Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The urgency to defeat authoritarianism to save freedom and justice

The urgency to defeat authoritarianism to save freedom and justice

rarrarorro/Getty Images

Stein is an organizational and political strategist who has worked with dozens of for-profit, not-for-profit and political and public sector organizations over the past 50 years. He currently serves as a researcher/writer, consultant and champion of the work of cross-partisan cultural and political organizations and initiatives.

The accelerating and dangerous rise of authoritarianism throughout the world is threatening the blessings of freedom, the human dignity of justice relentlessly pursued, and the governability of democracies, including our own. Current political, economic, social and cultural stresses and tensions throughout the world can no longer simply be explained by the obvious limitations of 20th-century-conceived ideologies, political parties, economic systems and cultural norms.

Rather, the great challenges of our time are between forces advancing freedom and justice versus those promoting division and exclusion — between political open-mindedness and those who promote narrowly conceived, rigid beliefs and certainties.


The central cultural and political struggles of this century are now between those who promote dialogue, deliberation and rational problem-solving to resolve our differences and those who demand allegiance to exclusive certainties fueled by nihilism, racism, nationalism, hatred of adversaries, violence, wokeness and cancel culture. The latter group ridicules and denigrates the unifying skills of collaboration, consensus and compromise with political adversaries.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The causes of these growing schisms across the globe include profound divisions among peoples, racial reckonings, economic inequalities, the disruptive human and environmental ravages of climate change, the destabilizing effects of mis- and disinformation spread by new technologies and social media, and fear of loss of status, change and displacement for many who have perceived themselves to be in the majority.

America’s constitutional republic form of government is being dangerously threatened by our unique version of these forces. As our country has become more diverse, our economic system less equitable, our political arena more tribal and coarsened, and our prevailing political, economic and cultural power structures more sharply challenged and directly confronted by forces across the political spectrum, the governing ideals, institutions and norms we developed in the last century are under growing assault.

Consequently, deep fissures have surfaced within both of our political parties, their abilities to deliberate and compromise with one another have seriously eroded, and visceral hatred for their adversaries is increasingly poisoning our politics. The fracturing Republican Party is practicing an increasingly scorched earth policy that is threatening the health and well-being of our constitutional republic. And Democrats are experiencing their own schisms that are challenging their ideological and political cohesion.

While Republicanism has been captured by radical authoritarian, nihilist and populist forces, Democrats also are threatening their continuing political capacity to agree on common causes or to address Americas’ shared desntinies.

The dangers to our republic are palpable. The decline of consensus, compromise and pursuit of common purpose, both within and between our two major political camps, poses grave dangers to healthy governance and the ability of America to thrive in the years and decades to come.

The urgency of now

The history of the world is a testament to the corrosive consequences of authoritarian populism, which, in all of its dysfunctional forms, denies freedoms, quashes justice, destroys human dignity and destabilizes democracies.

In America, the course is now clear. We must immediately and decisively confront and effectively compete with the forces and voices of authoritarianism by crafting a new, inclusive cultural, political and economic narrative — a 21st century vision of our country that respects our diversity of thought and opinion; acknowledges and honors our ideological differences; embraces love, not hatred; promotes unity, not division; and advances the practices of dialogue, deliberation and problem-solving across our many religious, racial, gender, ideological and regional divides.

“Unity” does not require “conformity.” Our differences and diversity are strengths, not weaknesses. The tenets of freedom, justice and opportunity for all animated the founding of our nation, are enshrined in our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution, and can inspire a healthier, more secure and prosperous America in the years and decades to come.

That we are still struggling after nearly 250 years to realize these ideals is cause for hope and commitment, not distrust and despair. Our commitment to one another, to our prosperity and to a continuously evolving national purpose must never be reduced to the sum of our differences, nor abandoned in hopeless despair that a “more perfect” union can never be realized.

The foundation of a new, pro-democracy American vision, mission and strategy already is evolving:

A new pro-democracy vision. Anti-democratic, authoritarian populism must be confronted effectively in the months and years ahead by a new pro-democracy cultural and political alliance committed to America’s constitutional republic form of governance and devoted to a secure, collaborative and prosperous future that offers the fruits of freedom, justice, human dignity and opportunity for all.

