Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

African American Literature Matters

African American Literature Matters

Girl (6-8) looking at book in library, silhouette

Getty Images//Terry Vine

This year's observance of Black History Month carries forward the centennial anniversary of the Harlem Renaissance. However, in this reflective season, we find ourselves at a crossroads that would be painfully familiar to those pioneering writers and artists of the 1920s.

The significance of African American literature has never been more profound. This is neither an imaginative nor conspiratorial factoid, especially amid the systematic dismantling of DEI initiatives, ethnic-centered curricula, and history. With six states and counting passing anti-DEI laws, universities nationwide are discontinuing their diversity programs. And more than 30 bills across the United States now target diversity initiatives in public colleges, threatening to unravel decades of progress in educational equity and cultural understanding. These actions are not just judicious administrative decisions. On the contrary, there are meticulously coordinated attempts to mute the very voices and existence of people and their sociocultural experiences and artifacts across generations. Illuminating why African American literature and ethnocultural genres remain paramount.


The parallels between our present moment and the birth of the Harlem Renaissance are undeniable. Then, as now, Black writers faced a society that sought to minimize their experiences and contributions. The response wasn't retreat but renaissance—a flowering of artistic expression that changed the world and reshaped American culture irrevocably. African American literary works have forever served a dual purpose: art and as an instrument of social change. From the searing testimonies of slave narratives to the jazz-infused poetry of Langston Hughes, from Zora Neale Hurston's folk-rooted storytelling to Toni Morrison's mythic explorations of Black experience, this literary tradition has consistently done more than tell stories—it has preserved history, challenged oppression, and imagined new possibilities for justice and equality.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

African American literature’s prowess resides in its capacity to transform personal experience into universal truth. When Ralph Ellison wrote on invisibility, he wasn't just describing the Black experience in America—he was illuminating the human condition of being unseen, unheard, and misunderstood. When Maya Angelou asked why the caged bird sings, she spoke to anyone who fought for freedom against overwhelming odds. This universality, paradoxically achieved through the most specific and personal stories, makes African American literature relevant and essential to understanding the American experience.

Though numerous institutions are reevaluating or removing resources for underrepresented Americans from their websites and curricula, African American literature serves as both a repository of epic memory and a beacon for the future. The literature that emerged from the Harlem Renaissance didn't just document a movement; it became the movement, creating spaces for Black voices where none existed. African American literary tradition has always understood that words and art are the means for articulating struggle—the experience of being both American and Black in a society that never fully recognizes or respects such a reality. African American literature's exploration and explication of such complexity remains important as we grapple with questions of identity, belonging, and justice.

The relevance of Black Americans' literary contributions should not be debated. Our literary tradition offers what no policy can erase: authentic voices speaking truth to power, creating beauty from struggle, and insisting on the full humanity of all people. Black folks’ pens, brushes, and instruments provide a counter-narrative to simplifying or sanitizing American history.

As distractors diligently seek to silence uniquely diverse voices, my people's literature speaks louder than ever. There is life and power in logos— to illuminate truth, inspire change, and build understanding. No legislative agenda or executive decree can veto that divine reality. The power of yours, mine, and our story can change hearts, open minds, and transform worlds.

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, and scholar-practitioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.

Read More

Future of the National Museum of the American Latino is Uncertain

PRESENTE! A Latino History of the United States

Credit: National Museum of the American Latino

Future of the National Museum of the American Latino is Uncertain

The American Museum of the Latino faces more hurdles after over two decades of advocacy.

Congress passed legislation to allow for the creation of the Museum, along with the American Women’s History Museum, as part of the Smithsonian Institution in an online format. Five years later, new legislation introduced by Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.) wants to build a physical museum for both the Latino and women’s museums but might face pushback due to a new executive order signed by President Donald Trump.

Keep ReadingShow less
Fairness, Not Stigma, for Transgender Athletes

People running.

Getty Images, Pavel1964

Fairness, Not Stigma, for Transgender Athletes

President Trump’s campaign and allies spent $21 million of campaign spending on attack ads against transgender people. With that level of spending, I was shocked to find out it was not a top concern for voters of either party, but it continued to prevail as a campaign priority.

