Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Talk of the Town: What Selena Gomez’s Critics Get Wrong About Her Spanish

Talk of the Town: What Selena Gomez’s Critics Get Wrong About Her Spanish

Selena Gomez attends the Hollywood Reporter's annual Women in Entertainment Gala presented by Lifetime at The Beverly Hills Hotel on December 04, 2024 in Beverly Hills, California.

(Photo by Emma McIntyre/WireImage)

Emilia Pérez,” Jacques Audiard’s musical film set in Mexico about a narcotraficante’s secret gender transition, has sparked a lot of chatter. It won awards at the Cannes Film Festival, including Best Actress for the all-female ensemble cast, picked up nominations for the 2025 Golden Globes, and is rumored to be a contender for the Oscars.

The talk isn’t all positive, though. Critiques of actress Selena Gomez’s Spanish in her portrayal of Jessi del Monte are particularly harsh, culminating in the Mexican actor Eugenio Derbez’s recent characterization of her Spanish and acting in this movie as “indefensible.”


These attacks are not new. Comments on her Spanish in a shampoo commercial and YouTube compilations of her speaking Spanish focus on her flubs.

While I cannot judge Gomez’s acting chops, I do have over 30 years experience teaching and assessing Spanish on the university level. The commentary on Gomez’s Spanish says more about cultural attitudes toward languages –and Spanish specifically– than about her proficiency.

Language is about communication. When people understand each other’s intended meaning, no matter their grammatical accuracy and accent (and we all have an accent), then their language has been successful.

The American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACFTL) Can-do Statements assess proficiency by what language learners at different levels can achieve, not by their mistakes. Linguists know bilingualism exists on a continuum, not the all-or-nothing scale people often apply to speakers.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 19.5% of the population identifies as Hispanic/Latino; almost one in five people speak a language other than English at home, and of those, 62% speak Spanish. Globally, Spanish is the official language of 21 countries, but given its variations across geographic, social clas,s and generational lines, there is no one right way to speak Spanish.

Too bad then that Gomez seems to have internalized the nitpicking of her Spanish and the culture’s rigid ideas of language proficiency. The lyrics of her 2021 collaboration with Rauw Alejandro, “Baila Conmigo,” open by questioning how much Spanish she understands. Throughout her interviews promoting the film, “Emilia Pérez,” she declares that she is not fluent and expresses a mixture of pride and disappointment in her language learning results for the role.

However, Gomez´s portrayal of Jessi goes beyond words. She communicates the heart of her character when she cuddles with her family under the stars, switches to a frosted hair color when separated from her husband, and gives her lover a sexy jiggle after she exits his car and before returning to the family enclave.

Language is also about identity. Gomez was born in Texas, and her father is of Mexican descent. She grew up with Spanish until her parents divorced, making her a heritage Spanish speaker with a linguistic, cultural,l and family background to be proud of, and proficiency levels vary widely among heritage speakers.

However, as stated by the National Heritage Language Resource Center, “Too often, speakers of heritage languages feel insecure or even ashamed of their heritage language. These deficit feelings, combined with societal pressures to use the dominant language, can contribute to speakers abandoning their home language.”

In essence, Gomez is critiqued for experiencing the typical challenges of heritage speakers while being held to native speaker standards–a no-win situation that a rapidly growing number of Americans can relate to. The character Jessi’s linguistic background is not explained in the movie, but she is from the United States and switches between Spanish and English, a form of translanguaging common among bilinguals and heritage speakers.

In the United States, some Spanish speakers experience linguistic racism. People perceived as “Latinx” who speak Spanish in public places are routinely discriminated, verbally harassed or even detained by Border Patrol.

Yet non-Latinos who learn Spanish are often celebrated for their bilingualism. So, while compilation videos poke fun at Gomez’s Spanish, other YouTube videos laud the bilingualism of actors who are non-native speakers, such as Gwyneth Paltrow, Josh Hutcherson, Ben Affleck, and Will Smith.

To be sure, proficiency levels do exist, though common notions of bilingual and fluent can be elusive and hard to define. The ACTFL proficiency levels range from novice to distinguished, and the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFRL) starts at A1 and goes to C2. But these proficiency labels do not reflect the nuances of what it means to “language” in the United States, especially for people of color.

The criticisms of Selena Gomez´s Spanish in this film aren't just overly simplistic and damaging. They miss the point of a movie about mutability, voice, trans lives, and transnational living. The desire to pin down Gomez as bilingual or not, her Spanish as good, or bad, her accent as authentic or gringo is antithetical to the movie’s main message.

