Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Report finds significant correlation between ease of voting and turnout

While turnout in 2018 hit historic heights – 50.3 percent of the voting-eligible population, the highest for a midterm since 1914 and the biggest increase ever from a previous midterm – vast differences in turnout among the states persisted thanks to their widely differing election administration policies.

That is the central finding of the latest America Goes to the Polls report, a collaboration between Nonprofit VOTE and the U.S. Elections Project.


For example, in seven of the 10 states with the highest turnout, voters are permitted to register on Election Day, while registration closes four weeks beforehand in eight of the 10 states with the lowest rates. On average, states with same-day registration had turnouts 7 percentage points higher than the other states.

Three of the four states where voters are sent ballots at least two weeks in advance and return them by mail – Colorado, Oregon and Washington – ranked in the top 10. The fourth and newest state, Utah, which changed its rules last year, had the biggest turnout boost of any state compared to 2014.

Since that midterm, 17 states and Washington, D.C., have launched automatic voter registration, generally whenever people renew drivers' licenses. The five to detail the consequences of the switch – Alaska, California, Georgia, Oregon and Vermont – reported registration growth on average four times faster than in 22 states without such a policy.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, however, states with highly competitive races for governor or senator did not on average have bigger throngs at the polls than other states. While Texas had one of the most expensive and closely contested Senate races, for example, the 46 percent who turned out to re-elect GOP Sen. Ted Cruz over Democrat Beto O'Rourke ranked ninth from the bottom nationwide.

To be sure, the Lone Star State's turnout rate was dead last four years before. It is among the states where registration ends a month before Election Day, and the League of Women Voters of Texas told the Houston Chronicle it's time that the state "joins the modern age" and moves to same-day voter registration.


Read More

An empty grocery cart in a market.

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani proposes five city-run grocery stores. See the arguments for and against, from food deserts to bodega concerns and the $70M cost.

Getty Images, Kwangmoozaa

Government-Owned Grocery Stores: Accessible Nutrition or Government Overreach?

Issue Introduction

Over the past few years, affordability has become the most central issue affecting Americans and the quality of life in the United States. The prices of groceries and basic necessities have risen 25-30% since the COVID-19 pandemic and are projected to rise another 3.2% in 2026. At the same time, the exodus of grocery chains from rural and low-income areas has scattered food deserts throughout individual states. Recent mass closures include Grocery Outlet’s shuttering of 36 stores and continued shut-downs of many Albertsons locations. These factors have led politicians to make affordability a major campaign issue.

During his progressive campaign for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani raised the idea of opening grocery stores owned and operated by the city government to provide New Yorkers with affordable groceries. In his April 2026 public address that marked his first 100 days in office, Mayor Mamdani announced plans for the first of five city-run grocery stores. Mamdani’s proposed initiative will use $70 million in capital funding to build five city-owned municipal stores–one in each borough–and place them under control of the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). NYCEDC will then select third-party operating staff in accordance with city standards for affordability and proper labor practices. Public opinion following the announcement continues to be divided between uproar and support.

Keep ReadingShow less
Land of the Free, Home of the Capitalism Didn’t Fail America. America Failed to Moderate Capitalism
Monopoly's mr. monopoly in a graffiti collage
Photo by Artur Ament on Unsplash

Land of the Free, Home of the Capitalism Didn’t Fail America. America Failed to Moderate Capitalism

The signs are everywhere. For many Americans, buying power has improved only modestly despite decades of economic growth. Corporate profits are at an all-time high. We have reached a level of wealth inequality last seen almost a hundred years ago. By many measures, our capitalist economy seems to have failed to deliver broadly shared prosperity.

However, the failure isn’t with the free market as an economic approach. Instead, it’s our failure to regulate and moderate the free market, or more accurately, that we have spent 40 years undermining or removing the regulations of the New Deal that made our economy work for more Americans.

Keep ReadingShow less
Woman putting savings in a white piggy bank.

America’s economy now rewards asset ownership over wages. A policy proposal: a $35,000 Birthright Account for every child, and how it could be funded.

Guido Mieth/Getty Images

The American Dream Needs a New Economic Operating System

It is, by now, not an exaggeration to state that the traditional American Dream—work hard, buy a house, raise a family, and retire securely—is failing. It was built for a labor-based economy in which steadily rising wages allowed ordinary families to accumulate wealth. But America has become an asset-based economy, and ownership of those assets is extraordinarily concentrated.

Since the 1980s, the returns from capital have far outpaced the returns from labor. Inflation-adjusted wages for ordinary workers have risen only modestly, while the real value of equities has multiplied many times over. Housing, education, healthcare and childcare costs have soared, employment has become less secure, and defined-benefit pensions have largely disappeared. Even two-income households with respectable jobs often struggle to buy a home, build savings and accumulate enough for retirement.

Keep ReadingShow less