Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Democrats Need To Focus on Communication

Opinion

Democrats Need To Focus on Communication

Democrat Donkey phone operator

AI illustration

The Democrats have a problem…I realize this isn’t a revelation, but I believe they’re boxed into a corner with limited options to regain their footing. Don’t get me wrong, the party could have a big win in the 2026 midterms with a backlash building against Trump and MAGA. In some scenarios, that could also lead to taking back the White House in 2028…but therein lies the problem.

In its second term, the Trump administration has severely cut government agencies, expanded the power of the Executive branch, enacted policies that will bloat the federal deficit, dismantled parts of the social safety net, weakened our standing in the world, and moved the US closer to a “pay for play” transactional philosophy of operating government that’s usually reserved for Third World countries. America has veered away from being the model emulated by other nations that aim to build a stable democracy.


Whichever party takes the White House in 2028, there will be a need for spending and taxes to rebuild essential government functions, to re-establish critical research initiatives, to restore staffing levels at agencies like the IRS, NOAA, EPA, CFPB, USAID, and others to enable them to operate as chartered by Congress. Rebuilding takes time. In fact, it takes a lot longer to rebuild than to dismantle. This process will require patience to have a discernible effect, and the American public has often demonstrated that it doesn’t have a tolerance for that. So, if it plays out that a Democrat wins the White House in 2028, the party will need to figure out how to communicate where we are as a nation, what’s important to rebuild the foundation that has guided us for 250 years, what to expect along the way, and why we all must have patience as we go through the process.

While execution will be important, success at winning the hearts and minds of the American people will boil down to communication. The Democrats have had a communication problem for decades. Republicans have proven far more effective than Democrats at delivering unified, consistent messaging across their party. For example, Biden does things post-pandemic to move the country forward and is blamed for inflation; Trump does things in his second term that are inflationary, and his supporters accept that there will be a period of “disruption” that may (or may not) lead to a long-term benefit. There are many examples, but suffice it to say that the Democrats have struggled to get their message out in a consistent fashion for a long time.

Now, fast-forward to 2028…Assuming there will ultimately be a broad backlash to the Trump presidency and that a Democrat is elected to the White House in 2028, they will be faced with a federal workforce that has been decimated. There will be a need to rebuild some functions, and that will come with a cost…which feeds into the timeworn mantra that Democrats want to tax-and-spend while Republicans are fiscally responsible.

The challenge is that you can’t simply switch on and off initiatives like biotech research and international development. These types of things are being set back decades; the brain drain takes its toll.

On top of the sheer volume of agencies that would need to be rebuilt, any new administration will have difficulty attracting top talent into federal positions with the knowledge that their jobs could be eliminated at the whim of a change in future administrations. The philosophical shift operates counter to the implicit deal that was in place for decades for federal workers.

By the end of its second term, the Trump administration will have expanded the power and reach of the Executive Branch. By following the Project 2025 roadmap, and with the help of the Supreme Court, they will have advanced the “Unitary” theory of the Executive–to what extent is to be determined, but it’s already happening. Even with the anticipated backlash against Trumpism, the Democrats will be in a tough position to rebuild without reinforcing hackneyed accusations about big government and big spending. Coupled with the time that will be needed to rebuild, the end result could be a win in 2028, followed by a boomerang backlash against the Democrats, leading to a return of Republicans to the White House in 2032. To avert this, Democrats must do a better job communicating their vision and the shortcomings of the other side. That unified, cohesive messaging needs to start NOW…leading up to the midterms and continuing into the 2028 campaign. To illustrate, here are the types of foundational issues that the Democratic party will need to saturate the advertising and social media channels with:

Essential Services: Republicans have eliminated essential services, reduced scientific research, and weakened the safety net programs that millions of people rely upon.

Taxes: Republicans have enacted tax breaks that primarily benefit the wealthy and leave the working class behind.

National Debt: Republicans have demonstrated fiscal irresponsibility through massive budget deficits that will be an anchor on our economic well-being in the coming decades.

Checks-and-Balances: The current administration has taken us on a detour away from three coequal branches of government in favor of an all-powerful Executive Branch.

International Leadership: Current policies have weakened the reputation of the US internationally and reduced our influence. We need to repair our standing as a beacon of democracy and hope throughout the world.