The criticism also misses the point of empathy and acceptance of different cultures, heritages, languagesand individuals, colliding and collaborating to meet people where they are and who they are.

Selena Gomez has spoken fondly of Mi Camino, the song Jessi and her boyfriend sing at a karaoke bar in the film, stating that “my laugh was real because I was messing up the words.”

Making mistakes with language is inevitable; approaching languages with a spirit of playfulness and acceptance is a choice. After all, as the lyrics Gomez sings, say, “Si mi equivoco de camino, igual. … Quiero quererme a mí misma.”

Annie Abbott is an Associate Teaching Professor of Spanish at the University of Illinois and a Public Voices Fellow of The OpEd Project.


Read More

Trump to the Nation: "We're Just Getting Started"

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to a joint session of Congress at the U.S. Capitol on March 04, 2025 in Washington, DC. President Trump is speaking about the early achievements of his presidency and his upcoming legislative agenda.

(Photo by Mandel Ngan-Pool/Getty Images)

Trump to the Nation: "We're Just Getting Started"

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump addressed a joint session of Congress, emphasizing that his administration is “just getting started” in the wake of a contentious beginning to his second term. Significant themes, including substantial cuts to the federal workforce, shifts in traditional American alliances, and the impact of an escalating trade war on markets, characterized his address.

In his speech, Trump highlighted his actions over the past six weeks, claiming to have signed nearly 100 executive orders and taken over 400 executive actions to restore “common sense, safety, optimism, and wealth” across the country. He articulated that the electorate entrusted him with the leadership role and stressed that he was fulfilling that mandate.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump’s Tariffs: a burden on workers, a boon for the wealthy

An illustration of a deconstructed dollar bill.

Getty Images, rob dobi

Trump’s Tariffs: a burden on workers, a boon for the wealthy

Earlier this year, President Trump imposed tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China, claiming they would fix trade imbalances and protect jobs. However, instead of helping American workers, these tariffs act as hidden taxes; they drive up costs and feed inflation. While average Americans bear the brunt of higher prices and lost jobs, the wealthy are insulated from the worst effects.

Many economists assert that tariffs are stealth taxes, that is, the burden is not distributed equally—while corporations may adjust by diversifying suppliers or passing costs along, working households cannot escape higher prices on essential goods like groceries and electronics. Analysts estimate these tariffs could add $1,250 to the annual cost of living for the average American household—a substantial burden for families already struggling with inflation. Additionally, according to the well-regarded Tax Foundation, the tariffs are projected to reduce GDP by 0.5% and result in the loss of approximately 292,000 jobs.

Keep ReadingShow less
Veterans diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases should apply for compensation

An individual applying for a program online.

Getty Images, Inti St Clair

Veterans diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases should apply for compensation

In 1922, the U.S. Navy identified asbestos as the most efficient material for shipbuilding insulation and equipment production due to its heat resistance and durability. The naturally occurring asbestos mineral was also the most abundant and cost-effective material on the market. During the difficult WWII years, asbestos became critical to the U.S. Military, especially for the U.S. Navy and the U.S. Air Force: shipping and shipbuilding were essential, and parts of the military aircraft and incendiary bombs also contained asbestos.

Even as demand exceeded supply, in 1942, a presidential order banned the use of asbestos for non-military purposes until 1945. The application of asbestos-based material by the Military continued to increase until the 1970s when its carcinogenic nature came to light, and the use of asbestos started to be regulated but not banned.

Keep ReadingShow less
S.E. Cupp: Where is the Democratic Party’s Ronald Reagan?

President Joe Biden and President-elect Donald Trump arrive for the inauguration ceremony in the U.S. Capitol rotunda in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 20, 2025.

Getty Images/TCA, Melina Mara/POOL/AFP

S.E. Cupp: Where is the Democratic Party’s Ronald Reagan?

With all the attention deservedly on President Trump and what he intends to do with his defiant return to the White House, there’s a more than good chance we’ll spend the next four years consumed once again by all things Trump.

There’s already been a dizzying amount: a giant raft of executive orders; attacks on a constitutional amendment; his threats to invade sovereign nations; a seeming Nazi salute from one of his biggest surrogates; his sweeping Jan. 6 pardons; his beef with a bishop; his TikTok flip-flop; his billion-dollar meme coin controversy; scathing new allegations against one of his Cabinet picks; unilaterally renaming a body of water; a federal crackdown on DEI; promises of immigration raids across major cities. All this in just the first three days of Trump’s second term.

Keep ReadingShow less