Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The worst gerrymandered districts can go away

Protestors in front of the Supreme Court.

Protestors rally against gerrymandering.

Evelyn Hockstein/For The Washington Post via Getty Images

Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

While most Americans only have a vague idea of what gerrymandering means, the impact on fair representation in the United States can’t be overstated.

Every 10 years the redistricting process occurs after the census to adjust congressional districts according to population. While the process is supposed to maintain fair and representative districts, politicians on both sides of the aisle have used this process to perpetuate their power.


To fix that problem, a group of House members reintroduced the Fair Representation Act on Thursday. Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.), a lead sponsor, issued the following press release.

To address these structural gerrymandering issues and extreme partisanship in federal elections on March 20, 2024, U.S. Representative Don Beyer today led a House delegation in the re-introduction of the Fair Representation Act. The updated bill would implement measures to elect U.S. House Representatives through ranked choice voting in multi-member districts ... and require ranked choice voting to elect U.S. Senators.

The Fair Representation Act was supported by nonpartisan organizations including FairVote and RepresentWomen. More than 20 academics and thought leaders including Harvard’s Lawrence Lessig and Nicholas Stephanopoulos and Princeton’s Samuel Wang signed an open letter in support of the Fair Representation Act.

"The Fair Representation Act offers vital solutions to the hyper-partisan gerrymandering and lack of electoral competition that has allowed extremist ideologies to hijack our political discourse and sewn public distrust of our political system,” said Rep. Don Beyer. “Our bill would implement critical reforms to strengthen our electoral system, ensure every voter has their voice represented, and restore public trust. This is the way to produce a Congress made up of Members who prioritize pragmatic legislative results and solutions for the benefit of the American people.”

“The Fair Representation Act will breathe new life into American democracy, strengthening the voice of our people in our elections and, in turn, our government,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin. “I’m proud to cosponsor this legislation with one of my National Capital Region colleagues, Congressman Don Beyer, to establish multi-member congressional districts ... with members elected through ranked choice voting—three reinforcing measures that, taken together, will ensure voters are empowered to choose their officials, not the other way around.”

“Our country is ready for reform, and now is the time for Congress to act,” said David Daley, Senior Fellow at FairVote. “The Fair Representation Act would create swing districts everywhere and make every contest competitive in every state. It would end gerrymandering and more fully represent the breadth of ideas held by voters. It would greatly expand opportunities for communities of color to build power. And it would create incentives for legislators to work productively in service of the public interest rather than to obstruct and demean their opponents.”

“The Fair Representation Act outlines a bold plan to increase competition and fairness in U.S. House elections and reduce polarization, with added benefits for women candidates. No single reform would create more opportunities for women and people of color from across the geographic and partisan spectrum to win seats in Congress,” said Cynthia Richie Terrell, Founder and Executive Director of RepresentWomen. “The ability to compete in fair elections is central to our vision of how we achieve gender balance for women in Congress, in our lifetimes.”

“This bill works to make our democracy as fair as possible by creating ways that our country's remarkable diversity, including religious diversity, has representation in Congress – further ensuring that our democracy works for all and that all people, including those from minority faith traditions feel heard in Washington, D.C,” said Rev. Paul Brandeis Raushenbush, President and CEO of Interfaith Alliance. “This is not a partisan issue – it's a moral one, inspired by a commitment to equity, respect and inclusion for people of all backgrounds.”

“We admire the reforms proposed in the FRA,” said Lisa D. T. Rice, proposer of ballot measure Initiative 83 that would enact similar reforms in the District of Columbia. “What Congressman Beyer and his co-sponsors are trying to do for the nation, we are trying to bring to the nation’s capital. The FRA, like our initiative, is pro-voter. We are all working for electoral systems that will empower majorities and hold elected officials accountable.”

Full text of the Fair Representation Act is available here with a one-pager here and additional resources here.

Read More

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

A check mark and hands.

Photo by Allison Saeng on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by the author.

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

Originally published by Independent Voter News.

Today, I am proud to share an exciting milestone in my journey as an advocate for democracy and electoral reform.

Keep ReadingShow less
Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ranked Choice Voting May Be a Stepping Stone to Proportional Representation

Someone filling out a ballot.

Getty Images / Hill Street Studios

Ranked Choice Voting May Be a Stepping Stone to Proportional Representation

In the 2024 U.S. election, several states did not pass ballot initiatives to implement Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) despite strong majority support from voters under 65. Still, RCV was defended in Alaska, passed by a landslide in Washington, D.C., and has earned majority support in 31 straight pro-RCV city ballot measures. Still, some critics of RCV argue that it does not enhance and promote democratic principles as much as forms of proportional representation (PR), as commonly used throughout Europe and Latin America.

However, in the U.S. many people have not heard of PR. The question under consideration is whether implementing RCV serves as a stepping stone to PR by building public understanding and support for reforms that move away from winner-take-all systems. Utilizing a nationally representative sample of respondents (N=1000) on the 2022 Cooperative Election Survey (CES), results show that individuals who favor RCV often also know about and back PR. When comparing other types of electoral reforms, RCV uniquely transfers into support for PR, in ways that support for nonpartisan redistricting and the national popular vote do not. These findings can inspire efforts that demonstrate how RCV may facilitate the adoption of PR in the U.S.

Keep ReadingShow less