Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Why Fed Independence Is a Cornerstone of Democracy—and Why It’s Under Threat

Opinion

Why Fed Independence Is a Cornerstone of Democracy—and Why It’s Under Threat
1 U.S.A dollar banknotes

In an era of rising polarization and performative politics, few institutions remain as consequential and as poorly understood by citizens as the Federal Reserve.

While headlines swirl around inflation, interest rates, and stock market reactions, the deeper story is often missed: the Fed’s independence is not just a technical matter of monetary policy. It’s a democratic safeguard.


That’s the premise behind the Sept. 25 episode of The Unity Forum, a cross-partisan webinar series hosted by Chris Malone to elevate civil dialogue and challenge assumptions on the most pressing issues of our time.

Chris is co-author of the award-winning book, The Human Brand, and a founder of Alumni For Freedom & Democracy, a network of individuals committed to preserving the essential freedoms that sustain an open society—freedom of thought, civil dialogue, democratic principles, and economic opportunity.

The guest speaker for the webinar is Dr. Pat Harker, whose career spans the highest levels of academia, government, and finance, including a decade as President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and current leadership roles at the Wharton School and Penn Washington.

Dr. Harker recently authored a provocative op-ed in The Wall Street Journal titled “Public Ignorance and Fed Independence,” arguing that cynicism about the Fed stems not from its actions but from widespread misunderstanding of its legal boundaries and economic role. He warns that political interference—whether through executive threats or legislative overreach—risks destabilizing the very mechanisms that protect long-term economic health.

The conversation will explore:

  • Whether recent Federal Open Market Committee decisions reflect data-driven independence or creeping political pressure.
  • What the Fed does and what it is legally prohibited from doing.
  • How the judiciary, Congress, and public opinion serve as backstops against interference.
  • The implications of budget deficits, Social Security reform, and demographic shifts on monetary policy.
  • What universities must do to prepare the next generation of economists for the complex realities of central banking.

Dr. Harker’s insights are especially timely given recent attempts to dismiss Fed leadership, a move that echoes historical tensions but may signal a new level of partisan intrusion. As he puts it, “The Fed’s independence is not a luxury—it’s a necessity.”

For those interested in diving deeper into this critical issue, join the live webinar or receive a recording of The Unity Forum, featuring Dr. Harker.

The event will be held on Zoom on Thursday, Sept. 25, at 1:00 p.m. ET, with an audience Q&A near the end of the program. All registered participants will receive a link to the discussion recording, allowing them to listen at their convenience.

Webinar Registration: https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_995jr6iBSYmwEIpb_Zhmxg

In an era when economic policy is often reduced to market performance and partisan soundbites, we need more spaces for reasoned discourse. That’s what The Unity Forum aims to provide.

David Nevins is publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.


Read More

An illustration of the U.S. flag on the shape of the U.S. with blue and red figures of people across it.

Every state has its own constitution.

How State Constitutions Became the Battleground for American Rights and Liberties – on Both the Left and Right

Beyond picking governors, state legislators, local officials and representatives to serve in Congress, voters in almost every state this year will have the opportunity to amend the language of their state constitution. In one state, they could potentially rewrite the constitution altogether.

Though the U.S. Constitution is rarely amended, voters frequently amend their state constitutions. In every election cycle, voters are asked to ratify constitutional amendments.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's annual policy conference at the Washington Convention Center March 6, 2018 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

After AIPAC failed to defeat El-Sayed in the Michigan Democratic Senate primary—after spending $32 million—it said that it remains committed to defeating El-Sayed and his "radical, anti-Israel" agenda in the general election. Which means it is poised to sink tens of millions of dollars in supporting Republican Mike Rogers. It also said that Haley Stevens, his opponent, had presented "an authentic Democratic agenda." Meaning that El-Sayed did not? And they think that Mike Rogers, a MAGA Trump supporter, does compared with El-Sayed?

How can AIPAC say that El-Sayed does not present an authentic Democratic agenda when his socialist stance is much more in line with the principles stated in the Declaration of Independence than most centrist Democrats'? And making it sound like AIPAC cares about an authentic Democratic agenda is deceitful, when in the same breath they make clear that they will support Mike Rogers, a Trump lackey, in the general election.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research
silhouette of person using microscope

Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research

Scientists and the federal government have been close partners since World War II. A landmark report by President Truman’s chief science advisor laid out a vision for government research that shaped eight decades of federally funded science. That vision is now at risk. In principle, the Trump administration has supported scientific research with its own vision for a new “golden age of science.” But in practice, the administration has upended the relationship between the government, researchers, and their institutions. The changes have alarmed working scientists and their allies, who have protested in record numbers.

In July, I moderated a webinar on “Rewriting the Rules: What’s happening to public science?” (read the transcript here). The webinar was co-sponsored by NAPA, CODE, and the Bridge Alliance, with Dr. Aaron Carroll of AcademyHealth, Dr. Chris Marcum of the Federation of American Scientists, Dr. Gretchen Goldman of the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Dr. Maryam Zaringhalam of the Center for Open Science. I also interviewed Cole Donovan of the Stand Up for Science Foundation by email.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democratic Party Suicide
a piece of paper cut out of the shape of a donkey
Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash

Democratic Party Suicide

A recent New York Times article, "Moderate Democrats Prepare for 'War' Against an Ascendant Left," describes a disturbing perspective among mainstream, moderate, centrist Democrats. It is disturbing for many reasons.

First, there is the practical impact. If indeed mainstream Democrats attack socialist Democrats in a sustained, organized manner, there is only one possible result: the defeat of the Party in 2026 and the renewed vigor of Trump and his MAGA allies. Especially when combined with the all-out effort that AIPAC will mostly take to support Republican candidates running against Democratic candidates who are socialists. (See my article, "The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC.")

Keep ReadingShow less