Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The next big lie: So he can quit rather than lose

The next big lie: So he can quit rather than lose
Getty Images

LaRue writes at Structure Matters. He is former deputy director of the Eisenhower Institute and of the American Society of International Law.

“On the advice of my doctors, their direction actually, I must withdraw as a candidate for president of the United States.”


Could Donald Trump really utter those words? As likely as not.

Consider what he knows: His odds of bucking conventional wisdom as he did in 2016 are very low. Even if he wins the Republican nomination for president next summer, his slim chances in the general election are eroding further. Such wisdom may never be tested, however, if he quits before facing a loss he cannot get close to derailing.

Trump says he will soldier on no matter what. Just a common lie, with the big one to follow. The facts – the voters have spoken against him all four times, from 2016’s three-million vote margin to 2022’s red fizzle – demolish all reasons for him to remain on the ballot until November 5, 2024.

His pending loss is even more likely, given that his culpability for his legal troubles is seriously damning and could soon include more indictments. His MAGA base is notably thinner and barely paying lip service against his arrests. Trump’s ultimate demise becomes clearer as prominent former Republican backers publicly peel away, such as Senator John Cornyn did in May.

Trump has little choice but to bring out his exit strategy, a path he counts on having – bankruptcy, anyone? – for his every endeavor. His 2024-campaign version could have been his plan from the beginning, or it is at least contending now for his preferred course of action: Withdraw because of poor health news.

This excuse would be believable. At age 78 in January 2025, he would be as old as Joe Biden was when he entered the White House in 2021. Add Trump’s physique to any prognosis and he has plausible health reasons that could necessitate dropping out. He would blast Biden “for not withdrawing in 2020 the way he should have, as I’m doing now,” and could even blame the “witch hunt” for exacerbating his chosen illness. The Next Big Lie rests easily in his back pocket.

It may seem odd to suggest that Trump would seek to save face by faking illness, but such a lie is not out of bounds for our nation’s most treasonous grifter. Perhaps his prior claims of good health were false and his new health excuse would be both old and real. Either lie would be true to form.

When he makes this announcement is anyone’s guess. While he will walk away in a healthy or unhealthy heartbeat, he will do so when it is most advantageous to him. This timing decision is his last grasp of control.

Odds are that he stays in the race as long as possible to be in and monetize the spotlight, and perhaps even to wallow in a MAGA-led convention lovefest. These goals are narcissistic enough to have been his only ones from the start, as he could have entered the race never intending to finish it. Does anyone think Trump cares about the upheaval he would cause by dropping out just before Labor Day?

(That a convention swan song remains possible is due to the dysfunctional nominations process, which uses low-vote, multi-candidate primaries that advance first-past-the-post, plurality winners. It must be changed to reduce the risk of selecting future undemocratic outliers who cannot earn majority support.)

But Trump might depart before the primaries in order not to jeopardize his chance of earning a pardon from a Republican victor. If he waits until after the convention to depart, he does risk making it harder for his Republican successor to win, notwithstanding how he will rip into “the even older guy” on his way out.

And he could still hang on until the bitter end. But that would only give Trump two more months in the brightest spotlight, which may not be enough to accept if it also means swallowing the reality of his fifth straight loss.

So he will exit the ring rather than wait for the count.

Idle speculation? Giving him too much credit for such deliberation? Perhaps, but we have previously underestimated his willingness to go to unimagined extremes. Without the tools of incumbency, his desperation may lead him to surprise us. Anything remains possible when it comes to Trump.

If he uses the Next Big Lie to step away, we can take little comfort in knowing that he will not again be president. His closing acts will be destructive, and Trumpism and election denialism will remain, even if weakened.

Let us prepare for the reconstruction to follow; it always has, whether after the Civil War, the Gilded Age, or other polarized periods. (And let’s not forget the Electoral College’s role in putting him in the White House to begin with – a second core problem to fix.)


Read More

Paul Ehrlich was wrong about everything

Crowd of people walking on a street.

Andy Andrews//Getty Images

Paul Ehrlich was wrong about everything

Biologist and author Paul Ehrlich, the most influential Chicken Little of the last century, died at the age of 93 this week. His 1968 book, “The Population Bomb,” launched decades of institutional panic in government, entertainment and journalism.

Ehrlich’s core neo-Malthusian argument was that overpopulation would exhaust the supply of food and natural resources, leading to a cascade of catastrophes around the world. “The Population Bomb” opens with a bold prediction, “The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

People clear rubble in a house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. The United States and Israel continued their joint attack on Iran that began on February 28. Iran retaliated by firing waves of missiles and drones at Israel, and targeting U.S. allies in the region.

Getty Images, Majid Saeedi

Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

Most of what we have heard from the administration as it pertains to the Iran War is swagger and bro-talk. A few days into the war, the White House released a social media video that combined footage of the bombardment with clips from video games. Not long after, it released a second video, titled “Justice the American Way,” that mixed images of the U.S. military with scenes from movies like Gladiator and Top Gun Maverick.

Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, War Secretary Pete Hegseth boasted of “death and destruction from the sky all day long.” “They are toast, and they know it,” he said. “This was never meant to be a fair fight... we are punching them while they’re down.”

Keep ReadingShow less
A student in uniform walking through a campus.

A Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) cadet walks through campus November 7, 2003 in Princeton, New Jersey.

Getty Images, Spencer Platt

Hegseth is Dumbing Down the Military (on Purpose)

One day before the United States began an ill-defined and illegal war of indefinite length with Iran, Pete Hegseth angrily attacked a different enemy: the Ivy League. The Secretary of War denounced Ivy League universities as "woke breeding grounds of toxic indoctrination” and then eliminated long-standing college fellowship programs with more than a dozen elite colleges, which had historically served as a pipeline for service members to the upper ranks of military leadership. Of the schools now on Hegseth’s "no-fly list," four sit in the top ten of the World’s Top Universities for 2026. So, why does the Secretary of War not want his armed forces to have the best education available? Because he wants a military without a brain.

For a guy obsessed with being the strongest and most lethal force in the world, cutting access to world-class schools is a bizarre gambit. It does reveal Hegseth doesn’t consider intelligence a factor–let alone an asset–in strength or lethality. That tracks. Hegseth alleges the Ivies infect officers with “globalist and radical ideologies that do not improve our fighting ranks…” God forbid the tip of the sword of our foreign policy has knowledge of international cooperation and global interconnectedness. The Ivy League has its own issues, but the Pentagon’s claim that they "fail to deliver rigorous education grounded in realism” is almost laughable. I’m a veteran Lieutenant Commander with two Ivy League degrees, both paid for with military tuition assistance, and I promise: it was rigorous. Meanwhile, are Hegseth’s performative politics grounded in reality? Attacking Harvard on social media the eve of initiating a new war with a foreign adversary is disgraceful, and even delusional.

Keep ReadingShow less
Are We Prepared for a World Where AI Isn’t at Work?
Person working at a desk with a laptop and books.

Are We Prepared for a World Where AI Isn’t at Work?

Draft an important email without using AI. Write it from scratch — no suggestions, no autocomplete, and no prompt to ChatGPT to compose or revise the email.

Now ask yourself: Did it feel slower? Harder? Slightly uncomfortable?

Keep ReadingShow less