Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

To prevent gun violence, protect our hospitals

To prevent gun violence, protect our hospitals
Getty Images

Shoshana Ungerleider, MD, is an internal medicine physician in San Francisco, host of TED Health and the founder of endwellproject.org.

When President Biden and Vice President Harris spoke about fighting an epidemic from the White House Rose Garden last week, it wasn’t a virus they were talking about. "Guns are the number one killer of children in America, more than car accidents, more than cancer, more than other diseases,” President Biden said, announcing the creation of the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention.


The choice of words, loaded with healthcare analogies, is no accident. For years, the government has been funding research studying gun violence as a public health epidemic, and the new office is designed to coordinate a public health approach to the emergency with more resources and support for survivors, families, and communities.

As the new office goes to battle against the gun violence epidemic, hospitals and clinics will be a key battleground — and it isn’t just because healthcare workers are on the front lines providing support for survivors. The healthcare profession has the unfortunate distinction of being one of America's most violent fields.

Health care workers are five times as likely to experience workplace violence as other workers, accounting for 73 percent of non-fatal injuries from violence in government data from 2018, the most recent year for which numbers are available. And it has only been getting worse: in a 2022 survey from National Nurses United, 48 percent of hospital nurses said they'd seen violence increase over the previous year.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

In August, a man shot and killed a security guard in a hospital in Portland, Oregon. In May, a man opened fire in a medical center waiting room in Atlanta, killing one woman and injuring four other women. Last October, a man killed two workers in the maternity ward of a Dallas hospital. And in June 2022, a man shot and killed four people in a Tulsa, Oklahoma, medical office, including a surgeon he blamed for pain after back surgery.

The fallout is severe. Poor working conditions and rising incidents of workplace violence are leading to unprecedented burnout and attrition in the healthcare field, which is a direct threat to patient care. In 2022, the Surgeon General warned of a looming crisis in the nation’s health infrastructure with a projected shortage of three million healthcare workers in the next five years. In a January 2023 survey of over 18,000 nurses, 30% said they're looking to quit their career, with 63% of them seeking a safer working environment.

It's alarming that American healthcare workers now face more non-fatal injuries from workplace violence than even law enforcement officers. But there are efforts underway to create a safer working environment, which the Office of Gun Violence Prevention should help speed up to ensure that healthcare workers can be the powerful allies they need to be in the fight against the gun violence epidemic.

The American Hospital Association's Hospitals Against Violence (HAV) initiative has been developing programs on the national, state and local levels to prevent workplace violence and help hospital employees cope with the impact of violence. In September, Senators Joe Manchin and Marco Rubio introduced the bipartisan Safety from Violence for Healthcare Employees (SAVE) Act which would make attacking healthcare workers a crime under federal law, similar to the protections in place for flight crews and airport workers. A similar bill was introduced in the House in April by Representatives Larry Bucshon and Madeleine Dean.

Every day, healthcare workers put on their scrubs and face an unpredictable world, hoping to make a difference, to save a life. They shouldn’t have to fear for their own in the process. If we want to save lives, we have to prioritize saving our healthcare system.

Read More

Large Bipartisan Majorities Oppose Deep Cuts to Foreign Aid

The Program for Public Consultation at the University of Maryland releases a new survey, fielded February 6-7, 2025, with a representative sample of 1,160 adults nationwide.

Pexels, Tima Miroshnichenko

Large Bipartisan Majorities Oppose Deep Cuts to Foreign Aid

An overwhelming majority of 89% of Americans say the U.S. should spend at least one percent of the federal budget on foreign aid—the current amount the U.S. spends on aid. This includes 84% of Republicans and 94% of Democrats.

Fifty-eight percent oppose abolishing the U.S. Agency for International Development and folding its functions into the State Department, including 77% of Democrats and 62% of independents. But 60% of Republicans favor the move.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Super Bowl of Unity

A crowd in a football stadium.

Getty Images, Adamkaz

A Super Bowl of Unity

Philadelphia is known as the City of Brotherly Love, and perhaps it is fitting that the Philadelphia Eagles won Sunday night's Super Bowl 59, given the number of messages of unity, resilience, and coming together that aired throughout the evening.

The unity messaging started early as the pre-game kicked off with movie star Brad Pitt narrating a moving ad that champions residence and togetherness in honor of those who suffered from the Los Angeles fires and Hurricane Helen:

Keep ReadingShow less
The Paradox for Independents

A handheld American Flag.

Canva Images

The Paradox for Independents

Political independents in the United States are not chiefly moderates. In The Independent Voter, Thomas Reilly, Jacqueline Salit, and Omar Ali make it clear that independents are basically anti-establishment. They have a "mindset" that aims to dismantle the duopoly in our national politics.

I have previously written about different ways that independents can obtain power in Washington. First, they can get elected or converted in Washington and advocate with their own independent voices. Second, they can seek a revolution in which they would be the most dominant voice in Washington. And third, a middle position, they can seek a critical mass in the Senate especially, namely five to six seats, which would give them leverage to help the majority party get to 60 votes on policy bills.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Bureaucrat’s Dilemma When Dealing with a Charismatic Autocrat

A single pawn separated from a group of pawns.

Canva Images

The Bureaucrat’s Dilemma When Dealing with a Charismatic Autocrat

Excerpt from To Stop a Tyrant by Ira Chaleff

In my book To Stop a Tyrant, I identify five types of a political leader’s followers. Given the importance of access in politics, I range these from the more distant to the closest. In the middle are bureaucrats. No political leader can accomplish anything without a cadre of bureaucrats to implement their vision and policies. Custom, culture and law establish boundaries for a bureaucrat’s freedom of action. At times, these constraints must be balanced with moral considerations. The following excerpt discusses ways in which bureaucrats need to thread this needle.

Keep ReadingShow less