Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Trump trap

The Trump trap

Former President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign event at the DoubleTree Manchester Downtown on Thursday, April 27, 2023, in Manchester, NH.

Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Goldstone’s latest book is “Not White Enough: The Long, Shameful Road to Japanese American Internment.” Learn more at www.lawrencegoldstone.com.

For anyone who may have forgotten (or tried to forget), there was Donald Trump, that pied piper of the extreme right, again on full display for seventy-minutes in a town hall/campaign rally that CNN thoughtfully provided for him. Any American harboring illusions that the man had changed, even the teeniest bit, was disabused of that notion with the very first question.


Trump sat across from Kaitlan Collins, who like Hillary Clinton accepting the 2016 Democratic nomination, chose a white pants suit for the occasion. Then, with either false sincerity or genuine mental illness, he insisted yet again that he won in 2020 only to be done in by massive fraud that would have required hundreds if not thousands of conspirators to pull off, not one of whom has yet breathed a word about it. The crowd applauded. (The white suit did not seem to yield any better results for Collins than it had for Clinton.)

For the remainder of the event, Trump was, well, Trump, leaving all but his most fervent supporters wondering, also yet again, if he really believed his own fantasies or was he simply spewing out the vitriol his fans have come to demand, sort of like Frank Sinatra always needing to end a concert with “My Way.”

But the real fallout was directed not at Trump but rather at CNN, who was accused of providing a platform to likely the most dangerous man in America. The network was excoriated by virtually every other media outlet, including MSNBC, which took the opportunity to mention how much better the night would have gone if Rachel Maddow had been in the interviewer’s chair. (The idea that Maddow could have ridden herd on Trump any better than Collins, or anyone else for that matter, is almost as delusional as Trump’s millions of fake Biden votes.)

The most serious criticism, however, was that CNN had allowed Trump to salt the crowd, that the so-called “independent voters” were merely MAGAs in disguise, who, when coupled with the announced MAGA attendees, turned the town hall into the sort of braying, snickering spectacle that people generally associate with Christians being fed to lions.

CNN tried to strike back, assigning Anderson Cooper to provide a three-minute rebuttal in which he admitted, “I get it,” in response to the anger and outrage, and added that he would understand if there were those who would never watch the network again. But he also pointed out that Trump was far ahead of any Republican challenger, may well be their party’s nominee in 2024, and that the “audience that upset you is a sampling of about half the country.”

From there, Cooper defended CNN for demonstrating that “it can happen again—it is happening again,” and then he took a shot at his own audience by asking if they think “staying in your silo and only listening to the people you agree with is going to make [Trump] go away?”

As self-serving as Cooper’s recitation might have been, there was some truth in it. Casting aside that CNN got outmaneuvered, not because they put him on the air, but did so in a format that may well have made him appear far more popular than he actually is, sad to say, Americans do need to be reminded of who Donald Trump is and the morass into which he would happily cast the nation in his indefatigable pursuit of personal aggrandizement.

They need to be reminded that the country means nothing to him, nor do those sad, pathetic Americans who have been convinced by a low-end salesman that he cares about their welfare or their futures. Trump cannot even be called a “master salesman” since before he stumbled on this reservoir of angry, gullible followers, his business ventures had a habit of ending in a flurry of bankruptcies, lawsuits, and unpaid bills.

But what Americans need most to be reminded of is that Donald Trump cheapens everything he touches, ironic for a man who claims great riches. Even the gaudy, overdesigned, ridiculously expensive decor that dominates his real estate holdings somehow seems cheap, sharing a penchant for gold toilets with Saddam Hussein. That he has demeaned the political process is obvious, but he has done the same thing with his university, his business practices, his steaks, his ties, and his $99 collectible digital trading cards.

All this would mean little except that he has now dragged everyone else—and his country—down with him. Politics was always a pretty tawdry affair, but the current version has, like everything involving Trump, reached caricaturish lows.

Still, it is also important not to overstate the threat. Trump’s ascension is possible, but in no way imminent. Many on the left rue the renomination of Joe Biden because of his low approval ratings, advancing age, and the uncertainty about the ability of his current vice president to assume the job, but Republicans have the same problems, only worse.

