Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Stay safe: Black women need tools to end violent relationships

Opinion

Black woman
Catherine McQueen/Getty Images

Crooks is an assistant professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago and a Public Voices Fellow with The OpEd Project.

Actress Keke Palmer and singer Cassie Ventura went public recently about intimate partner violence they experienced. Palmer was granted a restraining order against Darius Jackson, as well as sole custody of their 8-month-old son. Ventura settled a rape and sex trafficking lawsuit only a day after filing against Sean Combs.

Violence against Black women is a rampant crisis that needs to be addressed early and effectively. Black women need to protect themselves and feel safe along with the Black men in their lives as well as their communities. Yet many Black women may protect Black men at the expense of their own sexual health.

The Centers for Disease Control defines intimate partner violence as aggression or abuse occurring in a romantic partnership, including physical, sexual, stalking, and psychological abuse. Nearly 45 percent of Black women will experience intimate partner violence throughout their lives.


A 2018 study shows one in four Black girls will be sexually abused before the age of 18. Black women are at least 2.5 times more likely to experience violence at the hands of a partner than white women. For every Black woman who reports rape, at least 15 Black women do not report it and are silenced.

Sexual violence is pervasive among Black girls and women in the United States, as a reported 20 percent are raped during their lifetime. Yet, Black girls may not even recognize their first sexual encounters as abuse.

Previous studies suggested that because Black girls tend to look older than they are and go through puberty early, men view them as capable of consenting to sex. Unfortunately, these attitudes lead to an erasure of Black girlhood, placing blame and shame on Black girls for being sexualized rather than on the society and sexual predators that target them.

I am a Black woman, survivor of intimate partner violence, and university researcher focused on protecting Black women's sexual health. In a study I conducted in 2020 involving 20 Black women, they described being socialized to protect Black men, viewing this role as empowering.

The Black women in the study reported they found this as a way of keeping the Black family together so that their legacy, lineage, and culture would continue. Within the context of Black heterosexual relationships, these women empathetically recognized and understood the racially bound struggles faced by Black men.

Additionally, Black women in this study recounted their mothers and grandmothers teaching them that their ideal partners should be Black men and to aspire to have “ Black love.” However, the pursuit to achieve Black love may also carry expectations for Black women to endure hardships or forgive men who betrayed them.

The concept of Black love, while cherished, may present complexities. Prioritizing Black love over personal safety and autonomy may inadvertently foster toxic relationship dynamics by promoting endogamy, shedding light on sexual concurrency and sexual networks.

The protection of Black men as a priority may have detrimental consequences, including underreporting of sexual abuse and increased vulnerability to sexually transmitted infections and HIV.

A 2020 Essence survey of Black couples reaffirms the complex reality of Black love. Shared heritage and the historical context of racial oppression add powerful depth to the relationship. However, the pursuit of this profound connection might inadvertently keep some Black women in abusive or unhealthy sexual relationships with Black men.

Research shows abuse often disempowers Black women in heterosexual relationships and may prevent them from engaging in health-promoting behaviors that decrease the risk of STI/HIV. Intimate partner violence is linked to sexual behaviors like inconsistent condom use, difficulty negotiating condom use, having multiple and risky sexual partners, ultimately heightening vulnerability to STI/HIV among Black women.

Considering these challenges, one potential tool to assist partners in protecting themselves against STIs and HIV is pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), which involves taking medication to prevent HIV and could serve as a valuable resource for Black women in violent relationships.

However, several well-documented barriers hinder this approach. Some of these include side effects, financial concerns, medical mistrust, lack of knowledge, misconceptions and stigma surrounding its use.

Requiring no partner negotiation, the prophylaxis is a vital HIV prevention tool but doesn't address the wider issue of intimate partner violence. Throughout history, Black women have been the protectors of communities, children, Black men and themselves.

This preventative drug may just be seen as another laborious task for Black women to do to protect themselves. Many Black women report they are tired of protecting their sexuality, as Black female bodies have historically been harmed.

Significant historical events including slavery, Jim Crow, the civil rights movement and what came after that movement impact the current reproductive and sexual health status of Black women. And Black female bodies continue to be harmed by Black men in their communities.

Reluctant to seek help, few Black women want to openly admit they are engaging in “risky” sexual behaviors. The stigma around "risky" behaviors and the label "victim" clash with an ingrained identity as Strong Black Women.

PrEP represents an empowering HIV-prevention tool, and one daily pill may be a lifesaving step toward personal agency and bodily autonomy among Black women in violent relationships.

But it doesn't address the broader and deeply entrenched issue of intimate partner violence, an epidemic that is historic and ongoing. It's crucial to break this cycle of silence, provide support, and acknowledge Black women’s experiences in an effort to end intimate partner violence.

Read More

Iguanas on the Tombstones: A Poet's Metaphor for Colonialism​
Photo illustration by Yunuen Bonaparte for palabra

Iguanas on the Tombstones: A Poet's Metaphor for Colonialism​

Iguanas may seem like an unconventional subject for verse. Yet their ubiquitous presence caught the attention of Puerto Rican poet Martín Espada when he visited a historic cemetery in Old San Juan, the burial place of pro-independence voices from political leader Pedro Albizu Campos to poet and political activist José de Diego.

