Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The Trump trap

The Trump trap

Former President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign event at the DoubleTree Manchester Downtown on Thursday, April 27, 2023, in Manchester, NH.

Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Goldstone’s latest book is “Not White Enough: The Long, Shameful Road to Japanese American Internment.” Learn more at www.lawrencegoldstone.com.

For anyone who may have forgotten (or tried to forget), there was Donald Trump, that pied piper of the extreme right, again on full display for seventy-minutes in a town hall/campaign rally that CNN thoughtfully provided for him. Any American harboring illusions that the man had changed, even the teeniest bit, was disabused of that notion with the very first question.


Trump sat across from Kaitlan Collins, who like Hillary Clinton accepting the 2016 Democratic nomination, chose a white pants suit for the occasion. Then, with either false sincerity or genuine mental illness, he insisted yet again that he won in 2020 only to be done in by massive fraud that would have required hundreds if not thousands of conspirators to pull off, not one of whom has yet breathed a word about it. The crowd applauded. (The white suit did not seem to yield any better results for Collins than it had for Clinton.)

For the remainder of the event, Trump was, well, Trump, leaving all but his most fervent supporters wondering, also yet again, if he really believed his own fantasies or was he simply spewing out the vitriol his fans have come to demand, sort of like Frank Sinatra always needing to end a concert with “My Way.”

But the real fallout was directed not at Trump but rather at CNN, who was accused of providing a platform to likely the most dangerous man in America. The network was excoriated by virtually every other media outlet, including MSNBC, which took the opportunity to mention how much better the night would have gone if Rachel Maddow had been in the interviewer’s chair. (The idea that Maddow could have ridden herd on Trump any better than Collins, or anyone else for that matter, is almost as delusional as Trump’s millions of fake Biden votes.)

The most serious criticism, however, was that CNN had allowed Trump to salt the crowd, that the so-called “independent voters” were merely MAGAs in disguise, who, when coupled with the announced MAGA attendees, turned the town hall into the sort of braying, snickering spectacle that people generally associate with Christians being fed to lions.

CNN tried to strike back, assigning Anderson Cooper to provide a three-minute rebuttal in which he admitted, “I get it,” in response to the anger and outrage, and added that he would understand if there were those who would never watch the network again. But he also pointed out that Trump was far ahead of any Republican challenger, may well be their party’s nominee in 2024, and that the “audience that upset you is a sampling of about half the country.”

From there, Cooper defended CNN for demonstrating that “it can happen again—it is happening again,” and then he took a shot at his own audience by asking if they think “staying in your silo and only listening to the people you agree with is going to make [Trump] go away?”

As self-serving as Cooper’s recitation might have been, there was some truth in it. Casting aside that CNN got outmaneuvered, not because they put him on the air, but did so in a format that may well have made him appear far more popular than he actually is, sad to say, Americans do need to be reminded of who Donald Trump is and the morass into which he would happily cast the nation in his indefatigable pursuit of personal aggrandizement.

They need to be reminded that the country means nothing to him, nor do those sad, pathetic Americans who have been convinced by a low-end salesman that he cares about their welfare or their futures. Trump cannot even be called a “master salesman” since before he stumbled on this reservoir of angry, gullible followers, his business ventures had a habit of ending in a flurry of bankruptcies, lawsuits, and unpaid bills.

But what Americans need most to be reminded of is that Donald Trump cheapens everything he touches, ironic for a man who claims great riches. Even the gaudy, overdesigned, ridiculously expensive decor that dominates his real estate holdings somehow seems cheap, sharing a penchant for gold toilets with Saddam Hussein. That he has demeaned the political process is obvious, but he has done the same thing with his university, his business practices, his steaks, his ties, and his $99 collectible digital trading cards.

All this would mean little except that he has now dragged everyone else—and his country—down with him. Politics was always a pretty tawdry affair, but the current version has, like everything involving Trump, reached caricaturish lows.

