Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

To mail voting's bigger challenges, add a lost envelope boomlet in the Northeast

Casting a vote by mail
viavado/Getty Images

The challenges from this year's surge of mail voting continue to mount.

At least 130,000 primary ballots across the country have arrived too late to be counted, while tens of thousands more have been tossed because of missing signatures or other flaws — a 1 percent overall rejection rate in primaries so far that, while relatively small, could still prove decisive in a close election.

And then there are the envelopes that arrive on time and are completed correctly, but somehow don't get tabulated, leaving elections in limbo and local clerks embarrassed, although free of accusations of fraud. That's now happened twice this month alone — just in towns along Interstate 90 in the Northeast.


First was the local tax referendum in Grafton, 50 miles west of Boston, which took more than a week to conclude as officials haggled over the handling of 202 mailed-in envelopes discovered in the town clerk's vault after the initial count. (The final result improved the tax increase's margin of victory by four votes.)

Now, there's the case of the once-tied Republican primary for an opening on the bench that handles divorces and child custody disputes in Herkimer County, a rural and deeply wooded sliver of upstate New York halfway between Albany and Syracuse.

Three weeks after the initial count showed 2,291 votes for both would-be Family Court judges, attorney Thad Luke is claiming victory by five votes. His win was sealed after county election officials realized they had never seen any absentee votes from the hamlets of Norway and Russia (really) — and eventually located a cache of 30 ballots.

They were at the county courthouse, in "the secure room where the ballots were stored under a dual control lock system," the board said Friday. "The uncast ballots were still in their envelopes in the tray. These absentee ballot envelopes that had been cut open, but the ballots themselves had not been removed from the envelopes and counted."

The loser, municipal Judge Mark Rose, was as gracious as he could be about the oversight — which he described as understandable given the influx of mailed ballots in the June 23 primary because of the coronavirus pandemic. But he nonetheless said he would consider suing to seek a recanvassing of the result.

"They're very hardworking people in the Board of Elections and this was thrown on them," he said. "In a democracy such as the United States, when there is such a small margin, there should be an automatic recount."

At least 65,000 absentee or mail-in ballots have been rejected because they arrived past the deadline in 17 presidential primaries so far, NPR calculated this week, with rejection rates ranging from 2 tenths of 1 percent in Mississippi to nearly 6 percent in Virginia.

That report did not include California, where state records showed 70,330 ballots were rejected either because they were postmarked after primary day or arrived more than three days later. The Associated Press reported that the overall rejection rate was 1.5 percent, the highest in a statewide election since 2010, once ballots tossed for missing or indecipherable signatures or other problems were added to the total.


Read More

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Close-up of sign reading 'Immigrants Make America Great' at a Baltimore rally.

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Donald Trump’s second administration has fully clarified Latinos’ racial position in America: our ethnic group’s labor, culture, and aspirations are too much for his supporters to stomach. The Latino presence in America triggers too many uneasy questions (are they White?), too many doubts (are they really American?), and too much resentment (why are they doing better than me?).

Trump’s targeted deportations of undocumented Latinos, unwarranted arrests of Latino citizens, and heightened ICE presence in Latino neighborhoods address these worries by lumping Latinos with Black people. Simply put, we have become yet another visible population that America socially stigmatizes, economically exploits, and politically terrorizes because aggrieved White adults want to preserve their rank as our nation’s premier racial group. The cumulative impacts are serious: just yesterday, an international panel of investigators on human rights and racism, backed by the U.N., found that such actions have resulted in “grave human rights violations.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Just the Facts: The SAVE Act and the Future of Voter ID Rules
A close up of a window with a sticker on it
Photo by Zach Wear on Unsplash

Just the Facts: The SAVE Act and the Future of Voter ID Rules

Last week, I wrote a column in the Fulcrum entitled “Just the Facts: Voter ID, States’ Powers, and Federal Limits.” The facts presented in that writing made it clear that the U.S. Constitution does not require voter ID and left almost all election administration—including voter qualifications—to the states. However, over time, constitutional amendments and federal statutes have restricted states’ ability to impose discriminatory voting rules, but they have never mandated voter ID.

The SAVE America Act

The national debate over voter ID has entered a new phase with the introduction of the SAVE America Act, the most sweeping federal voter‑identification and citizenship‑documentation proposal in modern history. For more than two centuries, voter eligibility rules—ID included—have been primarily a matter of state authority, bounded by constitutional protections against discrimination. The SAVE America Act would shift that balance by imposing federal requirements for both photo identification and documentary proof of citizenship in federal elections.

Keep ReadingShow less
Posters are displayed next to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) as he speaks at a news conference to unveil the Take It Down Act to protect victims against non-consensual intimate image abuse, on Capitol Hill on June 18, 2024 in Washington, DC.

A lawsuit against xAI over AI-generated deepfakes targeting teenage girls exposes a growing crisis in schools. As laws struggle to keep up, this story explores AI accountability, teen safety, and what educators and parents must do now.

Getty Images, Andrew Harnik

Deepfakes: The New Face of Cyberbullying and Why Parents, Schools, and Lawmakers Must Act

As a former teacher who worked in a high school when Snapchat was born, I witnessed the birth of sexting and its impact on teens. I recall asking a parent whether he was checking his daughter’s phone for inappropriate messages. His response was, “sometimes you just don’t want to know.” But the federal lawsuit filed last week against Elon Musk's xAI has put a national spotlight on AI-generated deepfakes and the teenage girls they target. Parents and teachers can’t ignore the crisis inside our schools.

AI Companies Built the Tool. The Grok Lawsuit Says They Own the Damage.

Whether the theory of French prosecutors–that Elon Musk deliberately allowed the sexualized image controversy to grow so that it would drive up activity on the platform and boost the company’s valuation–is true or not, when a company makes the decision to build a tool and knows that it can be weaponized but chooses to release it anyway, they are making a risk-based decision believing that they can act without consequence. The Grok lawsuit could make these types of business decisions much more costly.

Keep ReadingShow less