Polarization: The current administration has worked to exacerbate the divisions within our people rather than celebrating the common beliefs that unite us.

The above list is not intended to be comprehensive, but is representative of the pointed, pervasive messaging that needs to be echoed up and down the Democratic party. While the foundational issues provide a North Star, the Democrats will need a clear message of what they would do in 2028 and why it’s desperately needed. They will need to run the 2028 campaign on specific issues that are both achievable and appealing to the general electorate. And if they win in 2028, they’ll need to have delivered on many of those promises to win again in 2032. Conversely, if the 2028 campaign is based on pie-in-the-sky hopes and platitudes, they will inevitably fall short and will be penalized in the long term.

The path for the Democrats to regain the trust of the American people is a difficult one. It starts with persuasive communication, in one voice, using consistent language, that emphasizes the common principles inherent in our country’s DNA. Be honest with the voters about what’s achievable and what it will take to get there. Execute the plan effectively…Rinse…Repeat.

Alan J. Simon is a technology consultant and a contributing author of “Leveraging: A Political, Economic and Societal Framework.”


Read More

An illustration of the U.S. flag on the shape of the U.S. with blue and red figures of people across it.

Every state has its own constitution.

How State Constitutions Became the Battleground for American Rights and Liberties – on Both the Left and Right

Beyond picking governors, state legislators, local officials and representatives to serve in Congress, voters in almost every state this year will have the opportunity to amend the language of their state constitution. In one state, they could potentially rewrite the constitution altogether.

Though the U.S. Constitution is rarely amended, voters frequently amend their state constitutions. In every election cycle, voters are asked to ratify constitutional amendments.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's annual policy conference at the Washington Convention Center March 6, 2018 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

After AIPAC failed to defeat El-Sayed in the Michigan Democratic Senate primary—after spending $32 million—it said that it remains committed to defeating El-Sayed and his "radical, anti-Israel" agenda in the general election. Which means it is poised to sink tens of millions of dollars in supporting Republican Mike Rogers. It also said that Haley Stevens, his opponent, had presented "an authentic Democratic agenda." Meaning that El-Sayed did not? And they think that Mike Rogers, a MAGA Trump supporter, does compared with El-Sayed?

How can AIPAC say that El-Sayed does not present an authentic Democratic agenda when his socialist stance is much more in line with the principles stated in the Declaration of Independence than most centrist Democrats'? And making it sound like AIPAC cares about an authentic Democratic agenda is deceitful, when in the same breath they make clear that they will support Mike Rogers, a Trump lackey, in the general election.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research
silhouette of person using microscope

Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research

Scientists and the federal government have been close partners since World War II. A landmark report by President Truman’s chief science advisor laid out a vision for government research that shaped eight decades of federally funded science. That vision is now at risk. In principle, the Trump administration has supported scientific research with its own vision for a new “golden age of science.” But in practice, the administration has upended the relationship between the government, researchers, and their institutions. The changes have alarmed working scientists and their allies, who have protested in record numbers.

In July, I moderated a webinar on “Rewriting the Rules: What’s happening to public science?” (read the transcript here). The webinar was co-sponsored by NAPA, CODE, and the Bridge Alliance, with Dr. Aaron Carroll of AcademyHealth, Dr. Chris Marcum of the Federation of American Scientists, Dr. Gretchen Goldman of the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Dr. Maryam Zaringhalam of the Center for Open Science. I also interviewed Cole Donovan of the Stand Up for Science Foundation by email.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democratic Party Suicide
a piece of paper cut out of the shape of a donkey
Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash

Democratic Party Suicide

A recent New York Times article, "Moderate Democrats Prepare for 'War' Against an Ascendant Left," describes a disturbing perspective among mainstream, moderate, centrist Democrats. It is disturbing for many reasons.

First, there is the practical impact. If indeed mainstream Democrats attack socialist Democrats in a sustained, organized manner, there is only one possible result: the defeat of the Party in 2026 and the renewed vigor of Trump and his MAGA allies. Especially when combined with the all-out effort that AIPAC will mostly take to support Republican candidates running against Democratic candidates who are socialists. (See my article, "The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC.")

Keep ReadingShow less