Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Hostages Freed, Questions Remain: Trump’s Role and the Cost of Binary Politics

Why acknowledging Trump’s diplomatic success doesn’t compromise democratic integrity—it strengthens it

Opinion

Hostages Freed, Questions Remain: Trump’s Role and the Cost of Binary Politics

U.S. President Donald Trump, September 18, 2025.

(Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images)

In February of this year, Kristina Becvar and I published a column in The Fulcrum reaffirming our mission amid a barrage of executive orders from the Trump Administration. We sought to clarify our role—not as partisan commentators, but as stewards of fact-based reporting and healthy self-governance.

We wrote then:


Our challenge as a publication, dedicated to keeping our readers informed so we can repair our democracy and make it live and work in our everyday lives, is not to be overly reactive or partisan. At the same time, we must not ignore the dangers of the administration's degrading, hostile, and accusatory language and dangerous actions when they occur, while also acknowledging inappropriate responses when they occur.”

We continued:

“The Fulcrum must be mindful of the fact that Trump won a plurality of the vote and currently has a majority approval rating. If we are to serve our mission of engaging a broad spectrum of citizens from the left, right, and center in the political process, all working together to face tough challenges facing our nation, we must be mindful of this fact.

We believe it is our obligation to acknowledge that a varying percentage of the administration's statements and actions have merit and are based on truth while, at the same time, not normalizing the language Trump uses or understating the devastating impact many of his executive orders or other actions are having on millions of people in the United States and around the world.”

Since that column, The Fulcrum has published numerous pieces that have criticized President Trump for inflammatory rhetoric and for actions perceived as threats to constitutional norms, the rule of law, and the integrity of our elections. We will continue to do so—without hesitation and without apology.

But we must also resist the gravitational pull of binary thinking.

Too often, citizens, media outlets, and political leaders treat politics as a zero-sum game—where acknowledging an opponent’s success is seen as a personal or ideological loss. The Fulcrum rejects this premise. We will not be party to a worldview that sees governance as warfare and truth as tribal.

With that in mind, we recognize a significant development in the Middle East: an agreement that has led to the release of Israeli hostages abducted by Hamas on October 7, 2023, and that may lay the groundwork for a broader cease-fire in Gaza. President Donald Trump played a meaningful role in facilitating this outcome. While it is premature to declare this a historic peace accord, the hostage release marks the first step in a complex 20-point peace plan.

This is a powerful beginning. President Trump deserves credit for being fully engaged and for offering unconventional solutions that led to the release of hostages. His involvement, while not without rhetorical overreach—declaring peace achieved and forecasting a bright future for Gaza—nonetheless represents a commendable contribution to a fragile moment of progress.

As a nation, we must learn to hold praise and concern in the same breath. Truth is rarely binary. Americans are often seduced by partisan reflexes—embracing information that confirms their beliefs and dismissing evidence that challenges them. This tendency, while human, can blind us to the good deeds of those we dislike and the harmful actions of those we admire.

A healthy democracy demands more than loyalty; it requires discernment.

We must commit to a new politics of problem-solving—one grounded in reason, logic, and inquiry, where conclusions follow from evidence, not ideology. This new politics must create space for people of differing views to sit together, grapple with hard truths, and make the decisions that everyone knows must be made.

To do this, we must move beyond the blame game.

The challenges we face—climate instability, economic inequality, and democratic fragility are too complex for a simple “for or against” mindset. Meeting them requires rising above reflexive partisanship and embracing a more thoughtful, principled engagement.

At The Fulcrum, we remain committed to that path. Not because it is easy, but because it is necessary.

David Nevins is the publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.


Read More

People wearing vests with "ICE" and "Police" on the back.
The latest shutdown deal kept government open while exposing Congress’s reliance on procedural oversight rather than structural limits on ICE.
Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

Where Can Immigration Enforcement Take Place?

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

The Origins: The Clinton Administration

Keep ReadingShow less
The Iran war could shape American policy for decades

U.S. forces patrol the Arabian Sea near M/V Touska on April 20, 2026, after firing upon the Iranian-flagged vessel that the U.S. accused of attempting to violate the U.S. naval blockade of Iranian ports near the Strait of Hormuz.

(U.S. Navy/Getty Images/TNS)

The Iran war could shape American policy for decades

The war with Iran that never really ended is back on. Like everybody else, including the Trump administration and the Iranian regime, I have no idea how it will end. But it eventually will, and how it will be remembered will matter enormously.

Politics is about many things, but whether you call it “spin,” “framing” or “narrative competition,” storytelling is never far from the heart of it. As the philosopher Richard Rorty observed, “Competition for political leadership is in part a competition between differing stories about a nation’s self-identity, and between differing symbols of its greatness.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Presidential powers: Corporate abuses big concern after SCOTUS move

An oil production operation is shown in North Dakota. With the U.S. Supreme Court granting more presidential powers to the executive branch, environmental groups warned key agencies will have a harder time going after polluters.

(Adobe Stock)

Presidential powers: Corporate abuses big concern after SCOTUS move

A U.S. Supreme Court opinion issued last month expands presidential power over independent federal agencies, prompting warnings from environmental advocates about potential implications for states such as North Dakota.

The court’s conservative majority said President Donald Trump had the authority to fire a former Federal Trade Commission member without cause. Legal observers countered the opinion nullifies longstanding precedent involving the role of Congress in insulating certain federal agency officials from direct presidential control.

Keep ReadingShow less
Federal Register Reports being printed out of a large machine.

Congress should strengthen the administrative state by writing clearer laws, limiting delegated authority, and requiring periodic reauthorization of agency powers.

Photo courtesy of Luka Jacobi-Krohn

Putting the Guardrails Back on Delegations of Power

Congress needs to write better laws instead of dismantling the administrative state.

Debates over the administrative state focus on whether these agencies have accrued too much power. Some argue that the solution is to severely weaken or, in extreme scenarios, dismantle these federal agencies. However, the issue is not the existence of these agencies but actually how Congress writes its laws. When statutes are drafted with vague language, agencies are left to interpret the scope, and courts are forced to set the boundaries. This results in constant litigation and generally regulatory instability. If Congress actually wants a more durable and accountable regulatory system, they need to start with themselves by writing clearer laws.

Keep ReadingShow less