Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

DEI programs are essential to tackle systemic barriers

DEI programs are essential to tackle systemic barriers

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI).

CT Mirror

By executive order, the Trump administration has called for an end to “dangerous, demeaning, and immoral” diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) schemes.

Growing up, my cultural identity was nurtured by my family but when I stepped beyond the safeguards of home, my experiences as an undergrad and grad student were revealing. My journey was marked by the absence of Latina representation in required texts and academic spaces. Revolutionary figures like U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, U.S. Surgeon General Antonia Coello Novello, writer Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, and others were glaringly omitted.


I found my sense of self through cultural organizations, not classrooms. These spaces allowed me to revel with fellow first-generation Latinas who shared the struggle of finding cultural affirmation in Spanglish conversations, shared traditions, and the quest of shattering the glass ceiling.

The history of higher education in the United States has been marked by systemic barriers to access and opportunity that BIPOC communities face. Many students, researchers, and staff from marginalized backgrounds have historically faced exclusion, racism, and isolation within institutions that were originally designed to serve the interests of privileged elites. Cultural organizations at historically white institutions (HWIs) play a critical role in countering these historic inequities by offering safe spaces for individuals to connect, share experiences, and support each other in both academic and personal growth.

However, as Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Access (DEIA) standards come under attack, these protected classes face unique challenges, compounded by declining national enrollment rates. In this precarious landscape, cultural organizations and BIPOC Greek letter organizations must resolve, like Langston Hughes, to “Let America be America Again.”

For the past two years, I’ve served as a community leader for the Yale School of Medicine’s Latino Recovery Colectivo. Yale’s Latino Colectivo provides not only a sense of belonging and identity but also an avenue for fostering inclusivity and empowerment in environments that have historically been dominated by white voices.

As pushbacks on inclusion and access policies intensify and funding for such initiatives faces cuts, their capacity to support students in an increasingly hostile climate could be strained, especially when resources are increasingly allocated to programs that focus on a narrow vision of “meritocracy” or colorblindness.

As national enrollment rates continue to decline, institutions might also view such organizations through the lens of “cost-effectiveness,” questioning whether these programs are worth maintaining in a more competitive and financially uncertain climate.

Institutions like Yale, which have invested in inclusion and access initiatives in various forms, including supporting groups like the Colectivo, will undoubtedly face significant pressures to adapt. The mission of organizations like the Colectivo—to uplift Latino researchers and community voices, ensure equitable access to resources, and advocate for systemic change— could be compromised if institutional policies shift away from prioritizing equity. For example, the Colectivo may find itself without the necessary resources to provide services, advocacy, and networking opportunities for its members, all of which are vital in navigating the pressures of medical school and academia.

DEI programs are essential to tackle systemic barriers was first published by the CT Mirror and is shared with permission. Doris Maldonado Mendez is a member of the Connecticut Mirror’s Community Editorial Board.

Read More

A Promise in the Making: Thirty-Five Years of the ADA

Americans with Disabilities Act ADA and glasses.

Getty Images

A Promise in the Making: Thirty-Five Years of the ADA

One July morning in 1990, a crowd gathered on the White House lawn, some in wheelchairs, others holding signs, many with tears in their eyes. President George H.W. Bush lifted his pen and signed his name to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)—the most sweeping civil rights law for people with disabilities in the nation's history. It was a moment three decades in the making: a rare convergence of activism, outrage, and legislative will. The ADA's promise was simple—no longer would disability mean exclusion from public life—but its implications were anything but.

Thirty-five years later, the ADA remains a landmark, a legal bulwark against discrimination, and a symbol of hard-won visibility for a community that has been too often relegated to the margins. Yet, like every civil rights law, the ADA's story is more complex than a single signature or a morning in Washington. Its passage and its legacy have always been about more than ramps and regulations.

Keep ReadingShow less
Illinois Camp Gives Underrepresented Kids an Opportunity To Explore New Pathways

Kuumba Family Festival at Evanston Township High School

Illinois Camp Gives Underrepresented Kids an Opportunity To Explore New Pathways

Summer camps in Evanston, Illinois — a quiet suburb just north of Chicago — usually consist of an array of different sports, educational programs, and even learning how to sail. But one thing is obviously apparent throughout the city’s camps: they’re almost all white.

Despite Black or African American families making up nearly 16% of Evanston’s population, Black kids are massively underrepresented throughout the city's summer camps.

Keep ReadingShow less
Students in a classroom.​

Today, Hispanic-Serving Institutions enroll 64 percent of all Latino college students.

Getty Images, andresr

Tennessee’s Attack on Federal Support for Hispanic-Serving Colleges Hurts Us All

The Tennessee Attorney General has partnered with a conservative legal nonprofit to sue the U.S. Department of Education over programming that supports Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs), colleges, and universities where at least 25% of the undergraduate full-time equivalent student enrollment is Hispanic. On its face, this action claims to oppose “discriminatory” federal funding. In reality, it is part of a broader and deeply troubling trend: a coordinated effort to dismantle educational opportunity for communities of color under the guise of anti-DEI rhetoric.

As a scholar of educational policy and leadership in higher education, I believe we must confront policies that narrow access and undermine equity in education for those who have been historically underserved. What is happening in Tennessee is not just a misguided action—it’s a self-inflicted wound that will harm the state's economic future and deepen historical inequality.

Keep ReadingShow less
Inclusion Is Not a Slogan. It’s the Ground We Walk On.

A miniature globe between a row of blue human figures

Getty Images//Stock Photo

Inclusion Is Not a Slogan. It’s the Ground We Walk On.

After political pressure and a federal investigation, Harvard University recently renamed and restructured its Office for Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging. MIT announced the closure of its DEI office, stating that it would no longer support centralized diversity initiatives. Meanwhile, Purdue University shut down its Office of Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging and removed cultural center programs that once served as safe spaces for marginalized students. I am aware of the costs of not engaging with ideas surrounding diversity and difference, and I have witnessed the consequences of the current administration's actions— and the pace at which universities are responding. It’s nowhere good.

I was forced to move to the United States from Russia, a country where the words inclusion, diversity, and equality are either misunderstood, mocked, or treated as dangerous ideology. In this country, a woman over fifty is considered “unfit” for the job market. Disability is not viewed as a condition that warrants accommodation, but rather as a reason to deny employment. LGBTQ+ individuals are treated not as equal citizens but as people who, ideally, shouldn’t exist, where the image of a rainbow on a toy or an ice cream wrapper can result in legal prosecution.

Keep ReadingShow less