Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The End of the American Era

Opinion

The End of the American Era
Getty Images, Grant Faint

In less than 100 days, President Donald Trump has destroyed relationships that have existed for 250 years. The list of alienated friends is growing, with potentially dangerous consequences for the United States. And the recent and shocking failure of the country’s entire national security leadership to protect deeply sensitive information about an attack, seeds further reasons to distrust a long-trusted voice.

Recently, President Emmanuel Macron pronounced that the U.S. under Trump is no longer an ally. France was considered to be America’s first ally and to lose its support in 2025 is symbolic of America’s loss of stature on a global basis.


America’s global alliance, developed since its founding but significantly since World War II, was built on a multinational series of organizations and relationships, which brought the world to a period of great (arguably its greatest) prosperity and a significant era of peace ( though not without significant regional conflicts), détente, and global cooperation.

Multinational organizations like the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, the World Health Organization, and similar entities, led to the resolution of crises with a foundation designed to lead to greater global commerce, health, and prosperity. The Bretton Woods Agreements, which laid the foundation for the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, were designed to systemize international support to countries in financial distress and promote economic sustainability and development.

The NATO Alliance consists of 32 countries and as a united force, until 2025, arguably represents the strongest military alliance in world history. In addition, the U.S. maintains major non-NATO military alliances with not less than 20 other countries for a truly global reach.

The military stature of the United States had been enhanced by its extensive soft power activities. Those have included support significantly, but not entirely, through USAID, which has provided critical health care, including disease control, famine relief, agricultural training and enhancement, and training in democracy and judicial independence. The work of USAID has contained disease outbreaks, mitigated famine, and provided critical support to people in need around the world.

It is hard to predict the number of potential conflicts, epidemics, famines, and refugee crises that the work of the U.S. aid efforts have prevented or helped limit. The support and cooperation with international entities have also sent another critical signal to the world and that is one of empathy. The message is that the United States of America is not just a military power. It is a country that understands that peace and prosperity on a global basis is a foundation for peace and prosperity at home.

Accordingly, an investment in the defense of Ukraine is an investment that the U.S. will not become involved in a far more expensive war in Europe. In addition to the dollar cost, the Ukrainians have borne the human costs, whereas a broader European war is likely to require a major commitment of U.S. and international troops. It is distressing and downright embarrassing to watch the U.S. president, who is well known for his lack of commitment to the truth, breach the United States' commitment to the president of Ukraine. It is a clear signal to the rest of the world that the promise of the U.S. may no longer be counted on and from here on out, you are now on your own.

That signal reduced the U.S. from the preeminent global power to a second-tier superpower on par with China and Russia. The European Union, along with, hopefully, the United Kingdom have now become principal advocates of freedom in the world. This creates a much weaker alliance than the united North American, European, Eastern Pacific, Australian, and New Zealand nations that, when necessary, could previously speak with one voice.

Trump is unable to offer an explanation as to why he believes the U.S. is stronger without such allies. Nor has he articulated why he believes that the U.S. and/or the world are better off in an alliance with Russia and North Korea than with NATO and the EU. In contrast, in his short tenure, President Trump has destroyed historical relationships by threatening to use U.S. military forces against Canada and Mexico, withdraw support from Ukraine, dismantle NATO, turn Gaza into a gambling resort, and impose unwarranted tariffs on much of the rest of the world.

The nature of integrity is that once it is lost, it is nearly impossible to recover. The ignorant shortsightedness of the new administration to foreign policy has made it clear that the U.S. is no longer a reliable partner. Vladimir Putin has made it clear that his government will not tolerate dissent, a free press, or democracy. Putin’s imprisonment of Mikhail Khodorkovsky and the assassinations of Boris Nemtsov and Alexei Navalny have made it clear that his style of leadership leans more toward the ruling of Joseph Stalin than any 21st century democracy. Putin’s invasion of Ukraine is his rawest attempt to begin the long process of reconfiguring a superpower along the lines of the USSR.

President Trump has adopted many of Stalin’s/Putin’s tendencies, rounding up people without regard to their guilt, innocence, or rights to due process and seeking to use governmental authority to financially harm law firms, universities, nonprofit organizations, and media companies who fail to display fealty at all times. His actions reflect a more totalitarian approach to leadership in the U.S. and abroad that eclipses the light on global democracy and extinguishes a flame that may never shine as brightly again.

