Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Is the House broken?

Opinion

Man speaking to reporters in the Capitol

Rep. Chip Roy joined the "Politics in Question" podcast.

Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

In the latest episode of “Politics In Question,” hosts Lee Drutman and James Wallner ask Republican Rep. Chip Roy of Texas whether the House of Representatives is broken.

They discuss various aspects of American politics, governance and the challenges faced by lawmakers. The discussion touches on the tensions between institutionalism and populism, reflecting on how the political landscape has evolved over time. Roy emphasizes the importance of institutions, expressing concerns about the growing disconnect between government actions and the desires of the electorate.


One significant topic explored is ever-increasing government spending and its impact on the nation. The congressman argues that the lack of a balanced budget requirement allows for unchecked spending, leading to financial instability. He contends that without such fiscal constraints, lawmakers are not compelled to engage in crucial debates about topics like Medicare, Social Security and taxes. The absence of tough choices, according to Roy, contributes to a broken system.

The conversation delves into historical parallels, drawing comparisons with pre-Civil War divisions in the United States. The congressman suggests that, despite significant differences, earlier periods of intense debate and argumentation resulted in resolutions, fostering a sense of reconciliation even among those who lost a particular debate. He questions the current state of American unity, pondering what binds the nation together amidst increasing cultural divides and demographic changes.

The podcast concludes with a reflection on the personal aspects of public service. Roy shares insights into the sacrifices made by those in public office, including time away from family and the toll it takes on personal lives. Despite the challenges, there is an acknowledgment of the honor and duty associated with serving the country.

Overall, the episode offers a multifaceted exploration of American politics, touching on the dynamics between institutionalism and populism, fiscal responsibility, historical parallels, and the personal aspects of public service. The congressman's perspective provides valuable insights into the complexities and challenges faced by lawmakers in navigating the current political landscape.


Read More

The Escalation Is Institutional: One Year Into Trump’s Return to Power

U.S. President Donald Trump on January 22, 2026

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
What Really Guides Lawmakers’ Decisions on Capitol Hill
us a flag on white concrete building

What Really Guides Lawmakers’ Decisions on Capitol Hill

The following article is excerpted from "Citizen’s Handbook for Influencing Elected Officials."

Despite the efforts of high school social studies teachers, parents, journalists, and political scientists, the workings of our government remain a mystery to most Americans. Caricatures, misconceptions, and stereotypes dominate citizens’ views of Congress, contributing to our reluctance to engage in our democracy. In reality, the system works pretty much as we were taught in third grade. Congress is far more like Schoolhouse Rock than House of Cards. When all the details are burned away, legislators generally follow three voices when making a decision. One member of Congress called these voices the “Three H’s”: Heart, Head, and Health—meaning political health.

Keep ReadingShow less
Illustration of someone holding a strainer, and the words "fakes," "facts," "news," etc. going through it.

Trump-era misinformation has pushed American politics to a breaking point. A Truth in Politics law may be needed to save democracy.

Getty Images, SvetaZi

The Need for a Truth in Politics Law: De-Frauding American Politics

“Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last?” With those words in 1954, Army lawyer Joseph Welch took Senator Joe McCarthy to task and helped end McCarthy’s destructive un-American witch hunt. The time has come to say the same to Donald Trump and his MAGA allies and stop their vile perversion of our right to free speech.

American politics has always been rife with misleading statements and, at times, outright falsehoods. Mendacity just seems to be an ever-present aspect of politics. But with the ascendency of Trump, and especially this past year, things have taken an especially nasty turn, becoming so aggressive and incendiary as to pose a real threat to the health and well-being of our nation’s democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

Waiting for the Door to Open: Advocates and older workers are left in limbo as the administration’s decision to abandon a harsh disability rule exists only in private assurances, not public record.

AI-created animation

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

We reported in the Fulcrum on November 30th that in early November, disability advocates walked out of the West Wing, believing they had secured a rare reversal from the Trump administration of an order that stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers.

The public record has remained conspicuously quiet on the matter. No press release, no Federal Register notice, no formal statement from the White House or the Social Security Administration has confirmed what senior officials told Jason Turkish and his colleagues behind closed doors in November: that the administration would not move forward with a regulation that could have stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers. According to a memo shared by an agency official and verified by multiple sources with knowledge of the discussions, an internal meeting in early November involved key SSA decision-makers outlining the administration's intent to halt the proposal. This memo, though not publicly released, is said to detail the political and social ramifications of proceeding with the regulation, highlighting its unpopularity among constituents who would be affected by the changes.

Keep ReadingShow less