In less than 100 days, President Donald Trump has destroyed relationships that have existed for 250 years. The list of alienated friends is growing, with potentially dangerous consequences for the United States. And the recent and shocking failure of the country’s entire national security leadership to protect deeply sensitive information about an attack, seeds further reasons to distrust a long-trusted voice.
Recently, President Emmanuel Macron pronounced that the U.S. under Trump is no longer an ally. France was considered to be America’s first ally and to lose its support in 2025 is symbolic of America’s loss of stature on a global basis.
America’s global alliance, developed since its founding but significantly since World War II, was built on a multinational series of organizations and relationships, which brought the world to a period of great (arguably its greatest) prosperity and a significant era of peace ( though not without significant regional conflicts), détente, and global cooperation.
Multinational organizations like the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, the World Health Organization, and similar entities, led to the resolution of crises with a foundation designed to lead to greater global commerce, health, and prosperity. The Bretton Woods Agreements, which laid the foundation for the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, were designed to systemize international support to countries in financial distress and promote economic sustainability and development.
The NATO Alliance consists of 32 countries and as a united force, until 2025, arguably represents the strongest military alliance in world history. In addition, the U.S. maintains major non-NATO military alliances with not less than 20 other countries for a truly global reach.
The military stature of the United States had been enhanced by its extensive soft power activities. Those have included support significantly, but not entirely, through USAID, which has provided critical health care, including disease control, famine relief, agricultural training and enhancement, and training in democracy and judicial independence. The work of USAID has contained disease outbreaks, mitigated famine, and provided critical support to people in need around the world.
It is hard to predict the number of potential conflicts, epidemics, famines, and refugee crises that the work of the U.S. aid efforts have prevented or helped limit. The support and cooperation with international entities have also sent another critical signal to the world and that is one of empathy. The message is that the United States of America is not just a military power. It is a country that understands that peace and prosperity on a global basis is a foundation for peace and prosperity at home.
Accordingly, an investment in the defense of Ukraine is an investment that the U.S. will not become involved in a far more expensive war in Europe. In addition to the dollar cost, the Ukrainians have borne the human costs, whereas a broader European war is likely to require a major commitment of U.S. and international troops. It is distressing and downright embarrassing to watch the U.S. president, who is well known for his lack of commitment to the truth, breach the United States' commitment to the president of Ukraine. It is a clear signal to the rest of the world that the promise of the U.S. may no longer be counted on and from here on out, you are now on your own.
That signal reduced the U.S. from the preeminent global power to a second-tier superpower on par with China and Russia. The European Union, along with, hopefully, the United Kingdom have now become principal advocates of freedom in the world. This creates a much weaker alliance than the united North American, European, Eastern Pacific, Australian, and New Zealand nations that, when necessary, could previously speak with one voice.
Trump is unable to offer an explanation as to why he believes the U.S. is stronger without such allies. Nor has he articulated why he believes that the U.S. and/or the world are better off in an alliance with Russia and North Korea than with NATO and the EU. In contrast, in his short tenure, President Trump has destroyed historical relationships by threatening to use U.S. military forces against Canada and Mexico, withdraw support from Ukraine, dismantle NATO, turn Gaza into a gambling resort, and impose unwarranted tariffs on much of the rest of the world.
The nature of integrity is that once it is lost, it is nearly impossible to recover. The ignorant shortsightedness of the new administration to foreign policy has made it clear that the U.S. is no longer a reliable partner. Vladimir Putin has made it clear that his government will not tolerate dissent, a free press, or democracy. Putin’s imprisonment of Mikhail Khodorkovsky and the assassinations of Boris Nemtsov and Alexei Navalny have made it clear that his style of leadership leans more toward the ruling of Joseph Stalin than any 21st century democracy. Putin’s invasion of Ukraine is his rawest attempt to begin the long process of reconfiguring a superpower along the lines of the USSR.
President Trump has adopted many of Stalin’s/Putin’s tendencies, rounding up people without regard to their guilt, innocence, or rights to due process and seeking to use governmental authority to financially harm law firms, universities, nonprofit organizations, and media companies who fail to display fealty at all times. His actions reflect a more totalitarian approach to leadership in the U.S. and abroad that eclipses the light on global democracy and extinguishes a flame that may never shine as brightly again.
Walter H. White, Jr. is a member of the board of Lawyers Defending American Democrac y, a past chair of the ABA Center for Human Rights, and a former Managing Director of the Moscow office of a major Washington D.C. law firm.




















