Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

DEI programs are essential to tackle systemic barriers

Opinion

DEI programs are essential to tackle systemic barriers

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI).

CT Mirror

By executive order, the Trump administration has called for an end to “dangerous, demeaning, and immoral” diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) schemes.

Growing up, my cultural identity was nurtured by my family but when I stepped beyond the safeguards of home, my experiences as an undergrad and grad student were revealing. My journey was marked by the absence of Latina representation in required texts and academic spaces. Revolutionary figures like U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, U.S. Surgeon General Antonia Coello Novello, writer Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, and others were glaringly omitted.


I found my sense of self through cultural organizations, not classrooms. These spaces allowed me to revel with fellow first-generation Latinas who shared the struggle of finding cultural affirmation in Spanglish conversations, shared traditions, and the quest of shattering the glass ceiling.

The history of higher education in the United States has been marked by systemic barriers to access and opportunity that BIPOC communities face. Many students, researchers, and staff from marginalized backgrounds have historically faced exclusion, racism, and isolation within institutions that were originally designed to serve the interests of privileged elites. Cultural organizations at historically white institutions (HWIs) play a critical role in countering these historic inequities by offering safe spaces for individuals to connect, share experiences, and support each other in both academic and personal growth.

However, as Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Access (DEIA) standards come under attack, these protected classes face unique challenges, compounded by declining national enrollment rates. In this precarious landscape, cultural organizations and BIPOC Greek letter organizations must resolve, like Langston Hughes, to “Let America be America Again.”

For the past two years, I’ve served as a community leader for the Yale School of Medicine’s Latino Recovery Colectivo. Yale’s Latino Colectivo provides not only a sense of belonging and identity but also an avenue for fostering inclusivity and empowerment in environments that have historically been dominated by white voices.

As pushbacks on inclusion and access policies intensify and funding for such initiatives faces cuts, their capacity to support students in an increasingly hostile climate could be strained, especially when resources are increasingly allocated to programs that focus on a narrow vision of “meritocracy” or colorblindness.

As national enrollment rates continue to decline, institutions might also view such organizations through the lens of “cost-effectiveness,” questioning whether these programs are worth maintaining in a more competitive and financially uncertain climate.

Institutions like Yale, which have invested in inclusion and access initiatives in various forms, including supporting groups like the Colectivo, will undoubtedly face significant pressures to adapt. The mission of organizations like the Colectivo—to uplift Latino researchers and community voices, ensure equitable access to resources, and advocate for systemic change— could be compromised if institutional policies shift away from prioritizing equity. For example, the Colectivo may find itself without the necessary resources to provide services, advocacy, and networking opportunities for its members, all of which are vital in navigating the pressures of medical school and academia.

DEI programs are essential to tackle systemic barriers was first published by the CT Mirror and is shared with permission. Doris Maldonado Mendez is a member of the Connecticut Mirror’s Community Editorial Board.

Read More

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

The rise of book bans and erasure of Black history from classrooms emotionally and systematically harms Black children. It's critical that we urge educators to represent Black experiences and stories in class.

Getty Images, Klaus Vedfelt

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

When my son, Jonathan, was born, one of the first children’s books I bought was "So Much" by Trish Cooke. I was captivated by its joyful depiction of a Black family loving their baby boy. I read it to him often, wanting him to know that he was deeply loved, seen, and valued. In an era when politicians are banning books, sanitizing curricula, and policing the teaching of Black history, the idea of affirming Black children’s identities is miscast as divisive and wrong. Forty-two states have proposed or passed legislation restricting how race and history can be taught, including Black history. PEN America reported that nearly 16,000 books (many featuring Black stories) were banned from schools within the last three years across 43 states. These prohibitive policies and bans are presented as protecting the ‘feelings’ of White children, while at the same time ignoring and invalidating the feelings of Black children who live daily with the pain of erasure, distortion, and disregard in schools.

When I hear and see the ongoing devaluation of Black children in schools and public life, I, and other Black parents, recognize this pain firsthand. For instance, recently, my teenage granddaughter, Jaliyah, texted me, asking to visit the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C., because she had heard that the President planned to close it. For what felt like the millionth time, my heart broke with the understanding that too many people fail to rally on behalf of Black children. Jaliyah’s question revealed what so many Black children intuitively understand—that their histories, their feelings, and their futures are often treated as expendable.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

equity, inclusion, diversity

AI generated

Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

Even before Trump’s actions against DEI, many in the academic community and elsewhere felt for some time that DEI had taken an unintended turn.

What was meant to provide support—in jobs, education, grants, and other ways—to those groups who historically and currently have suffered from discrimination became for others a sign of exclusion because all attention was placed on how these groups were faring, with little attention to others. Those left out were assumed not to need any help, but that was mistaken. They did need help and are angry.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two people in business attire walking into an office.

Dr. Valentina Greco reflects on how accent bias, internalized gatekeeping, and hidden prejudices shape academia—and how true change begins by confronting our own discomfort.

Getty Images, Marco VDM

How Do We Become the Gatekeepers?

“Do you have a moment?”

I turned and saw my senior colleague, Paul (not his real name), a mentor and sponsor, at my office door.

Keep ReadingShow less
So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

Conceptual image of multiple human face shapes in a variety of colors illustrating different races

Getty Images

So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

It is no secret that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs are under attack in our country. They have been blamed for undermining free speech, meritocracy, and America itself. The University of Virginia is the latest to settle with the government and walk away from its DEI initiatives rather than defend its programs or find a new solution.

Those who decry DEI say they do so in the name of meritocracy. They argue that those who benefit from DEI programs do so at the expense of other, more qualified individuals, and that these programs are weakening professions such as our military, science, education, and healthcare. But these arguments have it exactly backwards. DEI programs were never designed to give privilege to underrepresented people. They were put in place to chip away at discrimination and nepotism, both concepts that are antithetical to meritocracy.

Keep ReadingShow less