Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

North Carolina voters return to the polls Tuesday for runoff elections

North Carolina primary voting

A man casts a primary ballot in Norwood, N.C., on May 17. The state is conducting runoff elections Tuesday.

Sean Rayford/Getty Images

It’s a slow week for elections, with North Carolina the only state hosting voters on Tuesday – and mostly for municipal elections. Without any statewide or legislative races on the ballot, expect minimal turnout. In fact, the average turnout drop off for North Carolina federal runoffs is around 54 percent.

Fewer than a dozen states require runoffs when no candidate in a race receives a majority of the vote. But North Carolina’s version is different. A runoff is only necessary if no candidate receives a “substantial” plurality of votes, meaning 30 percent plus one. Additionally, a runoff is not required unless the candidate with the second most votes asks for one.


The election will include 10 municipality races, two board of education elections, and at least two counties' — Graham and Wake — races for sheriff. The biggest races include mayoral and city council contests in Charlotte, Fayetteville and Greensboro.

On Nov. 8, North Carolina voters will decide 14 seats in the House of Representatives — most of which are currently held by Republicans — and one Senate seat. On May 17, Cheri Beasley won the Democratic nomination for the Senate seat and she will face off against Republican Rep. Ted Budd.

In the 2020 election, Republicans won the majority of seats without much trouble. Former President Donald Trump won North Carolina with 49.9% of the votes compared to Biden’s 48.6%.

Cooper has been facing off against a Republican-led legislature, which means there’s been little action on election laws in the battleground states.

There have been few changes to the battleground state’s election law in recent years, with Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper and the Republican-led General Assembly working at odds.

Through a ballot initiative, voters approved a strict photo ID requirement that has been challenged in court by groups claiming it discriminates against Black people. The law remains on hold.

In fact, the courts have been the main source of changes to election policy in recent years:

A federal court in 2020 decided absentee ballots without the required voter information could not be rejected without allowing the individual sufficient time to fix the issues with their ballot. This process still stands.

A budget bill passed under the state’s governor would allow North Carolina to join the Electronic Registration Information Center, an interstate system for sharing voter registration data. ERIC helps states maintain accurate voter lists. The bill only provides enough funding for one year.

Read about additional changes in North Carolina.

This article was updated on July 26, 2022.


Read More

Nicolas Maduro’s Capture: Sovereignty Only Matters When It’s Convenient

US Capitol and South America. Nicolas Maduro’s capture is not the end of an era. It marks the opening act of a turbulent transition

AI generated

Nicolas Maduro’s Capture: Sovereignty Only Matters When It’s Convenient

The U.S. capture of Nicolás Maduro will be remembered as one of the most dramatic American interventions in Latin America in a generation. But the real story isn’t the raid itself. It’s what the raid reveals about the political imagination of the hemisphere—how quickly governments abandon the language of sovereignty when it becomes inconvenient, and how easily Washington slips back into the posture of regional enforcer.

The operation was months in the making, driven by a mix of narcotrafficking allegations, geopolitical anxiety, and the belief that Maduro’s security perimeter had finally cracked. The Justice Department’s $50 million bounty—an extraordinary price tag for a sitting head of state—signaled that the U.S. no longer viewed Maduro as a political problem to be negotiated with, but as a criminal target to be hunted.

Keep ReadingShow less
Red elephants and blue donkeys

The ACA subsidy deadline reveals how Republican paralysis and loyalty-driven leadership are hollowing out Congress’s ability to govern.

Carol Yepes

Governing by Breakdown: The Cost of Congressional Paralysis

Picture a bridge with a clearly posted warning: without a routine maintenance fix, it will close. Engineers agree on the repair, but the construction crew in charge refuses to act. The problem is not that the fix is controversial or complex, but that making the repair might be seen as endorsing the bridge itself.

So, traffic keeps moving, the deadline approaches, and those responsible promise to revisit the issue “next year,” even as the risk of failure grows. The danger is that the bridge fails anyway, leaving everyone who depends on it to bear the cost of inaction.

Keep ReadingShow less
White House
A third party candidate has never won the White House, but there are two ways to examine the current political situation, writes Anderson.
DEA/M. BORCHI/Getty Images

250 Years of Presidential Scandals: From Harding’s Oil Bribes to Trump’s Criminal Conviction

During the 250 years of America’s existence, whenever a scandal involving the U.S. President occurred, the public was shocked and dismayed. When presidential scandals erupt, faith and trust in America – by its citizens as well as allies throughout the world – is lost and takes decades to redeem.

Below are several of the more prominent presidential scandals, followed by a suggestion as to how "We the People" can make America truly America again like our founding fathers so eloquently established in the constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
Money and the American flag
Half of Americans want participatory budgeting at the local level. What's standing in the way?
SimpleImages/Getty Images

For the People, By the People — Or By the Wealthy?

When did America replace “for the people, by the people” with “for the wealthy, by the wealthy”? Wealthy donors are increasingly shaping our policies, institutions, and even the balance of power, while the American people are left as spectators, watching democracy erode before their eyes. The question is not why billionaires need wealth — they already have it. The question is why they insist on owning and controlling government — and the people.

Back in 1968, my Government teacher never spoke of powerful think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, now funded by billionaires determined to avoid paying their fair share of taxes. Yet here in 2025, these forces openly work to control the Presidency, Congress, and the Supreme Court through Project 2025. The corruption is visible everywhere. Quid pro quo and pay for play are not abstractions — they are evident in the gifts showered on Supreme Court justices.

Keep ReadingShow less