Vines is the executive producer of the 2021 documentary “Dialogue Lab: America” and president/CEO of Ideos Institute. Molineaux is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and president/CEO of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.
What if our neurology is hard-wired to thwart our brightest dreams? What if the enemy is inside us?
The American ethos – the idea that we, the people, could self-govern – was radical in the 1770s. In drafting the U.S. Constitution, multiple forms of governance were studied, much of which was included in the final draft. Cultural influences were taken from commonly recognized Greek and Roman efforts, the English rule of law, and a dash of French philosophy. Less well-known, however, is the influence of the indignous people, specifically the Iroquois, Shawney, Cherokee and Mohawk in the separation of civilian and military powers plus individual rights. This amalgamation of ideas, codified in our Constitution, sparked both a political and social culture that celebrated the tackling of the unknown with aplomb and agency and the pursuit of new ideas about what it meant to be a progressive and diverse Republic.
So what has changed?
Today, we, the people, seem to push away from the unknown and uncomfortable to cling to promises of security and safety. We’ve discarded collective critical thinking to become critics of what we don’t like. We prefer the devil we know over the adventure of discovery, innovation and the creation of something new. We have lost our curiosity and empathy for others to tribal fears. This is the enemy inside us – our tribal tendencies to “other” those unfamiliar to ourselves, discount expertise we don’t agree with and surround ourselves with similar-minded people.
Overwhelming all of this is a burgeoning desire within the larger public for this level of progress to stop. To return to something more familiar, more stable. More than anything else, the desire for predictability continues to erode the ethos which once made America unique. That the pursuit of greatness, an end result that must and should always remain elusive, is the essence of our uniqueness. Even our self-proclaimed exceptionalism.
And so it is in this time of multiple crises – pandemic fallout, failing systems, inflation, climate crises, polarized media and politicians, et al – that we need our American ingenuity and experimentation more than ever. To delay in this effort is fraught with challenges, namely the ability for those who falsely promise a return to the familiar and the certain to assume positions of power and influence, all the while chipping away at the foundational DNA that defines who we are as a nation. And yes, this includes the nearly imperceptible deterioration of our democracy. Though today that which was once imperceptible has become abundantly clear, including that which the framers of the U.S. labeled “mob rule.” The mob mentality demanding predictability has short-changed our innovative tendencies. Physical violence is rising – all because we are afraid of an uncertain future and our roles in it. Yes, the enemy is indeed within us.
Contrast our current societal woes to a culture that is inherently empathic. A society where those who are curious, intellectually humble, progress-oriented and questioning in pursuit of the unknown are heralded as leaders and influencers. In the past, this is what has defined America. It’s how we tackled the Great Depression, recovered economically following World War II, motivated the civil rights movement and landed on the moon. All periods of incredible change and uncertainty. The leaders who shepherded us through these fragile periods must have also found great comfort in knowing that behind them lay fellow countrymen moved by courage and grit, and undergirded by the knowledge that a nation of fearless pilgrims were poised and ready to meet the challenges ahead.
What’s changed?
We must ask ourselves these questions: Will there be continued will to strive for an ever greater future? And is there equal will to disarm the enemy inside us, to pursue greatness once again?
If there is the will to face ourselves, we’ve compiled a list of principles and actions that can help get us back on track:
- First, set aside fear. It may or may not be real. It’s not helpful.
- Be curious – about others, about solutions, about failed attempts. Ask questions.
- Be humble – no one has the answers right now, but some people have studied the problem and others have proposed solutions.
- Be additive and iterative – doing the same thing over and over is not helpful, but an adaptation or iteration could be! Build upon, don’t tear down. Learn from failures.
- Be empathic with others, but not at your own expense. Help when you can and let go when you can’t help. We have enough collective trauma in the world, so take care of yourself in a way that prevents you from being traumatized by our world.
- Look for the helpers – many empathic people find safety and security in a time of chaos – leaning into the uncertainty and providing pathways to a brighter future and a path out of the chaos.
Without the American ethos that made our country great, where would we be today? It is our embrace of the unknown, of gathering input from stakeholders and iterating from failure to success that led to our unique, and arguably influential, place in the world. We can make America great – not in its actual greatness, but in our tireless pursuit of it.



















