The New Georgia Project is a nonpartisan effort tot register and civically engage Georgians. Georgia's population is growing and becoming increasingly diverse. Over the past decade, the population of Georgia increased 18%. The New American Majority – people of color, those 18 to 29 years of age, and unmarried women – is a significant part of that growth. The New American Majority makes up 62% of the voting age population in Georgia, but they are only 53% of registered voters.
Site Navigation
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Top Stories
Latest news
Read More

The Washington Monument is visible as armed members of the National Guard patrol the National Mall on August 27, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Getty Images, Andrew Harnik
Fulcrum Roundtable: Militarizing U.S. Cities
Nov 15, 2025
Welcome to the Fulcrum Roundtable.
The program offers insights and discussions about some of the most talked-about topics from the previous month, featuring Fulcrum’s collaborators.
Consistent with the Fulcrum's mission, the Fulcrum Roundtable strives to share many perspectives to widen our audience’s viewpoints.
The Trump Administration’s use of National Guard deployments and intensified ICE raids has redrawn the contours of immigration enforcement in the United States. Touted by supporters as essential for national security and condemned by critics as a breach of civil liberties, these tactics have ignited lawsuits, stirred fear, and galvanized communities into action.
To explore the implications of these federal strategies, I spoke with:
Debilyn Molineaux, a storyteller, collaborator, and connector. For 20 years, she led cross-partisan organizations. Her accolades include being a co-founder of the Bridge Alliance and a former co-publisher of The Fulcrum.
Rachel Hoopsick, an Assistant Professor of Epidemiology and a Public Voices Fellow of The OpEd Project and the University of Illinois.
Edward Saltzberg is the Executive Director of the Security and Sustainability Forum and writes The Stability Brief.
- YouTube youtu.be
In the column, We Are Chicago, Debilyn asked: Is it law and order when ICE are patrolling American neighborhoods hunting undocumented people—or part of a larger authoritarian play to use SWAT-style takedowns and raids to scare people into surrendering their civil rights?
In Guarding What? The Moral Cost of Militarizing Our Cities, Rachel wrote about deploying National Guard troops to engage with civilian populations, carries deep consequences—for both the communities involved and the soldiers tasked with the mission.
Edward wrote: Democracy depends on courage: the willingness of people with something to lose to speak when it matters most. Some institutions still hold. But others are buckling.
He continued the conversation he started with his column, Courage Is Contagious.
The writers offered essential perspectives on the moral costs of militarizing our cities, the challenge to civil rights, and the critical role of courage in sustaining democracy when institutions are tested.
I invite you to read their columns and those of all of The Fulcrum's contributors. It's time well spent.
Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network.
Keep ReadingShow less
Recommended
Have Males Always been the Problem?
Nov 15, 2025
Have you ever wondered why there have been so many bad happenings in human history? Why are there so many bad actors? Sadly, I came to realize that it was largely caused by the male sex. That's not to say that women can't act badly, but the statistics are clearly weighted toward males as the cause of most of the bad events throughout all of history.
United States FBI statistics of 2012 document that 73.5% of criminal behavior is male-caused versus 26.2% by women of the 10 million criminal acts across all categories. Noted psychologist Steven Pinker argues in his book The Better Angels of Our Nature (2011) that historically high levels of male violence can be explained by psychological mechanisms that he calls "inner demons," such as predation, dominance, and revenge. Males commit more crimes than females, particularly violent ones, a trend supported by arrest and victimization data globally. This disparity is attributed to a combination of factors, including socialization into roles that may emphasize aggression, evolutionary differences, and potential biological factors. As of February 2017, 93.3 percent of federal inmates were men, according to the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
There are many causes of war and armed conflict. The Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights recognizes that there are currently 110 armed conflicts worldwide. These break down as follows: Non-international Armed Conflicts (first number) and International Armed Conflicts (second number): Middle East and North Africa 45/0, Africa 35/0, Asia 19/2, Europe 2/5, and Latin America 6/0. These are male-caused events.
