Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Hardened absentee rules in Iowa face newest Democratic lawsuit

Iowa voting

Volunteers study an Iowa map before the caucuses earlier this year. Now, a lawsuit has been filed challenging a new law that opponents say makes it more difficult to vote by mail.

Mark Makela/Getty Images

Democrats have, as promised, taken their courthouse crusade for easier mail-in voting into bellwether Iowa — alleging a new state law makes it unfairly complicated to vote absentee.

Among those filing the state court lawsuit in Iowa City on Tuesday was Marc Elias, the attorney who has now filed three dozen cases on behalf of the party's campaign committees challenging a variety of election laws.

Their effort, which Republicans are fighting vigorously, aims to get courts to make voting easier this fall as a way to promote turnout during the coronavirus pandemic, which they're confident will benefit Democratic candidates. Iowa saw record turnout for its June primaries, with almost 80 percent of votes cast by mail — triple the usual share in the state.


Democrats worry that number will shrink because of a provision in a law approved by the General Assembly and signed by Gov. Kim Reynolds last month. Elias had vowed then to sue to stop the measure from taking effect, and that is what he did Tuesday.

No excuse is required to get an absentee ballot in Iowa and 28 other states. Under the provision, however, if a voter provides incomplete or incorrect information when requesting a mail ballot, the county auditor's office is required to contact the voter first by telephone and email, then reach out with a letter in the mail. Until now, local officials have been permitted to use their voter registration database to fill in the blanks themselves.

The lawsuit claims that the change makes voting in Iowa "more complicated, cumbersome, confusing, expensive and time consuming" and is unconstitutional.

Republicans, who control the state capital and governor's mansion, said the change was needed to make sure everyone who requests an absentee ballot is an eligible voter.

Many but hardly all Republicans who administer elections in states and counties have joined President Trump in opposing an expansion of mail-in voting during the pandemic, arguing that it will increase the opportunities for widespread voter fraud. Democrats note there is no credible evidence to back this claim.

The plaintiffs in this case are the League of United Latin American Citizens of Iowa, a Latino civil rights organization, and Majority Forward, a Democratic-aligned nonprofit that promotes voter registration and turnout. The defendant is Paul Pate, the Republican secretary of state.

Turnout could prove crucial in several Iowa races in November. The state has been carried by the presidential winner in 14 of the 18 elections since World War II, including Trump last time, but polling suggests former Vice President Joe Biden has made the fight for its six electoral votes a tossup. So is the Senate race, featuring Democratic former real estate executive Theresa Greenfield and the incumbent Republican, Joni Ernest. And races for three of the state's four House seats are also highly competitive.


Read More

Aspirations for the American Experiment Versus the Save Act of 2026
a person is casting a vote into a box

Aspirations for the American Experiment Versus the Save Act of 2026

The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act stands as the direct antithesis of our founders' aspirations for the American Experiment, eroding the core principles of popular sovereignty and individual liberty. Rather than cultivating a government that derives its "just powers from the consent of the governed," this legislative measure inverts that relationship. It transforms a natural right into a government-administered privilege, erecting bureaucratic barriers that conflict with the expansive, participatory democratic republic the Framers sought to construct.

Subverting the Consent of the Governed: the foundational premise of the American Experiment, as articulated by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence, is that the legitimacy of a government hinges entirely on the active consent of its citizens. The SAVE Act disrupts this dynamic by fundamentally shifting the burden of proof.

Keep ReadingShow less
People wearing vests with "ICE" and "Police" on the back.
The latest shutdown deal kept government open while exposing Congress’s reliance on procedural oversight rather than structural limits on ICE.
Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

Where Can Immigration Enforcement Take Place?

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

The Origins: The Clinton Administration

Keep ReadingShow less