Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Primaries in Nevada and Georgia switching mostly to mail

Mail-in ballots

Nevada and Georgia are pushing their citizens to vote by mail in the state's upcoming primary elections in order to keep safe from the coronavirus.

George Frey/Getty Images

The coronavirus pandemic continues to drive deliberations in states nationwide about how to conduct elections for the rest of this year and beyond.

In both reliably blue Nevada and relatively red Georgia, election officials on Tuesday decided to make their primaries wide open to voting by mail. Delaware became the latest state to delay its primary, while Wisconsin pressed ahead despite warnings about a shortage of poll workers.


The details of these developments:

Nevada

GOP Secretary of State Barbara Cegavske said all registered voters in the state will receive an absentee ballot well ahead of the June 9 primary. Voters may return it by mail or drop it off at a designated location. Postage will be free.

Cegavske noted that most of the state's poll workers are elderly and thus at a higher risk if they contract the coronavirus. Still, each of the 17 counties in Nevada will have one in-person polling location.

Georgia

All the state's voters will be sent an application to get a no-excuse-required absentee ballot in time to return it by May 19, the new date for the presidential primary but the originally scheduled date for congressional, state legislative, judicial and some local contests.

GOP Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger announced the move Tuesday, saying it was an attempt to encourage as many people as possible to vote from home and steer clear of polling places. But early voting and Election Day precincts will remain open.

Officials said the mailing will cost about $13 million.

While Georgia allows no-excuse absentee voting, only 7 percent of ballots were cast that way in the 2018 gubernatorial election.

Delaware

Democratic Gov. John Carney signed an executive order Tuesday postponing the presidential primary from April 28 to June 2. Primaries for other offices are scheduled for September.

That brings to five the number of states that have delayed their Democratic nomination contests to the second Tuesday after Memorial Day — making June 2 something of a miniature Super Tuesday, assuming there's still a contest between former Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Bernie Sanders.

And the Pennsylvania's Legislature is expected to pass a bill in coming days proposing to likewise reschedule from April 28 to June 2. Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf is eager to sign the measure.

The other states to switch are Connecticut, Indiana, Maryland and Rhode Island. New Jersey, Montana, New Mexico, South Dakota and the District of Columbia are already set for that day.

Wisconsin

The next big-state primary remains on track for April 7, Democratic Gov. Tony Evers says, mainly because the ballot includes not only the presidential contest but also races for many local positions that would soon become vacant if the date is changed.

But on Tuesday the top election official in Madison, the second biggest city, said that about half the hired poll workers — 525 of them — have vowed not to show up that day, potentially leaving dozens of polling places unable to open. Clerks statewide are clamoring to hire replacements to make sure there are at least three officials in each place as the law requires. Some have proposed calling in the National Guard to man the voting sites.

Evers on Tuesday encouraged voters to request a ballot online and then vote absentee. Officials said requests were on pace to set a statewide record.

Read More

An oversized ballot box surrounded by people.

Young people worldwide form new parties to reshape politics—yet America’s two-party system blocks them.

Getty Images, J Studios

No Country for Young Politicians—and How To Fix That

In democracies around the world, young people have started new political parties whenever the establishment has sidelined their views or excluded them from policymaking. These parties have sometimes reinvigorated political competition, compelled established parties to take previously neglected issues seriously, or encouraged incumbent leaders to find better ways to include and reach out to young voters.

In Europe, a trio in their twenties started Volt in 2017 as a pan-European response to Brexit, and the party has managed to win seats in the European Parliament and in some national legislatures. In Germany, young people concerned about climate change created Klimaliste, a party committed to limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, as per the Paris Agreement. Although the party hasn’t won seats at the federal level, they have managed to win some municipal elections. In Chile, leaders of the 2011 student protests, who then won seats as independent candidates, created political parties like Revolución Democrática and Convergencia Social to institutionalize their movements. In 2022, one of these former student leaders, Gabriel Boric, became the president of Chile at 36 years old.

Keep ReadingShow less
How To Fix Gerrymandering: A Fair-Share Rule for Congressional Redistricting

Demonstrators gather outside of The United States Supreme Court during an oral arguments in Gill v. Whitford to call for an end to partisan gerrymandering on October 3, 2017 in Washington, DC

Getty Images, Olivier Douliery

How To Fix Gerrymandering: A Fair-Share Rule for Congressional Redistricting

The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground. ~ Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Col. Edward Carrington, Paris, 27 May 1788

The Problem We Face

The U.S. House of Representatives was designed as the chamber of Congress most directly tethered to the people. Article I of the Constitution mandates that seats be apportioned among the states according to population and that members face election every two years—design features meant to keep representatives responsive to shifting public sentiment. Unlike the Senate, which prioritizes state sovereignty and representation, the House translates raw population counts into political voice: each House district is to contain roughly the same number of residents, ensuring that every citizen’s vote carries comparable weight. In principle, then, the House serves as the nation’s demographic mirror, channeling the diverse preferences of the electorate into lawmaking and acting as a safeguard against unresponsive or oligarchic governance.

Nationally, the mismatch between the overall popular vote and the partisan split in House seats is small, with less than a 1% tilt. But state-level results tell a different story. Take Connecticut: Democrats hold all five seats despite Republicans winning over 40% of the statewide vote. In Oklahoma, the inverse occurs—Republicans control every seat even though Democrats consistently earn around 40% of the vote.

Keep ReadingShow less
Once Again, Politicians Are Choosing Their Voters. It’s Time for Voters To Choose Back.
A pile of political buttons sitting on top of a table

Once Again, Politicians Are Choosing Their Voters. It’s Time for Voters To Choose Back.

Once again, politicians are trying to choose their voters to guarantee their own victories before the first ballot is cast.

In the latest round of redistricting wars, Texas Republicans are attempting a rare mid-decade redistricting to boost their advantage ahead of the 2026 midterms, and Democratic governors in California and New York are signaling they’re ready to “fight fire with fire” with their own partisan gerrymanders.

Keep ReadingShow less
Stolen Land, Stolen Votes: Native Americans Defending the VRA Protects Us All – and We Should Support Them

Wilson Deschine sits at the "be my voice" voter registration stand at the Navajo Nation annual rodeo, in Window Rock.

Getty Images, David Howells

Stolen Land, Stolen Votes: Native Americans Defending the VRA Protects Us All – and We Should Support Them

On July 24, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked a Circuit Court order in a far-reaching case that could affect the voting rights of all Americans. Native American tribes and individuals filed the case as part of their centuries-old fight for rights in their own land.

The underlying subject of the case confronts racial gerrymandering against America’s first inhabitants, where North Dakota’s 2021 redistricting reduced Native Americans’ chances of electing up to three state representatives to just one. The specific issue that the Supreme Court may consider, if it accepts hearing the case, is whether individuals and associations can seek justice under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). That is because the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, contradicting other courts, said that individuals do not have standing to bring Section 2 cases.

Keep ReadingShow less