Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Policies to revise and erase history from school curricula target black children

Policies to revise and erase history from school curricula target black children
Getty Images

Nicole Y. Culliver, PhD. is a Public Voices fellow of The OpEd Project and The National Black Child Develop Institute.

As Florida Governor Ron DeSantis leads the charge in trying to regulate middle school curriculum to teach students that “slaves developed skills which, in some instances, could be applied for their personal benefit,” his main target is young Black children who will be most impacted by this false rhetoric and revisionist history. This erasure is another act of stealing the innocence that Black children were never given.


Black children remain silenced and stuck in the time warp of old slave practices that permeate many American systems with treatment standards that vary little from those used during slavery. DeSantis is using such practices and in essence is robbing young Black children of their identity.

To say Black childhood innocence is lost may be a misstatement, because Black children's innocence was never established, because it was stolen at the inception of American slavery. A declaration in government policy and early care organizational policies are needed to recognize that Black children are innocent and must explicitly recognize the Black child.

Black children were never seen as innocent children, and—like Black men and women—they were seen as property for financial gain and treated like animals. The information on Black childhood slavery has been little to none, as if it has been kept secret because of the theft. Black children worked in a variety of labor jobs as young as four years old and as caregivers and companions for white children and other slave children on the plantation until the slave owner decided for them to go work in the fields where they put in equal hours as adults. This cruelty was the norm and accounts for stolen innocence that has remained lost to the Black child.

American consensus is that children and the early childhood years are essential in setting the foundation for a healthy adulthood. We saw this first push in the 60’s with the government's head start program which was initiated as an community outreach program launching early development centers across the country for young children living in poverty.

Currently, this government program often finds bipartisan support and continues helping many American children by addressing some of their basic needs, especially those living in poverty. In addition, early care funding across states has become a mainstay in budgets, giving credence that the innocence of childhood and the well-being of the youngest Americans is a thing. However, these initiatives were created for the mainstream child and children living in poverty. While society has juxtaposed the mainstream child innocence and child living in poverty, the Black child is essentially nonexistent.

A recent experimental viral video demonstrates that many still don't see the Black child as innocent. The video shows two children, one white and one Black, standing alone in downtown New York to see if people would help them. While the white child received help and comfort, the Black child received none. She was rendered invisible.

Over the years, research has exposed this stolen innocence throughout different American systems where Black children's innocence is ignored and defaulted to the original slave system practices of our country. One example is the consistent practice of the adultification of Black children. Juvenile Court Statistics found within the U.S. 52.5 percent of black youth were transferred to the adult system by Juvenile Judges four times more that of white youth, despite being only 14 percent of the overall youth population.

America's healthcare system's oath to not harm consistently mistreats Black pediatric patients who are often given less pain medication for the same treatment as their counterparts. School systems have been harshly criticized for the disproportionately high rate of school suspension for Black kindergarten boys, calling it the gateway of the preschool to prison pipeline.

There is no racial justice currently for the protection or acknowledgment of Black children's innocence. It's time we recognize and find the lost innocent identity of the Black child.

Read More

Connecticut: Democracy, Innovation, and Economic Resilience

The 50: Connecticut

Credit: Hugo Balta

Connecticut: Democracy, Innovation, and Economic Resilience

The 50 is a four-year multimedia project in which the Fulcrum visits different communities across all 50 states to learn what motivated them to vote in the 2024 presidential election and see how the Donald Trump administration is meeting those concerns and hopes.

Hartford, Connecticut, stands as a living testament to American democracy, ingenuity, and resilience. As the state’s capital, it’s home to cultural landmarks like the Mark Twain House & Museum, where Twain penned The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, embodying the spirit of self-governance and creative daring that defines the region.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand blocking someone speaking

The Third Way has recently released a memo stating that the “stampede away from the Democratic Party” is partly a result of the language and rhetoric it uses.

Westend61/Getty Images

To Protect Democracy, Democrats Should Pay Attention to the Third Way’s List of ‘Offensive’ Words

More than fifty years ago, comedian George Carlin delivered a monologue entitled Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television.” It was a tribute to the legendary Lenny Bruce, whose “nine dirty words” performance led to his arrest and his banning from many places.

His seven words were “p—, f—, c—, c———, m———–, and t—.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Fox News’ Selective Silence: How Trump’s Worst Moments Vanish From Coverage
Why Fox News’ settlement with Dominion Voting Systems is good news for all media outlets
Getty Images

Fox News’ Selective Silence: How Trump’s Worst Moments Vanish From Coverage

Last week, the ultraconservative news outlet, NewsMax, reached a $73 million settlement with the voting machine company, Dominion, in essence, admitting that they lied in their reporting about the use of their voting machines to “rig” or distort the 2020 presidential election. Not exactly shocking news, since five years later, there is no credible evidence to suggest any malfeasance regarding the 2020 election. To viewers of conservative media, such as Fox News, this might have shaken a fully embraced conspiracy theory. Except it didn’t, because those viewers haven’t seen it.

Many people have a hard time understanding why Trump enjoys so much support, given his outrageous statements and damaging public policy pursuits. Part of the answer is due to Fox News’ apparent censoring of stories that might be deemed negative to Trump. During the past five years, I’ve tracked dozens of examples of news stories that cast Donald Trump in a negative light, including statements by Trump himself, which would make a rational person cringe. Yet, Fox News has methodically censored these stories, only conveying rosy news that draws its top ratings.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Flag / artificial intelligence / technology / congress / ai

The age of AI warrants asking if the means still further the ends—specifically, individual liberty and collective prosperity.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

Liberty and the General Welfare in the Age of AI

If the means justify the ends, we’d still be operating under the Articles of Confederation. The Founders understood that the means—the governmental structure itself—must always serve the ends of liberty and prosperity. When the means no longer served those ends, they experimented with yet another design for their government—they did expect it to be the last.

The age of AI warrants asking if the means still further the ends—specifically, individual liberty and collective prosperity. Both of those goals were top of mind for early Americans. They demanded the Bill of Rights to protect the former, and they identified the latter—namely, the general welfare—as the animating purpose for the government. Both of those goals are being challenged by constitutional doctrines that do not align with AI development or even undermine it. A full review of those doctrines could fill a book (and perhaps one day it will). For now, however, I’m just going to raise two.

Keep ReadingShow less