Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Tupac’s timeless political messages: Echoes in today’s American discord

Tupac’s timeless political messages: Echoes in today’s American discord
Getty Images

Escobar served honorably for four years in the Air Force. Following his time as a skilled F-15 Fighter Jet mechanic, he contributed to military justice, assisting attorneys in upholding military discipline. He recently founded a company called True College with a mission to help low-income students navigate the college application process.

The recent incarceration of Duane Davis, or "Keffe D," tethered to the ominous murder of the prolific Tupac Shakur in 1996, has inadvertently resurrected discussions around Tupac's audacious political lyrics. Even after a quarter of a century, the hard-hitting messages embedded within Tupac's rhythms pulsate with relevance, striking chords in the heart of America’s contemporary socio-political landscape.


With verses echoing the cries against systemic injustices, police brutality, and the racial disenfranchisement of the black community, Tupac’s musical legacy continues to breathe life into the ongoing struggles and resonates in today’s tumultuous American political climate.

Navigating through his lyrical labyrinth, one discerns Tupac as a fierce critic of social maladies. Songs like "Keep Ya Head Up" underscore the corrosive effects of police brutality, portraying

law enforcement not as protectors but as formidable adversaries. Such reflections encapsulate the persistent ordeal that has fueled movements like Black Lives Matter that demand accountability and reform in policing and criminal justice.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

In unraveling the tales of the distressed, Tupac’s "Brenda's Got a Baby" unveils the grim realities confronting young Black women. Within its poignant lyrics lies an exploration of issues like abortion, a contentious topic at the forefront of American political discourse. Amid evolving legal battles and policy shifts, the narratives within his music provide a cultural mirror reflecting the personal traumas and societal judgments faced by women, emphasizing the necessity of empathetic and supportive frameworks.

Tupac's "Changes" captivates through its vivid imagery of a tumultuous world, a canvas painted with the lack of readiness to embrace a Black president and the urgent cries for revolutionary

shifts. These words resonate with the divisive politics and racial rifts observed in recent election cycles, reinforcing the notion that his messages are not relics of the past but rather living dialogues engaging with contemporary socio-political realities.

Despite the controversies that clouded Tupac’s lyrical expressions, marked by profanity and raw depictions of violence, supporters argue that his music was merely a mirror reflecting the harsh terrains of inner-city life. It served as a vessel carrying the voices of marginalized communities, transcending temporal boundaries and reverberating in the global realms of musical influence and societal introspection.

Tupac’s legacy, amidst current unfolding dramas such as Duane Davis’s arrest, stands as a testament to the enduring relevance of his political messages. In the echoing silence left in his absence, the vibrancy of his lyrics continues to fuel the fight for social justice, equality, and systemic transformation in an America still grappling with the shadows of its past and the turbulence of its present.

Read More

People holding signs against Project 2025 and Donald Trump

Protestors rally against Project 2025 and Donald Trump in New York's Times Square.

Selcuk Acar/Anadolu via Getty Images

Project 2025: How anti-trans proposals could impact all families

This is part of a series offering a nonpartisan counter to Project 2025, a conservative guideline to reforming government and policymaking during the first 180 days of a second Trump administration. The Fulcrum's cross partisan analysis of Project 2025 relies on unbiased critical thinking, reexamines outdated assumptions, and uses reason, scientific evidence, and data in analyzing and critiquing Project 2025.

Willie Carver has been a teacher in Kentucky since 2007, now working with college students. For over two years, he has worked with the American Federation of Teachers’ National LGBTQ+ Task Force, an advocacy arm of the influential labor union created to counter the rise and repression brought by anti-LGBTQ+ laws.

One of the country’s most draconian anti-trans measures became law in Carver’s home state last March. The law has required teachers to put politics before the wellbeing of their own students and reshaped how students see and treat each other. It bans them from being taught about gender identity or sexual orientation, using restrooms and locker rooms that match their gender identity and learning about human sexuality. The law also made gender-affirming care illegal for trans youth.

Keep ReadingShow less
Perston holding a sign that reads "Project 2025 is Christian nationalism"

Opponents of Project 2025 hold a rally at Times Square on July 27.

Selcuk Acar/Anadolu via Getty Images

Project 2025: A blueprint for Christian nationalist regime change

Casey is a former editorial writer for The New York Times and has worked with the Kettering Foundation since 2010.

This is part of a series offering a nonpartisan counter to Project 2025, a conservative guideline to reforming government and policymaking during the first 180 days of a second Trump administration. The Fulcrum's cross-partisan analysis of Project 2025 relies on unbiased critical thinking, reexamines outdated assumptions, and uses reason, scientific evidence, and data in analyzing and critiquing Project 2025.

The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 is a “presidential transition project” created as a blueprint for recruitment and indoctrination should Donald Trump become the next president. The plan calls for establishing a government that would be imbued with “biblical principles” and run by a president who holds sweeping executive powers.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump at a podium

Former President Donald Trump's campaign exploits racist dog whistles, demonizing immigrants and endorsing white nationalist rhetoric, writes Johnson.

Adam J. Dewey/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Contending with whiteness in 2024

Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

The 2024 presidential campaign is shaping to be a racial reckoning for America.

With Vice President Kamala Harris positioned to shatter the glass ceiling as the first woman and person of color in the Oval Office and Donald Trump's candidacy fanning the flames of racial hatred, the election is laying bare the nation's ongoing struggle with whiteness and racial justice. As a pastor and advocate for racial reconciliation, I believe this moment will test our democracy's commitment to liberty and justice for all.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kamala Harris and Donald Trump

Kamala Harris and Donald Trump

Jacek Boczarski/Anadolu, Andrew Leyden/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Where Harris, Trump stand on issues is less important than you think

Anderson edited "Leveraging: A Political, Economic and Societal Framework," has taught at five universities and ran for the Democratic nomination for a Maryland congressional seat in 2016.

Candidates for president of the United States typically run for office as though they were running for prime minister in a parliamentary democracy where their own party would have a clear majority in parliament. In such systems, which make up the vast majority of democracies in the world, the prime minister has enormous power to set policy.

In the United States, you would think that presidents are prime ministers because they always talk about what "I" will do as president based on where "I" stand on a great range of issues. While the president admittedly has much more power to set foreign policy, all major domestic policies must be passed by Congress. Indeed, Congress makes laws, while the president and the Cabinet execute them.

Keep ReadingShow less
Young man looking angry at display of his smartphone.

The inflammatory rhetoric, meaningless speculation and lack of fact checking by the media may result in young adults rejecting traditional platforms in favor of their well-being.

urbazon/Getty Images

By focusing on outrage, the media risks alienating younger audiences

Rikleen is executive director of Lawyers Defending American Democracy and the editor of “Her Honor – Stories of Challenge and Triumph from Women Judges.” Beougher is a junior at Amherst College and a co-founder ofStudents Strengthening American Democracy.

As attacks on democracy and the rule of law continually increase, much of the media refuses to address its role in intensifying the peril.

Instead of asking hard questions and insisting on answers, traditional media outlets increasingly trade news and facts for speculative commentary that ignores a story’s contextual significance. At the same time, social media outlets and influencers stoke anger as an alternative to thoughtfulness.

Keep ReadingShow less