Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Friendly fire: Interparty fighting ensues to find the next president

Friendly fire: Interparty fighting ensues to find the next president
Getty Images

Steve Corbin is Professor Emeritus of Marketing at the University of Northern Iowa.

Betting on political contests is prohibited in America. Yet, gambling organizations throughout the world strongly predict Joe Biden (D) and Donald Trump (R) will be the 2024 presidential election contenders.


One would think card carrying Democrats would be all in to support Biden’s re-election campaign and die-hard Republicans would earnestly wager the former president to return to the White House. But, hold on.

One group of Democrats is opposing Joe’s re-election bid and five groups – plus 74 prominent Republicans -- are vehemently opposed to Trump’s candidacy.

The left-wing group RootsAction, worked very hard in 2020 to persuade progressives to support Joe Biden. Politico reports RootsAction has turned about face and emailed 1.2 million Americans on a “#DontRunJoe” campaign. “Step Aside Joe” is their newest campaign.

Sorry RootsAction, but two idioms come to mind: that ship has sailed and the horse has left the barn. Joe Biden will be the D’s candidate.

While Donald Trump leads all polls as the GOP presidential candidate, the title of The Hill’s May 19 article says a lot: Anti-Trump Republicans increasingly desperate to shake up race.

The conservative advocacy group Americans For Prosperity, founded by the billionaire industrialists Koch brothers and composed of four million activists, support anyone but Trump in the GOP primary race.

Video testimonials of 901 registered GOP voters throughout America stating why they oppose Mr. Trump for the 2024 election can be viewed on Republican Voters Against Trump’s web page.

Former U.S. Rep. David McIntosh (Indiana), president of the influential Club For Growth mega donor group, invited Republican candidates – except Donald Trump – to its Win It Back PAC summit last March.

A fourth anti-Trump re-election group, Republican Accountability Project, launched a $500,000 ad campaign on Fox News’ Hannity and Fox & Friends talk shows that depicts clips of Trump at the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection, stating “Trump did this. He’ll do it again, unless he faces consequences.”

43 Alumni for America, composed of people who served in the George W. Bush (Rep.) administration, publicly proclaimed “Our democracy, fragile as it is, cannot endure another Trump presidency. 43 Alumni for America stands strongly in opposition to Donald Trump’s candidacy.”

A Google search “List of Republicans who oppose the Donald Trump 2024 presidential campaign” reveals 74 prominent individuals -- with 113 reference citations – who have announced their anti-Trump re-election stance. The list includes one former U.S. president, two former vice-presidents, eight cabinet-level officials, five current and four former U.S. Senators, seven current and 13 former U.S. Representatives, five current and eight former governors, one former and three current statewide officials, one former federal judge and 16 other public figures . . . all Republicans.

For America’s democracy to survive, we need two viable political parties, each with a credible and trustworthy presidential candidate. On August 1, the editorial page of The Kansas City Star stated, “Republicans, our democracy depends on your willingness to read the Trump indictment.”

For the MAGA Republicans who feel the respective New York, Georgia and federal justice departments are weaponized against Mr. Trump, Bill Tubbs’ Aug. 9 North Scott Press op-ed drives home an important point: “… 100% of the supporting evidence [of the indictments] comes not from Democrats, but from Republicans who were close to the president and had much to gain by his re-election.” If anyone is weaponized, it’s Republicans against their like-kin, Donald Trump.

The five indictments (91 felony charges) in four different jurisdictions against criminal defendant Donald John Trump that span the pre-2016 election, during his presidency and post-2020 election time period only strengthens why five GOP groups and 74 influential Republicans oppose Trump seeking re-election.

If this anti-Trump endeavor does shake up the race, Virginia Governor Glenn Young (Rep.) might be a worthy candidate to save-the-day for the Grand Old Party.

Speaking of “old,” the irony is obvious of a Biden vs. Young matchup on Nov. 5, 2024 . . . just saying.

Sources:

1) Matt Haines, Biden reelection bid prompts concerns among many Democrats, VOA News, May 1, 2023

2) David Siders, Progressive group to press Biden not to run in 2024, Politico, July 11, 2022

3) Martin Pengelly, `No Republican party’ in US today, says anti-Trump conservative judge, The Guardian, Aug. 9, 2023

4) Michelle L. Price, Conservative groups look beyond Trump for 2024 GOP nominee, Associated Press, Feb. 7, 2023

5) Ed Mazza, Republic group demands `Consequences’ for Trump in scathing Fox News ad, HuffPost, Aug. 4, 2023

6) Steve Benen, GOP senator offers her party excellent advice on Trump indictment, MSNBC MaddowBlog, Aug. 3, 2023

