Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

This is not how a global leader behaves

This is not how a global leader behaves

President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky meet in the Oval Office at the White House on February 28, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Since the end of World War II, American leaders - left, right, and center - have upheld certain irrevocable principles. Among them: unwavering support for democracy, respect for allies, and leadership on the world stage.

On Friday, those principles fell in disgrace.


In a shameful and embarrassing display at the White House, President Donald Trump mimicked President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine. It was shameful and embarrassing.

President Trump and Vice President JD Vance accused Zelenskyy of being “disrespectful” during a confrontational visit to the White House on Friday that was on the edge of a shouting match. At one point, Trump said the Ukrainian president was “gambling with World War III,” and at the end of the meeting, as tensions rose, Trump said to Zelenskyy, regarding Russia talks: “You either make a deal, or we are out.”

This column is very difficult for me to write. As the co-publisher of a non-partisan daily news platform, I strive to be objective. On February 20th, co-publisher Kristina Becvar and I wrote a column in The Fulcrum entitled “Do Trump’s Goals Justify his Words and Actions.”

In that column, we addressed a challenge we face as a non-partisan publication.

“Our challenge as a publication, dedicated to keeping our readers informed so we can repair our democracy and make it live and work in our everyday lives, is not to be overly reactive or partisan. At the same time, we must not ignore the dangers of the administration's degrading, hostile, and accusatory language and actions when they occur, while also acknowledging inappropriate responses when they occur.”

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

We went on to say:

“It is easy to be reactive to statements like this. It is, perhaps, even imperative that The Fulcrum calls out such dangerous language used by Trump and Musk and do the same should members of Congress from the other party make similar comments. However, strongly admonishing abhorrent words or actions while, at the same time, acknowledging some degree of truth in the underlying action are not mutually exclusive. Finding where that truth remains is one of our key objectives.”

Today is one of those days in which it is imperative that we as a people do not ignore uncivil behavior !!!!

This week, Hugo Balta, executive editor of The Fulcrum, wrote a column stating, "in an era of increasing political polarization, the need for civility in politics has never been greater. Engaging in constructive and respectful dialogue is essential for maintaining a healthy democracy, fostering unity, and ensuring that governments function effectively. ”

What we witnessed in the White House was the antithesis of the constructive and respectful dialogue that Balta spoke of.

For generations, U.S. foreign policy has been built on key pillars. They have not always been applied perfectly but have served as guiding principles for leaders regardless of party affiliation. Since World War II, the U.S. has:

  • Stood as a strong advocate for democratic governance and the protection of human rights around the world.
  • Made the protection of the safety and security of the United States and its allies a top priority, including efforts to combat terrorism, prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and address cyber threats.
  • Worked with other nations and international organizations to address global challenges such as climate change, pandemics, and regional conflicts.
  • Maintained strong alliances and partnerships, such as those with NATO and other allies, to ensure collective security and mutual defense.
  • Used diplomatic efforts and foreign aid as key tools in building relationships, preventing conflicts, and fostering development in other countries.

This is all crumbling before our eyes, and I am deeply concerned and saddened.

Strength and winning are important for the United States. President Trump was elected to solve the serious problems facing Americans, and I respect his efforts to do so.

But what are we as a nation if everything is about winning? What are we as a nation if everything is a negotiation? Leadership without respect is dangerous.

Winning with honor is not a new thought. Albert Einstein said: "The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.” Mahatma Gandhi echoed the sentiment: "The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its weakest members are treated."

As the world's most powerful nation, we will not be judged by how we throw our muscle and power around. Ultimately, we will be judged by how we respect all people and all nations by fostering goodwill, cooperation, and mutual growth.

The fifth President of the United States, James Monroe, sums up my feelings on this very sad day for me.

"National honor is national property of the highest value. The sentiment in the mind of every citizen is national strength. It ought, therefore to be cherished."

Today, national honor was nowhere to be found in the White House.

David Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

SUGGESTION:

Do Trump’s Goals Justify His Words and Actions?

Is Civility in Politics Possible?

Read More

The Evolving Social Contract: From Common Good to Contemporary Practice

An illustration of hands putting together a puzzle.

Getty Images, cienpies

The Evolving Social Contract: From Common Good to Contemporary Practice

The concept of the common good in American society has undergone a remarkable transformation since the nation's founding. What began as a clear, if contested, vision of collective welfare has splintered into something far more complex and individualistic. This shift reflects changing times and a fundamental reimagining of what we owe each other as citizens and human beings.

The nation’s progenitors wrestled with this very question. They drew heavily from Enlightenment thinkers like John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who saw the social contract as a sacred covenant between citizens and their government. But they also pulled from deeper wells—the Puritan concept of the covenant community, the classical Republican tradition of civic virtue, and the Christian ideal of serving one's neighbor. These threads wove into something uniquely American: a vision of the common good that balances individual liberty with collective responsibility.

Keep ReadingShow less
We’ve Collectively Created the Federal Education Collapse

Students in a classroom.

Getty Images, Maskot

We’ve Collectively Created the Federal Education Collapse

“If we make money the object of man-training, we shall develop money-makers but not necessarily men.” - W.E.B. Du Bois

The current state of public education has many confused, anxious, and even fearful. Depending on the day, I feel any combination of the above, among other less-than-ideal adjectives. Simply, the future is uncertain. Schools are simultaneously cutting budgets and trying to remain relevant, all during an increasingly tense political climate.

Keep ReadingShow less
Recent Republican policies and proposals limiting legal immigration and legal immigrants' benefits and rights

An oversized gavel surrounded by people.

Getty Images, J Studios

Recent Republican policies and proposals limiting legal immigration and legal immigrants' benefits and rights

In a recent post we quoted a journalist describing the Republican Party as anti-immigration. Many of our readers wrote back angrily to say that the Republican party is only opposed to immigrants who are present illegally.

But that's not true. And we're not shy of telling it like it is.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Importance of Respecting Court Orders
brown wooden chess piece on brown book

The Importance of Respecting Court Orders

The most important question in American politics today is whether Donald Trump will respect court orders. Judges have repeatedly ruled against his administration.

But will he listen?

Keep ReadingShow less