Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

One Georgian's crusade to clean the voter rolls spurs a lawsuit

Georgia voting location

Election officials in DeKalb County, Ga., "have encouraged, solicited, and acted on extraordinary voter challenges that extend beyond the routine list maintenance activities that are required by state and federal law," a suit contends.

Jessica McGowan/Getty Images

A Georgia man is doing his part to keep the voter rolls clean. Or he's a guy with too much time on his hands.

Either way, someone named Lawrence Hoskins is a central figure in the latest voting rights lawsuit in the Peach State. He appears on page 14 of a 195-page complaint filed by civil rights groups against the Board of Registration and Elections in DeKalb County, a decidedly Democratic slice of Atlanta and its suburbs to the east.

The suit, filed Wednesday in federal court, alleges the election officials violated federal law and constitutional voting rights protections by failing to do enough to confirm the registration information of more than 50 people and then notify them before they were dropped from the rolls in the past two years.

Hoskins' role is perfectly legal under state law, which permits a registered voter to challenge another person's voting qualifications by filing a written complaint with a county.


So, he did just that: According to the suit, the board reviewed "approximately 100 challenges" Hoskins filed after poring over Postal Service change of address data, which he acquired from "a company in New York," as well as "home-purchase data" to identify people who had potentially moved. He then conducted "door-to-door canvassing" and presented his findings to the elections board in DeKalb County, which is the state's fourth most populous at almost 700,000 people.

State law mandates that boards hold a hearing to consider such a challenge and notify those with eligibility under question. The board then determines whether to keep people on the rolls.

The lawsuit doesn't challenge what Hoskins did, only how the board responded to him.

Election officials there "have encouraged, solicited, and acted on extraordinary voter challenges that extend beyond the routine list maintenance activities that are required by state and federal law" since 2018, the suit contends. Those measures include actively soliciting challenges to voters in Decatur, the county seat, where Hillary Clinton got five out of every six votes in 2016 despite losing statewide.

Two telephone calls to the only Lawrence Hoskins with a listed number in the Atlanta area were not returned Thursday.

The lawsuit also points to challenges brought against seven people whose address was listed as a place where homeless people are able to stay overnight and pick up their mail. An employee of the center who also serves on the elections board filed the challenge.

The suit hinges in part on whether the county adhered to the requirements of a federal law prohibiting the dropping of a person from the rolls unless they've been sent a notice and subsequently failed to vote in the next two federal elections, which didn't happen for those who were removed, according to the complaint.

"All counties in Georgia should be on notice that they cannot skirt the requirements of federal law with impunity," Sophia Lin Lakin, deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Voting Rights Project, said in a statement.

The ACLU and the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Georgia State Conference of the NAACP and the Georgia Coalition for the People's Agenda.


Read More

Michelle Martinez, University of Michigan (U-M)

Michelle Martinez, the inaugural director of the Tishman Center for Social Justice and the Environment at the University of Michigan (U-M)

At the University of Michigan, Environmental Justice Starts With Who Gets to Decide

When Michelle Martinez talks about climate change, she does not begin with temperatures, emissions, or models and projections.

She begins with people. For Martinez, the inaugural director of the Tishman Center for Social Justice and the Environment at the University of Michigan (U-M), climate change is already being experienced through the housing, economic, and political crises confronting communities today. And that makes climate justice inseparable from a more basic civic question: Who has the power to decide what happens to a community?

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand of Man Pointing to an I Voted Sticker

Close Up Hand of Man Pointing to an I Voted Sticker Place on His Shirt

Getty Images

Voters Want Results. The Midterms Made That Clear.

The 2026 midterm elections were never going to be a referendum on one person. They were always a test of whether Americans believed their leaders were addressing the issues affecting their daily lives.

Voters delivered a clear message in the midterm elections. The results were historic. Democrats not only reclaimed control of the House of Representatives, but also captured a majority in the U.S. Senate.

Keep ReadingShow less
A woman protesting holds a sign that readds, "Our Raise! Labor Safety Costs, surrounded by other people.

Uber drivers participate in a rally outside of the Uber Headquarters on January 05, 2023 in New York City. Uber drivers in NYC participated in a 24-hour strike outside of the company's NYC headquarters

Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

21st-Century Gig Workers Need Portable Benefits

In recent years, the US labor force has been undergoing a fundamental transformation. In today’s "Uber economy," gig workers, freelancers, contractors, temps, permatemps, remote workers after COVID, and so-called “independent workers” have been championed by Silicon Valley and Wall Street as the “new way to work”—the wave of the future, especially with AI changing the nature of work itself.

Many US consumers have driven in an Uber taxi, but don’t realize that most drivers earn below minimum wage after accounting for vehicle expenses, gas, maintenance, and unpaid time waiting for passengers. Those drivers are so-called “independent contractors,” so the billion-dollar Uber is not responsible for providing healthcare, Social Security contributions, workers' compensation, or unemployment compensation, not to mention sick leave or vacation pay.

Keep ReadingShow less