In less than 100 days, President Donald Trump has destroyed relationships that have existed for 250 years. The list of alienated friends is growing, with potentially dangerous consequences for the United States. And the recent and shocking failure of the country’s entire national security leadership to protect deeply sensitive information about an attack, seeds further reasons to distrust a long-trusted voice.
Recently, President Emmanuel Macron pronounced that the U.S. under Trump is no longer an ally. France was considered to be America’s first ally and to lose its support in 2025 is symbolic of America’s loss of stature on a global basis.
America’s global alliance, developed since its founding but significantly since World War II, was built on a multinational series of organizations and relationships, which brought the world to a period of great (arguably its greatest) prosperity and a significant era of peace ( though not without significant regional conflicts), détente, and global cooperation.
Multinational organizations like the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, the World Health Organization, and similar entities, led to the resolution of crises with a foundation designed to lead to greater global commerce, health, and prosperity. The Bretton Woods Agreements, which laid the foundation for the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, were designed to systemize international support to countries in financial distress and promote economic sustainability and development.
The NATO Alliance consists of 32 countries and as a united force, until 2025, arguably represents the strongest military alliance in world history. In addition, the U.S. maintains major non-NATO military alliances with not less than 20 other countries for a truly global reach.
The military stature of the United States had been enhanced by its extensive soft power activities. Those have included support significantly, but not entirely, through USAID, which has provided critical health care, including disease control, famine relief, agricultural training and enhancement, and training in democracy and judicial independence. The work of USAID has contained disease outbreaks, mitigated famine, and provided critical support to people in need around the world.
It is hard to predict the number of potential conflicts, epidemics, famines, and refugee crises that the work of the U.S. aid efforts have prevented or helped limit. The support and cooperation with international entities have also sent another critical signal to the world and that is one of empathy. The message is that the United States of America is not just a military power. It is a country that understands that peace and prosperity on a global basis is a foundation for peace and prosperity at home.
Accordingly, an investment in the defense of Ukraine is an investment that the U.S. will not become involved in a far more expensive war in Europe. In addition to the dollar cost, the Ukrainians have borne the human costs, whereas a broader European war is likely to require a major commitment of U.S. and international troops. It is distressing and downright embarrassing to watch the U.S. president, who is well known for his lack of commitment to the truth, breach the United States' commitment to the president of Ukraine. It is a clear signal to the rest of the world that the promise of the U.S. may no longer be counted on and from here on out, you are now on your own.
That signal reduced the U.S. from the preeminent global power to a second-tier superpower on par with China and Russia. The European Union, along with, hopefully, the United Kingdom have now become principal advocates of freedom in the world. This creates a much weaker alliance than the united North American, European, Eastern Pacific, Australian, and New Zealand nations that, when necessary, could previously speak with one voice.
Trump is unable to offer an explanation as to why he believes the U.S. is stronger without such allies. Nor has he articulated why he believes that the U.S. and/or the world are better off in an alliance with Russia and North Korea than with NATO and the EU. In contrast, in his short tenure, President Trump has destroyed historical relationships by threatening to use U.S. military forces against Canada and Mexico, withdraw support from Ukraine, dismantle NATO, turn Gaza into a gambling resort, and impose unwarranted tariffs on much of the rest of the world.
The nature of integrity is that once it is lost, it is nearly impossible to recover. The ignorant shortsightedness of the new administration to foreign policy has made it clear that the U.S. is no longer a reliable partner. Vladimir Putin has made it clear that his government will not tolerate dissent, a free press, or democracy. Putin’s imprisonment of Mikhail Khodorkovsky and the assassinations of Boris Nemtsov and Alexei Navalny have made it clear that his style of leadership leans more toward the ruling of Joseph Stalin than any 21st century democracy. Putin’s invasion of Ukraine is his rawest attempt to begin the long process of reconfiguring a superpower along the lines of the USSR.
President Trump has adopted many of Stalin’s/Putin’s tendencies, rounding up people without regard to their guilt, innocence, or rights to due process and seeking to use governmental authority to financially harm law firms, universities, nonprofit organizations, and media companies who fail to display fealty at all times. His actions reflect a more totalitarian approach to leadership in the U.S. and abroad that eclipses the light on global democracy and extinguishes a flame that may never shine as brightly again.
Walter H. White, Jr. is a member of the board of Lawyers Defending American Democrac y, a past chair of the ABA Center for Human Rights, and a former Managing Director of the Moscow office of a major Washington D.C. law firm.




















photo courtesy of Michael Varga.
An Independent Voter's Perspective on Current Political Divides
In the column, "Is Donald Trump Right?", Fulcrum Executive Editor, Hugo Balta, wrote:
For millions of Americans, President Trump’s second term isn’t a threat to democracy—it’s the fulfillment of a promise they believe was long overdue.
Is Donald Trump right?
Should the presidency serve as a force for disruption or a safeguard of preservation?
Balta invited readers to share their thoughts at newsroom@fulcrum.us.
David Levine from Portland, Oregon, shared these thoughts...
I am an independent voter who voted for Kamala Harris in the last election.
I pay very close attention to the events going on, and I try and avoid taking other people's opinions as fact, so the following writing should be looked at with that in mind:
Is Trump right? On some things, absolutely.
As to DEI, there is a strong feeling that you cannot fight racism with more racism or sexism with more sexism. Standards have to be the same across the board, and the idea that only white people can be racist is one that I think a lot of us find delusional on its face. The question is not whether we want equality in the workplace, but whether these systems are the mechanism to achieve it, despite their claims to virtue, and many of us feel they are not.
I think if the Democrats want to take back immigration as an issue then every single illegal alien no matter how they are discovered needs to be processed and sanctuary cities need to end, every single illegal alien needs to be found at that point Democrats could argue for an amnesty for those who have shown they have been Good actors for a period of time but the dynamic of simply ignoring those who break the law by coming here illegally is I think a losing issue for the Democrats, they need to bend the knee and make a deal.
I think you have to quit calling the man Hitler or a fascist because an actual fascist would simply shoot the protesters, the journalists, and anyone else who challenges him. And while he definitely has authoritarian tendencies, the Democrats are overplaying their hand using those words, and it makes them look foolish.
Most of us understand that the tariffs are a game of economic chicken, and whether it is successful or not depends on who blinks before the midterms. Still, the Democrats' continuous attacks on the man make them look disloyal to the country, not to Trump.
Referring to any group of people as marginalized is to many of us the same as referring to them as lesser, and it seems racist and insulting.
We invite you to read the opinions of other Fulrum Readers:
Trump's Policies: A Threat to Farmers and American Values
The Trump Era: A Bitter Pill for American Renewal
Federal Hill's Warning: A Baltimorean's Reflection on Leadership
Also, check out "Is Donald Trump Right?" and consider accepting Hugo's invitation to share your thoughts at newsroom@fulcrum.us.
The Fulcrum will select a range of submissions to share with readers as part of our ongoing civic dialogue.
We offer this platform for discussion and debate.