Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Nonprofit Offers $2,500 Financial Relief As over 6,000  Undocumented Students Lose In-State Tuition

News

Nonprofit Offers $2,500 Financial Relief As over 6,000  Undocumented Students Lose In-State Tuition

Source: Corporate Pero Latinos

Photo provided

Tiffany is one of over 6,000 undocumented students in Florida, affected by the elimination of a 2014 law when the FL Legislature passed SB 2-C, which ended in-state tuition for undocumented students in July.

As a result, the TheDream.US scholarship that she relied on was terminated – making finishing college at the University of Central Florida nearly unattainable. It was initially designed to aid students who arrived in the U.S. as children, such as Tiffany, who came to the U.S. from Honduras with her family at age 11.


“I just felt an overwhelming sense of helplessness,” she said, when the programs designed to support her ended. “It felt like my dreams were crumbling away.”

This September, Tiffany was awarded a $2,500 scholarship thanks to the nonprofit Corporate Pero Latinos (CPL). The fund is designed for undocumented students and recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which provides temporary protection from deportation to individuals who came to the U.S. as children. The nonprofit focuses on providing resources to the immigrant community - with four local chapters nationwide in South Florida, New York City, Seattle, and Chicago.

“I felt an immense sense of relief,” Tiffany, a junior in college, said it helped cover the remaining part of her tuition she was unable to afford. She said her father, who works in construction, and her mother, as a cook, tried to collect extra funds to support her. “Getting this degree, I know I will have a better future,” Tiffany said.

Source: Corporate Pero Latinos

Uncertainty for Undocumented Students

Undocumented FL students who previously paid $26.7 million with an out-of-state tuition waiver now pay over $40 million more for their postsecondary education tuition, according to the Florida Policy Institute. Thousands, like Tiffany, now face a financial hurdle to finish school, and FL colleges would reportedly lose about $15 million annually without those very students.

Professor Susan Sturm, Director of the Center for Institutional and Social Change at Columbia Law School, says the future of everybody depends upon building the capacities of undocumented students.

She describes the legislation to be “driven by fear, by misinformation, and by a scarcity mindset.” Professor Sturm says there “is an assumption that if you include people who haven't been included before, that's going to mean the exclusion of people who are currently struggling to stay supported. I think we have to change our ideas of that kind of power and the way we're allocating our resources.”

Culture, Career, and Community

As a Mexican-American woman, with roots from Laredo, Texas, Sophia Zarate founded the CPL program in 2021 when she moved to New York and noticed a lack of Latinos in corporate America. “I was seeking a community,” she said, “to meet people that could relate to me, both professionally and culturally.”

Now, because of the new legislation, she is committed to growing the scholarship for undocumented young people and creating a pipeline for higher education.

Zarate says she wants to inspire hope for students to “believe in themselves and in humanity, knowing that there are organizations out there trying to create these opportunities for them.”

Source: Corporate Pero Latinos

Bridging Language Barriers

Language barriers and broken pipelines are challenges many immigrants reportedly face. According to a 2024 study, More than a Monolith: The Advancement of Hispanic and Latino/a Talent, “some Spanish speakers said they are discouraged from communicating in Spanish at work, many are tapped for their language skills when it is convenient for their employer.”

Zarate’s program offers free English-language classes and basic computer skills to native Spanish speakers with the help of volunteers. Santiago Gomez Manuel, who is taking the class on weekends at a Mexican restaurant called La Contenta Oeste, where he works, says it's empowered him.

“It changed my life, “ Manuel said. He originally speaks both Spanish and the indigenous language of Tutunaku from Veracruz, Mexico. Manuel says his goal is to return to Veracruz one day to teach the town’s children English.

Professor Sturm says people who have experienced marginalization in the past are “who understand the value of education and who are deeply committed to contributing to our democracy.”

Source: Corporate Pero Latinos

A Pipeline for Opportunity

Tiffany says she aims to become a mechanical engineer focused on sustainability to serve vulnerable communities. “We're just trying to contribute to the economy and help the community that has given us a home,” she said. “We're just students, we're just kids.”

Professor Sturm says there is a need for “providing more financing for students coming into the school, building leadership opportunities and cohorts that would both push and pull students to succeed.”

Corporate Pero Latinos is becoming a pipeline toward opportunity for many immigrants, “it takes a village.” Zarate says she wants “to create impact - it's so much more powerful.”

Tiffany says the scholarship has served as “a reminder that I need to keep pushing forward, no matter how hard the circumstances are.” she said. “I can do this.”