“It was quite a sight to witness these iguanas sunning themselves on a wall of that cemetery, or slithering from one tomb to the next, or squatting on the tomb of Albizu Campos, or staring up at the bust of José de Diego, with a total lack of comprehension, being iguanas,” Espada told palabra from his home in the western Massachusetts town of Shelburne Falls.

Keep ReadingShow less
Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

Leonardo DiCaprio, Benicio del Toro, Chase Infiniti, and Paul Thomas Anderson pose during the fan event for the movie 'One Battle After Another' at Plaza Toreo Parque Central on September 18, 2025 in Naucalpan de Juarez, Mexico.

(Photo by Eloisa Sanchez/Getty Images)

Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

After decades of work, Angeleno director P.T. Anderson has scored his highest-grossing film with his recent One Battle After Another. Having opened on the weekend of September 26, the film follows the fanatical, even surrealistic, journey of washed-up revolutionary Bob Ferguson (Leonardo DiCaprio), who lives in hiding with his teenage daughter, Willa (Chase Infiniti), some fifteen years after his militant group, French 75, went underground. When their nemesis Colonel Lockjaw (Sean Penn) resurfaces, Bob and Wila again find themselves running from the law. When Wila goes AWOL, her karate teacher, Sensei Sergio St. Carlos (Benicio del Toro), is enlisted to help Bob find his daughter. Although ambitious, edgy, and fun, the political message of the hit film is generally muddled. The immensely talented director did not make a film matching the Leftist rigor of, say, Battleship Potemkin. Nor can the film be grouped among a veritable cavalcade of fictional and non-fictional films produced during the last twenty years that deal with immigrant issues along the U.S.-Mexico Border. Sleep Dealer, El Norte, and Who is Dayani Cristal? are but a few of the stronger offerings of a genre of filmmaking that, for both good and bad, may constitute a true cinematic cottage industry.

Nevertheless, the film leans heavily into Latino culture in terms of themes, setting, and characters. Filmed largely in the U.S.’s Bordertown par excellence—El Paso, Texas—we meet the martial arts teacher Sergio, who describes his work helping migrants cross the border as a “Latino Harriet Tubman situation.” We learn that the fugitive revolutionary, Bob, is known by several aliases, including “The Gringo Coyote.” His savior, Sensei Sergio, explains to him outrightly that he’s “a bad hombre”—cheekily invoking the hurtful bon mots used by then-candidate Donald Trump in a 2016 debate with Hilary Clinton. The epithet is repeated later on in the film when Bob, under police surveillance in the hospital, is tipped off to an exit route by a member of the French 75 disguised as a nurse: “Are you diabetic? You’re a bad hombre, Bob. You know, if you’re a bad hombre, you make sure you take your insulin on a daily basis, right?” All this, plus the fact that the film’s denouement begins with a raid on a Mexican Restaurant in Northern California.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards

Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards on February 01, 2025, in Los Angeles, California

Getty Images, Johnny Nunez

Why the Fight Over Jimmy Kimmel Matters for Us All

There are moments in a nation’s cultural life that feel, at first, like passing storms—brief, noisy, and soon forgotten. But every so often, what begins as a squall reveals itself as a warning: a sign that something far bigger is at stake. The initial cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel by Disney, along with the coordinated blackout from network affiliates like Nexstar and Sinclair, is one of those moments. It’s not merely another skirmish in the endless culture wars. Actually, it is a test of whether we, as a society, can distinguish between the discomfort of being challenged and the danger of being silenced.

The irony is rich, almost to the point of being absurd. Here is a late-night comedian, a man whose job is to puncture the pompous and needle the powerful, finding himself at the center of a controversy. A controversy bigger than anything he’d ever lampooned. Satire that, depending on your perspective, was either too pointed or simply pointed in the wrong direction. Yet, that was not the ostensible reason.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bad Bunny preforming on stage alongside two other people.

Bad Bunny performs live during "No Me Quiero Ir De Aquí; Una Más" Residencia at Coliseo de Puerto Rico José Miguel Agrelot on September 20, 2025 in San Juan, Puerto Rico

Getty Images, Gladys Vega

From Woodstock to Super Bowl: Bad Bunny and the Legacy of Musical Protest

As Bad Bunny prepares to take the Super Bowl stage in February 2026—and grassroots rallies in his honor unfold across U.S. cities this October—we are witnessing a cultural moment that echoes the artist-led protests of the 1960s and 70s. His decision to exclude U.S. tour dates over fears of ICE raids is generating considerable anger amongst his following, as well as support from MAGA supporters. The Trump administration views his lyrics and his fashion as threats. As the story unfolds, it is increasingly becoming a political narrative rather than just entertainment news.

Music has long been a part of the American political scene. In 1969, Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young released “Ohio,” a response to the Kent State shootings that galvanized antiwar sentiment.

Keep ReadingShow less