Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Rare Thursday primary in the Volunteer State

Rare Thursday primary in the Volunteer State

Image of hand dropping a ballot into a ballot box at a polling place.

There’s some extra primary action this week from Tennessee which is hosting a rare Thursday primary. Here is a breakdown of the biggest races, and the recent election laws that will affect the outcomes.

The biggest story for Tennessee’s elections this year is redistricting. The Republican legislature approved maps, with the votes for and against them breaking along party lines, that break up Democratic districts.


The greatest change was the redrawing of District 5, which split Davidson County, where the Nashville Metropolitan Area is, among three different districts. The new district will now almost certainly go to a Republican.

This makes the GOP primary for the 5th Congressional district the most contentious in the state, with nine Republican candidates vying to be on the ballot in November. This is after three candidates were voted off the ballot by Tennessee’s Republican party, including Trump-backed former State Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus, who moved to Tennessee last year.

Three of the most prominent candidates are former Tennessee Speaker of the House Beth Harwell, Maury County Mayor Andy Ogles and retired Tennessee National Guard Brigadier Gen. Kurt Winstead. It has been a charged battle, with candidates lobbing accusations at each other in debates and televised ads.

The winner will face, and almost certainly beat, Democratic State Senator Heidi Campbell, after incumbent Democrat Jim Cooper decided not to run due to the new maps. He had held the seat for 20 years.

Another interesting race is in Nashville’s state Senate District 19, which had an unconventional start.

Incumbent Sen. Brenda Gilmore (D) retired after the candidate filing deadline in April, leaving public defender Keeda Haynes as the sole candidate. This triggered Tennessee’s Anti-Skulduggery Act, intended to prevent incumbents from essentially choosing their successors by pulling out of the race at the last second.

The field was reopened, allowing five more Democrats to join, while Haynes was pushed off the ballot. Former city council member Jerry Maynard and nonprofit advocacy executive Charlane Oliver lead the pack. The primary winner is favored in November in this largely Democratic district.

Tennessee has enacted several provisions limiting voting access in recent years, including banning the use of private funding for election administration, changing the process for post-election audits to allow the secretary of state to decide which counties are audited and what type of auditing is used and banning ranked-choice voting.

The state also passed bills that require watermarks on absentee ballots, expand access to absentee ballots for nursing homes and expand authorization of the state coordinator of elections to find and purge non-citizens, as well as those who have moved states or passed away, from voter rolls.

Read More

Nicolas Maduro’s Capture: Sovereignty Only Matters When It’s Convenient

US Capitol and South America. Nicolas Maduro’s capture is not the end of an era. It marks the opening act of a turbulent transition

AI generated

Nicolas Maduro’s Capture: Sovereignty Only Matters When It’s Convenient

The U.S. capture of Nicolás Maduro will be remembered as one of the most dramatic American interventions in Latin America in a generation. But the real story isn’t the raid itself. It’s what the raid reveals about the political imagination of the hemisphere—how quickly governments abandon the language of sovereignty when it becomes inconvenient, and how easily Washington slips back into the posture of regional enforcer.

The operation was months in the making, driven by a mix of narcotrafficking allegations, geopolitical anxiety, and the belief that Maduro’s security perimeter had finally cracked. The Justice Department’s $50 million bounty—an extraordinary price tag for a sitting head of state—signaled that the U.S. no longer viewed Maduro as a political problem to be negotiated with, but as a criminal target to be hunted.

Keep ReadingShow less
Red elephants and blue donkeys

The ACA subsidy deadline reveals how Republican paralysis and loyalty-driven leadership are hollowing out Congress’s ability to govern.

Carol Yepes

Governing by Breakdown: The Cost of Congressional Paralysis

Picture a bridge with a clearly posted warning: without a routine maintenance fix, it will close. Engineers agree on the repair, but the construction crew in charge refuses to act. The problem is not that the fix is controversial or complex, but that making the repair might be seen as endorsing the bridge itself.

So, traffic keeps moving, the deadline approaches, and those responsible promise to revisit the issue “next year,” even as the risk of failure grows. The danger is that the bridge fails anyway, leaving everyone who depends on it to bear the cost of inaction.

Keep ReadingShow less
White House
A third party candidate has never won the White House, but there are two ways to examine the current political situation, writes Anderson.
DEA/M. BORCHI/Getty Images

250 Years of Presidential Scandals: From Harding’s Oil Bribes to Trump’s Criminal Conviction

During the 250 years of America’s existence, whenever a scandal involving the U.S. President occurred, the public was shocked and dismayed. When presidential scandals erupt, faith and trust in America – by its citizens as well as allies throughout the world – is lost and takes decades to redeem.

Below are several of the more prominent presidential scandals, followed by a suggestion as to how "We the People" can make America truly America again like our founding fathers so eloquently established in the constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
Money and the American flag
Half of Americans want participatory budgeting at the local level. What's standing in the way?
SimpleImages/Getty Images

For the People, By the People — Or By the Wealthy?

When did America replace “for the people, by the people” with “for the wealthy, by the wealthy”? Wealthy donors are increasingly shaping our policies, institutions, and even the balance of power, while the American people are left as spectators, watching democracy erode before their eyes. The question is not why billionaires need wealth — they already have it. The question is why they insist on owning and controlling government — and the people.

Back in 1968, my Government teacher never spoke of powerful think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, now funded by billionaires determined to avoid paying their fair share of taxes. Yet here in 2025, these forces openly work to control the Presidency, Congress, and the Supreme Court through Project 2025. The corruption is visible everywhere. Quid pro quo and pay for play are not abstractions — they are evident in the gifts showered on Supreme Court justices.

Keep ReadingShow less