Forty years ago, I felt that the most important thing was to know about the most eminent and good people in history. I identified fewer than two thousand great influencers of world civilization and the betterment of the planet. I had a website devoted to them. David Crystal’s Cambridge Biographical Encyclopedia lists twenty thousand notables of all time, but most are not “great,” albeit famous or notable. I realized that extolling great individuals and emulating them is not sufficient. It is the bad-behaved people who need to be dealt with.
Many great and good human events in world history can be laid at the feet of men. Men have exhibited highly principled behaviors, and many of these historical events were positive, life-giving, and culturally progressive. Men are responsible for some of the greatest events, scientific achievements, and democratic political systems with citizen representation. However, males have also been responsible for most of the negative and destructive events in human history. At the core is Destructive Self-Interest. The root cause of this is a mixture of male biology, childhood development, peer group, cultural, and media influences.
The male sex is responsible for bad behaviors in all dimensions, including war, racism, brutality, murder, domestic violence, human and animal abuse, rape, pedophilia, pornography, human trafficking, bullying, abuse of political power, and destruction of nature. Amidst greatness, bad male behavior continues to thrive in the form of unconscionable acts. Males are the problem, although not all of us, but we all need to be the solution. We need to take stock of our leaders and ourselves, and check our own bad behaviors and those of others. Only then can we earn respect, rather than expect it or demand it.
Every day in the press, people of great influence act in destructive ways. Violence and killings fill the news. The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued arrest warrants for individuals who are either current or former heads of state. Vladimir Putin (Russia): A warrant was issued in March 2023 for alleged war crimes in Ukraine. Benjamin Netanyahu (Israel): The ICC issued an arrest warrant for Israel's Prime Minister on charges of war crimes related to the conflict in Gaza. Min Aung Hlaing (Myanmar): An arrest warrant was issued in late November 2024 for Myanmar's acting president on charges of crimes against humanity related to the persecution of Rohingya Muslims. Omar al-Bashir (Sudan): The former President of Sudan has had active ICC warrants for genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity in Darfur since 2009. Joseph Kony (Uganda): The founder and leader of the Lord's Resistance Army remains the ICC's longest-standing fugitive, with an arrest warrant active since 2005.
Male personality traits comprise degrees of dominance, control, aggression, and a lack of empathy that create conflict. On the other hand, women generally seek compromise. Their focus is on the needs of others, with greater care, cooperation, and collaboration.
In The Better Angels of Our Nature, Steven Pinker says, “Traditional war is a man's game: tribal women never band together and raid neighboring villages to abduct grooms.” And “But over the long sweep of history, women have been, and will be, a pacifying force.” In her 1938 essay “Three Guineas,” Virginia Woolf wrote that "War is a man's game.” She claims the "killing machine has a gender and it is male."
Sex differences in aggression are one of the most robust and oldest findings in psychology. Males, regardless of age, engaged in more physical and verbal aggression, while females engaged in more indirect aggression, such as spreading rumors or gossip. Males tend to engage in more unprovoked aggression at a higher frequency than females. Summarized from "Gender Differences in Personality and Social Behavior," Del Giudice, Marco (2015).
In her book My Several Worlds, Pearl S. Buck said, "The test of a civilization is in the way that it cares for its helpless members.” Our world leaders, our community leaders, our fathers, and our young adults should all act in the best interests of others, not solely in their own.
The idea of a male-dominant culture is the problem versus a human-dominant culture. No dominance is the goal. Male behavior is mainly about “I”, the self, and self-centeredness. For example: “What I want,” “What I want you to do,” and “How I am stronger and smarter than you.” With most women, it’s about “We”, the other, and joint-focused. For example: “What should we do? “What do you think?” and “How should we proceed?” Women generally build consensus and cooperation.
The names in the news are all very familiar to us. These are world leaders, politicians, many wealthy and successful mega-millionaires and even billionaires. We need to ask whether what they are doing is in the best interest of others or is self-serving. How much does destructive self-interest operate in their actions and decisions that impact the groups with which they work, the countries they lead, and the people they represent? Do average people act with other people’s welfare in mind?
