Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Citing virus, Democrats sue to ease voting rules for Wisconsin primary

Coronavirus election suit

A new lawsuit asks a Wisconsin judge to order April 3 as the new deadline for people to register to vote electronically or by mail.

George Frey/Getty Images

Restrictions on the lives of Wisconsin voters because of the coronavirus require the state to permit registration and voting-by-mail to continue until the state's primary, Democrats maintain in a new lawsuit.

The Democratic National Committee and state party sued in federal court Wednesday, just before the deadline for registering online for the April 7 primary, the next major contest in the presidential race.

It's the latest in the wave of voting rights litigation brought by the Democrats in partisan battlegrounds from coast to coast in recent months, but the first contending that political rights are being improperly abridged because of the current nationwide public health emergency.


States across the nation are striving to hold primaries safely during the Covid-19 outbreak. Five have postponed their partisan contests so far and Wyoming has shifted to an entirely vote-by-mail presidential caucus April 4, when primaries in Alaska and Hawaii will also largely be conducted that way.

That leaves the Wisconsin primary three weeks from now as the next major election where, at least until recent days, most ballots were likely to get cast in person.

It's more problematic to delay than many of the earlier contests because, in addition to the 84 presidential convention delegates at stake, voters will also be asked to choose a justice for the state Supreme Court and to fill local offices including the mayor and county executive for Milwaukee, the state's biggest city. The terms of those local and judicial positions expire later in April, so the jobs would soon be vacant if the primary does not go forward.

Beyond that, leaders in both parties are eager to reassure voters about the safety of voting in states that are certain to be among the most intensely fought in the presidential race.

"Nobody should have to choose between exposure to Covid-19 and disenfranchisement," Wisconsin Democratic Party Chairman Ben Wikler said in a statement. "Our democracy depends on our ability to conduct free, safe, and fair elections, no matter what — even during a pandemic."

The lawsuit asks a judge to order April 3 as the new deadline for people to register to vote electronically or by mail — and to suspend the requirement that people provide a photo ID and some sort of proof of residency, such as a utility bill, in order to register.

As importantly, it asks the judge to extend the deadline for returning absentee ballots. They now must be in hand when the polls close on primary day. The Democrats say the court should permit voters to get them in the mail on primary day and have them counted if they arrive within 10 days.

As of Wednesday, 173,000 absentee ballot applications had been received by election officials statewide. That number is expected to increase dramatically before the April 2 deadline for requesting to vote absentee, as more and more voters conclude that staying away from groups of more than 10 people until the pandemic is under control means in-person voting is not the healthiest option.

The suit notes that Wisconsin residents, like all Americans, are being asked by health and political leaders to distance themselves from others to slow the spread of the virus.

Because of that, "many will be unwilling and unable to risk their safety and the safety of others by waiting in line to register to vote and cast their vote on election day," the suit argues. (Wisconsin has same-day voter registration.)

For the same reason, many Wisconsin residents may be unwilling to leave their homes to obtain and copy the documents they need to register to vote or to obtain an absentee ballot, the suit states.

In addition, the suit argues that many people rely on printers and scanners at their workplace to gather these documents.

This lawsuit was filed by Perkins Coie, the same firm that has brought more than two dozen claims on behalf of Democratic campaign committees contending laws and regulations in bellwether states are suppressing the vote. Democrats say they plan to spend tens of millions of dollars pressing these cases, and Republicans say they will spend millions defending measures they view mainly as appropriate defenses against fraud.

Late last year, Democrats were part of another lawsuit against Wisconsin election officials in an attempt to ease restrictions on college students voting where they are attending school.


Read More

people filling out their ballots at voting booths and submitting their vote.

Independent voters may hand Democrats control of Congress this fall — but as history shows, they'll get nothing in return. Here's how to change that.

Pressmaster/Getty Images

Swinging Outcomes Is Not Enough

The midterms are six weeks away, and polls predict that independent voters, who broke for Donald Trump in 2024, are planning on voting for Democrats by wide margins. Among Latinos, the numbers are staggering, to the point that the Republican gerrymanders in Florida and Texas may actually result in Democratic victories.

If the Democrats take control of Congress, it will be because of independents. And what do independents get in return?

Keep ReadingShow less
Diverse People At Voting Booth. Vote Here Elections Sign

A political scientist examines how automatic voter registration is quietly turning non-affiliation into America's largest voting bloc.

AndreyPopov/Getty Images

When Neither Party Is the Default: Rethinking Representation As America’s Electorate Changes

For most of my career as a political scientist, representation was the central theme of my teaching and research. Early on, I studied how legislators understood their responsibilities to constituents — whether they saw themselves as delegates carrying out constituent mandates, trustees exercising independent judgment, or politicos combining both. That work asked a question that still matters: What does it mean to represent the public in a changing democracy?

Today I find myself asking a related question: What happens when the electorate changes but the institutions built to represent it do not?

Keep ReadingShow less
A person looks out at the North Tower pool at the 9/11 Memorial and Museum ahead of the 25th anniversary of the attack on the World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

A person looks out at the North Tower pool at the 9/11 Memorial and Museum ahead of the 25th anniversary of the attack on the World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

Gary Hershorn/Getty Images

How 9/11’s Memory Continues to Shape American Citizenship

Twenty‑five years after September 11th, the burden of that day continues to affect us in ways that are difficult to express. It was a moment of profound loss, but also one that revealed both the vulnerability and resilience of our national fabric. The memories remain vivid for many of us: where we were, what we felt, and how the world appeared to change in an instant. Even now, a quarter century later, the impact of that morning continues to shape how we understand our country, our responsibilities, and our relationships with one another.

To help us all reflect on that day, I invited four contributors to the Fulcrum to share reflections not to revisit the tragedy, but to commemorate the ways it has persisted in our consciousness twenty-five years later.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close-up shot of a Black woman's hands receiving a mail-in ballot to vote in a USA Presidential, Senatorial, Congressional, or local election

An immigrant's perspective on why America's election debate over security vs. access is a false choice — and how USPS mail ballot rules fit in.

Jeremy Poland/Getty Images

Ballot Security and Voter Access Are Not Opposites: What the USPS Ballot Rule Gets Right

I came to the United States from India in 1982. In Indian elections, I watched officials check voter identity and mark a voter’s finger with indelible ink. Party representatives observed the process. The system was imperfect, as every large democracy is, but it sent a simple message: casting one vote is a serious civic act, and the process should make that clear.

When I later became an American citizen and cast my first ballot, the experience felt very different. A poll worker found my name on a list and handed me a ballot. In my precinct, there was no photo identification check. I was surprised—not because I expected voting to be difficult, but because I expected a system as consequential as an election to have clear, visible safeguards.

Keep ReadingShow less