Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Tupac’s timeless political messages: Echoes in today’s American discord

Tupac’s timeless political messages: Echoes in today’s American discord
Getty Images

Escobar served honorably for four years in the Air Force. Following his time as a skilled F-15 Fighter Jet mechanic, he contributed to military justice, assisting attorneys in upholding military discipline. He recently founded a company called True College with a mission to help low-income students navigate the college application process.

The recent incarceration of Duane Davis, or "Keffe D," tethered to the ominous murder of the prolific Tupac Shakur in 1996, has inadvertently resurrected discussions around Tupac's audacious political lyrics. Even after a quarter of a century, the hard-hitting messages embedded within Tupac's rhythms pulsate with relevance, striking chords in the heart of America’s contemporary socio-political landscape.


With verses echoing the cries against systemic injustices, police brutality, and the racial disenfranchisement of the black community, Tupac’s musical legacy continues to breathe life into the ongoing struggles and resonates in today’s tumultuous American political climate.

Navigating through his lyrical labyrinth, one discerns Tupac as a fierce critic of social maladies. Songs like "Keep Ya Head Up" underscore the corrosive effects of police brutality, portraying

law enforcement not as protectors but as formidable adversaries. Such reflections encapsulate the persistent ordeal that has fueled movements like Black Lives Matter that demand accountability and reform in policing and criminal justice.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

In unraveling the tales of the distressed, Tupac’s "Brenda's Got a Baby" unveils the grim realities confronting young Black women. Within its poignant lyrics lies an exploration of issues like abortion, a contentious topic at the forefront of American political discourse. Amid evolving legal battles and policy shifts, the narratives within his music provide a cultural mirror reflecting the personal traumas and societal judgments faced by women, emphasizing the necessity of empathetic and supportive frameworks.

Tupac's "Changes" captivates through its vivid imagery of a tumultuous world, a canvas painted with the lack of readiness to embrace a Black president and the urgent cries for revolutionary

shifts. These words resonate with the divisive politics and racial rifts observed in recent election cycles, reinforcing the notion that his messages are not relics of the past but rather living dialogues engaging with contemporary socio-political realities.

Despite the controversies that clouded Tupac’s lyrical expressions, marked by profanity and raw depictions of violence, supporters argue that his music was merely a mirror reflecting the harsh terrains of inner-city life. It served as a vessel carrying the voices of marginalized communities, transcending temporal boundaries and reverberating in the global realms of musical influence and societal introspection.

Tupac’s legacy, amidst current unfolding dramas such as Duane Davis’s arrest, stands as a testament to the enduring relevance of his political messages. In the echoing silence left in his absence, the vibrancy of his lyrics continues to fuel the fight for social justice, equality, and systemic transformation in an America still grappling with the shadows of its past and the turbulence of its present.

Read More

The Fragile Ceasefire in Gaza

A view of destruction as Palestinians, who returned to the city following the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas, struggle to survive among ruins of destroyed buildings during cold weather in Jabalia, Gaza on January 23, 2025.

Getty Images / Anadolu

The Fragile Ceasefire in Gaza

Ceasefire agreements are like modern constitutions. They are fragile, loaded with idealistic promises, and too easily ignored. Both are also crucial to the realization of long-term regional peace. Indeed, ceasefires prevent the violence that is frequently the fuel for instability, while constitutions provide the structure and the guardrails that are equally vital to regional harmony.

More than ever, we need both right now in the Middle East.

Keep ReadingShow less
Money Makes the World Go Round Roundtable

The Committee on House Administration meets on the 15th anniversary of the SCOTUS decision on Citizens United v. FEC.

Medill News Service / Samanta Habashy

Money Makes the World Go Round Roundtable

WASHINGTON – On the 15th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s ruling on Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, and one day after President Trump’s inauguration, House Democrats made one thing certain: money determines politics, not the other way around.

“One of the terrible things about Citizens United is people feel that they're powerless, that they have no hope,” said Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Ma.).

Keep ReadingShow less
Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less