Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Federal workers say they're proud of their work but would also go elsewhere

Federal employees sound off

Federal employees have been battered by government shutdowns and abuse from elected officials. A new survey finds them still proud of what they do but willing to leave government service.

wildpixel/Getty Images
While federal workers are proud of what they do, nearly half would leave if they could get a similar job elsewhere, according to a wide-ranging survey of government employees released last week.

The survey comes at a critical time for the federal workforce, which is aging rapidly. Federal workers older than 60 outnumber those younger than 30 by nearly two to one, according to the Office of Personnel Management. Job satisfaction and retention are central indicators that the people who actually operate American democracy have some confidence it's functioning as intended.


The new survey, by Eagle Hill Consulting, was conducted online in May and June. It echoes a survey of federal employee attitudes published by OPM last month that found a similar contrast between forms of job satisfaction: 90 percent told the government personnel agency they view the work they do as important, but less than half said they are satisfied with the policies and practices of their senior leaders.

The new survey found a variety of examples of dissatisfaction by the 2.1 million civilian federal employees and the 1.4 million active military workers. Among the findings:

  • Three-fourths say their organization has core values but only 55 percent say the organization's policies align with those values.
  • Only 61 percent of federal workers trust their direct supervisor, and a slightly higher share of employees distrust top leaders in their organization (40 percent) than trust them (38 percent). This stands in contrast with a national survey of private sector employees by Eagle Hill that found 58 percent trust their executive leadership.

In a report containing the poll results, the consulting firm argues for improving the culture of the federal workplace. "A strong culture is key to developing and retaining an engaged, productive workforce," the report states.


Read More

CT election security group honors 10 years of fighting for democracy

A 2021 poll shows 73% of Connecticut voters supported the amendment giving all voters the option to vote by absentee ballot without needing an excuse.

(Adobe Stock)

CT election security group honors 10 years of fighting for democracy

A Connecticut voting-rights group is celebrating its 10th anniversary.

Bridgeport Generation Now has worked to broaden voting access and ensure fairer elections for city residents. Some of its most important work came at a time when many Bridgeport residents felt their votes didn't matter, pointing to absentee ballot fraud as the cause.

Keep ReadingShow less
Court’s Slaughter Decision Hands Presidents Sweeping New Authority

U.S. President Donald Trump in the Oval Office at the White House on July 24, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Photo by Eric Lee/Getty Images)

Court’s Slaughter Decision Hands Presidents Sweeping New Authority

This series from Lawyers Defending American Democracy connects the words of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution to current events that threaten democracy and the justice system. Each piece highlights the unique responsibility lawyers carry—through their oath, professional obligations, and roles in their communities—to help the public understand what’s at risk and to speak out when democratic principles are under threat. LDAD’s call to action is straightforward: as the Founders once did, we must recognize threats to constitutional values, demand accountability, and act to defend them.

In its recent decision in Trump v. Slaughter, a divided Supreme Court approved an expansive use of presidential power that upsets the Constitutional balance between Congress and the President. The Court approved the President’s summary dismissal of agency leaders (in this case, commissioners of the Federal Trade Commission), notwithstanding a statute signed by a former President and the Court's own precedent specifically forbidding such dismissals. This decision will further politicize and weaponize much of our federal government.

Keep ReadingShow less