Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

A Community Response to Disabled Gun Violence Survivors

News

A Community Response to Disabled Gun Violence Survivors

“What did you see once you got shot?” That might not be one of the first things victims of gun violence are asked, but it was the first question Access Living asked in a survey used to address and assess the many difficulties survivors of gun violence faced.

The nation’s gun violence crisis continues to be a significant threat to people’s lives, as it has claimed over 10,000 lives in the United States every year for the past 10 years, according to Gun Violence Archive. Only three months into 2025, there have been over 100 shootings reported in Chicago, and this will probably continue to rise, as in the country in 2023, on average, 118 people died of gun violence a day. According to the National Institute for Health Care Management Foundation, for every person who dies due to gun violence, more than two survive, usually with significant lifelong physical injuries that they have to learn to live with, along with the mental trauma of the incident.


They can suffer from losing their ability to walk, hold jobs, and being able to live a normal life. Several organizations are stepping into this space to provide the services they need since they’re so limited.

In 2022 and 2023, Access Living conducted over 100 interviews with gun violence survivors to hear what barriers they experienced firsthand. They also interviewed government officials, community-based organizations, violence prevention leaders, and staff of hospital trauma centers to hear what they’ve seen working with survivors. Shared experiences among survivors included difficulties in accessing and attaining healthcare and mental health resources, as well as accessible and affordable housing, transportation, and education necessary for employment. They also reported facing stigma, disability, and racial discrimination, and social isolation without the support to rebuild and heal their lives.

Through the study, they were able to identify ways to help fix the gaps they were dealing with, using their experiences to inform the development of a program tailored to their needs. By conducting one-on-one and group interviews, Access Living’s community strategy specialist Candace Coleman and Michelle Garcia, manager of organizing and community development, asked a variety of questions to understand what was lacking for each interviewee. Some key components include personal care, the need for medical supplies, and mental health support. The program will involve identifying and working with survivors through different outlets, including the hospital setting, nursing home setting, and the community, by using community organizations and word of mouth to identify survivors at any age and area of recovery.

For personal care, survivors stated the need to have someone come to their house and help them do their daily activities that involve moving, like dressing, cleaning their home, meal prep, or just having someone there to help them move around and get things done. When they’re injured, there is a chance they will need a wheelchair, walker, cane, crutches, etc., or they might need a different type of supplies, like a urinal, for example. “That’s usually what they would need, or other medical supplies, medical equipment, then also mental health support,” Garcia says. “This has been a very traumatic experience for folks, being shot, becoming disabled, and having to adjust, so that was a gap that has been seen. No mental health support whatsoever, not just for them, but for the family members.”

With mental health support for victims, there’s even less support for youth who survive gun violence, especially in marginalized communities. “They need more access to professionals, especially in the Black and Brown community, who look like them, have similar shared experiences, and can relate to them,” says Leslie Helmcamp, Lurie Children’s Hospital’s director of violence prevention initiative, “I think they’re out there, but it’s more about focusing on a pipeline of who can support and provide mental health services for youth.”

Lurie Children’s Hospital piloted a hospital-based violence intervention program in 2023, where two social workers worked with youth survivors of violence-related injuries to provide them with the correct care and services. This includes victims of other types of violence, including stabbing and sexual assault. The program continues to this day and provides coordination and referrals to community-based services such as counseling and therapy, substance use treatment, victim crime services, life skills coaching, mentoring, case management, and recreational and workforce development to children between the ages of zero and nineteen. Social workers work with the families to assess the issue and make sure there aren’t any immediate threats to the child’s safety, and do some safety planning if there are, so it doesn’t become a violent act again. From there, they try to get to know the family, what the family’s and survivors’ needs are, specific goals for their plan to recover, and make sure they feel supported to be able to heal and hopefully prevent them from getting injured again.

