Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

AI Is a Weapon Pointed at America. Our Best Defense Is Education.

Opinion

AI Is a Weapon Pointed at America. Our Best Defense Is Education.

Elementary students raising their hands to answer the teacher's question in a class in the robotics mechanical and electric classroom.

Getty Images, Cravetiger

Foreign adversaries are already deploying artificial intelligence as a weapon against America, not just on distant battlefields, but within our social media feeds, news sources, and critical infrastructure. AI-powered disinformation campaigns designed to sow chaos and division, sophisticated cyber attacks – these are no longer future hypotheticals; they are clear and present dangers. America's most significant vulnerability in this new era isn't necessarily a lack of technology but a lack of understanding among our own citizens. An unprepared public is fertile ground for manipulation and a weak link in our national defense. To secure our future, we must urgently equip Americans with the knowledge to navigate an AI-shaped world.

This isn't just about recognizing deepfakes. National resilience requires citizens who understand the basics of how algorithms shape their information environment and can think critically about AI's influence. Furthermore, our national security apparatus itself desperately needs more AI-savvy personnel. The Department of Defense faces alarming shortages in its cyber and tech workforce – tens of thousands of critical positions remain vacant – hindering our ability to develop, deploy, and defend against AI capabilities. Simultaneously, our economic edge depends on fostering widespread innovation and adoption of AI, which is bottlenecked by a lack of skilled workers across industries. Simply put, AI literacy is now a cornerstone of both national defense and economic competitiveness.


Recent government efforts, including presidential executive orders focused on AI education, rightly acknowledge this challenge. They propose task forces, grant programs, and public-private partnerships – important signals, but ultimately insufficient. These initiatives largely rely on existing educational structures that are already strained and lack widespread AI expertise. Expecting overburdened K-12 teachers to suddenly become AI experts through optional workshops is unrealistic. We need direct intervention and sustained, expert support in classrooms nationwide, not just top-down directives filtered through slow-moving bureaucracies.

The urgency is magnified by the global race for AI dominance. Competitors like China are not waiting. They are implementing mandatory K-12 AI education, investing massively in talent development, and rapidly closing the gap. China now produces a huge share of the world's top AI researchers, and increasingly, that talent stays home. While America still attracts brilliant minds from abroad, relying on that while our own educational pipeline lags is complacent and dangerous. In the strategic competition over AI, ceding the educational foundation means ceding future leadership.

The solution must match the scale of the problem: America needs a national AI Education Corps.

This initiative would mobilize AI expertise – recruiting talented recent graduates, researchers, and industry professionals – and deploy them directly into K-12 school districts. Think of it like Teach For America but focused specifically on building AI understanding. Corps members would partner with local educators, providing intensive training, customized curriculum support, and ongoing virtual mentorship throughout the school year.

The focus would be foundational and adaptable, not just teaching students how to use today’s AI tools but fostering a deeper understanding of core AI principles, data literacy, algorithmic thinking, and ethical considerations. The goal is to create critical thinkers and adaptable learners prepared for AI’s inevitable evolution, empowering them to both defend against its misuse and contribute to its responsible development. This would be a collaborative effort, tailored to the diverse needs of local schools, not a one-size-fits-all federal mandate.

Creating such a Corps requires real investment, but the cost pales in comparison to the price of inaction – compromised national security, lost economic advantage, and a citizenry vulnerable to manipulation. Public-private partnerships can leverage corporate expertise and resources alongside federal support. Attractive incentives, from loan forgiveness to career opportunities, can mobilize the necessary talent. This isn't about building bureaucracy; it's about efficiently deploying vital expertise where it's needed most.

The AI transformation is happening now. Relying on slow, incremental changes to our education system is a recipe for falling behind. An AI Education Corps offers a bold, concrete path to rapidly build the widespread AI literacy that our national security and economic future demand. It’s an investment in our people, our resilience, and America’s continued leadership. It’s time to build it.

Kevin Frazier is an AI Innovation and Law Fellow at Texas Law and Author of the Appleseed AI substack.


Read More

Open Letter to Justice Roberts: Partisan Gerrymandering Is Unconstitutional
beige concrete building under blue sky during daytime

Open Letter to Justice Roberts: Partisan Gerrymandering Is Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court, in holding that partisan gerrymandering is permissible—unless it "goes too far"—stated that the argument made against this practice based on the Court's "one person, one vote" doctrine didn't work because the cases that developed that doctrine were about ensuring that each vote had an equal weight. The Court reasoned that after redistricting, each vote still has equal weight.

I would respectfully disagree. After admittedly partisan redistricting, each vote does not have an equal weight. The purpose of partisan gerrymandering is typically to create a "safe" seat—to group citizens so that the dominant political party has a clear majority of the voters. It's the transformation of a contested seat or even a seat safe for the other party into a safe seat for the party doing the redistricting.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Puncher’s Illusion: Winning the First Round and Losing the War
Toy soldiers in a battle formation
Photo by Saifee Art on Unsplash

The Puncher’s Illusion: Winning the First Round and Losing the War

In the Rumble in the Jungle, George Foreman came in expecting to end the fight early.

At first, it looked that way. He was stronger, faster, and landing clean punches. I watched the 1974 championship on simulcast fifty-two years ago and remember how dominant he was in the opening rounds.

Keep ReadingShow less
Calling Wealthy Benefactors!
A rusty house figure stands over a city.
Photo by Katja Ano on Unsplash

Calling Wealthy Benefactors!

My housing has been conditional on circumstances beyond my control, and the time is up; the owner is selling.

Securing affordable housing is a stressor for much of the working class. According to recent data, nearly 50% of renters are cost-burdened, meaning they spend over 30% of their take-home income on housing costs. Rental prices in California are especially high, 35% higher than the national average. Renting is routinely insecure. The lords of land need to renovate, their kids need to move in. They need to sell.

Keep ReadingShow less
An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed upon entering the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building on June 6, 2023 in New York City. New York City has provided sanctuary to over 46,000 asylum seekers since 2013, when the city passed a law prohibiting city agencies from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement agencies unless there is a warrant for the person's arrest.(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)
An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed.
(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)

The Power of the Purse and Executive Discretion: ICE Expansion Under the Trump Administration

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

  • Core Constitutional Debate: Expanded ICE enforcement under the Trump Administration raises a core constitutional question: Does Article II executive power override Article I’s congressional power of the purse?
  • Executive Justification: The primary constitutional justification for expanded ICE enforcement is The Unitary Executive Theory.
  • Separation of Powers: Critics argue that the Unitary Executive Theory undermines Congress’s power of the purse.
  • Moral Conflict: Expanded ICE enforcement has sparked a moral debate, as concerns over due process and civil liberties clash with claims of increased public safety and national security.

Where is ICE Funding Coming From?

Since the beginning of the current Trump Administration, immigration enforcement has undergone transformative change and become one of the most contested issues in the federal government. On his first day in office, President Trump issued Executive Order 14159, which directs executive agencies to implement stricter immigration enforcement practices. In order to implement these practices, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), a budget reconciliation package that paired state and local tax cuts with immigration funding. This allocated $170.7 billion in immigration-related funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to spend by 2029.

Keep ReadingShow less