Destructive acts of self-interest are most often perpetrated by males, often against other males. The root causes can be revenge, anger, thwarting justice, jealousy, excitement, greed, economic gain, racism, lack of guilt, sexual gratification, and inflicting pain.
Most men are good and try to do good, but too many of them have serious negative impacts. They create wars, misuse power for personal gain, and foment conflict. They have taken advantage of others for personal aggrandizement. The history of the world is littered with tyrants, dictators, autocratic leaders, charismatic and non-charismatic, and destructive individuals. In popular culture, this is also true. Crimes and wrongdoing are frequent.
We men need to recognize our denial, rationalization, and minimization of our bad male behavior. There are not just some rotten apples; those apples are us. We are all from the same tree. We need to accept the roots of the tree, and the fruit of good and bad male behavior is a moral obligation. We as men are all responsible.
We need to better understand and combat male bad behavior in all cultures, populations, and age groups. The only way to effect real change is to raise awareness of our role in negative behaviors, coupled with honest, open conversation.
Richard K. Templeton, MD, is a practicing psychiatrist in his hometown of Annapolis, Maryland. Templeton is the founder of Bad Male Behavior.
Keep ReadingShow less
California’s clean energy shift: how ending coal power impacts Latino communities
Nov 15, 2025
California has taken another step away from fossil fuels. For the first time in decades, the state will no longer buy electricity produced from coal, ending a long-standing reliance on out-of-state power plants such as the Intermountain facility in Utah. The move is both symbolic and practical. It confirms that California’s grid, one of the largest in the world, has officially cut ties with the dirtiest source of energy still used in the United States.
The Intermountain Power Plant once sent electricity hundreds of miles through transmission lines that connected Utah’s coal fields with Los Angeles. That arrangement allowed California to meet part of its growing energy demand without technically burning coal at home. Now that contract has expired, and the plant itself is being converted to operate on natural gas and hydrogen. California officials say the end of coal imports is a turning point in the state’s decades-long effort to cut emissions and accelerate renewable energy.
Today, more than 60 percent of California’s electricity comes from clean sources such as solar, wind, and hydro. Battery storage systems are expanding across the state, making it possible to store solar energy during the day and use it at night. Yet the transition is not complete. California still depends on natural gas to fill supply gaps, and heat waves or wildfires can strain the system. Lawmakers are also debating Senate Bill 540, which would create a regional Western power market. Supporters say the measure would help stabilize prices and integrate renewables, but some environmental advocates worry it might allow coal and gas power from other states to flow back into California through energy trading.
For many Latino and working-class communities, the shift away from coal is personal. These neighborhoods have long lived closest to the industrial sites and power plants that emit pollution linked to asthma, heart disease, and premature death. The end of coal imports is expected to bring measurable health gains, especially in areas near ports and transportation corridors where the cumulative effect of dirty energy has been felt for generations.
Pedro Hernández, California Program Manager for GreenLatinos, welcomes the change but warns that eliminating coal is only one step. “California’s phaseout of coal-generated electricity has produced some tangible benefits, but the state’s energy portfolio remains far from clean,” he explains in an interview with Latino News Network. “To build on this progress, California must continue transitioning away from other sources of dirty energy such as diesel and biomass incineration facilities, which are disproportionately located in Latino communities.”
He points out that the state must also confront new air pollution threats made worse by climate change, including smoke from wildfires that now last longer and spread farther. “We have to accelerate the transition of vehicles away from fossil fuels,” Hernández says, adding that transportation emissions remain one of the biggest health burdens for Latino families living near freeways or logistics centers.
California’s clean energy shift also raises questions about equity. Solar farms and battery plants are creating new jobs, but many former fossil fuel workers do not have access to training programs that would allow them to move into these sectors. Hernández believes the state must ensure that the infrastructure needed for a clean energy future reaches every community. “While focusing on energy generation is essential, we must also ensure that the necessary supporting infrastructure is in place so Latino households can equitably benefit from a clean energy future,” he says.
