago for speeches carefully calibrated to unite factions and define the central messages of the Harris-Walz campaign. It was a ceremony, a celebration and a storyline — just like the Republicans’ convention last month, and many conventions in years past.

For most of American history, party conventions served a different purpose. They were practical meetings where elites hammered out details of the party platform and wrangled over potential nominees. In a political world where party tickets at every level of government were determined in smoke-filled rooms, the convention was the biggest smoke-filled room of them all.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hands making a heart and painted to look like an American flag
Chinnapong/Getty Images

A framework for democracy philanthropy

Stid is the executive director of Lyceum Labs, a fiscally sponsored project of the Defending Democracy Together Institute. The following is reposted with permission from his blog, The Art of Association.

It is challenging for philanthropic funders to get started and stay focused when it comes to strengthening democracy. The vagaries of our political system — really a complex system of systems cast on a continental scale — make it hard to know where to even begin. There are dozens of solutions that could be worthy of support. Alas, none are backed by dispositive evidence indicating that they are the single-best way forward. Then, every second and fourth year, elections reset the stage of democracy and reshuffle the cast of characters, often in unsettling ways.

Democracy's proximity to politics further complicates the philanthropic picture. The tax code bars foundations from backing or opposing candidates, parties and ballot measures. Many foundations take a belt-and-suspenders approach to this proscription on electioneering by avoiding anything that smacks of politics (as democracy-related causes frequently do). Other foundations, in contrast, push right up to the edge, seeking to exploit all the legal ways they can underwrite voter registration, education and participation, ostensibly on a nonpartisan basis, to further their political goals.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less
Red and blue figures pulling a map of the U.S. apart

Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft, who oversees elections, is running for governor this year.

filo

We can break the partisan cycle by unrigging the system

Sturner, the author of “Fairness Matters,” is the managing partner of Entourage Effect Capital.

This is the sixth entry in the “Fairness Matters” series, examining structural problems with the current political systems, critical policies issues that are going unaddressed and the state of the 2024 election.

We face complex issues, from immigration to the national debt, from Social Security to education, from gun violence to climate change and the culture war, from foreign policy to restoring a vibrant middle class by ensuring economic outcomes are more balanced and equitable.

Yet, neither party seems to be doing much about any of the political problems and policy challenges plaguing our nation. Instead of working on real solutions, our politicians spend their time and our national resources distracting and dividing us by using every tool at their disposal to retain power. Why is that? As Andrew Yang points out in a recent TED Talk (quoting a senator), “A problem is now worth more to us unaddressed than addressed.” It’s galling until you remember that the Democratic and Republican parties are private, gain-seeking organizations that exist to seek and retain power. As such, we should be wary of political parties because our interests and theirs are not aligned.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less