Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Biden backs universal vote-at-home, saying Trump is out to 'undermine' election

Joe Biden

Joe Biden, above during a virtual campaign event in March, is predicting without evidence that President Trump will seek to postpone the election.

Scott Olson/Getty Images

Joe Biden has joined the cause of voting by mail, making an aggressive pitch for federally funded absentee ballots for everyone this year and blasting President Trump for "trying to undermine the election" by making it more difficult to vote.

The presumptive Democratic nominee's statements, at a fundraiser Thursday night, were his first endorsement of the idea that's galvanizing the world of democracy reform during the coronavirus pandemic.

In the primary campaign, Biden put less emphasis than his major rivals on good governance issues, from campaign finance to voting rights. And until now he has been silent on the challenges of conducting a viable election during the country's biggest public health crisis in a century — perhaps, at least in part, for fear of making an increasingly partisan debate more polarized.


When the former vice president addressed 670 donors online, however, he took on his November opponent with blunt force and openly advocated for policies fellow Democrats believe could be harnessed to his benefit in November.

He also predicted, without evidence, that Trump will seek to postpone the election altogether.

"We have to make it easier for everybody to be able to vote, particularly if we are still basically in the kind of lockdown circumstances we are in now," Biden said. "But that takes a lot of money, and it's going to require us to provide money for states and insist they provide mail-in ballots."

Such a federal mandate is highly unlikely to get through a divided Congress, but Democrats are calling for at least $2 billion in aid so states can deliver and count a surge of absentee ballots (expected regardless of federal action), expand in-person early voting to reduce long Election Day lines, and keep voting sites sanitized and staffed with poll workers.

Along with that money, Democrats want the next economic stimulus bill to provide billions in aid to the Postal Service, which has been crippled by Covid-19 but could see volume spike with tens of millions of mail ballots this fall. Trump has come out against both lines of spending, saying expanded absentee voting will help "cheaters" and the USPS is undeserving of taxpayer aid.

"He's already trying to undermine the election with false claims of voter fraud and threatening to block essential Covid assistance," Biden said. "Imagine threatening not to fund the post office. Now what in God's name is that about? Other than trying to let the word out that he's going to do all he can to make it very hard for people to vote. That's the only way he thinks he can possibly win."

Going further, the former vice president appeared to equate the president's opposition to alternative voting methods to the foreign hacking of the 2016 election.

"I promise you the Russians did interfere in our election and I guarantee you they are doing it again with two other major actors," Biden said, adding, "You can be assured, between he and the Russians there is going to be an attempt to interfere."

He then added: "This president, mark my words, I think he's going to try to kick back the election somehow, come up with some rationale why it can't be held."

Trump has not given any signal he's considering such a move, and in March he said he opposed postponing any primaries or the Nov. 3 contest. The president does not have the authority to change that date. It's set by Congress, and it's hard to imagine the Democratic House voting for a postponement, which has never happened in American history. Any executive order delaying Election Day would immediately be challenged as unconstitutional.

The president's re-election campaign on Friday lambasted Biden's suspicion about a Trump-ordered delay as "the incoherent, conspiracy theory ramblings of a lost candidate who is out of touch with reality."

That headline-grabbing comment threatened to overshadow the breakthrough nature of Biden's comments about making vote-by-mail the nationwide norm.

Democracy reform groups and voting rights organizations, which have not often unified behind an issue, have done so in this case. And they have been quietly lamenting Biden has not joined them, even as three former rivals on his presumed list of possible running mates -- Amy Klobuchar, Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren -- have released plans to secure elections during the pandemic through more voting at home and been in the forefront of efforts in the Senate to secure funding for state voting contingency effotrts.

A handful of op eds from fix-the-system advocates in the past week had urged Biden to come out forcefully for a similar plan and then follow up with more explicit promises to put improved voting rights, easier access to the ballot and campaign finance regulation high on his legislative agenda if he wins.

The virtual fundraiser, featuring former Democratic rival Pete Buttigieg and singer Melissa Etheridge on Zoom, was targeted to LGBT donors and raised an estimated $1.1 million. One reporter, from CBS News, was allowed to log in and then share his reporting widely.


Read More

multiethnic American voters participating in the US election, showcasing the concept of choice in a democracy

Presidents who lost the popular vote often faced economic turmoil. See the pattern from Harrison to Trump and how a 50-state strategy could change it.

Alan Mazzocco/Getty Images

Path Forward from Economic Consequences of Non-Popular Vote Presidents

While losing the popular vote does not inherently cause economic ruin, the structural political weakness of entering office without a democratic majority mandate often compounded the economic challenges their administrations faced. These terms were marked by distinct economic hardships, structural imbalances, or severe financial crises.

Destabilizing Partisan Protectionism

Keep ReadingShow less
Diverse People At Voting Booth. Vote Here Elections Sign

A political scientist examines how automatic voter registration is quietly turning non-affiliation into America's largest voting bloc.

AndreyPopov/Getty Images

When Neither Party Is the Default: Rethinking Representation As America’s Electorate Changes

For most of my career as a political scientist, representation was the central theme of my teaching and research. Early on, I studied how legislators understood their responsibilities to constituents — whether they saw themselves as delegates carrying out constituent mandates, trustees exercising independent judgment, or politicos combining both. That work asked a question that still matters: What does it mean to represent the public in a changing democracy?

Today I find myself asking a related question: What happens when the electorate changes but the institutions built to represent it do not?

Keep ReadingShow less
A person looks out at the North Tower pool at the 9/11 Memorial and Museum ahead of the 25th anniversary of the attack on the World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

A person looks out at the North Tower pool at the 9/11 Memorial and Museum ahead of the 25th anniversary of the attack on the World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

Gary Hershorn/Getty Images

How 9/11’s Memory Continues to Shape American Citizenship

Twenty‑five years after September 11th, the burden of that day continues to affect us in ways that are difficult to express. It was a moment of profound loss, but also one that revealed both the vulnerability and resilience of our national fabric. The memories remain vivid for many of us: where we were, what we felt, and how the world appeared to change in an instant. Even now, a quarter century later, the impact of that morning continues to shape how we understand our country, our responsibilities, and our relationships with one another.

To help us all reflect on that day, I invited four contributors to the Fulcrum to share reflections not to revisit the tragedy, but to commemorate the ways it has persisted in our consciousness twenty-five years later.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close-up shot of a Black woman's hands receiving a mail-in ballot to vote in a USA Presidential, Senatorial, Congressional, or local election

An immigrant's perspective on why America's election debate over security vs. access is a false choice — and how USPS mail ballot rules fit in.

Jeremy Poland/Getty Images

Ballot Security and Voter Access Are Not Opposites: What the USPS Ballot Rule Gets Right

I came to the United States from India in 1982. In Indian elections, I watched officials check voter identity and mark a voter’s finger with indelible ink. Party representatives observed the process. The system was imperfect, as every large democracy is, but it sent a simple message: casting one vote is a serious civic act, and the process should make that clear.

When I later became an American citizen and cast my first ballot, the experience felt very different. A poll worker found my name on a list and handed me a ballot. In my precinct, there was no photo identification check. I was surprised—not because I expected voting to be difficult, but because I expected a system as consequential as an election to have clear, visible safeguards.

Keep ReadingShow less