That means modernizing electrical wiring, upgrading residential infrastructure, and helping families retrofit old homes to safely install rooftop solar systems. “Many of the most vulnerable Latino families live in formerly redlined communities or substandard housing, where affordable retrofits are needed to protect them from electrical hazards and ensure their homes are ready for rooftop solar installations,” Hernández explains.
He also stresses that clean energy projects must be planned responsibly to avoid harming the very environments they aim to protect. “The next priorities should include responsibly siting clean energy projects and battery storage in locations that do not further degrade the environment or the ecosystems Latinos rely on for carbon sequestration and clean water,” Hernández says. He adds that too often, clean energy development has been framed as incompatible with wildlife and habitat protection, even though Latino communities consistently support both causes.
Economic access remains another challenge. GreenLatinos argues that long-term subsidies and grant programs are essential to help families participate in the transition without going into debt. For many low-income residents, the upfront cost of solar panels or electric appliances remains a barrier, even as the long-term savings are clear. “We need to make sure these benefits are not only available to those who can already afford them,” Hernández says.
California’s decision to stop importing coal power marks real progress, but it also highlights the complexity of building an energy system that is clean, reliable, and fair. The state has set ambitious climate goals, yet achieving them will require more than technology. It will take political will, community engagement, and sustained investment to ensure that Latino neighborhoods, which have long carried the costs of pollution, now share fully in the benefits of clean energy.
For Hernández, the message is clear. California’s transition must be measured not only in megawatts but in lives improved. “If we can create cleaner air, safer homes, and stable jobs in communities that have been left behind for too long, then this shift will truly be a success,” he says.
California’s clean energy shift: how ending coal power impacts Latino communities was first published on California Latino News and was republished with permission.
Alex Segura is a bilingual, multiple-platform journalist based in Southern California.
Keep ReadingShow less

Statue Of Liberty
Photo by Brandon Mowinkel on Unsplash
Almost as Good as It Gets?
Nov 15, 2025
In the classic film, Network, Howard Beale delivered one of the most remembered lines in movie history: “I’m mad as hell, and I am not going to take it anymore”. Many voters, from Virginia to California and Maine to Georgia, seemed to feel that way. Frustrated by chaos, corruption, and exhaustion, they turned out in record numbers to deliver sweeping victories for Democrats, winning most every significant contest on the ballot.
Virginia, Virginia, Virginia
Virginia has again shown itself as a bellwether of change. Abigail Spanberger won by the largest margin since Bob McDonnell’s 2009 victory, as Democrats swept all statewide races in an election with turnout higher than four years ago — a clear sign of Democratic energy.
Less noticed but equally consequential were Democrats’ massive gains in the House of Delegates, where they flipped 13 seats and will hold a 64–36 margin come January. Speaker of House Don Scott, arguably now the most powerful man in the state and the primary architect of the romp, exclaimed that this “is what a mandate looks like,” while cautioning that “the word of the day is restraint. We can’t overreach.”
Republicans, meanwhile, imploded. Neither Trump nor mainstream conservatives ever embraced Winsome-Sears, whose campaign was derided by a Trump ally as a “dumpster fire”—a label made literal when her campaign bus caught fire on the roadside. Late GOP money shifted to Jason Miyares, but even that could not save him. Trump supporters unloaded after her loss. Chris LaCivita, longtime Virginia GOP strategist and Trump’s 2024 campaign manager, wrote: “A Bad candidate and Bad campaign have consequences — the Virginia Governor’s race is example number 1.”

Winsome-Sears faced incredible headwinds. Trump is even more toxic in Virginia today than he was in 2017, when Ralph Northam won the governorship by 9 points and Democrats gained 15 seats in the House of Delegates. And with this year’s Republican candidates carrying major weaknesses, it was a perfect storm for Democrats. You could see this in the turnout numbers. In Republican-leaning districts, turnout was down, while the opposite was true in Democratic areas. Fairfax alone produced a surplus of 205,000 votes, 100,000 more than McAuliffe’s total of four years ago. Spanberger’s margin remained consistent from the beginning until the very end, when the undecided vote broke decisively for the next governor.