Still, it is also important not to overstate the threat. Trump’s ascension is possible, but in no way imminent. Many on the left rue the renomination of Joe Biden because of his low approval ratings, advancing age, and the uncertainty about the ability of his current vice president to assume the job, but Republicans have the same problems, only worse.

Trump’s approval ratings are hardly stratospheric, he is only a few years younger, and whoever agrees to be his vice president, Kari Lake say, is anything but a good bet to inspire confidence. (Nikki Haley would have likely jumped at it if not for the damning verdict in Trump’s sexual assault trial. She may still be offered the post but will decline if she has even a scintilla of political moxie.) Republicans have the added burden of their candidate-in-waiting now officially recognized as a sexual predator who will almost certainly soon be a defendant in a series of trials that carry potential sentences of more than twenty years.

Ensuring that Donald Trump never again holds public office is vital, of course, but of equal importance is that Republicans free themselves from the trap Trump has led them into. Democrats, while not having to deal with Trump directly, still need to find a way to project strength without descending to the phony chest thumping that Trump seems to have made a necessary part of campaigning.

At the moment, both parties find themselves in the Trump trap. It will take a good deal of will, courage, and foresight to pull themselves out of it.


Read More

Business meeting, blurred background and people in office for teamwork, collaboration and planning

Another recruitment drive won’t fix a nonprofit board. A practical guide to sharing real decision-making power with diverse members: acknowledge, affirm, act.

Jacob Wackerhausen/Getty Images

Before Recruiting Diverse Board Members, Examine Who Holds Power

Nonprofit leaders keep asking me where they will find the next generation of diverse board talent. My question is what those leaders will be allowed to change once they arrive. In this piece, I outline concrete steps boards can take to ensure diverse members have real opportunities to shape organizational decision-making and to translate good intentions into meaningful progress.

In my board service and consulting work, I hear the concern from executives and grassroots activists alike. They worry about recruiting successors, sustaining funding, and governing organizations whose work increasingly depends on partnerships beyond their own walls. I share those concerns. I also wonder whether another recruitment initiative will solve what troubles them.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Pennsylvania state capitol building.

The Pennsylvania state capitol building.

jimfeng/Getty Images

Pennsylvania’s Bipartisan Exchange Is Rebuilding Trust in Governance

The University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics has nearly 40 years of experience working with legislators from different political parties, and it is building on this history by drawing on lessons from the successful American Congressional Exchange model, begun in 2018 at the Bipartisan Policy Center, and from state exchanges now underway in Minnesota and Michigan. The University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics, in collaboration with the Bridge Alliance, has launched the Pennsylvania Legislative Exchange.

This state-based, systematic approach is designed to foster better relationships and build trust across the political aisle with the following guiding principles:

Keep ReadingShow less
Shadow on a wall of Judge hitting gavel in court, concept of justice, law, and legal protection

DOJ lawsuits in Alaska and California preview post-Election Day fights over certification and seating winners. Here’s how officials and voters can prepare.

Aitor Diago / Getty Images

The Lawsuits Will Lose. The Delays Will Still Win.

Less than two weeks before Election Day, President Trump’s Justice Department asked a federal court to stop Alaska from certifying its U.S. Senate race if Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan loses to Democrat Mary Peltola. The lawsuit claims that a second candidate on the ballot, Daniel J. Sullivan, will confuse voters. That argument went nowhere in June, when the Alaska Supreme Court ruled that the state had no legal way to remove him from the ballot. Asked about the suit, the president took credit. “I’m the one that said do it,” he told reporters.

Alongside the Alaska suit, the Trump administration sued California to keep the state from counting mail ballots from 20,000 people it calls “likely” noncitizens. Over the summer, the Department of Homeland Security put that number at 190,000. Legal experts expect both suits to fail, as so many suits like them have. Still, Alaska and California give us an early look at what the weeks after November 3rd could bring: recount demands, calls to review or throw out ballots, and pressure to delay seating winners.

Keep ReadingShow less