Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Trump is the king of the bogus 'witch hunt' defense

Former President Donald Trump

Former President Donald Trump

The Washington Post/Getty Images

Corbin is professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa.

A lot of politicians throughout the world have claimed they are the victims of weaponized, political persecution and a witch hunt when they encounter legal trouble. Among them: former President Bill Clinton, former Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens, Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former President Donald Trump.


Trump has got to be the witch-hunt legal defense king in the world. He claims the New York, Georgia, Florida and District of Columbia court cases – totaling 91 felony charges – are politically motivated and are an American legal system “witch hunt” aimed at restricting his ability to run for president in 2024.

Anyone with a modicum of intelligence would realize the hypocrisy of Trump’s current ploy if they knew he never once declared “witch hunt” in the 62 lawsuits he filed and lost while contesting the 2020 election. Note: Trump-appointed judges were among the 80-plus magistrates who dismissed his election fraud lawsuits.

Let’s not forget it was nine jurors (six men and three women), not the judge, who awarded E. Jean Carroll $5 million because Trump sexually abused and defamed her – a fact-driven, not witch-hunt-motivated, verdict. (A federal judge ruled the ex-president’s comments about Carroll were libelous.) A second trial involving Carroll and Trump is set to start Jan. 15, the day of the Iowa GOP caucus.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The MAGA faithful probably haven’t let it sink in that Judge Arthur Engoron of New York City already ruled that Trump, his sons and the Trump Organization repeatedly committed fraud during the last decade; again, a fact-driven (not political) decision.

Furthermore, Trump never once – to the best of my knowledge – cried wolf or uttered “witch hunt” in the 4,000-plus lawsuits that encompassed his life. Arizona Central-USA Today notes Trump has been the plaintiff 2,121 times and was a defendant on 1,929 occasions. The media’s ongoing analysis of Trump’s legal findings are broken down as follows: 1) 17 political campaign cases; six within the last year, 2) 190 government and tax cases, 3) 85 product branding and trademark cases, 4) 1,863 casino-related cases, 5) 208 class action cases over contract disputes tied to real estate developments, 6) 130 employee-employment cases, 7) 63 golf-club-related cases, 8) 14 media outlet or individual defamation cases, 9) 697 personal injury cases, 10) 622 real estate cases and 11) 206 other miscellaneous cases.

And, let’s remember “Donald Trump has been accused of rape, sexual assault, and sexual harassment, including non-consensual kissing or groping, by at least 25 women since the 1970’s.” Since past actions are the best predictor of future behavior, it’s not surprising Trump has not yet made good on his promise that “all of these liars (females) will be sued after the election (2016) is over.” Again, crying wolf.

Here’s a quick review – thanks to a Dec. 6 Politico report – of Trump’s current criminal cases that appear to be the real deal rather than a witch-hunt:

  1. In Washington, D.C., four felony counts for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
  2. Thirteen felony counts for election interference in Georgia
  3. In New York, 34 felony counts in connection with hush money payments to a porn star.
  4. In Florida, 40 felony counts for hoarding U.S. classified documents and impeding government’s efforts to retrieve them as per law.

Might Trump be crying “witch hunt” and his lawyers purposely throwing as many counter arguments onto the court systems so the cases won’t have a verdict until after the Nov. 5, 2024, election? Of course.

His history of life-long legal issues – starting at age 27 (accusations of violating the Fair Housing Act of 1968) – should cause any registered Republican, independent or Democrat with an ounce of brain matter to think more than once about whether a man like Trump is fit to lead the greatest country in the world and abide by the Constitution and laws.

The words of Theodore Roosevelt are fitting: “No man is above the law and no man is below it; nor do we ask any man’s permission when we ask him to obey it.”

Read More

George Santos

Why was it so easy for Santos to lie throughout his campaign? As it turns out, it’s pretty easy to scam a broken system.

Mandel Ngan/Getty Images

George Santos and a system built for corruption

Nate is a communications consultant for RepresentUs, a nonpartisan organization focused on minimizing corruption in the U.S. political system.

