Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Biden backs universal vote-at-home, saying Trump is out to 'undermine' election

Joe Biden

Joe Biden, above during a virtual campaign event in March, is predicting without evidence that President Trump will seek to postpone the election.

Scott Olson/Getty Images

Joe Biden has joined the cause of voting by mail, making an aggressive pitch for federally funded absentee ballots for everyone this year and blasting President Trump for "trying to undermine the election" by making it more difficult to vote.

The presumptive Democratic nominee's statements, at a fundraiser Thursday night, were his first endorsement of the idea that's galvanizing the world of democracy reform during the coronavirus pandemic.

In the primary campaign, Biden put less emphasis than his major rivals on good governance issues, from campaign finance to voting rights. And until now he has been silent on the challenges of conducting a viable election during the country's biggest public health crisis in a century — perhaps, at least in part, for fear of making an increasingly partisan debate more polarized.


When the former vice president addressed 670 donors online, however, he took on his November opponent with blunt force and openly advocated for policies fellow Democrats believe could be harnessed to his benefit in November.

He also predicted, without evidence, that Trump will seek to postpone the election altogether.

"We have to make it easier for everybody to be able to vote, particularly if we are still basically in the kind of lockdown circumstances we are in now," Biden said. "But that takes a lot of money, and it's going to require us to provide money for states and insist they provide mail-in ballots."

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Such a federal mandate is highly unlikely to get through a divided Congress, but Democrats are calling for at least $2 billion in aid so states can deliver and count a surge of absentee ballots (expected regardless of federal action), expand in-person early voting to reduce long Election Day lines, and keep voting sites sanitized and staffed with poll workers.

Along with that money, Democrats want the next economic stimulus bill to provide billions in aid to the Postal Service, which has been crippled by Covid-19 but could see volume spike with tens of millions of mail ballots this fall. Trump has come out against both lines of spending, saying expanded absentee voting will help "cheaters" and the USPS is undeserving of taxpayer aid.

"He's already trying to undermine the election with false claims of voter fraud and threatening to block essential Covid assistance," Biden said. "Imagine threatening not to fund the post office. Now what in God's name is that about? Other than trying to let the word out that he's going to do all he can to make it very hard for people to vote. That's the only way he thinks he can possibly win."

Going further, the former vice president appeared to equate the president's opposition to alternative voting methods to the foreign hacking of the 2016 election.

"I promise you the Russians did interfere in our election and I guarantee you they are doing it again with two other major actors," Biden said, adding, "You can be assured, between he and the Russians there is going to be an attempt to interfere."

He then added: "This president, mark my words, I think he's going to try to kick back the election somehow, come up with some rationale why it can't be held."

Trump has not given any signal he's considering such a move, and in March he said he opposed postponing any primaries or the Nov. 3 contest. The president does not have the authority to change that date. It's set by Congress, and it's hard to imagine the Democratic House voting for a postponement, which has never happened in American history. Any executive order delaying Election Day would immediately be challenged as unconstitutional.

The president's re-election campaign on Friday lambasted Biden's suspicion about a Trump-ordered delay as "the incoherent, conspiracy theory ramblings of a lost candidate who is out of touch with reality."

That headline-grabbing comment threatened to overshadow the breakthrough nature of Biden's comments about making vote-by-mail the nationwide norm.

Democracy reform groups and voting rights organizations, which have not often unified behind an issue, have done so in this case. And they have been quietly lamenting Biden has not joined them, even as three former rivals on his presumed list of possible running mates -- Amy Klobuchar, Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren -- have released plans to secure elections during the pandemic through more voting at home and been in the forefront of efforts in the Senate to secure funding for state voting contingency effotrts.

A handful of op eds from fix-the-system advocates in the past week had urged Biden to come out forcefully for a similar plan and then follow up with more explicit promises to put improved voting rights, easier access to the ballot and campaign finance regulation high on his legislative agenda if he wins.

The virtual fundraiser, featuring former Democratic rival Pete Buttigieg and singer Melissa Etheridge on Zoom, was targeted to LGBT donors and raised an estimated $1.1 million. One reporter, from CBS News, was allowed to log in and then share his reporting widely.