7) Wikipedia, List of Republicans who oppose the Donald Trump 2024 presidential campaign (with 113 reference citations)

8) Alexander Bolton, Anti-Trump Republicans increasingly desperate to shake up race, The Hill, May 19, 2023

9) Bill Tubbs, Democracy is on trial: Let the people watch!, North Scott Press, Aug. 9, 2023

10) Kate Bachelder Odell, A Republican renaissance in Virginia?, The Wall Street Journal, Aug. 12-23, 2023

11) Jonah Goldberg, Trump’s indictment reflects failures of populist passions, Waterloo-Cedar Falls Courier, Aug. 10, 2023

12) Bill Allison, Charles Koch-tied group seeks to block Trump from GOP nomination, Bloomberg, July 31, 2023

13) Ed Mazza, Republican group to run blistering anti-Trump ad on Fox News during prime time, HuffPost, June 13, 2023

Disclosure: Steve is a non-paid freelance opinion editor and guest columnist contributor (circa 2013) to 172 newspapers in 32 states who receives no remuneration, funding or endorsement from any for-profit business, not-for-profit organization, political action committee or political party



Read More

Post office trucks parked in a lot.

Changes to USPS postmarking, ranked choice voting fights, costly runoffs, and gerrymandering reveal growing cracks in U.S. election systems.

Photo by Sam LaRussa on Unsplash.

2026 Will See an Increase in Rejected Mail-In Ballots - Here's Why

While the media has kept people’s focus on the Epstein files, Venezuela, or a potential invasion of Greenland, the United States Postal Service adopted a new rule that will have a broad impact on Americans – especially in an election year in which millions of people will vote by mail.

The rule went into effect on Christmas Eve and has largely flown under the radar, with the exception of some local coverage, a report from PBS News, and Independent Voter News. It states that items mailed through USPS will no longer be postmarked on the day it is received.

Keep ReadingShow less
Congress Must Stop Media Consolidation Before Local Journalism Collapses
black video camera
Photo by Matt C on Unsplash

Congress Must Stop Media Consolidation Before Local Journalism Collapses

This week, I joined a coalition of journalists in Washington, D.C., to speak directly with lawmakers about a crisis unfolding in plain sight: the rapid disappearance of local, community‑rooted journalism. The advocacy day, organized by the Hispanic Technology & Telecommunications Partnership (HTTP), brought together reporters and media leaders who understand that the future of local news is inseparable from the future of American democracy.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

Keep ReadingShow less
People wearing vests with "ICE" and "Police" on the back.

The latest shutdown deal kept government open while exposing Congress’s reliance on procedural oversight rather than structural limits on ICE.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

A Shutdown Averted, and a Narrow Window Into Congress’s ICE Dilemma

Congress’s latest shutdown scare ended the way these episodes usually do: with a stopgap deal, a sigh of relief, and little sense that the underlying conflict had been resolved. But buried inside the agreement was a revealing maneuver. While most of the federal government received longer-term funding, the Department of Homeland Security, and especially Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), was given only a short-term extension. That asymmetry was deliberate. It preserved leverage over one of the most controversial federal agencies without triggering a prolonged shutdown, while also exposing the narrow terrain on which Congress is still willing to confront executive power. As with so many recent budget deals, the decision emerged less from open debate than from late-stage negotiations compressed into the final hours before the deadline.

How the Deal Was Framed

Democrats used the funding deadline to force a conversation about ICE’s enforcement practices, but they were careful about how that conversation was structured. Rather than reopening the far more combustible debate over immigration levels, deportation priorities, or statutory authority, they framed the dispute as one about law-enforcement standards, specifically transparency, accountability, and oversight.

Keep ReadingShow less
ICE Monitors Should Become Election Monitors: And so Must You
A pole with a sign that says polling station
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

ICE Monitors Should Become Election Monitors: And so Must You

The brutality of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the related cohort of federal officers in Minneapolis spurred more than 30,000 stalwart Minnesotans to step forward in January and be trained as monitors. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s demands to Minnesota’s Governor demonstrate that the ICE surge is linked to elections, and other ICE-related threats, including Steve Bannon calling for ICE agents deployment to polling stations, make clear that elections should be on the monitoring agenda in Minnesota and across the nation.

A recent exhortation by the New York Times Editorial Board underscores the need for citizen action to defend elections and outlines some steps. Additional avenues are also available. My three decades of experience with international and citizen election observation in numerous countries demonstrates that monitoring safeguards trustworthy elections and promotes public confidence in them - both of which are needed here and now in the US.

Keep ReadingShow less