Access Living, a non-profit organization based in Chicago, provides services and tries to break down barriers for people with disabilities while protecting their civil rights and challenging stereotypes, is one of the partner organizations that helped launch this program at Lurie. They have partnerships with BUILD Inc., Chicago Police Department Crime Victim Services, Communities United, Cook County Public Defender’s Office, Reclaim 13, UCAN, youth outreach services, and youth/parent representatives. They joined their planning team to contribute to designing and developing the program to make sure they were thinking of all the ways they could support the survivors and their families.

Once the social worker at Lurie meets with the youth and their family and learns exactly what they need, the hospital keeps in constant contact with them for six months if the family would like them to be involved for that long. As this program has been moving along, they’ve noticed that once families get placed in mental health services or therapeutic services, whether it be at Lurie Children’s or externally, they might be ready to navigate the world on their own, so they don’t need those consistent check-ins. Since it has been running for less than two years, they’re still learning about the duration of help that people might be interested in having, and it sometimes depends on the type of injury or if the threat is still there.

Access Living provides the support and training needed for the social workers at Lurie’s Children’s Hospital who deliver care, train new staff, and consult.

Gun violence survivors are different from disabled people who’ve had their disabilities for many years. “They might be newer to being a survivor of gun violence, and with that, we’re assisting them in identifying services that they might need. Helping them identify as a survivor and someone new to the disability community, what they need to live independently, and what kind of support they need in place,” says Access Living senior manager Katie Blank.

Access also connects them with a fellow survivor who has gone through something similar. Doing so helps build a connection with someone who can provide additional resources and guidance based on their own experiences.

According to Blank, the goal is to help survivors increase their independence, rights, and autonomy. This includes information and referrals, resources, connecting services, peer mentorship, and assistance with the specific services and resources the survivor needs. While running a mentoring group for survivors of gun violence, that will be run by a survivor. From there, they’ll identify if there are specific types of mentoring groups that they’re interested in. Like providing a youth-based, youth-led mentoring or female-based, female-led mentoring. Which means either leading them internally or finding external mentoring groups for people who will be interested.

The program continues to evolve in response to what it has learned. For example, many gun violence survivors might prefer mentor groups that meet in the evenings or virtually. In addition, it has added resources based on what people have requested, such as affordable housing, accessible housing, and guidance on making accessibility modifications to existing housing.

Just as they interviewed survivors to determine how they wanted to navigate this program, they will also conduct interviews and surveys with attendees to gather their goals and expectations for participating in these groups. Whether that means referring them over to Chicago Cred, an anti-gun organization, or the Mayor’s Office for People with Disabilities, if they need job coaching or job placement, since Access Living doesn’t help with employment. Or sending them to an organization that specifically helps with housing accommodations, since many people live on the second and third floors and will need to be moved to the first floor, obtain a ramp or access to an elevator, or have things installed in their space to help them get around. According to Blank, “It would be identifying what they need and then referring them, connecting, and creating that relationship.”

Morgan Bruner is a journalism student at Columbia College Chicago, entering her junior year in the fall. With two years under her belt, Morgan has covered various topics, including gun violence.

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists. Learn how by clicking HERE.


Read More

An empty grocery cart in a market.

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani proposes five city-run grocery stores. See the arguments for and against, from food deserts to bodega concerns and the $70M cost.

Getty Images, Kwangmoozaa

Government-Owned Grocery Stores: Accessible Nutrition or Government Overreach?

Issue Introduction

Over the past few years, affordability has become the most central issue affecting Americans and the quality of life in the United States. The prices of groceries and basic necessities have risen 25-30% since the COVID-19 pandemic and are projected to rise another 3.2% in 2026. At the same time, the exodus of grocery chains from rural and low-income areas has scattered food deserts throughout individual states. Recent mass closures include Grocery Outlet’s shuttering of 36 stores and continued shut-downs of many Albertsons locations. These factors have led politicians to make affordability a major campaign issue.

