Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Hostages Freed, Questions Remain: Trump’s Role and the Cost of Binary Politics

Why acknowledging Trump’s diplomatic success doesn’t compromise democratic integrity—it strengthens it

Opinion

Hostages Freed, Questions Remain: Trump’s Role and the Cost of Binary Politics

U.S. President Donald Trump, September 18, 2025.

(Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images)

In February of this year, Kristina Becvar and I published a column in The Fulcrum reaffirming our mission amid a barrage of executive orders from the Trump Administration. We sought to clarify our role—not as partisan commentators, but as stewards of fact-based reporting and healthy self-governance.

We wrote then:


Our challenge as a publication, dedicated to keeping our readers informed so we can repair our democracy and make it live and work in our everyday lives, is not to be overly reactive or partisan. At the same time, we must not ignore the dangers of the administration's degrading, hostile, and accusatory language and dangerous actions when they occur, while also acknowledging inappropriate responses when they occur.”

We continued:

“The Fulcrum must be mindful of the fact that Trump won a plurality of the vote and currently has a majority approval rating. If we are to serve our mission of engaging a broad spectrum of citizens from the left, right, and center in the political process, all working together to face tough challenges facing our nation, we must be mindful of this fact.

We believe it is our obligation to acknowledge that a varying percentage of the administration's statements and actions have merit and are based on truth while, at the same time, not normalizing the language Trump uses or understating the devastating impact many of his executive orders or other actions are having on millions of people in the United States and around the world.”

Since that column, The Fulcrum has published numerous pieces that have criticized President Trump for inflammatory rhetoric and for actions perceived as threats to constitutional norms, the rule of law, and the integrity of our elections. We will continue to do so—without hesitation and without apology.

But we must also resist the gravitational pull of binary thinking.

Too often, citizens, media outlets, and political leaders treat politics as a zero-sum game—where acknowledging an opponent’s success is seen as a personal or ideological loss. The Fulcrum rejects this premise. We will not be party to a worldview that sees governance as warfare and truth as tribal.

With that in mind, we recognize a significant development in the Middle East: an agreement that has led to the release of Israeli hostages abducted by Hamas on October 7, 2023, and that may lay the groundwork for a broader cease-fire in Gaza. President Donald Trump played a meaningful role in facilitating this outcome. While it is premature to declare this a historic peace accord, the hostage release marks the first step in a complex 20-point peace plan.

This is a powerful beginning. President Trump deserves credit for being fully engaged and for offering unconventional solutions that led to the release of hostages. His involvement, while not without rhetorical overreach—declaring peace achieved and forecasting a bright future for Gaza—nonetheless represents a commendable contribution to a fragile moment of progress.

As a nation, we must learn to hold praise and concern in the same breath. Truth is rarely binary. Americans are often seduced by partisan reflexes—embracing information that confirms their beliefs and dismissing evidence that challenges them. This tendency, while human, can blind us to the good deeds of those we dislike and the harmful actions of those we admire.

A healthy democracy demands more than loyalty; it requires discernment.

We must commit to a new politics of problem-solving—one grounded in reason, logic, and inquiry, where conclusions follow from evidence, not ideology. This new politics must create space for people of differing views to sit together, grapple with hard truths, and make the decisions that everyone knows must be made.

To do this, we must move beyond the blame game.

The challenges we face—climate instability, economic inequality, and democratic fragility are too complex for a simple “for or against” mindset. Meeting them requires rising above reflexive partisanship and embracing a more thoughtful, principled engagement.

At The Fulcrum, we remain committed to that path. Not because it is easy, but because it is necessary.

David Nevins is the publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.


Read More

An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed upon entering the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building on June 6, 2023 in New York City. New York City has provided sanctuary to over 46,000 asylum seekers since 2013, when the city passed a law prohibiting city agencies from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement agencies unless there is a warrant for the person's arrest.(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)
An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed.
(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)

The Power of the Purse and Executive Discretion: ICE Expansion Under the Trump Administration

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

  • Core Constitutional Debate: Expanded ICE enforcement under the Trump Administration raises a core constitutional question: Does Article II executive power override Article I’s congressional power of the purse?
  • Executive Justification: The primary constitutional justification for expanded ICE enforcement is The Unitary Executive Theory.
  • Separation of Powers: Critics argue that the Unitary Executive Theory undermines Congress’s power of the purse.
  • Moral Conflict: Expanded ICE enforcement has sparked a moral debate, as concerns over due process and civil liberties clash with claims of increased public safety and national security.

Where is ICE Funding Coming From?

Since the beginning of the current Trump Administration, immigration enforcement has undergone transformative change and become one of the most contested issues in the federal government. On his first day in office, President Trump issued Executive Order 14159, which directs executive agencies to implement stricter immigration enforcement practices. In order to implement these practices, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), a budget reconciliation package that paired state and local tax cuts with immigration funding. This allocated $170.7 billion in immigration-related funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to spend by 2029.

Keep ReadingShow less
Towards a Reformed Capitalism
oval brown wooden conference table and chairs inside conference room

Towards a Reformed Capitalism

Despite all the laws and regulations that apply to corporations, which for the most part are designed to make corporations more responsive to the greater good, corporations have wreaked great harm on our environment, their workers, their customers, and the general public. Despite all the rules, capitalism can still pretty much do what it wants.

The problem is not that the laws and regulations are not enforced, although that is partly true. The problem is more that the laws and regulations are weak because of the strong influence corporations have on both Congress (this is true of Democrats as well as Republicans) and those responsible for regulating.

Keep ReadingShow less
Families of Americans Overseas Wrongfully Detained Bring Advocacy to Capitol Hill

The Bring Our Families Home campaign brought together loved ones of Americans wrongly detained overseas to display portraits in the Senate Russell Rotunda on Wednesday, May 6.

(Jacques Abou-Rizk, MNS)

Families of Americans Overseas Wrongfully Detained Bring Advocacy to Capitol Hill

WASHINGTON – American journalist Reza Valizadeh visited his elderly Iranian parents in March 2024 for the first time in 15 years. Valizadeh’s stories for Voice of America and other U.S. government-funded outlets often criticized the Iranian regime. So before traveling, he sought and received confirmation that he would be safe from a high-ranking commander in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a branch of Iran’s armed forces. However, in September that same year, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps arrested Valizadeh, and Tehran’s Revolutionary Court sentenced him to ten years in prison for “collaboration with a hostile government.”

In the Rotunda of the Senate Russell Building last week, the Bring Our Families Home campaign set up portraits of Valizadeh and 12 other Americans currently wrongfully detained overseas. The group, family members of illegitimately detained Americans, appealed to Congress to push for their safe return. Each foam poster board included the name, home state, and country of detainment. The display also included portraits of the 33 people released after advocacy by the James W. Foley Foundation.

Keep ReadingShow less
DHS Funding During the Shutdown
Getty Images, Charles-McClintock Wilson

DHS Funding During the Shutdown

When Congress failed to approve funding for the Department of Homeland Security for the remainder of this fiscal year in February, almost all of its employees began to work without pay. That situation changed, however, on April 3, when President Donald Trump issued a memorandum ordering the DHS secretary and director of the Office of Management and Budget to “use funds that have a reasonable and logical nexus to the functions of DHS” to pay its employees and issue back pay.

Trump shifted money to avoid the political embarrassment that would be caused by the collapse of airport security screening through the actions of disgruntled agents and the disruption to air travel that would ensue. But it’s legally dubious.

Keep ReadingShow less