Clarisa Melendez is a bilingual multimedia storyteller who has produced stories for NBC News and Telemundo. Her work often amplifies the voices of underserved communities, from Indigenous youth using AI to preserve native languages to programs supporting children of farmworkers.


Read More

Two groups of glass figures. One red, one blue.

Congressional paralysis is no longer accidental. Polarization has reshaped incentives, hollowed out Congress, and shifted power to the executive.

Getty Images, Andrii Yalanskyi

How Congress Lost Its Capacity to Act and How to Get It Back

In late 2025, Congress fumbled the Affordable Care Act, failing to move a modest stabilization bill through its own procedures and leaving insurers and families facing renewed uncertainty. As the Congressional Budget Office has warned in multiple analyses over the past decade, policy uncertainty increases premiums and reduces insurer participation (see, for example: https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61734). I examined this episode in an earlier Fulcrum article, “Governing by Breakdown: The Cost of Congressional Paralysis,” as a case study in congressional paralysis and leadership failure. The deeper problem, however, runs beyond any single deadline or decision and into the incentives and procedures that now structure congressional authority. Polarization has become so embedded in America’s governing institutions themselves that it shapes how power is exercised and why even routine governance now breaks down.

From Episode to System

The ACA episode wasn’t an anomaly but a symptom. Recent scholarship suggests it reflects a broader structural shift in how Congress operates. In a 2025 academic article available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN), political scientist Dmitrii Lebedev reaches a stark conclusion about the current Congress, noting that the 118th Congress enacted fewer major laws than any in the modern era despite facing multiple time-sensitive policy deadlines (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5346916). Drawing on legislative data, he finds that dysfunction is no longer best understood as partisan gridlock alone. Instead, Congress increasingly exhibits a breakdown of institutional capacity within the governing majority itself. Leadership avoidance, procedural delay, and the erosion of governing norms have become routine features of legislative life rather than temporary responses to crisis.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump’s ‘America First’ is now just imperialism

Donald Trump Jr.' s plane landed in Nuuk, Greenland, where he made a short private visit, weeks after his father, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, suggested Washington annex the autonomous Danish territory.

(Ritzau Scanpix/AFP via Getty Images)

Trump’s ‘America First’ is now just imperialism

In early 2025, before Donald Trump was even sworn into office, he sent a plane with his name in giant letters on it to Nuuk, Greenland, where his son, Don Jr., and other MAGA allies preened for cameras and stomped around the mineral-rich Danish territory that Trump had been casually threatening to invade or somehow acquire like stereotypical American tourists — like they owned it already.

“Don Jr. and my Reps landing in Greenland,” Trump wrote. “The reception has been great. They and the Free World need safety, security, strength, and PEACE! This is a deal that must happen. MAGA. MAKE GREENLAND GREAT AGAIN!”

Keep ReadingShow less
The Common Cause North Carolina, Not Trump, Triggered the Mid-Decade Redistricting Battle

Political Midterm Election Redistricting

Getty images

The Common Cause North Carolina, Not Trump, Triggered the Mid-Decade Redistricting Battle

“Gerrymander” was one of seven runners-up for Merriam-Webster’s 2025 word of the year, which was “slop,” although “gerrymandering” is often used. Both words are closely related and frequently used interchangeably, with the main difference being their function as nouns versus verbs or processes. Throughout 2025, as Republicans and Democrats used redistricting to boost their electoral advantages, “gerrymander” and “gerrymandering” surged in popularity as search terms, highlighting their ongoing relevance in current politics and public awareness. However, as an old Capitol Hill dog, I realized that 2025 made me less inclined to explain the definitions of these words to anyone who asked for more detail.

“Did the Democrats or Republicans Start the Gerrymandering Fight?” is the obvious question many people are asking: Who started it?

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. and Puerto Rico flags
Puerto Rico: America's oldest democratic crisis
TexPhoto/Getty Image

Puerto Rico’s New Transparency Law Attacks a Right Forged in Struggle

At a time when public debate in the United States is consumed by questions of secrecy, accountability and the selective release of government records, Puerto Rico has quietly taken a dangerous step in the opposite direction.

In December 2025, Gov. Jenniffer González signed Senate Bill 63 into law, introducing sweeping amendments to Puerto Rico’s transparency statute, known as the Transparency and Expedited Procedure for Access to Public Information Act. Framed as administrative reform, the new law (Act 156 of 2025) instead restricts access to public information and weakens one of the archipelago’s most important accountability and democratic tools.

Keep ReadingShow less