Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Supreme Court lets stand a ban on corporate contributions to candidates

Supreme Court lets stand a ban on corporate contributions to candidates
Drew Angerer / Getty Photos

The Supreme Court has turned down an opportunity to permit businesses to donate directly to candidates, deviating from a stretch of decisions expanding the "money is free speech" rights of corporate America.

As is routine, the justices made no statement Monday explaining why they decided against hearing the appeal of two family-owned businesses in Massachusetts that challenged the state's prohibition on for-profit companies making campaign donations.


They asked the court to reverse its 2003 decision allowing limits on corporate contributions to candidates, which would have been a significant expansion of the deregulation of campaign financing set in the Citizens United decision nine years ago. That landmark ruling declared that corporations have a First Amendment right to spend unlimited amounts on elections so long as money is allocated independently from the candidates.

The two suburban Boston companies, a chain of auto parts stores and a self-storage outfit, were represented by the libertarian Goldwater Institute. They argued the state ban on donations from for-profit corporations to candidates and political committees violated the First Amendment free-speech rights of businesses and the Constitution's guarantee of equal protection under the law, because the restrictions on businesses' political activity are more stringent than for nonprofit corporations and unions.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

All federal candidates are barred from accepting donations directly from corporations, and 22 states also ban corporate contributions to candidates, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Read More

We need a "children-first" approach to the digital world

Kid looking at smartphone

Keiko Iwabuchi//Getty Images

We need a "children-first" approach to the digital world

On a recent appearance on the Team Never Quit podcast, I described the internet broadly and social media more specifically as a “democracy-killing force.” This wasn't hyperbole. The scope, scale, and speed with which the all-consuming Big Tech wave has unmoored us from ourselves, each other, and reality has been unprecedented in human history.

The heart of democracy is a government that operates "for the people" and "by the people" — upholding the highest levels of individual and collective freedom for its citizenry. It also, above all else, promotes "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." This incredibly precious and audaciously ambitious mandate of our founding fathers is one that every generation has carried forward with a ruthless commitment to the American experiment: a commitment underwritten with sweat, tears, and blood.

Keep ReadingShow less
Jimmy Carter: Defender of Democracy

Jimmy Carter, 39th President of the United States

Jimmy Carter: Defender of Democracy

Jimmy Carter, the 39th President of the United States, is being recognized for his steadfast commitment to the principles of democracy throughout his political career and beyond. Carter, the only Georgian ever elected to the White House, died on Sunday. He was 100 years old.

Carter is often celebrated for his steadfast commitment to the principles of democracy throughout his political career and beyond. From January 20, 1977, to January 20, 1981, his presidency was marked by a focus on human rights and democratic governance, both domestically and internationally.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person being bombarded with disinformation
Misinformation is rampant in America. Experts explain how to combat it.
Pavlo Plakhotia/Getty Images

2024: The year in misinformation

Record-breaking hurricanes, the rapid development and use of generative artificial intelligence technologies, anything Taylor Swift, two assassination attempts, and President-elect Donald Trump’s win were among the biggest news stories of 2024. But misinformation often spread as rapidly as the facts about these events did. Here are the top misinformation trends of 2024.

1. Fraudulent election fraud claims

In the weeks leading up to the 2024 presidential election, false claims aimed at casting doubt on the legitimacy of the electoral process were prevalent on social media. The News Literacy Project tracked viral election misinformation and archived hundreds of social media posts. The claims ranged from falsehoods about noncitizens voting to election technology suppliers altering tallies to satellites being used to change vote counts. But widespread voting irregularities have not been found and election fraud claims themselves proved fraudulent.

Keep ReadingShow less
Chicago's Southwest Side: Vision for Urban Revitalization

Brian Delisi and Trina Mulligan come to Park No. 571 without any prejudice against Bubbly Creek. In addition to kayaking, Delisi enjoys occasional fishing.

Victoria Malis // The Fulcrum

Chicago's Southwest Side: Vision for Urban Revitalization

BRIDGEPORT, ILLINOIS – A young couple attached a kayak to the roof of an SUV before heading back home to Little Italy. Mere minutes before, Brian Delisi had finished his first kayaking venture on Bubbly Creek. He tested the waters solo this time, but his fiancée, Trina Mulligan, said they would return with two kayaks in the following few weeks. Save for a few fishermen, Park No. 571 in Bridgeport was empty on the chilly overcast Saturday afternoon.

McKinley Park Development Council (MPDC) hopes to see many more people on the South Branch of the Chicago River in the future. MPDC, an advisory nonprofit, published the South Branch Connectivity framework plan this summer. Theplan was sponsored by the Our Great Rivers grant funded through The Chicago Community Trust. It would connect McKinley Park, Bridgeport, Chinatown, and Pilsen with a continuous trail along the river and nudge the residents of these four neighborhoods to engage with the river itself.

Keep ReadingShow less