Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

This is not how a global leader behaves

Opinion

This is not how a global leader behaves

President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky meet in the Oval Office at the White House on February 28, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Since the end of World War II, American leaders - left, right, and center - have upheld certain irrevocable principles. Among them: unwavering support for democracy, respect for allies, and leadership on the world stage.

On Friday, those principles fell in disgrace.


In a shameful and embarrassing display at the White House, President Donald Trump mimicked President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine. It was shameful and embarrassing.

President Trump and Vice President JD Vance accused Zelenskyy of being “disrespectful” during a confrontational visit to the White House on Friday that was on the edge of a shouting match. At one point, Trump said the Ukrainian president was “gambling with World War III,” and at the end of the meeting, as tensions rose, Trump said to Zelenskyy, regarding Russia talks: “You either make a deal, or we are out.”

This column is very difficult for me to write. As the co-publisher of a non-partisan daily news platform, I strive to be objective. On February 20th, co-publisher Kristina Becvar and I wrote a column in The Fulcrum entitled “Do Trump’s Goals Justify his Words and Actions.”

In that column, we addressed a challenge we face as a non-partisan publication.

“Our challenge as a publication, dedicated to keeping our readers informed so we can repair our democracy and make it live and work in our everyday lives, is not to be overly reactive or partisan. At the same time, we must not ignore the dangers of the administration's degrading, hostile, and accusatory language and actions when they occur, while also acknowledging inappropriate responses when they occur.”

We went on to say:

“It is easy to be reactive to statements like this. It is, perhaps, even imperative that The Fulcrum calls out such dangerous language used by Trump and Musk and do the same should members of Congress from the other party make similar comments. However, strongly admonishing abhorrent words or actions while, at the same time, acknowledging some degree of truth in the underlying action are not mutually exclusive. Finding where that truth remains is one of our key objectives.”

Today is one of those days in which it is imperative that we as a people do not ignore uncivil behavior !!!!

This week, Hugo Balta, executive editor of The Fulcrum, wrote a columnstating, "in an era of increasing political polarization, the need for civility in politics has never been greater. Engaging in constructive and respectful dialogue is essential for maintaining a healthy democracy, fostering unity, and ensuring that governments function effectively. ”

What we witnessed in the White House was the antithesis of the constructive and respectful dialogue that Balta spoke of.

For generations, U.S. foreign policy has been built on key pillars. They have not always been applied perfectly but have served as guiding principles for leaders regardless of party affiliation. Since World War II, the U.S. has:

  • Stood as a strong advocate for democratic governance and the protection of human rights around the world.
  • Made the protection of the safety and security of the United States and its allies a top priority, including efforts to combat terrorism, prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and address cyber threats.
  • Worked with other nations and international organizations to address global challenges such as climate change, pandemics, and regional conflicts.
  • Maintained strong alliances and partnerships, such as those with NATO and other allies, to ensure collective security and mutual defense.
  • Used diplomatic efforts and foreign aid as key tools in building relationships, preventing conflicts, and fostering development in other countries.

This is all crumbling before our eyes, and I am deeply concerned and saddened.

Strength and winning are important for the United States. President Trump was elected to solve the serious problems facing Americans, and I respect his efforts to do so.

But what are we as a nation if everything is about winning? What are we as a nation if everything is a negotiation? Leadership without respect is dangerous.

Winning with honor is not a new thought. Albert Einstein said: "The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.” Mahatma Gandhi echoed the sentiment: "The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its weakest members are treated."

As the world's most powerful nation, we will not be judged by how we throw our muscle and power around. Ultimately, we will be judged by how we respect all people and all nations by fostering goodwill, cooperation, and mutual growth.

The fifth President of the United States, James Monroe, sums up my feelings on this very sad day for me.

"National honor is national property of the highest value. The sentiment in the mind of every citizen is national strength. It ought, therefore to be cherished."

Today, national honor was nowhere to be found in the White House.

David Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

SUGGESTION:

Do Trump’s Goals Justify His Words and Actions?

Is Civility in Politics Possible?

Read More

Communication concept with multi colored abstract people icons.

Research shows that emotional, cognitive, and social mechanisms drive both direct and indirect contact, offering scalable ways to reduce political polarization.

Getty Images, Eoneren

“Direct” and “Indirect” Contact Methods Likely Work in Similar Ways, so They Should Both Be Effective

In a previous article, we argued that efforts to improve the political environment should reach Americans as media consumers, in addition to seeking public participation. Reaching Americans as media consumers uses media like film, TV, and social media to change what Americans see and hear about fellow Americans across the political spectrum. Participant-based efforts include dialogues and community-based activities that require active involvement.

In this article, we show that the mechanisms underlying each type of approach are quite similar. The categories of mechanisms we cover are emotional, cognitive, relational, and repetitive. We use the terms from the academic literature, “direct” and “indirect” contact, which are fairly similar to participant and media consumer approaches, respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less
Millions Could Lose Housing Aid Under Trump Plan

Photo illustration by Alex Bandoni/ProPublica. Source images: Chicago History Museum and eobrazy

Getty Images

Millions Could Lose Housing Aid Under Trump Plan

Some 4 million people could lose federal housing assistance under new plans from the Trump administration, according to experts who reviewed drafts of two unpublished rules obtained by ProPublica. The rules would pave the way for a host of restrictions long sought by conservatives, including time limits on living in public housing, work requirements for many people receiving federal housing assistance and the stripping of aid from entire families if one member of the household is in the country illegally.

The first Trump administration tried and failed to implement similar policies, and renewed efforts have been in the works since early in the president’s second term. Now, the documents obtained by ProPublica lay out how the administration intends to overhaul major housing programs that serve some of the nation’s poorest residents, with sweeping reforms that experts and advocates warn will weaken the social safety net amid historically high rents, home prices and homelessness.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump’s Ultimatums and the Erosion of Presidential Credibility

Donald Trump

YouTube

Trump’s Ultimatums and the Erosion of Presidential Credibility

On Friday, October 3rd, President Donald Trump issued a dramatic ultimatum on Truth Social, stating this is the “LAST CHANCE” for Hamas to accept a 20-point peace proposal backed by Israel and several Arab nations. The deadline, set for Sunday at 6:00 p.m. EDT, was framed as a final opportunity to avoid catastrophic consequences. Trump warned that if Hamas rejected the deal, “all HELL, like no one has ever seen before, will break out against Hamas,” and that its fighters would be “hunted down and killed.”

Ordinarily, when a president sets a deadline, the world takes him seriously. In history, Presidential deadlines signal resolve, seriousness, and the weight of executive authority. But with Trump, the pattern is different. His history of issuing ultimatums and then quietly backing off has dulled the edge of his threats and raised questions about their strategic value.

Keep ReadingShow less