Katy Byrne, MA, LMFT, is a Marriage and Family Therapist living in the Bay Area for over 35 years and author of The Power of Being Heard. ConversationswithKaty.com.
I think we're missing something in our thinking about the great divide.
What we have overlooked or denied as we stare at the lack of unification in our world, is our individual responsibility in fueling divisiveness.
In America we shun anyone different than us, or judge and yell at those who disagree with our views. We resist working through conflict with loved ones, gossiping about them or swearing at them under our breath instead.
We need to name the root of this problem first before we can change it. There is a destructive force inside each of us.
I’ve seen this by watching clients in my psychotherapy office. They enter the room resistant, feeling “right” about their rage or defended against feeling hurt, longing or fear. They criticize themselves or each other. They can’t ask for what they need. Their vulnerable wishes and emotions - like fear, hurt or shame are covered up by blame, despair, giving up, anxiety, break ups, self-harm, shunning, abandonment, exhausting arguments, stonewalling, lawsuits, and more.
I have the honor of witnessing clients in psychotherapy repairing broken places, bridging their internal or relational gaps or becoming more whole. They heal and learn to regulate their harmful impulses. They bow to the humble, tangled task of understanding themselves and each other. Their feelings under their defenses are hurt and fear, although hard and embarrassing to admit. But these softer emotions open up hearts, connections and worlds.
They don’t lose power, they gain it and a voice - by asking for their wishes. These heroic people admit their deeper needs, their longings, fears and concerns. In this way they create communication and unity in their homes and lives. I believe this new way of having difficult dialogue can be duplicated within politics, in organizations and within debate everywhere.
We are each a part of the torn fabric of a larger community. Without our cohesion, we are like a frayed sweater - unable to support each other and therefore weakened in our own alliances whether it’s our volunteer activities, our neighborhood gatherings, workplaces, families, friendships, marriages, etc.
We can criticize and blame all day, which is what we spend most of our political conversations doing. We can change laws or policies and create some momentary safety - better freeways, more jobs, affordable housing, or more trained police, fewer guns, etc. We can improve things – all activism matters…helping the animals, picking up trash instead of throwing it, or joining organizations. But, in the end, we have to learn to bridge divides. At the root of anger and argument, violence or destruction is pain and fear. The personal is political.
I want to be clear, pro- action is profoundly important. Without Rosa Parks,
Gloria Steinem or Abraham Lincoln we would not be as far along as we are. Without brave people speaking up and blowing whistles, like Bob Woodward’s breaking apart Watergate and as far back as Joan of Arc, Thoreau's civil disobedience, many brave souls like Lincoln and Mandela have forged a path. This includes so many more humans, the people who rescue dogs or deer, firefighters and brave citizens, without them we would be in even more danger, you who write to the editor and join helpful organizations all matter - without you we would not be as far along in the evolution of our species.
National defenses are much like personal defenses. We, the people stonewall each other, we are resentful and revengeful, we shoot to kill with our words or deeds. The round ball above our necks - the amygdala inside the brain is a worthy opponent, a problem. It insists on the "fight or flight" impulse, it likes war. Humans lurch into rage even when someone comes too close to our car bumpers.
People have almost completely massacred our world at this juncture. We have to get to the roots of our repetitious compulsion, our insistence on fury and fighting – the
real weeds or they will grow back. We can meditate or believe in God, but our instinct to anger or judge others is the problem. And it has great force. Like weeds, we can pull them, spray them with poison, complain about them each spring, but they will grow back- even through thick cement - unless we understand them better.
I watch it happen before my eyes in my therapy office, as they bug out of my own head. I feel like I am sitting in the front row of a panoramic movie theater as I hear couples and family debates, the fights they have had over and over or shut down in an effort not to argue. Often someone rolls their eyes, "I thought we talked about this. Do we have to go over it again?” And I say to them, "you can yell at the weeds for growing back, but the roots will pop back without tending.” And underneath their impatience is their own fear of criticisms. We all want to be heard and seen.
I show them a new way to hear each other and I hear them exhale. Their relief can be heard like an echo through the ages. These couples and families find themselves and each other through transparency, their true stories and excruciating vulnerability.
I sometimes imagine a huge water balloon that they are holding up between them as they argue. When it breaks, the baby is born. I know peace if possible.
The urge to dominate and destroy emerges from anxiety - even Trump is defending against his own shame and inadequacies. He couldn’t possibly have really lost the vote, so he flails and attacks others to prove that he is in fact, okay. We all defend against our own vulnerability.
