Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

As Kemp starts reopening Georgia, suit seeks another primary delay

Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp

Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp is trying to reopen businesses while a voting reform group is suing state election officials to delay the primary election again.

Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images

An election reform advocacy group has filed a lawsuit seeking another delay in Georgia's primary and changes in the way people vote because of the coronavirus epidemic.

The Coalition for Good Governance sued Monday in federal court, asking the primary be pushed back another three weeks, to June 30.

The suit was filed the same day Republican Gov. Brian Kemp announced he was allowing gyms, barber shops and many other businesses to reopen Friday. His aggressive plans to start reopening the state's economy went against the advice of health experts, who say the result could be a spike in potentially fatal Covid-19 cases in the coming month.


The primary now set for June 9 — with congressional, legislative, judicial and local government nominations at stake — originally was scheduled for March 24 and has already been delayed twice.

The Colorado-based coalition has been a strong advocate for using hand-marked paper ballots. It previously filed a suit alleging the new touchscreen computers being used in Georgia were so big and bright that people's privacy rights while voting would be violated. A judge rejected that argument.

The new suit argues that Georgia is headed to a repeat of the recent debacle in Wisconsin, where last-minute legal rulings left voters confused and forced thousands to risk their health in order to vote in person two weeks ago.

The suit states that the touchscreen voting machines and the computer device used to check in voters are difficult and time-consuming to keep clean. It calls for using hand-marked paper ballots instead.

The lawsuit also calls for additional early voting and suggests that election officials are not prepared for the flood of absentee ballots that will be returned this election.

Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger has sent absentee ballot request forms to Georgia's 6.9 million voters in an attempt to encourage people to avoid going to the polls.


Read More

People at voting booths.

A clear breakdown of voter ID laws under the Constitution, federal statutes, and court rulings—plus analysis of new Trump administration proposals to impose nationwide voter identification requirements.

Getty Images, LPETTET

Just the Facts: Voter ID, States’ Powers, and Federal Limits

The Fulcrum approaches news stories with an open mind and skepticism, presenting our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.


Few issues generate more heat and are less understood than voter ID.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person signing a piece of paper with other people around them.

Javon Jackson, center, was able to register to vote following passage of a 2019 Nevada law that restored voting rights to formerly incarcerated individuals.

The Nation Is Missing Millions of Voters Due to Lack of Rights for Former Felons

If you gathered every American with a prison record into one contiguous territory and admitted it to the union, you would create the 12th-largest state. It would be home to at least 7 million to 8 million people and hold a dozen votes in the Electoral College.

In a close presidential race, this hypothetical state of the formerly incarcerated could decide who wins the White House.

Keep ReadingShow less
With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

An analysis of Trump’s SAVE Act strategy, the voter ID debate, and how Pew data is being misused—exploring election integrity, voter suppression, and the political fight shaping U.S. democracy.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Stop Fighting Voter ID. Start Defining It.

President Trump doesn't need the SAVE America Act to pass. He only needs the debate to continue. Every minute spent arguing about voter suppression repeats the underlying premise — that noncitizen voting is a real and widespread problem — until it feels like an established fact. The question is whether Democrats will contest Republicans’ definition before the frame hardens.

Trump's claim that 88% of Americans support the bill traces to a Pew Research Center survey — a survey that found 83% support a “government-issued photo ID to vote,” not extreme vetting for proof of citizenship. That support included 95% of Republicans and 71% of Democrats, indicating genuine, broad, bipartisan support for a basic civic principle. That's worth taking seriously.

Keep ReadingShow less
People standing at voting booths.

The proposed SAVE Act and MEGA Act would require proof of citizenship to register to vote, risking the disenfranchisement of millions of eligible Americans.

Getty Images, EvgeniyShkolenko

The SAVE Act is a Solution in Search of A Problem

The federal government seems to be barreling toward a federal election power grab. Trump's State of the Union address called for the Senate to push through the SAVE Act, which has already passed the House, in the name of so-called "election integrity." And the SAVE Act isn’t the only such bill. Like the SAVE Act, the Make Elections Great Again (MEGA) Act—introduced in the House—would require voters to provide a document outlined in the Act that allegedly proves their U.S. citizenship. We’ve been down this road before in Texas, and spoiler alert: it was unworkable.

Both the SAVE and MEGA Acts would disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens without making our federal elections more secure. They seek to roll out a faulty federal voter registration system, despite the existing separate registration and voting process for state and local elections. And these Acts target a minuscule “problem”—but would unleash mass voter purges and confusion.

Keep ReadingShow less