Donald Trump has requested an April 2026 trial date for his federal indictment for 2020 election interference charges connected to the Jan. 6 insurrection.
Video: Trump’s legal team seeks to delay federal election case until April 2026
News
MSNBC
News
MSNBC
Donald Trump has requested an April 2026 trial date for his federal indictment for 2020 election interference charges connected to the Jan. 6 insurrection.

Washington, D.C. — The Senate is preparing to begin a budget reconciliation process that could direct up to $72 billion in new funding to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), a move that has prompted sharp criticism from civil rights groups who argue the agencies already operate with expanded enforcement powers and minimal oversight.
The proposal isn’t a standard spending bill. It’s a reconciliation package, which allows Republicans to advance it in the Senate with a simple majority rather than the 60 votes normally required to break a filibuster. That procedural choice makes it one of the most direct efforts yet to cement Trump’s immigration agenda without needing Democratic support.
The Latino civic organization Voto Latino is urging lawmakers to reject the proposal, citing a growing list of reported abuses, wrongful detentions, and deaths in custody. They argue the Trump administration has widened ICE and CBP’s enforcement authority without corresponding accountability from Congress, resulting in communities across the country experiencing increased detentions, wrongful deportations, and family separations. Despite billions in additional funding last year, the Senate is now considering tens of billions more, without what advocates describe as meaningful guardrails or reforms.
The organization argues that the agencies’ record under Secretary Markwayne Mullin reflects a pattern of abuse, inadequate medical care, and preventable deaths in custody. “Rewarding that record with a $72 billion blank check will only make it worse,” the group said.
Recent reporting from national and local outlets highlights the breadth of incidents fueling the backlash. The Texas Tribune documented the case of José Contreras Díaz, a longtime DACA recipient who was deported to Honduras while his wife was pregnant, later allowed to return, and then detained again, leaving him uncertain about what comes next. NBC Chicago reported that Kevin Gonzalez, an 18‑year‑old U.S. citizen with terminal cancer, died hours after his detained parents were released so they could say goodbye. In Georgia, WABE reported the death of Denny Adan Gonzalez, the second person to die in ICE custody in the state this year and the 18th nationwide in 2026.
Other cases involve U.S. citizens and military families and have raised concerns about the use of force:
Republicans argue the package is needed to restore and expand enforcement funding after Democrats blocked the usual appropriations process. Democrats, meanwhile, are expected to criticize it as an attempt to bypass standard spending rules and broaden ICE authority without sufficient oversight.
Next step is the Senate procedural review. Under reconciliation rules, every provision must have a direct budgetary effect — not simply function as a policy change framed as spending. That gives the Senate parliamentarian significant power over which elements Republicans can keep in the bill.
Voto Latino is calling on Americans, community leaders, and organizations to contact their members of Congress and demand a “no” vote on the reconciliation package. The group argues that Congress should not approve billions more for agencies accused of abuse, wrongful deportations, and family separations without implementing meaningful oversight and accountability measures.
As the reconciliation process moves forward, lawmakers face competing pressures over border security, civil liberties, and federal spending. Advocates warn that without reforms, expanded funding risks deepening the very problems already documented across the country.
Senate Pushes $72 Billion ICE Funding Boost as Abuse Allegations Mount was first published by the Latino News Network and republished with permission.
Hugo Balta is the executive editor of The Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network, and twice president of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists.
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Representatives and senators remain fiercely divided over President Donald Trump… yet they remain united over John Denver.
On May 13, hundreds of attendees packed the U.S. Capitol Building’s auditorium for Congressional Record, a concert where musical Republican and Democratic members of Congress alike showcased their talents. Denver’s Take Me Home, Country Roads served as the grand finale, with all members joining onstage in a rousing performance across party lines.
At a pre-concert reception, The Fulcrum asked two Republican and two Democratic members about their musical tastes and backgrounds.
“I like everything from big band to classic rock,” said Ohio Republican Rep. Bob Latta – who wasn’t performing himself, but whose wife, Marcia Sloan, sang America the Beautiful as part of the House Spouse Glee Club. Asked about his own musical skills, or lack thereof: “My piano teacher told my parents not to waste any more money.”
At 27, the youngest member of the current Congress by a solid three years, Florida Democrat Rep. Maxwell Frost is also the first Gen Z member elected. Asked whether he’d turned any of his middle-aged or older House colleagues on to any of his favorite modern music, Frost replied, “I’ve put a few people onto [electropop duo] Magdalena Bay.”
