Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Hardened absentee rules in Iowa face newest Democratic lawsuit

Iowa voting

Volunteers study an Iowa map before the caucuses earlier this year. Now, a lawsuit has been filed challenging a new law that opponents say makes it more difficult to vote by mail.

Mark Makela/Getty Images

Democrats have, as promised, taken their courthouse crusade for easier mail-in voting into bellwether Iowa — alleging a new state law makes it unfairly complicated to vote absentee.

Among those filing the state court lawsuit in Iowa City on Tuesday was Marc Elias, the attorney who has now filed three dozen cases on behalf of the party's campaign committees challenging a variety of election laws.

Their effort, which Republicans are fighting vigorously, aims to get courts to make voting easier this fall as a way to promote turnout during the coronavirus pandemic, which they're confident will benefit Democratic candidates. Iowa saw record turnout for its June primaries, with almost 80 percent of votes cast by mail — triple the usual share in the state.


Democrats worry that number will shrink because of a provision in a law approved by the General Assembly and signed by Gov. Kim Reynolds last month. Elias had vowed then to sue to stop the measure from taking effect, and that is what he did Tuesday.

No excuse is required to get an absentee ballot in Iowa and 28 other states. Under the provision, however, if a voter provides incomplete or incorrect information when requesting a mail ballot, the county auditor's office is required to contact the voter first by telephone and email, then reach out with a letter in the mail. Until now, local officials have been permitted to use their voter registration database to fill in the blanks themselves.

The lawsuit claims that the change makes voting in Iowa "more complicated, cumbersome, confusing, expensive and time consuming" and is unconstitutional.

Republicans, who control the state capital and governor's mansion, said the change was needed to make sure everyone who requests an absentee ballot is an eligible voter.

Many but hardly all Republicans who administer elections in states and counties have joined President Trump in opposing an expansion of mail-in voting during the pandemic, arguing that it will increase the opportunities for widespread voter fraud. Democrats note there is no credible evidence to back this claim.

The plaintiffs in this case are the League of United Latin American Citizens of Iowa, a Latino civil rights organization, and Majority Forward, a Democratic-aligned nonprofit that promotes voter registration and turnout. The defendant is Paul Pate, the Republican secretary of state.

Turnout could prove crucial in several Iowa races in November. The state has been carried by the presidential winner in 14 of the 18 elections since World War II, including Trump last time, but polling suggests former Vice President Joe Biden has made the fight for its six electoral votes a tossup. So is the Senate race, featuring Democratic former real estate executive Theresa Greenfield and the incumbent Republican, Joni Ernest. And races for three of the state's four House seats are also highly competitive.

Read More

Why Doing Immigration the “White Way” Is Wrong

A close up of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge.

Getty Images, Tennessee Witney

Why Doing Immigration the “White Way” Is Wrong

The president is granting refugee status to white South Africans. Meanwhile, he is issuing travel bans, unsure about his duty to uphold due process, fighting birthright citizenship, and backing massive human rights breaches against people of color, including deporting citizens and people authorized to be here.

The administration’s escalating immigration enforcement—marked by “fast-track” deportations or disappearances without due process—signal a dangerous leveling-up of aggressive anti-immigration policies and authoritarian tactics. In the face of the immigration chaos that we are now in, we could—and should—turn our efforts toward making immigration policies less racist, more efficient, and more humane because America’s promise is built on freedom and democracy, not terror. As social scientists, we know that in America, thinking people can and should “just get documented” ignores the very real and large barriers embedded in our systems.

Keep ReadingShow less
Insider trading in Washington, DC

U.S. senators and representatives with access to non-public information are permitted to buy and sell individual stocks. It’s not just unethical; it sends the message that the game is rigged.

Getty Images, Greggory DiSalvo

Insider Trading: If CEOs Can’t Do It, Why Can Congress?

Ivan Boesky. Martha Stewart. Jeffrey Skilling.

Each became infamous for using privileged, non-public information to profit unfairly from the stock market. They were prosecuted. They served time. Because insider trading is a crime that threatens public trust and distorts free markets.

Keep ReadingShow less
Supreme Court Changes the Game on Federal Environmental Reviews

A pump jack seen in a southeast New Mexico oilfield.

Getty Images, Daniel A. Leifheit

Supreme Court Changes the Game on Federal Environmental Reviews

Getting federal approval for permits to build bridges, wind farms, highways and other major infrastructure projects has long been a complicated and time-consuming process. Despite growing calls from both parties for Congress and federal agencies to reform that process, there had been few significant revisions – until now.

In one fell swoop, the U.S. Supreme Court has changed a big part of the game.

Keep ReadingShow less