Just look inside, you will find your own inner terrorist is resentful at someone else or at yourself. The inner critic says we are too fat, too flat, too old or too short or someone else is. This inner terrorist, Darth Vader is alive in us all and needs somewhere to go with that fire. So, we project this inner tyrant out and tear at the fabric of our own relationships every day.
In the end, better freeways, free food, money and war will not save us, though they will help a lot – but the great divide we are all so concerned about, the possibility of more dictatorships and desecration of our place here on the planet will only be repaired by learning to regulate our anger, more insightful education, teaching the kids communication skills, conflict resolution, more mediators and mental health support. Weaving the sweater back is work.




















U.S. President Donald Trump boards Air Force One on August 14, 2026 at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland. Trump is traveling to Long Island to tour law enforcement facilities in Nassau County and rally support for local Republican candidates ahead of the upcoming midterm elections
Travel Far Enough, You Meet Yourself
Is it possible that our President has simply not traveled enough?
Born and raised in Queens and attending Fordham University in the Bronx, Donald Trump has no record of traveling outside New York until he was over 20, when he transferred to a college in the neighboring state of Pennsylvania. Were his formative years amiss, then, in his learning about other places and other people?
Is his view akin to the famous New Yorker cover by Saul Steinberg, an illustration of the United States with New York City as the epicenter of the country and the Hudson River the border of the known world? We can now at least add Washington, D.C., and Mar-a-Lago to the map of “the realm.”
Our President has now traveled some, but what we recommend is another kind of travel. Not a state-sponsored trip or a venture to scout locations for future Trump Towers. This would be a genuine travel experience, enriching and eye-opening, showcasing other cultures and ways of living.
It will extend far beyond viewing military parades, hobnobbing with such “understanding” world leaders as Kim Jong Un, or taking tea with the King.
WHERE, then, should the President go? As Elon Musk’s Starship spacecraft is not yet ready to take passengers to Mars, perhaps he could explore our own vast country?
Maybe he could travel to “flyover country,” the farming states, where his ying-yanging tariffs and trade restrictions have played havoc with rural economies. Or possibly to California, number one in homeless U. S. citizens, and while there, regale homeless veterans (approximately 32,500 nationwide) with tales of his brave exploits invading and bombing foreign countries.
Or he might tour the Great Lakes, and rename the other four?
WHEN should he go? This will be tough, as he is very busy building his ballroom and renaming bodies of water.
How about a trip in early November, around the midterm elections? Despite the long-discredited accusation of widespread voter fraud, it would be reassuring to know he might be so caught up divvying out ladles of soup in a soup kitchen somewhere that he wouldn’t remember to deploy the military for “election security.”
HOW will he travel? He should definitely not take his Qatari-donated, newly renovated 747, especially after last time, when he had to be smuggled off clandestinely in a catering truck. It’s unlikely any traveling companions, like the Secretary of State or of the Treasury, are going to fall for the ruse a second time. Besides, we may need those people. No more decoys!
Perhaps the President could fly commercially, although this likely would expose him to undue suffering. Without gold bathroom fixtures and maple wood floors, the trip will be no “Luxury Experience.” If only he still had his “Trump Shuttle,” bought with a massive loan he later defaulted on, saying then, “I’m smart. I got out at a good time.”
Considering the potential pitfalls, maybe it’s best the President travel incognito, disguised perhaps as an elderly woman wearing a lot of bronzer.
Wherever, whenever, however: our President needs a vacation.
Moreover, we need a vacation from him.
If the President refuses our travel suggestions, here’s another idea:
Let’s get him a pet! He has never owned a pet. As we know with our children, pets teach essential life lessons: compassion and empathy; they instill a sense of responsibility. There is a well-established connection between those who can care for a pet and those who can care for people.
So, which pet should we choose? A puppy? A kitten? A boa constrictor?
Imagine, the President may even decide he likes having a pet. After all, what is more obedient than a well-trained dog, besides possibly the Cabinet? And what is more docile than a sweet kitten, other than plausibly the Supreme Court?
The President may even become more mellow with a pet afoot and less likely to slap tariffs on our allies, or attempt to annex our neighbors, or bully our Congress. (Realizing, of course, a bully requires active participation from the bullied to maintain his status.)
Maybe we should do both: get the President a pet and devise a travel plan for him. (Do you think we could possibly convince him to leave his phone at home?)
Let’s go for it! After all:
Travel far enough, you meet yourself. (David Mitchell)
And for our President, that would likely be the most profound discovery of all.
Amy Lockard is an Iowa resident who regularly contributes to regional newspapers and periodicals. She is working on the second of a four-book fictional series based on Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice."