Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Report: Young adults heavily favor open primaries

open primaries

Younger voters want to see the primary system reformed, according to a new study.

Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

The midterm elections resulted in control of Congress being split between Republicans and Democrats at a time when young people are feeling particularly disassociated from the political parties, according to new data released by the democracy reform group Students for Open Primaries.

Two-thirds of people ages 16-39 identified themselves as independents in the study, which was conducted prior to Election Day. And 68 percent say they do not feel represented by either of the parties, pinning at least some of the blame on the primary system.

“A growing number of young Americans, especially first-time voters, distrust party politics,” the study states. “More and more are rejecting registering with a party, believing that neither the Democratic Party nor the Republican Party represent them.”


Those feelings extend beyond party structures to individuals, with 80 percent saying they believe federal and state elected officials are more loyal to the party than constituents. (Twenty-six percent identified as Democrats and 9 percent as Republicans.)

As advocates for a shift away from closed primaries, Students for Open Primaries used the study to assess views on changes to the voting system that would allow independent and unaffiliated voters to help nominate candidates.

Four-fifths of respondents believe closed primaries, in which only voters registered with a political party may participate in that party’s nominating contest, are a “problem impacting young voters.”

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Made with Flourish

Just over half said they did not know whether they live in a state with open primaries, but it’s not as simple as being “open” or “closed.” The National Conference of State Legislature identifies a number of variations with nine fully closed and six partially closed states. Then there is a range of open states – in some, voters who are registered with a party may cross to the other side; in others, only independents may choose which primary to participate in; and 15 states have full open primaries, where every voter may make a private decision about primaries.

“Young voters support open and nonpartisan primary systems as a key reform to make our system of elections more representative and democratic,” the report states.

The survey went a step further in its question about open primaries, asking whether respondents favored a system in which all candidates appear on one primary ballot, with the top vote-getters – regardless of party affiliation – advancing to the general election. Respondents overwhelmingly favored the idea, with backing from 85 percent.

California and Washington have such a system, with the top two candidates moving forward. Alaska recently implemented a “top four” system, and the voters of Nevada approved a “top five” ballot initiative early this month although it needs to go through a second round of approval in 2024.

Louisiana has a different version in which it holds an all-candidate primary on Election Day. Any candidate receiving a majority of the vote wins the race; otherwise, the two with the most votes proceed to a runoff.

The survey of 1,000 people ages 16-39 was conducted June 1-Oct. 1. According to Students for Open Primaries, the respondents were near-evenly split between Generation Z (16-22 years old) and millennials (23-39 years old.)

Read the full report.

Read More

The Psychology of Politics

An illustration of people and their unique minds.

Getty Images, Carol Yepes

The Psychology of Politics

Have you ever wondered why so many otherwise reasonable people are completely bananas about politics? We all know plenty of normal and decent folks who spout wacky political views. But it’s not just our neighbors who’ve gone mad. All over the country, Americans pick and choose the facts they want to believe, champion policies they don’t understand, hold contradictory views at the same time, admire immoral politicians, loathe decent ones, and so on.

What’s going on here? And why does it seem to be getting worse?

Keep ReadingShow less
Addressing Economic Inequity Among Domestic Violence Survivors

A person holding a stack of dollar bills that are flying away.

Getty Images, PM Images

Addressing Economic Inequity Among Domestic Violence Survivors

The 2024 film, “Anora,” about a young woman victimized by sex trafficking, recently won five Oscars at the Academy Awards. Perhaps, it is a signal of more awareness and less stigma surrounding the pervasiveness of domestic violence at all levels of society.

The ongoing lawsuits between actors Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni claiming sexual harassment and violence threat allegations around their film, “It Ends With Us,” about a relationship scarred with domestic violence, demonstrates the thin line between real life and on-screen adaptations.

Keep ReadingShow less
Layoffs at the EPA May Impact Federal Funding for Communities

Environmental Protection Agency EPA | Where James works | mccready ...

Layoffs at the EPA May Impact Federal Funding for Communities

WASHINGTON—The federal government laid off more than 60,000 workers in the first two months of 2025, while another 75,000 employees accepted a buyout and voluntarily resigned.

Among those laid off was James Clark, an Environmental Protection Agency employee who lost his job while on his honeymoon. “It’s just very sad to see someone like Elon Musk take a chainsaw on live TV and say what we do doesn’t matter,” said Clark.

Keep ReadingShow less
Congress Avoids a Shutdown But at What Cost?

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) speaks to reporters at the U.S. Capitol on March 14, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Tasos Katopodis

Congress Avoids a Shutdown But at What Cost?

On March 14, the GOP-led Senate passed a stopgap spending bill to keep the federal government running until September 30. The bill’s passage was made possible by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s last-minute reversal—shifting from opposing the measure and advocating for a shorter extension to allowing the bill to advance. His decision was purely tactical: he feared Democrats would be blamed for a shutdown.

Schumer’s move provided the necessary votes to overcome procedural hurdles, effectively thwarting a Democratic filibuster. While Republican support for Trump’s budget was unsurprising, the Democratic leadership’s decision to go along was a stunning concession. It handed the Trump administration a significant victory while further eroding Congress’s budgetary authority, shifting more spending power to the executive branch.

Keep ReadingShow less