Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Hostages Freed, Questions Remain: Trump’s Role and the Cost of Binary Politics

Why acknowledging Trump’s diplomatic success doesn’t compromise democratic integrity—it strengthens it

Opinion

Hostages Freed, Questions Remain: Trump’s Role and the Cost of Binary Politics

U.S. President Donald Trump, September 18, 2025.

(Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images)

In February of this year, Kristina Becvar and I published a column in The Fulcrum reaffirming our mission amid a barrage of executive orders from the Trump Administration. We sought to clarify our role—not as partisan commentators, but as stewards of fact-based reporting and healthy self-governance.

We wrote then:


Our challenge as a publication, dedicated to keeping our readers informed so we can repair our democracy and make it live and work in our everyday lives, is not to be overly reactive or partisan. At the same time, we must not ignore the dangers of the administration's degrading, hostile, and accusatory language and dangerous actions when they occur, while also acknowledging inappropriate responses when they occur.”

We continued:

“The Fulcrum must be mindful of the fact that Trump won a plurality of the vote and currently has a majority approval rating. If we are to serve our mission of engaging a broad spectrum of citizens from the left, right, and center in the political process, all working together to face tough challenges facing our nation, we must be mindful of this fact.

We believe it is our obligation to acknowledge that a varying percentage of the administration's statements and actions have merit and are based on truth while, at the same time, not normalizing the language Trump uses or understating the devastating impact many of his executive orders or other actions are having on millions of people in the United States and around the world.”

Since that column, The Fulcrum has published numerous pieces that have criticized President Trump for inflammatory rhetoric and for actions perceived as threats to constitutional norms, the rule of law, and the integrity of our elections. We will continue to do so—without hesitation and without apology.

But we must also resist the gravitational pull of binary thinking.

Too often, citizens, media outlets, and political leaders treat politics as a zero-sum game—where acknowledging an opponent’s success is seen as a personal or ideological loss. The Fulcrum rejects this premise. We will not be party to a worldview that sees governance as warfare and truth as tribal.

With that in mind, we recognize a significant development in the Middle East: an agreement that has led to the release of Israeli hostages abducted by Hamas on October 7, 2023, and that may lay the groundwork for a broader cease-fire in Gaza. President Donald Trump played a meaningful role in facilitating this outcome. While it is premature to declare this a historic peace accord, the hostage release marks the first step in a complex 20-point peace plan.

This is a powerful beginning. President Trump deserves credit for being fully engaged and for offering unconventional solutions that led to the release of hostages. His involvement, while not without rhetorical overreach—declaring peace achieved and forecasting a bright future for Gaza—nonetheless represents a commendable contribution to a fragile moment of progress.

As a nation, we must learn to hold praise and concern in the same breath. Truth is rarely binary. Americans are often seduced by partisan reflexes—embracing information that confirms their beliefs and dismissing evidence that challenges them. This tendency, while human, can blind us to the good deeds of those we dislike and the harmful actions of those we admire.

A healthy democracy demands more than loyalty; it requires discernment.

We must commit to a new politics of problem-solving—one grounded in reason, logic, and inquiry, where conclusions follow from evidence, not ideology. This new politics must create space for people of differing views to sit together, grapple with hard truths, and make the decisions that everyone knows must be made.

To do this, we must move beyond the blame game.

The challenges we face—climate instability, economic inequality, and democratic fragility are too complex for a simple “for or against” mindset. Meeting them requires rising above reflexive partisanship and embracing a more thoughtful, principled engagement.

At The Fulcrum, we remain committed to that path. Not because it is easy, but because it is necessary.

David Nevins is the publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Read More

Pete Hegseth walking in a congressional hallway
Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump's nominee to be defense secretary, and his wife, Jennifer, make their way to a meetin with Sen. Ted Budd on Dec. 2.
Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

The War against DEI Is Gonna Kill Us

Almost immediately after being sworn in again, President Trump fired the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, a Black man.

Chairman Brown, a F-16 pilot, is the same General who in 2021 spoke directly into the camera for a recruitment commercial and said: “When I’m flying, I put my helmet on, my visor down, my mask up. You don’t know who I am—whether I’m African American, Asian American, Hispanic, White, male, or female. You just know I’m an American Airman, kicking your butt.” He got kicked off his post. The first-ever female Chief of Naval Operations was fired, too.

Keep ReadingShow less
“It’s Probably as Bad as It Can Get”:
A Conversation with Lilliana Mason

Liliana Mason

“It’s Probably as Bad as It Can Get”: A Conversation with Lilliana Mason

In the aftermath of the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, the threat of political violence has become a topic of urgent concern in the United States. While public support for political violence remains low—according to Sean Westwood of the Polarization Research Lab, fewer than 2 percent of Americans believe that political murder is acceptable—even isolated incidence of political violence can have a corrosive effect.

According to political scientist Lilliana Mason, political violence amounts to a rejection of democracy. “If a person has used violence to achieve a political goal, then they’ve given up on the democratic process,” says Mason, “Instead, they’re trying to use force to affect government.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Combatting the Trump Administration’s Militarized Logic

Members of the National Guard patrol near the U.S. Capitol on October 1, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Al Drago/Getty Images)

Combatting the Trump Administration’s Militarized Logic

Approaching a year of the new Trump administration, Americans are getting used to domestic militarized logic. A popular sense of powerlessness permeates our communities. We bear witness to the attacks against innocent civilians by ICE, the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and we naturally wonder—is this the new American discourse? Violent action? The election of Zohran Mamdani as mayor of New York offers hope that there may be another way.

Zohran Mamdani, a Muslim democratic socialist, was elected as mayor of New York City on the fourth of November. Mamdani’s platform includes a reimagining of the police force in New York City. Mamdani proposes a Department of Community Safety. In a CBS interview, Mamdani said, “Our vision for a Department of Community Safety, the DCS, is that we would have teams of dedicated mental health outreach workers that we deploy…to respond to those incidents and get those New Yorkers out of the subway system and to the services that they actually need.” Doing so frees up NYPD officers to respond to actual threats and crime, without a responsibility to the mental health of civilians.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Four Top Officials Can Win Back Public Trust


Image generated by IVN staff.

How Four Top Officials Can Win Back Public Trust

Mandate for Change: The Public Calls for a Course Correction

The honeymoon is over. A new national survey from the Independent Center reveals that a plurality of American adults and registered voters believe key cabinet officials should be replaced—a striking rebuke of the administration’s current direction. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are all underwater with the public, especially among independents.

But the message isn’t just about frustration—it’s about opportunity. Voters are signaling that these leaders can still win back public trust by realigning their policies with the issues Americans care about most. The data offers a clear roadmap for course correction.

Health and Human Services: RFK Jr. Is Losing the Middle

Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is emerging as a political liability—not just to the administration, but to the broader independent movement he once claimed to represent. While his favorability ratings are roughly even, the plurality of adults and registered voters now say he should be replaced. This sentiment is especially strong among independents, who once viewed Kennedy as a fresh alternative but now see him as out of step with their values.

Keep ReadingShow less