Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Adding to chaos, Wisconsin primary may be delayed after all

Wisconsin election

Don't expect lines at Tuesday's polling places in Wisconsin like this one in Milwaukee during the 2018 midterm. The coronavirus pandemic has prompted more than a million requests for absentee ballots.

Darren Hauk/Getty Images

UPDATE: Democratic Gov. Tony Evers reversed his longstanding position on Friday afternoon and said Wisconsin's primary set for Tuesday should be delayed. He called a Saturday special session of the Legislature, run by Republicans, to debate a bill creating an all-mail election with a May 26 deadline. The headline above is new, the story below is not.

Wisconsin's primary is on course for Tuesday after a federal judge ripped the state's leaders for not postponing the election in the middle of the coronavirus pandemic but said he did not have the authority to delay it.

Every other state that scheduled an April contest has postponed or transformed it to almost all vote-by-mail. But Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and the Republican-led Legislature agreed on no delay and only relatively minor changes — leaving voting rights groups and campaigns predicting confusion, anger and maybe a wave of illness next week.

U.S. District Judge William Conley on Thursday did extend until Friday evening the deadline for applying for absentee ballots, which more than 1.1 million Wisconsinites have already done. He also ordered ballots received as long as six days after election day to get counted and waived a requirement that a witness sign every absentee ballot, which would mean hundreds of thousands of social distancing violations.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter


The legal battle is not quite over, however. The national and state Republican parties have already appealed Conley's easements of those rules to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. And state lawmakers have asked that court to let them get involved at the last minute.

Whether or not Conley's changes stand, the election seems sure to be chaotic. It is not clear how many will actually venture out to the polls, and those who do may find their normal polling sites shuttered because too many poll workers did not show up.

Most of them are elderly, the group most vulnerable to Covid-19, and already about 60 percent of municipalities say they know they will not have enough poll workers. As many as 7,000 are expected to stay away. Evers says the National Guard will fill in at some locations.

Milwaukee officials say they are planning to open fewer than a dozen polling places instead of the usual 180. (The state's largest city is hosting the Democratic presidential convention, which this week was delayed by five weeks and will now begin Aug. 17.)

State officials said they were compelled to press ahead with the primary because, in addition to the 84 Democratic presidential delegates at stake, nonpartisan races are on the ballot for local offices and judgeships — including a potentially pivotal state Supreme Court seat — that will become vacant within weeks without a winner.

The marquee contest seems to be a foregone conclusion, because former Vice President Joe Biden is running about 30 points ahead of Sen. Bernie Sanders in recent polls. So the election may end up being far more significant in establishing legal boundaries for what changes are allowed during a health emergency and who can make them.

In addition, high levels of pandemonium and outrage, with many Wisconsinites feeling disenfranchised and endangered, could change the dynamic for the fall, when the state will be a premier presidential battleground.

Conley wrote that the governor is trying to "thread the needle" by garnering a large enough turnout so the election will be considered legitimate while at the same time not causing a greater outbreak of the coronavirus.

"However unlikely this outcome may be, or ill-advised in terms of the public health risks and the likelihood of a successful election, the only role of a federal district court is to take steps that help avoid the impingement on citizens' rights to exercise their voting," the judge wrote.

The court's ruling came in a case that was the consolidation of three different lawsuits: one by minority voting rights advocates, another by the state and national Democratic parties, and the last by advocates for elderly voters who live alone. The last group pressed the argument that getting a witness signature on a ballot posed an unacceptable health risk.

Others argued that so many people were switching to mail-in ballots that the deadlines involved had to be extended. The judge moved the deadline for requesting the form by one day, to 5 p.m. Friday, and extended by six days, to 4 p.m., April 13, the deadline for absentee ballots to arrive at election offices.

He set no requirement for when those ballots had to be postmarked, prompting Republicans to say the judge has effectively (and wrongly) delayed the primary date.

"In the absence of the legislature doing its part to ensure a fair and safe election, I appreciate that the court chose to implement some common-sense solutions that I've been advocating for," Evers tweeted.

Evers a week ago asked the Legislature to pass emergency legislation sending ballots to every registered voter, but the GOP leaders quickly rebuffed him.

"Unless this is appealed," Chairman Dean Knudson of the state Elections Commission said after the judge's ruling, "we're going to have area mess."

Read More

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

A roll of "voted" stickers.

Pexels, Element5 Digital

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

The analysis and parsing of learned lessons from the 2024 elections will continue for a long time. What did the campaigns do right and wrong? What policies will emerge from the new arrangements of power? What do the parties need to do for the future?

An equally important question is what lessons are there for our democratic structures and processes. One positive lesson is that voting itself was almost universally smooth and effective; we should applaud the election officials who made that happen. But, many elements of the 2024 elections are deeply challenging, from the increasingly outsized role of billionaires in the process to the onslaught of misinformation and disinformation.

Keep ReadingShow less
MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

A check mark and hands.

Photo by Allison Saeng on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by the author.

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

Originally published by Independent Voter News.

Today, I am proud to share an exciting milestone in my journey as an advocate for democracy and electoral reform.

Keep ReadingShow less
Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less