In 2009, comedian Robin Williams quipped, “Politicians should wear sponsor jackets like NASCAR drivers.” Just one year later, the Supreme Court decided to drive in a different direction. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission opened the floodgates to dark money, exacerbating our existing political corruption problem.

George Santos was expelled from the House of Representatives on Dec. 1 for defrauding campaign donors and members of his district, but the entire saga should be seen as a broader indictment of a broken system that enables (and seemingly encourages) political corruption. Santos was enabled by insufficient reporting laws and ineffective federal oversight. As the Campaign Legal Center reported, “Dysfunction at the FEC has reduced transparency in our elections and faith in our political system.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Kevin McCarthy

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy was nominated for speaker by his fellow Republicans, but still needs to secure enough votes to win the post.

Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images

McCarthy faces pressure from new watchdog group in campaign for speaker

David Jolly, a former Republican member of Congress who has become a leading figure in efforts to break the two-party hold on American politics, has turned his newest organization's efforts toward Rep. Kevin McCarthy’s campaign to be speaker of the House.

Jolly and Maria Cardona, a public affairs veteran and Democratic strategist, recently formed Facts First USA with the goal of preventing lawmakers from using their oversight powers for political gain. This week, the group is focused on McCarthy’s negotiations with his fellow Republicans as he seeks to shore up enough votes to be the next speaker.

As first reported by Politico, Facts First President David Brock has sent a memo to the group’s allies warning of deals McCarthy may make with “ultra MAGA extremists” in the House in exchange for their votes for speaker.

Keep ReadingShow less
Stop the corruption
Vasil Dimitrov/Getty Images

Ending corruption requires a 100 percent commitment

Molineaux is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and president/CEO of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Last week, we asked our readers and the larger community of the Bridge Alliance to give us your take on corruption. Specifically, we asked, “Is all corruption equal?” My quick take is yes, all corruption is equal. But the impact of corruption is not.

I have long held that as a society, we have allowed small corruptions to become normalized. Then when obvious or public corruption is revealed, we take corruption less seriously. We make excuses about “so-and-so is worse.” Small corruptions leave us dirty and slimy, but we quickly forget them and wash off the residue. These could be incidents of disrespect, where we could have spoken up or “forgot” to take out the trash because we just didn’t feel like it. Neither will have broad impact, and if our conscience is not easily pricked, what will we allow next? A personal growth training I once attended had a saying, “99.5 percent effort is hard, 100 percent is easy.” Why? Because if you make a 99.5 percent commitment, you’ll constantly be maneuvering the exception. If there are no exceptions, it’s easy. This is a good strategy for personal exercise plans, dieting and commitments to our ethics.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less
Cassidy Hutchinson

Cassidy Hutchinson, a top former aide to Trump White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, testifies before the committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection Tuesday.

Mandel Ngan-Pool/Getty Images

Watching the Jan. 6 hearings through the lens of both accountability and healing

Roig is the chief network weaver atThe Horizons Project and the chair of the board of theAlliance for Peacebuilding.

“How did we get to this point?”

That’s how the third day of the Jan. 6, 2021, hearings began on June 16. Many Americans are asking the same question, with a mix of exhaustion, exasperation and alarm that our country has devolved to the heightened levels of violence and dysfunction that the select committee has outlined thus far. It has been painful to rewatch the violence that took place at the Capitol, but also to hear the personal stories of the violent threats and intimidation unleashed on elections officials and poll workers throughout the country.

One of the thorniest questions of our times is: How will we come together to reckon with the clear and present danger of the growing authoritarian threat in the United States, while also healing a fractured nation dealing with collective trauma, distrust, outrage and despair? The answer is that we must do both. While there are clearly urgent legal and political imperatives required in the short term, actions and organizing focused on truth-telling and justice will not be unfolding in a vacuum. They must form the foundations needed for long-term cultural and institutional transformations to take place.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less