Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

‘Homeschool Act’ Stalled in House, but Opponents Remain Vigilant for Potential Revival

The bill to increase regulation of homeschooled children remains viable for a vote but contentious.

News

‘Homeschool Act’ Stalled in House, but Opponents Remain Vigilant for Potential Revival

Opponents of HB2827 gather in the Capitol to protest the bill April 9, which received a historic 51,000 opposition signatures.

Maggie Dougherty

Opponents of House Bill 2827 —dubbed the “Homeschool Act”—managed to keep it from the floor of the Illinois House for a vote before the April 11 deadline. But the bill’s primary sponsor, Rep. Terra Costa Howard (D-Glen Ellyn), remains committed to getting it passed.

“Our intention is to keep working the bill, keep making amendments as necessary, and continuing to meet with organizations who have strong opinions about it, that's what's important to do,” said Costa Howard.


HB2827 did not make the third reading to pass out of the chamber but remains live until the legislative session ends in May or June of 2026.

The bill requires parents or administrators to file a homeschool declaration form with the State Board of Education, notifying their local school district of their intent to homeschool a child.

Specifications of what the form will entail remain unclear but could require parents to report curriculums used in home schooling and other personal information like the child’s name, birthdate, and gender. It also requires homeschool administrators to have at least a high school diploma or equivalent to teach.

Costa Howard first introduced the bill after an in-depth ProPublica investigation revealed Illinois’ lack of regulation among homeschooled children. In some instances, state oversight led to cases of unreported child abuse, as the investigation reveals.

“First and foremost, [this bill] is to protect kids,” said Costa Howard. “We know that there are children who, when they have been pulled out of school, nobody sees that these kids have fallen through the cracks and they are not in front of mandated reporters. We want to make sure that that doesn't happen,” she said.

Illinois does not currently keep data on how many children are homeschooled in the state nor does it mandate a specific curriculum or testing protocol.

The “Homeschool Act” has generated historic opposition in the House session, with thousands of homeschool parents and religious-affiliated groups signing witness slips to oppose the bill from moving forward.

A building with columns and a dome AI-generated content may be incorrect.

The legislative session in the Springfield capital is expected to end in May or June 2026. (Credit: Maggie Dougherty)

“This bill's provisions threaten families’ due process rights in multiple ways, which are very concerning,” said Mailee Smith, a staff attorney and senior director of labor policy at Illinois Policy Institute, a nonpartisan research organization tracking government accountability.

“It allows truancy officers to interrogate children without cause and without parental presence. It also allows these parents to be investigated and their children to be interviewed based on anonymous reports, and that's from the language of the bill itself,” said Smith.

According to the legislation, if homeschool parents or administrators fail to submit the required forms on time, a truancy officer may visit the home and meet with the child to determine whether an investigation may be warranted.

“This is a bill that could cause trauma to children on the whim of a government bureaucrat or an anonymous complaint or just a cantankerous neighbor who reports a family to the government,” said Smith.

Previous iterations of the bill included criminal penalties for noncompliance, including fines and jail time. The current version states that parents will be referred to the State Attorney's Office to determine the charges.

A critical component of the bill that remains unclear is how the state plans to contact families for noncompliance when it does not keep records of currently homeschooled children.

Rachel Mikottis runs an outdoor homeschool co-op called Free Haven Forest School in Mokena. She said the passing of a bill like this would greatly impact the school, which offers hands-on, educational experiences in nature.

“Current homeschool laws give us the freedom to [teach this way] because we don't want to operate in a building, that is not our goal,” said Mikottis. “The purpose of outdoor education is to get kids engaged in nature and to use nature as our classroom,” she said. The new homeschool requirements could subject schools like Free Haven Forest to adopt more standardized policies for learning.

Mikottis said one of her biggest concerns is how homeschoolers will be notified of the new registration requirements.

“What if I live in rural Illinois, and I'm a farmer—I homeschool my kids because the closest school is an hour away and no one notified me of this law? Now, a truancy officer can come by and [investigate] me. The criminalization of parents is definitely the worst part,” said Mikottis.

In response to how the state plans to notify parents, Costa Howard said administrators will “do their best” but did not specify a formal plan.

Despite other states' efforts to make homeschooling easier for families and a growing number of educational options available for children across the country, Illinois has increasingly pushed for more regulations, including requiring private schools to register annually with the state, which is currently optional.

Opponents of the bill argue the legislation attacks constitutional rights to educational freedom, with some families pursuing homeschooling to avoid the state’s public school challenges.

A graph of a child AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Source: National Center for Education Statistics, National Education Surveys Program. “Parent and Family Involvement in Education: 2023” (accessed May 10, 2025).

“Illinois has a plethora of issues going on within its own school systems throughout the state, not least among them are proficiency levels,” said David Smith, a homeschool parent and executive director of the Illinois Family Institute.