Spanberger’s margin, coupled with the national environment, was key to the victories of her running mates, Ghazala Hashmi and Jay Jones. Jones was successful in linking Miyares to Trump, and the outgoing AG’s failure to fight for universities like UVA and George Mason left him further exposed to criticism. Despite the last-minute publication of Jones’s inappropriate text messages from several years ago, he still won more votes than Governor Youngkin did in 2021 (1.75 million to 1.66 million) and his margin of victory was much larger than the outgoing governor (200,000 vs. 64,000). Youngkin’s 2021 victory now appears to be more of an anomaly than it did at the time.
Looking to the future, Democratic performance improved across the state. Whether this portends a reversal of the party’s lackluster results in rural areas is not clear, but this year’s results provides some optimism.
New Jersey, New York, and Turnout
Trump was a factor in most every key race. In the Commonwealth, Trump’s cuts in federal employment was felt more personally. But the president’s “termination” of the Gateway Project in New Jersey and New York, the largest infrastructure and jobs project in the nation, because they were “democratic initiatives” became an organizing tool for both newly-elected Governor Mikie Sherrill and incoming Mayor Zohran Mamdani. Sherill’s race was supposed to be close; it was not. Democrats also picked up seats in the Jersey state assembly, and may have a super majority when all votes are counted.
In New York, Mayor-elect Mamdani harnessed the affordability crisis to mobilize young voters and ran an insurgent campaign against entrenched wealth — including Donald Trump himself. Republicans will likely try to make him the face of the Democratic Party, but last night’s results show each electorate is unique, and victory depends on tailoring messages to local coalitions and concerns.
In New Jersey, about 54% of registered voters cast a ballot, the highest turnout in a non-presidential election since 1998, dramatically up from the 40% who voted in the last governor’s contest. New York City, turnout was higher than any year since 1969.
Voting for Ideas and Democracy
In California and Maine, where no statewide candidates were on the ballot, voters instead turned out for ideas! In the Golden state, an overwhelming majority approved a constitutional amendment empowering the legislature to redraw congressional maps—an explicit rebuke to Texas’s recent partisan gerrymander designed to rig the midterms. In Maine, voters soundly rejected a voter-suppression initiative that would have required photo identification at the polls, defeating it by a commanding 64–36% margin.
Democrats in Pennsylvania notched 3 critical victories to retain seats on the state supreme court at a time when voting rights and democratic protections increasingly depend on state-level decisions.
Change even reached deep-red states. In Georgia, Democrats scored major upsets by unseating two Republican members of the Public Service Commission, the office that determines utilities rates and influences state climate policy. The victors will be the state’s first Democratic commissioners since 2007. And in Mississippi, two special-election victories ended the GOP’s supermajority in the state Senate.
Even in local areas, the blue tide swept Democrats into power. In Onondaga County, New York, a traditionally red jurisdiction surrounding Syracuse, Democrats won every contested seat for the local legislature, giving them the majority for the first in approximately 50 years. Just down the road in Oswego County, New York, Democrats picked up five Republican seats in the county legislature.
When Trump was elected, many predicted that there would be an electoral backlash. It has arrived. But the real test lies ahead: whether the energy of this moment can be sustained through the 2026 midterms and beyond.
The election results remind us that democracy still works when people believe in it, organize for it, and show up to defend it. The message from this election is clear—Americans still vote for ideas, fairness, and for the future.
A version of Almost as Good as It Gets? was originally published on the Substack "Fights of Our Lives" and is republished with permission.
David J. Toscano is an attorney in Charlottesville, Virginia, and a former Mayor. He served fourteen years in Virginia’s House of Delegates, including seven as the Democratic Leader.
Keep ReadingShow less
Load More

















