Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Midterm turnout surge was fueled by every demographic

Last year's turnout — the highest for a midterm election in a century — was boosted by bursts of new voters from virtually every demographic group, the Census Bureau reports.

Overall turnout was a shade above 53 percent of eligible voters, a whopping 16 percentage points higher than in the previous midterm, halfway through President Obama's second term. (That 37 percent turnout of 2014 was the lowest for a midterm since World War II.)

Notably, 36 percent of the youngest eligible voters, those 18 to 29, cast ballots last year — up 16 points from four years earlier. But still, young people as a share of the electorate edged up just a couple of points, to 7 percent, because other cohorts were also on the rise. The elderly, who constitute nearly one-quarter of the electorate, vote at a fundamentally higher rate: Last year 66 percent of people older than 65 went to the polls, a 7-point uptick.


Highlights of the turnout increases for other sectors of the population:

  • 49 percent of people 30 to 44, up 13 points from 2014
  • 58 percent of whites, up 12 points to the highest level for a midterm in four decades
  • 51 percent of blacks, up 10 points
  • 41 percent of Asians, up 14 points
  • 40 percent of Hispanics, up 13 points
  • 74 percent of citizens with postgraduate degrees, up 12 points
  • 59 percent of people with a bachelor's degree or some college, up 13 points
  • 42 percent of high school graduates, up 8 points
  • 27 percent of those without a high school diploma, up 5 points

The data, released Tuesday, was from a special survey the Census Bureau conducts nationwide after each federal election. The Washington Post has more numbers and good graphics of the historic trends.

With President Trump on the ballot, the boost he provided to midterm turnout (which energized both the GOP and Democratic bases, although the latter a bit more) should continue if not be magnified in 2020. Changes to election laws, making it easier to register and vote in several states, also seem sure to enhance turnout next time.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Read More

The AI Race We Need: For a Better Future, Not Against Another Nation

The concept of AI hovering among the public.

Getty Images, J Studios

The AI Race We Need: For a Better Future, Not Against Another Nation

The AI race that warrants the lion’s share of our attention and resources is not the one with China. Both superpowers should stop hurriedly pursuing AI advances for the sake of “beating” the other. We’ve seen such a race before. Both participants lose. The real race is against an unacceptable status quo: declining lifespans, increasing income inequality, intensifying climate chaos, and destabilizing politics. That status quo will drag on, absent the sorts of drastic improvements AI can bring about. AI may not solve those problems but it may accelerate our ability to improve collective well-being. That’s a race worth winning.

Geopolitical races have long sapped the U.S. of realizing a better future sooner. The U.S. squandered scarce resources and diverted talented staff to close the alleged missile gap with the USSR. President Dwight D. Eisenhower rightfully noted, “Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.” He realized that every race comes at an immense cost. In this case, the country was “spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Third Parties, First Principles: Reshaping Democracy One Reform at a Time

Third Parties, First Principles: Reshaping Democracy One Reform at a Time

Primaries, Preferences, and Participation  — This Week’s Expand Democracy 5

Welcome to the newest edition of The Expand Democracy 5! With Rob Richie’s help (from his journey along the Appalachian Trail!), Eveline Dowling explores: (1) parties and polarization in elections in the UK and Australia; (2) open primaries in the United States; (3) bipartisan views on environmental issues; (4) addressing the voting needs of military families; and (5) this week’s timely links.

In keeping with The Fulcrum’s mission to share ideas that help to repair our democracy and make it live and work in our everyday lives, we intend to publish The Expand Democracy 5 in The Fulcrum each Friday.

Keep ReadingShow less
Could Splits Within the GOP Over Economic Policy Hurt the Trump Administration?

With Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) by his side President Donald Trump speaks to the press following a House Republican meeting at the U.S. Capitol on May 20, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Tasos Katopodis

Could Splits Within the GOP Over Economic Policy Hurt the Trump Administration?

Republican U.S. Senator Josh Hawley from Missouri is an unusual combo of right and left politics—kind of like an elephant combined with a donkey combined with a polar bear. And, yet, his views may augur the future of the Republican Party.

Many people view the Republican and Democratic parties as ideological monoliths, run by hardcore partisans and implacably positioned against each other. But, in fact, both parties have their internal divisions, influenced by various outside organizations. In the GOP, an intra-party battle is brewing between an economic populist wing with its more pro-labor positions and a traditional libertarian wing with its pro-free market stances.

Keep ReadingShow less