Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Uncertainty envelops next week's Wisconsin primary

Wisconsin primary

This line at a fire station in Milwaukee during the 2018 midterm election will not be replicated during Wisconsin's April 7 primary because of the coronavirus — if the primary is even held as scheduled.

Darren Hauck/Getty Imags

Eight days to the Wisconsin primary and almost every aspect of it remains up in the air, from the rules for how people will vote to whether the election will even take place.

The state, which already looms as the essential presidential battleground in November, has quickly become the heart of the national debate about the propriety of voting during a pandemic. It is the only state that has not in some way delayed an April presidential primary, the main rationale being that some state and local contests on the ballot are for jobs that become vacant without a timely election.

Democratic Gov. Tony Evers shifted course Friday and, after saying the polls should be open April 7 as usual, proposed that 3.3 million ballots be printed and delivered to every voter in the state in time for them to be filled in and sent back on schedule. Republicans in charge of the Legislature, who would have to pass a bill for that to happen, said the idea was a logistical impossibility.


A federal judge on Saturday consolidated three lawsuits filed against the state — efforts to postpone the primary altogether or at least relax the rules to make absentee voting easier for more people. The judge promised to rule on these requests in time.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Another federal judge on Friday dismissed Green Bay's bid to delay the election because of concerns about the safety of government employees, poll workers and voters.

Judge William Griesbach said cities lacked authority to bring such lawsuits, but he added that his decision "is not intended to minimize the serious difficulties the city and its officials are facing in attempting to conduct the upcoming election."

Wisconsin is not only an important place in Democratic presidential politics, with 84 pledged delegates at stake, but any changes in the voting process now could still be in place in November, when Wisconsin's 10 electoral votes will be top of mind for both nominees. Donald Trump won the state by just 23,000 votes last time, breaking a seven-election winning streak for the Democrats.

The most sweeping suit before U.S. District Judge William Conley seeks to have the primary delayed at least until the governor lifts his emergency order closing most schools and businesses and requiring most people to stay at home. That's not likely before May given President Trump's decision Sunday to extend federal social distancing guidelines through the end of April.

Another suit, filed on behalf of elderly people living alone and at highest risk of getting sick, wants to eliminate the requirement that a witness must sign all mail-in ballots. The third suit seeks to extend online registration times and suspend the requirement that people provide a photo ID and proof of residency, such as a utility bill, to register.

Conley signaled Monday he'd have a hearing Wednesday and told the Wisconsin Election Commission to explain by Monday night why the primary should not be delayed.

As of Monday morning the state had more than 1,100 confirmed Covid-19 cases and at least 20 deaths. It also had sent more than 848,000 absentee ballots to voters and seen nearly 252,000 returned, already a record for a springtime election in Wisconsin.

Day's end is the deadline for voters to register online if they want to cast an absentee ballot and Thursday is the deadline for requesting one.

"Even he knows that's not logistically feasible," state Senate GOP Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald said of Evers' plan to rush out vote-by-mail forms. "Acting like this is doable is a hoax."

The current back-and-forth has totally overshadowed the big voting rights issue in Wisconsin before the novel coronavirus — whether to purge more than 200,000 names from the registration rolls, a matter that has been tied up in court for months and is now on hold.

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, the conservative think tank leading that effort, said that Evers' proposal "might make sense if the Wisconsin Elections Commission kept the voter rolls clean and up to date, but we know that it does not."

Read More

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

A roll of "voted" stickers.

Pexels, Element5 Digital

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

The analysis and parsing of learned lessons from the 2024 elections will continue for a long time. What did the campaigns do right and wrong? What policies will emerge from the new arrangements of power? What do the parties need to do for the future?

An equally important question is what lessons are there for our democratic structures and processes. One positive lesson is that voting itself was almost universally smooth and effective; we should applaud the election officials who made that happen. But, many elements of the 2024 elections are deeply challenging, from the increasingly outsized role of billionaires in the process to the onslaught of misinformation and disinformation.

Keep ReadingShow less
MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

A check mark and hands.

Photo by Allison Saeng on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by the author.

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

Originally published by Independent Voter News.

Today, I am proud to share an exciting milestone in my journey as an advocate for democracy and electoral reform.

Keep ReadingShow less
Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less