According to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), only 33% of Illinois students performed at or above proficiency in 2024.

Illinois is one of 41 states with 1 in 3 or fewer of its fourth-graders meeting reading standards.

“Can we blame parents for wanting better for their kids and leaving the system?” said Mikottis.

2024 data from the National Home Education Research Institute reported that home-educated students typically score 15 to 25 percentile points above that of public school students on standardized tests.

“Instead of focusing on fixing the issues in the school system, they're focusing on criminalizing parents for wanting to raise their kids better than what [public] schools have to offer,” she said.

Claire Murphy is a master’s student in the investigative specialization at Northwestern University’s Medill School of Journalism. She is also a freelance journalist based in Chicago, IL.


Read More

President Donald Trump speaks to members of the media

White House communications aide Danielle Alvarez (R) films with her phone as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to members of the media as he departs on the South Lawn of the White House on October 23, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Finn Gomez/Getty Images

Trump’s Arch Plan Defies Law and Warps D.C.’s Historic Core

The Trump Arch construction controversy is the latest vanity project by Donald Trump using taxpayer money without Congressional approval, placing his ego-based physical stamp on not only American historical architecture but also the American psyche. With no good reason for constructing this arch, it’s an act of self-aggrandizement meant to make him look powerful and important. The project is unconstitutional, illegal, and patently un-American. Three Vietnam War veterans and an architectural historian have also filed a lawsuit against it.

Like all other actors in government, executive agencies, like the National Park Service, must follow the rule of law and respect ‘separation of powers’ established by the U.S. Constitution. This means following the laws enacted by Congress, which has the power to distribute public funds and determine how they are spent, not the Executive Branch, including the President.

Keep ReadingShow less
An empty grocery cart in a market.

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani proposes five city-run grocery stores. See the arguments for and against, from food deserts to bodega concerns and the $70M cost.

Getty Images, Kwangmoozaa

Government-Owned Grocery Stores: Accessible Nutrition or Government Overreach?

Issue Introduction

Over the past few years, affordability has become the most central issue affecting Americans and the quality of life in the United States. The prices of groceries and basic necessities have risen 25-30% since the COVID-19 pandemic and are projected to rise another 3.2% in 2026. At the same time, the exodus of grocery chains from rural and low-income areas has scattered food deserts throughout individual states. Recent mass closures include Grocery Outlet’s shuttering of 36 stores and continued shut-downs of many Albertsons locations. These factors have led politicians to make affordability a major campaign issue.

During his progressive campaign for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani raised the idea of opening grocery stores owned and operated by the city government to provide New Yorkers with affordable groceries. In his April 2026 public address that marked his first 100 days in office, Mayor Mamdani announced plans for the first of five city-run grocery stores. Mamdani’s proposed initiative will use $70 million in capital funding to build five city-owned municipal stores–one in each borough–and place them under control of the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). NYCEDC will then select third-party operating staff in accordance with city standards for affordability and proper labor practices. Public opinion following the announcement continues to be divided between uproar and support.

Keep ReadingShow less
​U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies during a Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on July 21, 2026. Hegseth is crafting a strong and masculine identity for his audience as he reportedly contemplates a presidential run.

(Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Politicians Can’t Just ’Give the People What They Want’

For reasons that will baffle my many detractors, I am often asked for advice about being an opinion journalist. One of my standard responses is: You have to be willing to disappoint your biggest fans.

What I mean is that if you start to see your job as telling fans what they want to hear, you risk becoming an entertainer rather than a thinker, and eventually you become a caricature. I’ve seen it happen numerous times. Patrick Buchanan was a brilliant columnist and a serious person. But over the course of his career, he listened too much to the people who said, “Go Pat, go!” and too little to friends who said, “I think that’s taking it too far.”

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

Congress approval is at a record-low 10%. Moderation and consensus-building, not partisan theatrics, are how Washington gets problems solved.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

Reclaiming the Politics of the Possible

Washington is stuck in a cycle of performative conflict. The incentives seem to reward outrage, not outcomes that last; purity tests, not problem‑solving. So it’s no surprise that after three shutdowns in less than a year, public approval of Congress collapsed to just 10 percent this spring. (Gallup, April 2026.) But the country we live in — where many middle-income families report persistent financial strain and businesses are navigating unprecedented technological upheaval — cannot be governed by theatrics. Breaking this cycle requires moderation, consensus‑building, and a cooperative approach to governance.

This is not a call for centrism as an ideology. Instead, this is a call for transformative leaders to embrace moderation as their governing strategy, recognizing that in a pluralistic country of nearly 350 million people durable solutions require broad and stable alliances. Ultimately, this is a call for the 240 million of us who are eligible to vote in November to elect consensus-builders instead of bomb-throwers, and healers instead of arsonists.

Keep ReadingShow less