During his progressive campaign for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani raised the idea of opening grocery stores owned and operated by the city government to provide New Yorkers with affordable groceries. In his April 2026 public address that marked his first 100 days in office, Mayor Mamdani announced plans for the first of five city-run grocery stores. Mamdani’s proposed initiative will use $70 million in capital funding to build five city-owned municipal stores–one in each borough–and place them under control of the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). NYCEDC will then select third-party operating staff in accordance with city standards for affordability and proper labor practices. Public opinion following the announcement continues to be divided between uproar and support.

Keep ReadingShow less
​U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies during a Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on July 21, 2026. Hegseth is crafting a strong and masculine identity for his audience as he reportedly contemplates a presidential run.

(Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Politicians Can’t Just ’Give the People What They Want’

For reasons that will baffle my many detractors, I am often asked for advice about being an opinion journalist. One of my standard responses is: You have to be willing to disappoint your biggest fans.

What I mean is that if you start to see your job as telling fans what they want to hear, you risk becoming an entertainer rather than a thinker, and eventually you become a caricature. I’ve seen it happen numerous times. Patrick Buchanan was a brilliant columnist and a serious person. But over the course of his career, he listened too much to the people who said, “Go Pat, go!” and too little to friends who said, “I think that’s taking it too far.”

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

Congress approval is at a record-low 10%. Moderation and consensus-building, not partisan theatrics, are how Washington gets problems solved.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

Reclaiming the Politics of the Possible

Washington is stuck in a cycle of performative conflict. The incentives seem to reward outrage, not outcomes that last; purity tests, not problem‑solving. So it’s no surprise that after three shutdowns in less than a year, public approval of Congress collapsed to just 10 percent this spring. (Gallup, April 2026.) But the country we live in — where many middle-income families report persistent financial strain and businesses are navigating unprecedented technological upheaval — cannot be governed by theatrics. Breaking this cycle requires moderation, consensus‑building, and a cooperative approach to governance.

This is not a call for centrism as an ideology. Instead, this is a call for transformative leaders to embrace moderation as their governing strategy, recognizing that in a pluralistic country of nearly 350 million people durable solutions require broad and stable alliances. Ultimately, this is a call for the 240 million of us who are eligible to vote in November to elect consensus-builders instead of bomb-throwers, and healers instead of arsonists.

Keep ReadingShow less
Adult man holds a microphone while asking a question during a town hall meeting.

Congress ignored 90% of public support for background checks. Learn how citizen assemblies and sortition helped Ireland break gridlock and could work in the US.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

Consensus Without Power: How Sortition Could Break America's Legislative Gridlock

In April 2013, four months after the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting killed twenty children, the US Senate voted on the Manchin-Toomey Act to expand background checks and to include gun-show and internet sales of firearms. Roughly nine in ten Americans, including a majority of gun owners, supported the bill—a figure that has held steady across more than a decade of polling. It fell short of the 60-vote threshold by six votes. This was not an outlier. On complex issues, representatives often fail to translate public consensus into reality. Research shows that legislators consistently vote in line with donor and interest group preferences over constituent opinion. Before the vote, the National Rifle Association (NRA) warned every senator it would “rate” their vote on its annual rating system, and a low NRA rating could cost senators their next primary. Consequently, the bill died 54-46, and the majority of Americans watched, powerless, as their consensus was overridden by self-interested representatives.

Liberal democracies need a method to bypass electoral incentives that run counter to public opinion. One already exists: Ireland faced the same stalemate on complex issues before it instituted a process called sortition. The beauty of sortition lies in its removal of the primary pressure that misaligns representatives’ interests from public interest: reelection. Much like jury duty, citizens are randomly drawn from the population. An independent body then stratifies the pool, so the final group mirrors the country by age, gender, geography, and income. The group meets over weeks or months, hearing from experts and the public, as well as debating frequently. At the end, it issues a recommendation that parliament may then put to a referendum or pass into law.

Keep ReadingShow less