Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Is the House broken?

Opinion

Man speaking to reporters in the Capitol

Rep. Chip Roy joined the "Politics in Question" podcast.

Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

In the latest episode of “Politics In Question,” hosts Lee Drutman and James Wallner ask Republican Rep. Chip Roy of Texas whether the House of Representatives is broken.

They discuss various aspects of American politics, governance and the challenges faced by lawmakers. The discussion touches on the tensions between institutionalism and populism, reflecting on how the political landscape has evolved over time. Roy emphasizes the importance of institutions, expressing concerns about the growing disconnect between government actions and the desires of the electorate.


One significant topic explored is ever-increasing government spending and its impact on the nation. The congressman argues that the lack of a balanced budget requirement allows for unchecked spending, leading to financial instability. He contends that without such fiscal constraints, lawmakers are not compelled to engage in crucial debates about topics like Medicare, Social Security and taxes. The absence of tough choices, according to Roy, contributes to a broken system.

The conversation delves into historical parallels, drawing comparisons with pre-Civil War divisions in the United States. The congressman suggests that, despite significant differences, earlier periods of intense debate and argumentation resulted in resolutions, fostering a sense of reconciliation even among those who lost a particular debate. He questions the current state of American unity, pondering what binds the nation together amidst increasing cultural divides and demographic changes.

The podcast concludes with a reflection on the personal aspects of public service. Roy shares insights into the sacrifices made by those in public office, including time away from family and the toll it takes on personal lives. Despite the challenges, there is an acknowledgment of the honor and duty associated with serving the country.

Overall, the episode offers a multifaceted exploration of American politics, touching on the dynamics between institutionalism and populism, fiscal responsibility, historical parallels, and the personal aspects of public service. The congressman's perspective provides valuable insights into the complexities and challenges faced by lawmakers in navigating the current political landscape.


Read More

The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's annual policy conference at the Washington Convention Center March 6, 2018 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

After AIPAC failed to defeat El-Sayed in the Michigan Democratic Senate primary—after spending $32 million—it said that it remains committed to defeating El-Sayed and his "radical, anti-Israel" agenda in the general election. Which means it is poised to sink tens of millions of dollars in supporting Republican Mike Rogers. It also said that Haley Stevens, his opponent, had presented "an authentic Democratic agenda." Meaning that El-Sayed did not? And they think that Mike Rogers, a MAGA Trump supporter, does compared with El-Sayed?

How can AIPAC say that El-Sayed does not present an authentic Democratic agenda when his socialist stance is much more in line with the principles stated in the Declaration of Independence than most centrist Democrats'? And making it sound like AIPAC cares about an authentic Democratic agenda is deceitful, when in the same breath they make clear that they will support Mike Rogers, a Trump lackey, in the general election.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research
silhouette of person using microscope

Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research

Scientists and the federal government have been close partners since World War II. A landmark report by President Truman’s chief science advisor laid out a vision for government research that shaped eight decades of federally funded science. That vision is now at risk. In principle, the Trump administration has supported scientific research with its own vision for a new “golden age of science.” But in practice, the administration has upended the relationship between the government, researchers, and their institutions. The changes have alarmed working scientists and their allies, who have protested in record numbers.

In July, I moderated a webinar on “Rewriting the Rules: What’s happening to public science?” (read the transcript here). The webinar was co-sponsored by NAPA, CODE, and the Bridge Alliance, with Dr. Aaron Carroll of AcademyHealth, Dr. Chris Marcum of the Federation of American Scientists, Dr. Gretchen Goldman of the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Dr. Maryam Zaringhalam of the Center for Open Science. I also interviewed Cole Donovan of the Stand Up for Science Foundation by email.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democratic Party Suicide
a piece of paper cut out of the shape of a donkey
Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash

Democratic Party Suicide

A recent New York Times article, "Moderate Democrats Prepare for 'War' Against an Ascendant Left," describes a disturbing perspective among mainstream, moderate, centrist Democrats. It is disturbing for many reasons.

First, there is the practical impact. If indeed mainstream Democrats attack socialist Democrats in a sustained, organized manner, there is only one possible result: the defeat of the Party in 2026 and the renewed vigor of Trump and his MAGA allies. Especially when combined with the all-out effort that AIPAC will mostly take to support Republican candidates running against Democratic candidates who are socialists. (See my article, "The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC.")

Keep ReadingShow less
An Iranian flag and the message "No King" graffitied on the ruins of the data center building of Sharif University of Technology after a U.S.-Israeli missile strike on April 7, 2026 in Tehran, Iran.

How has the meaning of military victory changed? Explore Iran, deterrence, nuclear weapons, and why modern wars are fought with limited objectives.

Kaveh Kazemi/Getty Images

The Last War We Understood

Every modern conflict seems to produce the same debate.

Supporters argue that military action achieved its objectives. Critics ask why the enemy still exists. Iran is only the latest example.

Keep ReadingShow less