Trump’s approval ratings are hardly stratospheric, he is only a few years younger, and whoever agrees to be his vice president, Kari Lake say, is anything but a good bet to inspire confidence. (Nikki Haley would have likely jumped at it if not for the damning verdict in Trump’s sexual assault trial. She may still be offered the post but will decline if she has even a scintilla of political moxie.) Republicans have the added burden of their candidate-in-waiting now officially recognized as a sexual predator who will almost certainly soon be a defendant in a series of trials that carry potential sentences of more than twenty years.

Ensuring that Donald Trump never again holds public office is vital, of course, but of equal importance is that Republicans free themselves from the trap Trump has led them into. Democrats, while not having to deal with Trump directly, still need to find a way to project strength without descending to the phony chest thumping that Trump seems to have made a necessary part of campaigning.

At the moment, both parties find themselves in the Trump trap. It will take a good deal of will, courage, and foresight to pull themselves out of it.


Read More

Paul Ehrlich was wrong about everything

Crowd of people walking on a street.

Andy Andrews//Getty Images

Paul Ehrlich was wrong about everything

Biologist and author Paul Ehrlich, the most influential Chicken Little of the last century, died at the age of 93 this week. His 1968 book, “The Population Bomb,” launched decades of institutional panic in government, entertainment and journalism.

Ehrlich’s core neo-Malthusian argument was that overpopulation would exhaust the supply of food and natural resources, leading to a cascade of catastrophes around the world. “The Population Bomb” opens with a bold prediction, “The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

People clear rubble in a house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. The United States and Israel continued their joint attack on Iran that began on February 28. Iran retaliated by firing waves of missiles and drones at Israel, and targeting U.S. allies in the region.

Getty Images, Majid Saeedi

Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

Most of what we have heard from the administration as it pertains to the Iran War is swagger and bro-talk. A few days into the war, the White House released a social media video that combined footage of the bombardment with clips from video games. Not long after, it released a second video, titled “Justice the American Way,” that mixed images of the U.S. military with scenes from movies like Gladiator and Top Gun Maverick.

Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, War Secretary Pete Hegseth boasted of “death and destruction from the sky all day long.” “They are toast, and they know it,” he said. “This was never meant to be a fair fight... we are punching them while they’re down.”

Keep ReadingShow less
A student in uniform walking through a campus.

A Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) cadet walks through campus November 7, 2003 in Princeton, New Jersey.

Getty Images, Spencer Platt

Hegseth is Dumbing Down the Military (on Purpose)

One day before the United States began an ill-defined and illegal war of indefinite length with Iran, Pete Hegseth angrily attacked a different enemy: the Ivy League. The Secretary of War denounced Ivy League universities as "woke breeding grounds of toxic indoctrination” and then eliminated long-standing college fellowship programs with more than a dozen elite colleges, which had historically served as a pipeline for service members to the upper ranks of military leadership. Of the schools now on Hegseth’s "no-fly list," four sit in the top ten of the World’s Top Universities for 2026. So, why does the Secretary of War not want his armed forces to have the best education available? Because he wants a military without a brain.

For a guy obsessed with being the strongest and most lethal force in the world, cutting access to world-class schools is a bizarre gambit. It does reveal Hegseth doesn’t consider intelligence a factor–let alone an asset–in strength or lethality. That tracks. Hegseth alleges the Ivies infect officers with “globalist and radical ideologies that do not improve our fighting ranks…” God forbid the tip of the sword of our foreign policy has knowledge of international cooperation and global interconnectedness. The Ivy League has its own issues, but the Pentagon’s claim that they "fail to deliver rigorous education grounded in realism” is almost laughable. I’m a veteran Lieutenant Commander with two Ivy League degrees, both paid for with military tuition assistance, and I promise: it was rigorous. Meanwhile, are Hegseth’s performative politics grounded in reality? Attacking Harvard on social media the eve of initiating a new war with a foreign adversary is disgraceful, and even delusional.

Keep ReadingShow less
Are We Prepared for a World Where AI Isn’t at Work?
Person working at a desk with a laptop and books.

Are We Prepared for a World Where AI Isn’t at Work?

Draft an important email without using AI. Write it from scratch — no suggestions, no autocomplete, and no prompt to ChatGPT to compose or revise the email.

Now ask yourself: Did it feel slower? Harder? Slightly uncomfortable?

Keep ReadingShow less