Eric Trump, the newly appointed ALT5 board director of World Liberty Financial, walks outside of the NASDAQ in Times Square as they mark the $1.5- billion partnership between World Liberty Financial and ALT5 Sigma with the ringing of the NASDAQ opening bell, on Aug. 13, 2025, in New York City.
Why does the Trump family always get a pass?
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche joined ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday to defend or explain a lot of controversies for the Trump administration: the Epstein files release, the events in Minneapolis, etc. He was also asked about possible conflicts of interest between President Trump’s family business and his job. Specifically, Blanche was asked about a very sketchy deal Trump’s son Eric signed with the UAE’s national security adviser, Sheikh Tahnoon.
Shortly before Trump was inaugurated in early 2025, Tahnoon invested $500 million in the Trump-owned World Liberty, a then newly launched cryptocurrency outfit. A few months later, UAE was granted permission to purchase sensitive American AI chips. According to the Wall Street Journal, which broke the story, “the deal marks something unprecedented in American politics: a foreign government official taking a major ownership stake in an incoming U.S. president’s company.”
“How do you respond to those who say this is a serious conflict of interest?” ABC host George Stephanopoulos asked.
“I love it when these papers talk about something being unprecedented or never happening before,” Blanche replied, “as if the Biden family and the Biden administration didn’t do exactly the same thing, and they were just in office.”
Blanche went on to boast about how the president is utterly transparent regarding his questionable business practices: “I don’t have a comment on it beyond Trump has been completely transparent when his family travels for business reasons. They don’t do so in secret. We don’t learn about it when we find a laptop a few years later. We learn about it when it’s happening.”
Sadly, Stephanopoulos didn’t offer the obvious response, which may have gone something like this: “OK, but the president and countless leading Republicans insisted that President Biden was the head of what they dubbed ‘the Biden Crime family’ and insisted his business dealings were corrupt, and indeed that his corruption merited impeachment. So how is being ‘transparent’ about similar corruption a defense?”
Now, I should be clear that I do think the Biden family’s business dealings were corrupt, whether or not laws were broken. Others disagree. I also think Trump’s business dealings appear to be worse in many ways than even what Biden was alleged to have done. But none of that is relevant. The standard set by Trump and Republicans is the relevant political standard, and by the deputy attorney general’s own account, the Trump administration is doing “exactly the same thing,” just more openly.
Since when is being more transparent about wrongdoing a defense? Try telling a cop or judge, “Yes, I robbed that bank. I’ve been completely transparent about that. So, what’s the big deal?”
This is just a small example of the broader dysfunction in the way we talk about politics.
Americans have a special hatred for hypocrisy. I think it goes back to the founding era. As Alexis de Tocqueville observed in “Democracy In America,” the old world had a different way of dealing with the moral shortcomings of leaders. Rank had its privileges. Nobles, never mind kings, were entitled to behave in ways that were forbidden to the little people.
In America, titles of nobility were banned in the Constitution and in our democratic culture. In a society built on notions of equality (the obvious exceptions of Black people, women, Native Americans notwithstanding) no one has access to special carve-outs or exemptions as to what is right and wrong. Claiming them, particularly in secret, feels like a betrayal against the whole idea of equality.
The problem in the modern era is that elites — of all ideological stripes — have violated that bargain. The result isn’t that we’ve abandoned any notion of right and wrong. Instead, by elevating hypocrisy to the greatest of sins, we end up weaponizing the principles, using them as a cudgel against the other side but not against our own.
Pick an issue: violent rhetoric by politicians, sexual misconduct, corruption and so on. With every revelation, almost immediately the debate becomes a riot of whataboutism. Team A says that Team B has no right to criticize because they did the same thing. Team B points out that Team A has switched positions. Everyone has a point. And everyone is missing the point.
Sure, hypocrisy is a moral failing, and partisan inconsistency is an intellectual one. But neither changes the objective facts. This is something you’re supposed to learn as a child: It doesn’t matter what everyone else is doing or saying, wrong is wrong. It’s also something lawyers like Mr. Blanche are supposed to know. Telling a judge that the hypocrisy of the prosecutor — or your client’s transparency — means your client did nothing wrong would earn you nothing but a laugh.
Jonah Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast. His Twitter handle is @JonahDispatch.