Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Is the House broken?

Opinion

Man speaking to reporters in the Capitol

Rep. Chip Roy joined the "Politics in Question" podcast.

Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

In the latest episode of “Politics In Question,” hosts Lee Drutman and James Wallner ask Republican Rep. Chip Roy of Texas whether the House of Representatives is broken.

They discuss various aspects of American politics, governance and the challenges faced by lawmakers. The discussion touches on the tensions between institutionalism and populism, reflecting on how the political landscape has evolved over time. Roy emphasizes the importance of institutions, expressing concerns about the growing disconnect between government actions and the desires of the electorate.


One significant topic explored is ever-increasing government spending and its impact on the nation. The congressman argues that the lack of a balanced budget requirement allows for unchecked spending, leading to financial instability. He contends that without such fiscal constraints, lawmakers are not compelled to engage in crucial debates about topics like Medicare, Social Security and taxes. The absence of tough choices, according to Roy, contributes to a broken system.

The conversation delves into historical parallels, drawing comparisons with pre-Civil War divisions in the United States. The congressman suggests that, despite significant differences, earlier periods of intense debate and argumentation resulted in resolutions, fostering a sense of reconciliation even among those who lost a particular debate. He questions the current state of American unity, pondering what binds the nation together amidst increasing cultural divides and demographic changes.

The podcast concludes with a reflection on the personal aspects of public service. Roy shares insights into the sacrifices made by those in public office, including time away from family and the toll it takes on personal lives. Despite the challenges, there is an acknowledgment of the honor and duty associated with serving the country.

Overall, the episode offers a multifaceted exploration of American politics, touching on the dynamics between institutionalism and populism, fiscal responsibility, historical parallels, and the personal aspects of public service. The congressman's perspective provides valuable insights into the complexities and challenges faced by lawmakers in navigating the current political landscape.

Read More

Congress Bill Spotlight: Remove the Stain Act

A deep look at the fight over rescinding Medals of Honor from U.S. soldiers at Wounded Knee, the political clash surrounding the Remove the Stain Act, and what’s at stake for historical justice.

Getty Images, Stocktrek Images

Congress Bill Spotlight: Remove the Stain Act

Should the U.S. soldiers at 1890’s Wounded Knee keep the Medal of Honor?

Context: history

Keep ReadingShow less
The Recipe for a Humanitarian Crisis: 600,000 Venezuelans Set to Be Returned to the “Mouth of the Shark”

Migrant families from Honduras, Guatemala, Venezuela and Haiti live in a migrant camp set up by a charity organization in a former hospital, in the border town of Matamoros, Mexico.

(Photo by Andrew Lichtenstein/Corbis via Getty Images)

The Recipe for a Humanitarian Crisis: 600,000 Venezuelans Set to Be Returned to the “Mouth of the Shark”

On October 3, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to end Temporary Protected Status for roughly 600,000 Venezuelans living in the United States, effective November 7, 2025. Although the exact mechanisms and details are unclear at this time, the message from DHS is: “Venezuelans, leave.”

Proponents of the Administration’s position (there is no official Opinion from SCOTUS, as the ruling was part of its shadow docket) argue that (1) the Secretary of DHS has discretion to determine designate whether a country is safe enough for individuals to return from the US, (2) “Temporary Protected Status” was always meant to be temporary, and (3) the situation in Venezuela has improved enough that Venezuelans in the U.S. may now safely return to Venezuela. As a lawyer who volunteers with immigrants, I admit that the two legal bases—Secretary’s broad discretion and the temporary nature of TPS—carry some weight, and I will not address them here.

Keep ReadingShow less
For the Sake of Our Humanity: Humane Theology and America’s Crisis of Civility

Praying outdoors

ImagineGolf/Getty Images

For the Sake of Our Humanity: Humane Theology and America’s Crisis of Civility

The American experiment has been sustained not by flawless execution of its founding ideals but by the moral imagination of people who refused to surrender hope. From abolitionists to suffragists to the foot soldiers of the civil-rights movement, generations have insisted that the Republic live up to its creed. Yet today that hope feels imperiled. Coarsened public discourse, the normalization of cruelty in policy, and the corrosion of democratic trust signal more than political dysfunction—they expose a crisis of meaning.

Naming that crisis is not enough. What we need, I argue, is a recovered ethic of humaneness—a civic imagination rooted in empathy, dignity, and shared responsibility. Eric Liu, through Citizens University and his "Civic Saturday" fellows and gatherings, proposes that democracy requires a "civic religion," a shared set of stories and rituals that remind us who we are and what we owe one another. I find deep resonance between that vision and what I call humane theology. That is, a belief and moral framework that insists public life cannot flourish when empathy is starved.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Myth of Colorblind Fairness

U.S. Supreme Court

Photo by mana5280 on Unsplash

The Myth of Colorblind Fairness

Two years after the Supreme Court banned race-conscious college admissions in Students for Fair Admissions, universities are scrambling to maintain diversity through “race-neutral” alternatives they believe will be inherently fair. New economic research reveals that colorblind policies may systematically create inequality in ways more pervasive than even the notorious “old boy” network.

The “old boy” network, as its name suggests, is nothing new—evoking smoky cigar lounges or golf courses where business ties are formed, careers are launched, and those not invited are left behind. Opportunity reproduces itself, passed down like an inheritance if you belong to the “right” group. The old boy network is not the only example of how a social network can discriminate. In fact, my research shows it may not even be the best one. And how social networks discriminate completely changes the debate about diversity.

Keep ReadingShow less