Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

One Georgian's crusade to clean the voter rolls spurs a lawsuit

Georgia voting location

Election officials in DeKalb County, Ga., "have encouraged, solicited, and acted on extraordinary voter challenges that extend beyond the routine list maintenance activities that are required by state and federal law," a suit contends.

Jessica McGowan/Getty Images

A Georgia man is doing his part to keep the voter rolls clean. Or he's a guy with too much time on his hands.

Either way, someone named Lawrence Hoskins is a central figure in the latest voting rights lawsuit in the Peach State. He appears on page 14 of a 195-page complaint filed by civil rights groups against the Board of Registration and Elections in DeKalb County, a decidedly Democratic slice of Atlanta and its suburbs to the east.

The suit, filed Wednesday in federal court, alleges the election officials violated federal law and constitutional voting rights protections by failing to do enough to confirm the registration information of more than 50 people and then notify them before they were dropped from the rolls in the past two years.

Hoskins' role is perfectly legal under state law, which permits a registered voter to challenge another person's voting qualifications by filing a written complaint with a county.


So, he did just that: According to the suit, the board reviewed "approximately 100 challenges" Hoskins filed after poring over Postal Service change of address data, which he acquired from "a company in New York," as well as "home-purchase data" to identify people who had potentially moved. He then conducted "door-to-door canvassing" and presented his findings to the elections board in DeKalb County, which is the state's fourth most populous at almost 700,000 people.

State law mandates that boards hold a hearing to consider such a challenge and notify those with eligibility under question. The board then determines whether to keep people on the rolls.

The lawsuit doesn't challenge what Hoskins did, only how the board responded to him.

Election officials there "have encouraged, solicited, and acted on extraordinary voter challenges that extend beyond the routine list maintenance activities that are required by state and federal law" since 2018, the suit contends. Those measures include actively soliciting challenges to voters in Decatur, the county seat, where Hillary Clinton got five out of every six votes in 2016 despite losing statewide.

Two telephone calls to the only Lawrence Hoskins with a listed number in the Atlanta area were not returned Thursday.

The lawsuit also points to challenges brought against seven people whose address was listed as a place where homeless people are able to stay overnight and pick up their mail. An employee of the center who also serves on the elections board filed the challenge.

The suit hinges in part on whether the county adhered to the requirements of a federal law prohibiting the dropping of a person from the rolls unless they've been sent a notice and subsequently failed to vote in the next two federal elections, which didn't happen for those who were removed, according to the complaint.

"All counties in Georgia should be on notice that they cannot skirt the requirements of federal law with impunity," Sophia Lin Lakin, deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Voting Rights Project, said in a statement.

The ACLU and the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Georgia State Conference of the NAACP and the Georgia Coalition for the People's Agenda.


Read More

Business meeting, blurred background and people in office for teamwork, collaboration and planning

Another recruitment drive won’t fix a nonprofit board. A practical guide to sharing real decision-making power with diverse members: acknowledge, affirm, act.

Jacob Wackerhausen/Getty Images

Before Recruiting Diverse Board Members, Examine Who Holds Power

Nonprofit leaders keep asking me where they will find the next generation of diverse board talent. My question is what those leaders will be allowed to change once they arrive. In this piece, I outline concrete steps boards can take to ensure diverse members have real opportunities to shape organizational decision-making and to translate good intentions into meaningful progress.

In my board service and consulting work, I hear the concern from executives and grassroots activists alike. They worry about recruiting successors, sustaining funding, and governing organizations whose work increasingly depends on partnerships beyond their own walls. I share those concerns. I also wonder whether another recruitment initiative will solve what troubles them.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Pennsylvania state capitol building.

The Pennsylvania state capitol building.

jimfeng/Getty Images

Pennsylvania’s Bipartisan Exchange Is Rebuilding Trust in Governance

The University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics has nearly 40 years of experience working with legislators from different political parties, and it is building on this history by drawing on lessons from the successful American Congressional Exchange model, begun in 2018 at the Bipartisan Policy Center, and from state exchanges now underway in Minnesota and Michigan. The University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics, in collaboration with the Bridge Alliance, has launched the Pennsylvania Legislative Exchange.

This state-based, systematic approach is designed to foster better relationships and build trust across the political aisle with the following guiding principles:

Keep ReadingShow less
Shadow on a wall of Judge hitting gavel in court, concept of justice, law, and legal protection

DOJ lawsuits in Alaska and California preview post-Election Day fights over certification and seating winners. Here’s how officials and voters can prepare.

Aitor Diago / Getty Images

The Lawsuits Will Lose. The Delays Will Still Win.

Less than two weeks before Election Day, President Trump’s Justice Department asked a federal court to stop Alaska from certifying its U.S. Senate race if Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan loses to Democrat Mary Peltola. The lawsuit claims that a second candidate on the ballot, Daniel J. Sullivan, will confuse voters. That argument went nowhere in June, when the Alaska Supreme Court ruled that the state had no legal way to remove him from the ballot. Asked about the suit, the president took credit. “I’m the one that said do it,” he told reporters.

Alongside the Alaska suit, the Trump administration sued California to keep the state from counting mail ballots from 20,000 people it calls “likely” noncitizens. Over the summer, the Department of Homeland Security put that number at 190,000. Legal experts expect both suits to fail, as so many suits like them have. Still, Alaska and California give us an early look at what the weeks after November 3rd could bring: recount demands, calls to review or throw out ballots, and pressure to delay seating winners.

Keep ReadingShow less