Opponents of transgender participation in sports continue to voice their opinions, three months into the Trump presidency. Just last month, the Trump administration suspended $175 million in federal funding to Penn State over a transgender swimmer. $175 million is a bit dramatic over one swimmer, or in the case of the entire NCAA, fewer than 10 athletes. Even Governor Gavin Newsom was recently under fire for sharing his views on his podcast. Others, like Rep. Nancy Mace, have also caught on to the mediagenic nature of transphobia right now. “You want penises in women's bathrooms, and I'm not going to have it,” she said in a U.S. House hearing last month. I had no clue who Nancy Mace was prior to her notorious views on LGBTQ+ rights. Frankly, her flip from being a supporter of LGBTQ+ rights to shouting “Tr**ny” in a hearing seems less like a change of opinion and more of a cry for attention.

Keep ReadingShow less
Unit Cohesion is a Pretext for Exclusion

The transgender flag on a military uniform.

Getty Images, Cunaplus_M.Faba

Unit Cohesion is a Pretext for Exclusion

In the annals of military history, the desire for uniformity has often been wielded as a sword against inclusion. This tendency resurfaced dramatically when President Donald Trump, shortly after taking office, signed an executive order, purportedly rooted in concerns about unit cohesion, that banned transgender individuals from serving in the armed forces. It was challenged and blocked by a federal judge on March 18, who described the ban as “soaked in animus and dripping with pretext.” On March 27, a second judge issued an injunction on the ban, calling it “unsupported, dramatic and facially unfair exclusionary policy” (the Trump administration asked the 9th Circuit to stay the ruling; they were denied on April 1). It turns out that the argument that introducing any minority into military ranks would disrupt unit cohesion is practically a cliché, with similar claims having been made against integrating black men, women, and then openly gay service members. It is a tale as old as time. But that’s just it–it’s just a tale. Don’t believe it.

The military top brass have, at times, insisted that the integration of minority groups would undermine the effectiveness of our armed forces, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Air Force General Henry Arnold wrote in 1941 that “the use of women pilots serves no military purpose,” only to have “nothing but praise” for them by 1944, after having served with them. Regarding integrating women into combat roles in 1993, Congress members argued that “although logical, such a policy would [erode] the civilizing notion that men should protect…women.” Of course, they also offered the even more convenient cover story that integration would be “disruptive to unit cohesion.” Similarly, although many claimed that “letting gays serve openly would ruin [unit cohesion],” the resistance was found to be “based on nothing” except “our own prejudices and . . . fears.” Dozens of studies conducted by the U.S. military and 25 other nations confirmed the presence of gay soldiers had no impact on unit cohesion. These results were ignored in “the service of an ideology equating heterosexuality with bravery and patriotism.” Unit cohesion is a simple—though thinly veiled—rationale.

Keep ReadingShow less
Banned Books Damn Our Children's Future

Two children reading in school.

Getty Images, Jim Craigmyle

Banned Books Damn Our Children's Future

April 2nd is International Children's Book Day. It is time to celebrate the transformative power of children's literature and mourn the spaces where stories once lived. The numbers are staggering: there were over 10,000 book bans in U.S. public schools during the 2023-2024 school year alone, affecting more than 4,000 unique titles. Each banned book represents a mirror taken away from a child who might have seen themselves in those pages or a window closed to a child who might have glimpsed a world beyond their own.

I'm a child of the 80s and 90s, back when PBS was basically raising us all. Man, LeVar Burton's voice on Reading Rainbow was like that cool uncle who always knew exactly what book you needed. Remember him saying, "But you don't have to take my word for it"? And Sesame Street—that show was living proof that a kid from the Bronx could learn alongside a kid from rural Kansas, no questions asked. These and other such programs convinced an entire generation that we could "go anywhere" and "be anything.” Also, they were declarations that every child deserves to see themselves in stories, to dream in technicolor, and to imagine futures unlimited by the accidents of birth or circumstance.

Keep ReadingShow less