Michigan Republican Rep. Tim Walberg often leads worship songs with his guitar at a weekly Thursday bipartisan congressional prayer group. Asked what music plays in the car, he answered like the true Michigander he is: “I usually listen to Motown.”
Illinois Democrat Rep. Jonathan Jackson also wasn’t performing, but didn’t hesitate when asked to name his favorite concert he’s ever attended: “The Jackson 5, at Chicago’s 1972 Black Expo.” (He was too humble to mention that his father, the late Jesse Rev. Jackson, organized the expo.) “Music takes people to where they want to be,” said the son.
Congressman Mark Messner (IN) on the trumpet.
The Congressional Record concert was created by Kevin Canafax and Geoff Browning, who didn’t even know each other in person – they connected on Facebook.
Canafax is a Cincinnati-based vice president at a financial services company by day, but leads the Led Zeppelin tribute band Soul Shadow by night. He conceived of taking his annual arts education fundraiser, Suits That Rock, featuring local business leaders performing songs, to the nation’s capital for Congress members to take up the act.
Lacking connections in the area, he read a Roll Call profile article about Browning, who worked for Massachusetts Democratic Rep. Katherine Clark at the time, but also performed for the unclassifiable D.C.-area Band of Tomorrow. (The group’s official website’s description: “funk // rock // reggae // samba // disco // soul // fire // auditory contraband collective.”)
After connecting on Facebook, the two men launched the inaugural concert in September 2024. Their clever name, Congressional Record, puns on the Congressional Record, Congress’s official transcribed archives of floor speeches and votes.
Both the first and second concerts were timed to the D.C. “fly-in” week sponsored by advocacy organization National Association of Music Merchants (NAMM), which champions increased public funding of arts education in schools.
“We hope this becomes an annual event like the Congressional Baseball Game,” said Browning, who now works as director of public policy for a software company.
The congressional performers rehearsed over two days with the professional backing band who accompanied them, at the Capitol Hill-area recording studio Ivakota. “They would pop in throughout the day,” trombone player Reggie Pace said, “when they weren’t in committee.”
Representatives Jared Huffman (CA), Becca Balint (VT), and Sean Casten (IL) perform together.
Earlier that day, Congress voted on such bills as the Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act. But by night, the eclectic mix of genres included:
2024’s Congressional Record concert ended with bipartisan Congress members onstage together singing an inspiring rendition of Let It Be by the Beatles. 2026’s installment similarly ended with Take Me Home, Country Roads. A song from the 1960s, then the 1970s.
Those eras marked perhaps the peak of what’s been retroactively termed “the monoculture.” Most people got their news from Walter Cronkite at 6:30 PM, their comedy from Johnny Carson at 11:30, and nearly everybody knew the biggest songs.
Those eras also marked perhaps the high-water mark for political bipartisanship. Just look at the Senate’s list of near-unanimous Supreme Court confirmation votes from the period. This was a time when a Republican president created the Environmental Protection Agency.
That’s likely not a coincidence. It was a time not of unanimity, but at least of relatively shared facts, sources, and reference points.
Vice versa, it’s also likely not a coincidence that the 2010s-20s dissolution of political centrism and bipartisan compromise occurred alongside the much-discussed demise of “cultural universals”: current television shows, books, or music that most people consume or know.
Indeed, the same factors contributed to both phenomena, on both the political and cultural levels. Social media. Algorithms. Echo chambers. Ideological and digital self-segregation. The corresponding plummet of mass market media formats, such as print journalism and over-the-air television or radio.
Over the decades, Country Roads clearly transcended its regional origins to become a “cultural universal.” By the 2025 Super Bowl, the entire Superdome stadium sang along.
Is there an equivalent song from the past decade or so? One which would truly get every stadium attendee – or Congress member – singing along, knowing all the lyrics? Across political parties, across races, across genders, across generations?
A society failing to create such a cross-demographic culture is also unlikely to create such cross-ideological public policy. Shared culture may not lead to shared governing, but they’re borne of the same roots.
The closing chord rang out. The audience gave a standing ovation. Perhaps this concert will indeed become an annual event. But we should aim for an America where such cultural and political unity also occurs on the other 364 days of the year.
Jesse Rifkin's writings about politics and Congress have been published in the Washington Post, Politico, Roll Call, Los Angeles Times, CNN Opinion, GovTrack, and USA Today.