Relentless pursuit of a pro-democracy mission. Our new American vision must animate a pro-democracy mission to create a healthy constitutional republic governed by an inclusive generation of duly elected representatives. Such representatives will commit themselves to the establishment of capacities, collaborations and cooperative ventures that identify, celebrate and elevate those in America who are advancing truth, trust, reason and civility and are building bridges among pro-democracy Republicans, Democrats and independents for constructive dialogue, deliberation and problem-solving in communities and nationally.

Mobilizing and implementing a pro-democracy strategy. This new pro-democracy force and voice is ready to be built in America. Its roots are taking hold in a range of existing, highly respected center-left, center-right, moderate and independent organizations with enlightened leadership ready for the challenges confronting our planet, country and communities.

This potentially powerful coalition of interests must begin mobilizing in 2022, strengthening and coalescing by 2024, and growing for decades to come to promote an enlightened 21st century pro-democracy agenda to confront authoritarian populism fueled by extremist forces across the political spectrum.

A more comprehensive strategy about how this inclusive, vibrant and effective “pro-democracy” force can be built in America will be published in early 2022.

Read More

Complaint Filed to Ethics Officials Regarding Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick
red and white x sign

Complaint Filed to Ethics Officials Regarding Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick

On Friday, March 21, the Campaign Legal Center (CLC) filed a complaint with the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) related to U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick urging the purchase of Tesla stock on March 19th.

CLC is a nonpartisan legal organization dedicated to solving the challenges facing American democracy. Its mission is to fight for every American’s freedom to vote and participate meaningfully in the democratic process, particularly Americans who have faced political barriers because of race, ethnicity, or economic status.

Keep ReadingShow less
Understanding the Debate on Presidential Immunity

The U.S. White House.

Getty Images, Caroline Purser

Understanding the Debate on Presidential Immunity

Presidential Immunity: History and Background

Presidential immunity is the long-standing idea that the president of the United States has exemption from liability or legal proceedings for acts related to the duties of presidential office. Contrary to popular belief, presidential immunity is not explicitly enumerated in the Constitution; only sitting members of Congress are explicitly granted judicial immunity through the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause. Rather, the concept of presidential immunity has arisen through the Department of Justice’s longstanding policy against prosecuting presidents in office and the Supreme Court’s interpretation of Article II, which has developed through a number of Supreme Court cases dating back to 1867.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump
President Donald Trump.
Brandon Bell/Getty Images

Trump 2.0: Navigating the New Political Landscape

With Trump’s return to the White House, we once again bear daily witness to a spectacle that could be described as entertaining, were it only a TV series. But Trump’s unprecedented assault on our democratic norms and institutions is not only very real but represents the gravest peril our democratic republic has confronted in the last 80 years.

Trump’s gradual consolidation of power and authoritarian proclivities, reminiscent of an earlier era, are very frightening on their own account. But it is his uncanny ability to control the narrative that empowers him to shred our nation’s fabric while proceeding with impunity. His actions not only threaten the very republic that he now leads but overturn the entire post-WWII world order, which is now in chaos. Trump has ostensibly cast aside the governing principle with the U.N. Charter of Sovereignty. By suggesting on multiple occasions that the U.S. will “get Greenland one way or another,” and that Canada might become our 51st state, our neighbor to the north is now developing plans to protect itself from what it views as the enemy across the border.

Keep ReadingShow less
Free Speech and Freedom of the Press Under Assault

A speakerphone locked in a cage.

Getty Images, J Studios

Free Speech and Freedom of the Press Under Assault

On June 4, 2024, an op-ed I penned (“Project 2025 is a threat to democracy”) was published in The Fulcrum. It received over 74,000 views and landed as one of the top 10 most-read op-eds—out of 1,460—published in 2024.

The op-ed identified how the right-wing extremist Heritage Foundation think tank had prepared a 900-page blueprint of actions that the authors felt Donald Trump should implement—if elected—in the first 180 days of being America’s 47th president. Dozens of opinion articles were spun off from the op-ed by a multitude of cross-partisan freelance writers and published in The Fulcrum, identifying—very specifically—what Trump and his appointees would do by following the Heritage Foundation’s dictum of changing America from a pluralistic democracy to a form of democracy that, according to its policy blueprint, proposes “deleting the terms diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), plus gender equality, out of every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation and piece of legislation that exists.”

Keep ReadingShow less