Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Can AI Fill the Silence for Aging-Abroad Seniors?

Can AI Fill the Silence for Aging-Abroad Seniors?
man and woman walking on road during daytime

Since 2023, 30.8% of King County households have reported speaking a foreign language other than English at home. The demographic shift indicates that residents aged 65 and older are projected to increase by 85% between 2020 and 2035, according to Age Friendly Seattle.

Among them, a growing number are immigrants with limited English proficiency, often isolated from digital tools and access to public services.


According to the National Institute of Health (NIH), over 25 million people in the United States are bilingual yet have limited English proficiency (LEP). When accessing healthcare services, limited communication between care providers and patients can lead to adverse outcomes, including risks to patient safety or even death.

On March 1, 2025, President Donald Trump issued Executive Order (EO) 14224, officially designating English as the U.S. national language — a historic first at the federal level and canceled EO 13166, signed by Clinton, which obliged federal agencies to offer language access for individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP).

While EO 14224 is not explicitly against multilingual services, it abolished longstanding laws and policies that ensure federal agencies work to eliminate discrimination against LEP individuals.

Roughly 13% of King County seniors have reported facing language barriers, often relying on family members or community centers to navigate basic to vital life tasks, such as making a doctor's appointment, ordering food, filling up gas, and asking for directions.

"The language barrier is one of the most critical issues for our older adult clients," said Meeran Sung, a case manager at the Korean Community Service Center (KCSC). "Older folks come to me for help in private matters like phone bills or apartment documents, but when it comes to government programs like food stamps or housing, it gets harder. I have to meet with them one-on-one, explain the programs in their language, and help them fill out applications."

Many immigrants who often relocate to be with their children face inevitable barriers to access as they "age abroad," which often exposes them to a high risk of dementia, social isolation, and a lack of culturally appropriate care.

"Many older adults say their children are too busy to help," Sung said. "We often hear about conflict between first-generation parents and second-generation children, especially when cultural differences or language barriers exist. Many older immigrants don't want to burden their children, so they avoid asking for help even when needed."

Language barriers also complicate life for families in the "sandwich generation," where adult children must juggle raising their own children while caring for aging parents.

"There are a lot of challenges for middle-aged folks who are both parenting and caregiving," said Grace Lee, a program coordinator at KCSC. "They feel responsible but often don't have the right resources or time to give their parents the care they need."

The United Nations Population Division Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) reports that by 2050, one in six people globally will be over 65.

As the global aging issue grows louder, AI-based health tools have evolved into fascinating approaches to elderly care.

The demand for AI-powered community services that utilize AI to alleviate caretakers' burden and enhance their responsibilities has been increasing, ensuring seniors have access to all aspects of communal life without facing discrimination, isolation, abuse, or other forms of exploitation.

According to the NIH, AI-based health technologies can detect early warning signs of disease and offer personalized, prompt treatment plans based on precise data analysis.

For instance, an automated home safety wearable device, such as an Apple Watch, tracks and analyzes data from the user's vital signs and activity level, sending real-time alerts to designated family members or medical agents without human intervention when it detects something unusual based on the electronic health record.

Additionally, telehealth platforms are revolutionizing long-limited access to 1:1 doctor consultations for aging and younger populations in remote or underserved areas.

Lindsay Kim is an administrative officer, caseworker, legislative & research assistant, and freelance student journalist studying at the University of Washington.

Lindsay was a student in Hugo Balta's solutions journalism class. Balta is the Fulcrum's executive editor and the publisher of the Latino News Network. The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists. Learn more by clicking HERE.

Please help the Fulcrum's NextGen initiatives by donating HERE!

Read More

Veterans’ Care at Risk Under Trump As Hundreds of Doctors and Nurses Reject Working at VA Hospitals
Photo illustration by Lisa Larson-Walker/ProPublica

Veterans’ Care at Risk Under Trump As Hundreds of Doctors and Nurses Reject Working at VA Hospitals

Veterans hospitals are struggling to replace hundreds of doctors and nurses who have left the health care system this year as the Trump administration pursues its pledge to simultaneously slash Department of Veterans Affairs staff and improve care.

Many job applicants are turning down offers, worried that the positions are not stable and uneasy with the overall direction of the agency, according to internal documents examined by ProPublica. The records show nearly 4 in 10 of the roughly 2,000 doctors offered jobs from January through March of this year turned them down. That is quadruple the rate of doctors rejecting offers during the same time period last year.

Keep ReadingShow less
Protecting the U.S. Press: The PRESS Act and What It Could Mean for Journalists

The Protect Reporters from Excessive State Suppression (PRESS) Act aims to fill the national shield law gap by providing two protections for journalists.

Getty Images, Manu Vega

Protecting the U.S. Press: The PRESS Act and What It Could Mean for Journalists

The First Amendment protects journalists during the news-gathering and publication processes. For example, under the First Amendment, reporters cannot be forced to report on an issue. However, the press is not entitled to different legal protections compared to a general member of the public under the First Amendment.

In the United States, there are protections for journalists beyond the First Amendment, including shield laws that protect journalists from pressure to reveal sources or information during news-gathering. 48 states and the District of Columbia have shield laws, but protections vary widely. There is currently no federal shield law. As of 2019, at least 22 journalists have been jailed in the U.S. for refusing to comply with requests to reveal sources of information. Seven other journalists have been jailed and fined for the same reason.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democrats Score Strategic Wins Amid Redistricting Battles

Democrat Donkey is winning arm wrestling match against Republican elephant

AI generated image

Democrats Score Strategic Wins Amid Redistricting Battles

Democrats are quietly building momentum in the 2025 election cycle, notching two key legislative flips in special elections and gaining ground in early polling ahead of the 2026 midterms. While the victories are modest in number, they signal a potential shift in voter sentiment — and a brewing backlash against Republican-led redistricting efforts.

Out of 40 special elections held across the United States so far in 2025, only two seats have changed party control — both flipping from Republican to Democrat.

Keep ReadingShow less
Policing or Occupation? Trump’s Militarizing America’s Cities Sets a Dangerous Precedent

A DC Metropolitan Police Department car is parked near a rally against the Trump Administration's federal takeover of the District of Columbia, outside of the AFL-CIO on August 11, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Policing or Occupation? Trump’s Militarizing America’s Cities Sets a Dangerous Precedent

President Trump announced the activation of hundreds of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., along with the deployment of federal agents—including more than 100 from the FBI. This comes despite Justice Department data showing that violent crime in D.C. fell 35% from 2023 to 2024, reaching its lowest point in over three decades. These aren’t abstract numbers—they paint a picture of a city safer than it has been in a generation, with fewer homicides, assaults, and robberies than at any point since the early 1990s.

The contradiction could not be more glaring: the same president who, on January 6, 2021, stalled for hours as a violent uprising engulfed the Capitol is now rushing to “liberate” a city that—based on federal data—hasn’t been this safe in more than thirty years. Then, when democracy itself was under siege, urgency gave way to dithering; today, with no comparable emergency—only vague claims of lawlessness—he mobilizes troops for a mission that looks less like public safety and more like political theater. The disparity between those two moments is more than irony; it is a blueprint for how power can be selectively applied, depending on whose power is threatened.

Keep ReadingShow less