Congress Bill Spotlight: Easter Monday Act, Federal Holiday
Congress Bill Spotlight: SERVE Act, To Undo Trump Renamings
Congress Bill Spotlight: MAMDANI Act, Blocking Funds to NYC
Congress Votes With Only One House or Senate Dissenter, 2025

Childcare providers warn that Trump administration rollbacks and rising costs are pushing America’s fragile child care system toward collapse, leaving families and workers struggling to survive.
Earlier this month, the Trump Administration sent a clear message to American families: child care is a personal problem, not a public responsibility.
The president’s executive order repealed federally mandated provisions that helped stabilize the child care industry after the COVID-19 shutdown. Without these safety nets, more programs will close their doors. What little federal support childcare providers had was already inadequate. I know this firsthand because, after three decades in the child care field, I was forced to face a harsh reality and close my doors.
As an organizer, I am now fighting in my home state of North Carolina to ensure others don’t do the same. But that fight is getting harder, with higher prices due to tariffs and the war. Now, childcare providers are facing these rollbacks. If America values children, then America must finally value child care and the people who provide it by committing to the public investment required to keep the system from collapsing.
For decades, the U.S. has structured child care as an individual burden carried primarily by women, families, and an underpaid workforce expected to hold together one of the country’s most essential systems through sacrifice alone. As a result, America continues to operate what is essentially 50 fragmented child care experiments layered onto a federally funded system with no consistent national floor for affordability, provider stability, or compensation.
The situation got more dire on Monday with the Trump administration’s executive order. It removed the cap that limited co-payments to 7% of the family’s income; eliminated requirements that direct services be provided through grants and contracts; and rescinded provisions that allowed childcare providers to be paid in advance for their service. In addition, it mandated reimbursement models for programs based on enrollment rather than by attendance. These provisions were enacted as a safety net to offset significant workforce shortages due to chronically low wages.
The same day, across the country, thousands of child care providers and parents protested, sending loud messages to legislators to “fix” the problem. While the needs may differ from state to state, there is one resounding national reality: the system is failing the very people it depends on to survive.
The consequences are impossible to ignore. The rollbacks are driving up costs for childcare providers – and families – at a time when people can least afford it. Rents are rising. Food prices are rising. Utilities are rising. And, for the first time in three years, American wages are not keeping up with inflation.
As an organizer, it rankles me to know that this year marks nearly 106 years since the ratification of the 19th Amendment, yet women still disproportionately carry the labor-intensive and financial burden of care work. The framework of child care has persistently shifted the economic risk of the care economy onto providers themselves. And when I meet with these providers, I hear the same refrains. They are continuously being asked to do more. More training. More documentation. More educational attainment. More compliance. More quality measures. But nowhere in that conversation is there the same urgency around childcare subsidies that help lower-income families afford care, sustainability, or whether the people carrying the system can continue to survive under its weight.
In almost any other industry, experts would recognize this as an unsustainable business model. But child care has historically been cast as “women’s work,” making it easier for society to normalize low wages, unpaid labor, and impossible expectations.
But these changes don’t just affect providers. For families, when quality programs disappear, that lack of access can ripple through every part of their lives. Parents may experience higher absenteeism at work, lost wages, and ultimately even job loss when stable care is no longer available. When families become desperate to keep their jobs to meet basic needs, some may feel forced to place their children in unvetted child care settings, simply because it is the only care they can access or afford.
The welfare of children sits at the center of mandated health and safety requirements, higher education expectations, and increasingly stringent quality systems. Many of these goals are important. But too often, the system appears to be designed to sustain itself rather than to adequately meet the needs of families, providers, and children simultaneously.
What continues to hold this structure together are the caring hearts of providers and the belief that children deserve safe, nurturing environments. But passion cannot continue to subsidize public policy failures.
Childcare providers cannot continue carrying this burden alone. If America truly values children, then legislators must make the public investment to keep the system from collapsing.
Danielle Caldwell is an organizer, early childhood Education Consultant and advocate. She is also a Public Voices Fellow of The OpEd Project in partnership with the National Black Child Development Institute.
The Fulcrum is proud to announce its six Summer 2026 Fulcrum Fellows, a cohort of emerging journalists who will participate in the organization’s 10‑week training program focused on solutions‑focused reporting and narrative complexity. The fellowship, which runs June 8–August 14, 2026, is part of The Fulcrum’s national NextGen initiative to expand opportunities for young reporters and strengthen journalism that moves beyond polarized storytelling.
The program—developed in partnership with the Latino News Network (LNN)—provides mentorship, newsroom experience, and publication opportunities for fellows committed to community‑centered reporting. The Fulcrum and LNN’s continued collaboration emphasizes elevating underrepresented voices and culturally nuanced storytelling.