Walter H. White, Jr. is a member of the board of Lawyers Defending American Democrac y, a past chair of the ABA Center for Human Rights, and a former Managing Director of the Moscow office of a major Washington D.C. law firm.


Read More

A map labeling Lake Ontario as "Lake America" is displayed behind U.S. President Donald Trump.

A map labeling Lake Ontario as "Lake America" is displayed as U.S. President Donald Trump signs an executive order during an event in the Oval Office of the White House on August 27, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Cartography of Convenience: Why Rushed Renaming Erodes Public Trust

In tough economic times, governments often reach for the easiest kind of progress: a new name on an old sign. Wage stagnation, inflation, crumbling roads, and rising rents are hard problems that take years and real money to fix. Renaming a street, a lake, or a strait is not. It costs a fraction as much and lets officials point to something they “did.” A new name never fixes a pothole or lowers a grocery bill. This year offered an unusually rich catalogue of the habit, reaching from a city council in Texas to a wartime waterway in the Persian Gulf.

A Concept Borrowed From the Cremation Ground

Indian philosophy has an old idea called shmashana vairagya, describing the sudden clarity a person feels standing at a cremation ground, when ordinary ambitions look small. The feeling fades once the mourner goes home. Public policy has its own version of this cycle. In the raw hours after a tragedy, a scandal, or a surge of national feeling, officials decide, sometimes within a single social media post, what belongs on a map or a sign forever. The emotion passes in hours. The bill, when there is one, stays for years.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump

U.S. President Donald Trump on February 6, 2026.

(Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

A Demagogue in the White House: Will the Guardrails Hold?

A demagogue does not seize all power at once. He takes it piece by piece.

In Trump’s second administration, those pieces accumulated in plain sight. The president generated so much disruption and noise that Americans struggled to keep pace. Each new controversy displaced the last, obscuring a more consequential story: the steady accumulation of presidential power.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) and U.S. President Donald Trump followed by Chinese first lady Peng Liyuan and U.S. first lady Melania Trump arrive for a state dinner at the White House.

Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) and U.S. President Donald Trump followed by Chinese first lady Peng Liyuan and U.S. first lady Melania Trump arrive for a state dinner in the East Room of the White House on September 24, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

When Leaders Disagree, Ceremony Plays an Important Role

When Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived at the White House on 24 September, the U.S. welcomed him with an elaborate display of ceremony. The Army Herald Trumpets sounded a fanfare, the Chinese and American national anthems were played, and the Old Guard Fife and Drum Corps performed. A military review was followed by a flyover involving a B-2 bomber and four F-22 fighter jets, according to the White House. It was an extraordinary production for two countries that still disagree on some of the most important issues in international politics.

Talks between President Donald Trump and Xi touched on trade, artificial intelligence and Taiwan. The visit was marked by warm words and some signs of cooperation, but it did not erase the fundamental competition between the United States and China. So why was all this ceremony staged? It is tempting to dismiss political pomp as mere window dressing: an expensive historical relic surrounding the serious business taking place behind closed doors. As a music historian, however, I think this misunderstands what ceremony does. Ceremony can become particularly valuable when words alone are not enough.

Keep ReadingShow less
A ​fire burns and destroys the city hall  in Limoges, central France.

A fire burns and destroys the city hall after a group of individuals forced entry into the building during ongoing protest action against the "high cost of living," in Limoges, central France on Oct. 17, 2026.

Pascal Lachenaud/AFP/Getty Images/Tribune

What Americans can learn from the French protests

On Monday, France’s Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez admitted that police have “lost control” as some cities continue to see massive waves of looting and mayhem. Social media brims with images of stores being ransacked, cars burning, and mask-wearing goons running wild. In Limoges, the beautiful Hôtel de Ville was burnt to the ground.

But the chaos, as is so often the case, began peacefully. And many supporters and leaders of the protests have condemned the violence. I think that violence has more to do with France’s miserable record of assimilating immigrants from North Africa and the Middle East than with budget cuts. Call me cynical, but I don’t believe the goons pillaging Louis Vuitton stores are planning to resell the handbags to buy better school supplies or to bolster their teachers’ salaries.

Keep ReadingShow less