Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Oregon, Boston suburb move toward teen voting

Campaigns to give 16-year-olds some voting rights were launched this week on both coasts.

The lopsidedly Democratic Oregon Legislature began moving a bill that would have voters decide in 2020 whether to lower the voting age by two years for all state and local elections. The main suspense looks to be whether the proposal will be extended to federal contests as well.

And the mayor of Somerville, a suburb of Boston, asked the city council to join him in seeking permission from the state to alter the municipal voting age.


In both places, advocates argued the move would boost civic engagement by getting teenagers "hooked" on voting at an earlier age, and that it's appropriate to expand the franchise to include all people old enough to drive, pay taxes and shape public policy debates – pointing to the gun control activism of Parkland, Fla., teenagers after 17 fellow students died at a high school there a year ago.

But opponents argued the move would vest too much responsibility in youngsters. "Sixteen-year-olds are too young to enlist in the military, too young to own firearms, too young to own property, too young to enter into legal contracts, and too young to get married," said Oregon state Senate GOP leader Herman Baertschiger Jr. "This is nothing more than an attempt to expand the voter rolls to sway elections."

Read More

A person in a military uniform holding a gavel.

As the Trump administration redefines “Warrior Ethos,” U.S. military leaders face a crucial test: defend democracy or follow unlawful orders.

Getty Images, Liudmila Chernetska

Warrior Ethos or Rule of Law? The Military’s Defining Moment

Does Secretary Hegseth’s extraordinary summoning of hundreds of U.S. command generals and admirals to a Sept. 30 meeting and the repugnant reinstatement of Medals of Honor to 20 participants in the infamous 1890 Wounded Knee Massacre—in which 300 Lakota Sioux men, women, and children were killed—foreshadow the imposition of a twisted approach to U.S. “Warrior Ethos”? Should military leaders accept an ethos that ignores the rule of law?

Active duty and retired officers must trumpet a resounding: NO, that is not acceptable. And, we civilians must realize the stakes and join them.

Keep ReadingShow less
Yes, They Are Trying To Kill Us
Provided

Yes, They Are Trying To Kill Us

In the rush to “dismantle the administrative state,” some insist that freeing people from “burdensome bureaucracy” will unleash thriving. Will it? Let’s look together.

A century ago, bureaucracy was minimal. The 1920s followed a worldwide pandemic that killed an estimated 17.4–50 million people. While the virus spread, the Great War raged; we can still picture the dehumanizing use of mustard gas and trench warfare. When the war ended, the Roaring Twenties erupted as an antidote to grief. Despite Prohibition, life was a party—until the crash of 1929. The 1930s opened with a global depression, record joblessness, homelessness, and hunger. Despair spread faster than the pandemic had.

Keep ReadingShow less