Read More

Painting of people voting

"The County Election" by George Caleb Bingham

Sister democracies share an inherited flaw

Myers is executive director of the ProRep Coalition. Nickerson is executive director of Fair Vote Canada, a campaign for proportional representations (not affiliated with the U.S. reform organization FairVote.)

Among all advanced democracies, perhaps no two countries have a closer relationship — or more in common — than the United States and Canada. Our strong connection is partly due to geography: we share the longest border between any two countries and have a free trade agreement that’s made our economies reliant on one another. But our ties run much deeper than just that of friendly neighbors. As former British colonies, we’re siblings sharing a parent. And like actual siblings, whether we like it or not, we’ve inherited some of our parent’s flaws.

Keep ReadingShow less
Members of Congress standing next to a sign that reads "Americans Decide American Elections"
Sen. Mike Lee (left) and Speaker Mike Johnson conduct a news conference May 8 to introduce the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act.
Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Bill of the month: Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act

Rogers is the “data wrangler” at BillTrack50. He previously worked on policy in several government departments.

Last month, we looked at a bill to prohibit noncitizens from voting in Washington D.C. To continue the voting rights theme, this month IssueVoter and BillTrack50 are taking a look at the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act.

IssueVoter is a nonpartisan, nonprofit online platform dedicated to giving everyone a voice in our democracy. As part of its service, IssueVoter summarizes important bills passing through Congress and sets out the opinions for and against the legislation, helping us to better understand the issues.

BillTrack50 offers free tools for citizens to easily research legislators and bills across all 50 states and Congress. BillTrack50 also offers professional tools to help organizations with ongoing legislative and regulatory tracking, as well as easy ways to share information both internally and with the public.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump and Biden at the debate

Our political dysfunction was on display during the debate in the simple fact of the binary choice on stage: Trump vs Biden.

Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The debate, the political duopoly and the future of American democracy

Johnson is the executive director of the Election Reformers Network, a national nonpartisan organization advancing common-sense reforms to protect elections from polarization.

The talk is all about President Joe Biden’s recent debate performance, whether he’ll be replaced at the top of the ticket and what it all means for the very concerning likelihood of another Trump presidency. These are critical questions.

But Donald Trump is also a symptom of broader dysfunction in our political system. That dysfunction has two key sources: a toxic polarization that elevates cultural warfare over policymaking, and a set of rules that protects the major parties from competition and allows them too much control over elections. These rules entrench the major-party duopoly and preclude the emergence of any alternative political leadership, giving polarization in this country its increasingly existential character.

Keep ReadingShow less
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Voters should be able to take the measure of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., since he is poised to win millions of votes in November.

Andrew Lichtenstein/Getty Images

Kennedy should have been in the debate – and states need ranked voting

Richie is co-founder and senior advisor of FairVote.

CNN’s presidential debate coincided with a fresh batch of swing-state snapshots that make one thing perfectly clear: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. may be a longshot to be our 47th president and faces his own controversies, yet the 10 percent he’s often achieving in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada and other battlegrounds could easily tilt the presidency.

Why did CNN keep him out with impossible-to-meet requirements? The performances, mistruths and misstatements by Joe Biden and Donald Trump would have shocked Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas, who managed to debate seven times without any discussion of golf handicaps — a subject better fit for a “Grumpy Old Men” outtake than one of the year’s two scheduled debates.

Keep ReadingShow less
I Voted stickers

Veterans for All Voters advocates for election reforms that enable more people to participate in primaries.

BackyardProduction/Getty Images

Veterans are working to make democracy more representative

Proctor, a Navy veteran, is a volunteer with Veterans for All Voters.

Imagine this: A general election with no negative campaigning and four or five viable candidates (regardless of party affiliation) competing based on their own personal ideas and actions — not simply their level of obstruction or how well they demonize their opponents. In this reformed election process, the candidate with the best ideas and the broadest appeal will win. The result: The exhausted majority will finally be well-represented again.

Keep ReadingShow less