Kazon Allen
Kazon Allen, a broadcast journalism student at Florida A&M University, said he hopes to grow into a more in‑depth storyteller with the power to inform the public and elevate voices that often go unheard. He explained that the Fulcrum Fellowship felt like a natural next step in his development as a journalist. “I applied to the fellowship to strengthen my journalism skills and continue growing as a storyteller. I’ve been studying communication and journalism from high school through college, and through this opportunity, I hope to advance my storytelling, gain new skills, and expand my opportunities as an upcoming journalist,” he said.
Shon Eric Hernandez
Shon Eric Hernandez, a journalism major at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, is interested in the intersections of media, politics, and entertainment. He said he is eager to deepen his understanding of solutions‑focused reporting—journalism that not only identifies problems but also examines how they can be addressed. “I want to move from critiquing media to practicing solutions‑focused reporting,” he said. “Through this experience, I hope to strengthen my investigative reporting, source‑building, and narrative skills so I can tell stories that critically examine problems and help readers become better informed and empowered.”
Daniela Mattson
Daniela Mattson, a journalism student at the University of Southern California, said she is eager to grow through mentorship from The Fulcrum’s editorial team and to further strengthen her reporting grounded in accuracy and ethics. "Through the fellowship, I hope to build meaningful connections with fellow student journalists and professional mentors who will push the boundaries of my storytelling and encourage me to do my best work," she said. "I look forward to being part of a community of journalists who understand and value the importance of ethical and impactful storytelling.”
Isabel Papp
Isabel Papp, a student at Northwestern University majoring in both journalism and political science, is a bilingual reporter who described herself as an “equity‑minded” storyteller committed to amplifying underrepresented voices and bringing cultural nuance to coverage of Latino communities. “I believe experimenting with my approach to journalism is the way to achieve the most robust writing possible,” she said. “Journalism should help people, and solutions journalism is the next step toward that goal.”
Gabriela Quintero
Gabriela Quintero, an incoming freshman at Barnard College of Columbia University, said she believes that reporting on democracy is a way of helping to uphold it. “Learning from experts in politics will allow me to develop the skills necessary to pursue a professional career in journalism,” she said. “I hope to become a better reporter through the fellowship by working on stories I wouldn’t have had the opportunity to report on otherwise and by developing meaningful connections with young journalists across the country.”
Alexis Tamm
Alexis Tamm, a recent graduate of Georgetown University, is passionate about multidimensional, human‑centered storytelling. She said she was drawn to The Fulcrum’s mission to counter divisive narratives and emphasized her commitment to producing journalism that challenges “us vs. them” mentalities and helps audiences better understand one another to spark meaningful change. “I'm excited to focus on solutions storytelling and to keep learning how to complicate the narrative and give voice to many different perspectives in my work," she said.
The fellows will receive training in op‑ed writing, climate‑solutions reporting in collaboration with the Solutions Journalism Network, and Complicating the Narrative techniques as core components of the fellowship curriculum.
The Fulcrum Fellowship continues to advance its mission of training journalists who can illuminate not only the challenges facing American democracy but also the solutions emerging across communities. The Fulcrum's Executive Editor and Publisher of the Latino News Network, Hugo Balta has described the program as one that empowers young reporters to tell “richer, more human stories” that move beyond one‑dimensional narratives.
“As the 2026 cohort begins its work this summer, these fellows will contribute reporting that expands the reach of their storytelling and strengthens journalism that informs, connects, and empowers communities,” Balta said.
Thanks in part to support from the Hortencia Zavala Foundation, the Fulcrum Fellowship will also host a Fall 2026 session. Applications will open later this summer, offering another opportunity to join the program’s growing national network of next‑generation civic storytellers.
“Growing the Fulcrum Fellowship from its inaugural session last summer to two full sessions this year is an exciting milestone for our newsroom” said David Nevins, publisher of The Fulcrum. “It reflects our commitment to expanding opportunities for emerging journalists and strengthening a pipeline of storytellers who are passionate about informing the public and elevating civic dialogue.”
Hugo Balta is an accredited Solutions Journalism and Complicating the Narratives trainer with the Solutions Journalism Network.
The Fulcrum is deeply committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists, investing in emerging reporters who are driven to produce ethical, solutions‑focused storytelling and strengthen civic understanding through their work.
The Latino News Network's mission is to provide greater visibility to Hispanics, Latinos through community‑centered reporting that provides culturally nuanced, solutions‑driven coverage for underserved audiences.
What Is It To You?