Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Rare Thursday primary in the Volunteer State

Rare Thursday primary in the Volunteer State

Image of hand dropping a ballot into a ballot box at a polling place.

There’s some extra primary action this week from Tennessee which is hosting a rare Thursday primary. Here is a breakdown of the biggest races, and the recent election laws that will affect the outcomes.

The biggest story for Tennessee’s elections this year is redistricting. The Republican legislature approved maps, with the votes for and against them breaking along party lines, that break up Democratic districts.


The greatest change was the redrawing of District 5, which split Davidson County, where the Nashville Metropolitan Area is, among three different districts. The new district will now almost certainly go to a Republican.

This makes the GOP primary for the 5th Congressional district the most contentious in the state, with nine Republican candidates vying to be on the ballot in November. This is after three candidates were voted off the ballot by Tennessee’s Republican party, including Trump-backed former State Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus, who moved to Tennessee last year.

Three of the most prominent candidates are former Tennessee Speaker of the House Beth Harwell, Maury County Mayor Andy Ogles and retired Tennessee National Guard Brigadier Gen. Kurt Winstead. It has been a charged battle, with candidates lobbing accusations at each other in debates and televised ads.

The winner will face, and almost certainly beat, Democratic State Senator Heidi Campbell, after incumbent Democrat Jim Cooper decided not to run due to the new maps. He had held the seat for 20 years.

Another interesting race is in Nashville’s state Senate District 19, which had an unconventional start.

Incumbent Sen. Brenda Gilmore (D) retired after the candidate filing deadline in April, leaving public defender Keeda Haynes as the sole candidate. This triggered Tennessee’s Anti-Skulduggery Act, intended to prevent incumbents from essentially choosing their successors by pulling out of the race at the last second.

The field was reopened, allowing five more Democrats to join, while Haynes was pushed off the ballot. Former city council member Jerry Maynard and nonprofit advocacy executive Charlane Oliver lead the pack. The primary winner is favored in November in this largely Democratic district.

Tennessee has enacted several provisions limiting voting access in recent years, including banning the use of private funding for election administration, changing the process for post-election audits to allow the secretary of state to decide which counties are audited and what type of auditing is used and banning ranked-choice voting.

The state also passed bills that require watermarks on absentee ballots, expand access to absentee ballots for nursing homes and expand authorization of the state coordinator of elections to find and purge non-citizens, as well as those who have moved states or passed away, from voter rolls.

Read More

Is the U.S. at "War" with Iran?

A woman sifts through the rubble in her house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026, in Tehran, Iran.

(Photo by Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)

Is the U.S. at "War" with Iran?

This question is not an exercise in double-talk. It is critical to understand the power that our Constitution grants exclusively to Congress, and the power that resides in the President as Commander-in-Chief of the military.

The Constitution clearly states that Congress has the power to declare war. The President does not have that power. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 recognizes that distribution of power by saying that a President can only introduce military force into an existing or imminent hostility if Congress has declared war or specifically authorized the President to use military force, or there is a national emergency created by an attack on the U.S.

Keep ReadingShow less
Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs
person sitting while using laptop computer and green stethoscope near

Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs

Healthcare and social assistance professions added 693,000 jobs in 2025. Without those gains, the U.S. economy would have lost roughly 570,000 jobs.

At first glance, these numbers suggest that healthcare is a growth engine in an otherwise slowing labor market. But a closer look reveals something more troubling for patients and healthcare professionals.

Keep ReadingShow less
A large group of people is depicted while invisible systems actively scan and analyze individuals within the crowd

Anthropic’s lawsuit against the Trump administration over a Pentagon “supply-chain risk” label raises major constitutional questions about AI policy, corporate speech, and political retaliation.

Getty Images, Flavio Coelho

Anthropic Sues Trump Over ‘Unlawful’ AI Retaliation

Anthropic’s dispute with the Trump administration is no longer just about AI policy; it has escalated into a constitutional test of whether American companies can uphold their values against political retaliation. After the administration labeled Anthropic a “supply‑chain risk”, a designation historically reserved for foreign adversaries, and ordered federal agencies to cease using its technology, the company did not yield. Instead, Anthropic filed two lawsuits: one in the Northern District of California and another in the D.C. Circuit, each challenging different aspects of the government’s actions and calling them “unprecedented and unlawful.”

The Pentagon has now formally issued the supply‑chain risk designation, triggering immediate cancellations of federal contracts and jeopardizing “hundreds of millions of dollars” in near‑term revenue. Anthropic’s filings describe the losses as “unrecoverable,” with reputational damage compounding the financial harm. Yet even as the government blacklists the company, the Pentagon continues using Claude in classified systems because the model is deeply embedded in wartime workflows. This contradiction underscores the political nature of the designation: a tool deemed too “dangerous” to be used by federal agencies is simultaneously indispensable in active military operations.

Keep ReadingShow less