U.S. President Donald Trump delivers the State of the Union address during a joint session of Congress in the House Chamber at the Capitol on Feb. 24, 2026, in Washington, D.C. Trump delivered his address days after the Supreme Court struck down the administration's tariff strategy, and amid a U.S. military buildup in the Persian Gulf threatening Iran.
Some MAGA loyalists have turned on Trump. Why the rest haven’t
I recently watched "A Face in the Crowd" for the umpteenth time.
I had a better reason than procrastination to rewatch Elia Kazan’s brilliant 1957 film exploring populism in the television age. It was homework. I was asked to discuss it with Turner Classic Movies host Ben Mankiewicz at the just-concluded TCM Film Festival in Los Angeles. As a pundit and an author, I do a lot of public speaking. But I don’t really do a lot of cool public speaking, so this was a treat.
With that not-very-humble brag out of the way, I had a depressing realization watching it this time.
"A Face in the Crowd" tells the story of a charming drifter with a dark side named Larry “Lonesome” Rhodes, played brilliantly by Andy Griffith. A singer with the gift of the gab, Rhodes takes off on radio but quickly segues to the brand-new medium of television. He becomes a national sensation — and political kingmaker — by forming a deep connection with the masses, particularly among the rural and working classes. His core audience is made up of people with grievances. “Everybody that’s got to jump when somebody else blows the whistle,” as Rhodes puts it.
The film’s climax (spoiler alert) comes when Rhodes’ manager and spurned lover, Marcia, turns on the microphone while the credits rolled at the end of “Cracker Barrel,” his national TV show. Rhodes tells his entourage what he really thinks of the “morons” in his audience. “Shucks, I can take chicken fertilizer and sell it to them for caviar. I can make them eat dog food, and they’ll think it’s steak. … Good night, you stupid idiots.”
It was a canonical “hot mic” moment in American cinema. But the idea that if people could glimpse the “real person” behind the popular facade, they’d turn on them is a very old theme in literature — think Pierre Choderlos de Laclos’ "Les Liaisons Dangereuses" (1782) or Richard Brinsley Sheridan’s "The School for Scandal" (1777), in which diaries and letters do the work of microphones.
Kazan and screenwriter Budd Schulberg were very worried about the ability of demagogues to whip up populist fervor and manipulate the masses through the power of TV, in part because everyone had already seen it happen with radio and film, by Father Coughlin in America and Hitler in Germany. But as dark as their vision was, they still clung to the idea that if the demagogue was exposed, the people would instantly turn on their leader in an “Emperor’s New Clothes” moment for the mass media age.
And that’s the source of my depressing realization. I think they were wrong. It turns out that once that organic connection is made, even a shocking revelation of the truth won’t necessarily break the spell.
In 2016, a lot of writers revisited "A Face in the Crowd" to understand the Trump phenomenon. After all, here was a guy who used a TV show — "The Apprentice" — and social media to build a massive following, going over the heads of the “establishment.” Trump’s own hot mic moment with "Access Hollywood," in which he boasted of his sexual predations, proved insufficient to undo him. That was hardly the only such moment for him. We’ve heard Trump bully the Georgia secretary of state to “find 11,780 votes.” He told Bob Woodward he deliberately “played down” COVID-19. After leaving office, he was recorded telling aides he shouldn’t be sharing classified documents with them — then doing it anyway. And so on.
Trump’s famous claim that he could “shoot somebody” on Fifth Avenue and not lose any voters may have been hyperbole. But it’s not crazy to think he wouldn’t lose as many voters as he should.
In the film, Lonesome Rhodes implodes when Americans encounter his off-air persona. The key to Trump’s success is that he ran as his off-air persona. Why people love that persona is a complicated question. Among the many complementary explanations is that he comes across as authentic, and some people value authenticity more than they value good character, honesty, or competence.
This is not just a problem for Republicans. Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner once had a Nazi tattoo and has said things about women as distasteful as Trump’s “grab them by (the genitals)” comments, and the Democratic establishment is rallying around him because he’s authentic — and because Democrats want to win that race.
Many prominent MAGA loyalists are turning on Trump these days. They claim — wrongly in my opinion — that he’s changed and that the Iran war is a betrayal of their cause. But if you look at the polls, voters who describe themselves as “MAGA” still overwhelmingly support Trump. In short, he still has the Fifth Avenue voters on his side.
Jonah Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast. His Twitter handle is @JonahDispatch.